AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS vs Intel Core Ultra 5 238V Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data shows a decisive overall victory for the Intel Core Ultra 5 238V, which wins 16 of the 17 head-to-head comparisons recorded. The only exception is PassMark integer math, where the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS takes the lead.

The Cinebench results are remarkably consistent. Across all six Cinebench tests, the Intel part holds a nearly identical 21.1% advantage over the AMD chip. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the Intel Core Ultra 5 238V scores 15,645 against the Ryzen 5 7533HS's 12,342, a margin of 3,303 points. Single-core performance follows the same pattern: Cinebench R23 single-core shows 2,208 for Intel versus 1,742 for AMD. The R15 and R20 iterations confirm this trend, with Intel ahead by the same 21.1% in both single-threaded and multi-threaded runs.

The PassMark suite reveals where the gap widens or narrows. The largest single delta appears in PassMark find prime numbers, where Intel scores 174 against AMD's 48, a 72.4% difference. Floating point math also shows a massive separation: Intel records 53,160 versus 27,800, a 47.7% deficit for AMD. Physics testing follows closely, with Intel at 1,546 and AMD at 821, a 46.9% gap.

Single-thread performance in PassMark reinforces the pattern. Intel posts 3,890 in both single-thread and single-threaded tests, while AMD manages 2,740, giving Intel a 29.6% edge. Extended instructions show Intel ahead by 27% (15,377 versus 11,219). Data encryption favors Intel by 18% (13,072 versus 10,718), and random string sorting gives Intel an 18.1% advantage (21,585 versus 17,669). Data compression is the closest contest among Intel's wins, with only a 4.4% difference (176,532 versus 168,692).

The one AMD victory is substantial. In PassMark integer math, the Ryzen 5 7533HS scores 50,800, which is 30.6% higher than the Intel Core Ultra 5 238V's 38,889. This is the only test where AMD leads by a double-digit margin, and it is the largest single-test win for either processor in either direction.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core Ultra 5 238V dominates across the majority of workloads. Its strongest relative advantages appear in prime number finding (72.4% ahead), floating point math (47.7% ahead), and physics simulations (46.9% ahead). These results indicate a clear edge in scientific computing, mathematical modeling, and simulation workloads. The consistent 21.1% lead across all Cinebench versions points to superior performance in rendering and general multi-threaded content creation tasks.

The Intel chip also holds a notable single-core advantage, with 29.6% higher PassMark single-thread scores and 21.1% higher Cinebench R23 single-core scores. This translates to better responsiveness in lightly threaded applications, including everyday productivity software and legacy workloads that rely on one or two threads.

The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS finds its niche in integer-heavy arithmetic. The 30.6% lead in PassMark integer math suggests an advantage in specific computational tasks such as cryptography, hashing, or compression algorithms that rely heavily on integer operations. However, this strength does not extend to the related data compression test, where Intel still wins by 4.4%, or to data encryption, where Intel leads by 18%.

For users prioritizing balanced performance across rendering, simulation, and general-purpose computing, the Intel part wins nearly every category. The AMD chip's single win, while significant in its specific domain, does not offset the breadth of Intel's superiority elsewhere.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different design philosophies and manufacturing generations. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS belongs to the 7000 series and uses the Zen 3+ architecture with the Rembrandt-R codename. It is built on TSMC's 6 nm process with a die size of 208 mm². The Intel Core Ultra 5 238V is part of Core Ultra Series 2, uses the Lunar Lake architecture, and is fabricated on TSMC's 3 nm node.

Core and thread counts differ substantially. The AMD chip offers 6 cores and 12 threads, enabling simultaneous multithreading. The Intel chip provides 8 cores but only 8 threads, with no multithreading capability. Despite having fewer threads, the Intel part still wins all multi-threaded benchmarks, indicating that its individual cores are substantially more efficient.

Clock speeds tell a mixed story. The AMD processor has a higher base clock at 3.30 GHz, while Intel starts at 2.10 GHz. However, Intel's boost clock reaches 4.70 GHz, surpassing AMD's 4.40 GHz maximum. The thermal design power differs sharply: AMD is rated at 35 watts, while Intel operates at just 17 watts. This suggests the Intel chip delivers its higher performance within a lower power envelope.

Cache hierarchies follow different strategies. AMD allocates 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3. Intel uses 192 KB of L1 per core, 2.5 MB of L2 per core, and only 8 MB of shared L3. The Intel design relies on larger per-core L2 caches rather than a large shared L3 pool.

Memory support also diverges. Both use dual-channel memory buses, and AMD specifies DDR5 support with 76.8 GB/s bandwidth. Intel's memory support is listed as dependent on the motherboard, with no bandwidth figure recorded. Neither processor supports ECC memory.

PCIe connectivity differs significantly. AMD provides Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU, while Intel offers Gen 5 but only 4 lanes. Integrated graphics are present on both: AMD uses the Radeon 660M, while Intel uses the Arc 130V.

Sockets are incompatible. AMD uses Socket FP7, while Intel uses BGA 2833. The AMD part has two part numbers listed (100-000001632 for FP7 and 100-000001634 for FP7r2), while Intel lists SRPN5 and SRPN4. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

The Verdict

The recorded data points to the Intel Core Ultra 5 238V as the stronger processor for nearly all workloads. It wins 16 of 17 benchmarks, holds a consistent 21.1% lead across all Cinebench tests, and shows particularly large advantages in floating point math, physics, and prime number calculations. Its higher percentile ranking (75th versus 73rd) and higher average benchmark score (21,981 versus 19,364) reinforce this conclusion.

The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS remains relevant for workloads that stress integer arithmetic, where its 30.6% advantage over Intel is the single largest margin recorded in either direction. Users running integer-heavy applications may prefer the AMD part despite its losses elsewhere.

The Intel chip achieves its results with a lower TDP (17 watts versus 35 watts), a newer 3 nm manufacturing process, and a higher boost clock. Its 8 cores outperform AMD's 6 cores and 12 threads in multi-threaded tests, indicating that Intel's per-core efficiency more than compensates for its lack of simultaneous multithreading.

The data does not support choosing the AMD processor for general-purpose or rendering tasks. The Intel part wins every Cinebench test, every PassMark test except integer math, and all single-thread measurements. The verdict from the benchmark results is clear: the Intel Core Ultra 5 238V is the superior processor for the vast majority of use cases, with AMD's chip serving a narrower integer-focused role.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 238V scores 21,981 on average, while the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS scores 19,364.

Q: How large is the Intel lead in Cinebench R23 multi-core?

A: The Intel chip scores 15,645 compared to 12,342 for AMD, a 21.1% difference.

Q: Does the AMD processor win any benchmark tests?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS wins PassMark integer math with a score of 50,800, which is 30.6% higher than Intel's 38,889.

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS has 6 cores and 12 threads. The Intel Core Ultra 5 238V has 8 cores and 8 threads.

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 238V boosts to 4.70 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS boosts to 4.40 GHz.

Q: How do the thermal design power ratings compare?

A: The AMD chip has a TDP of 35 watts, while the Intel chip has a TDP of 17 watts.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS | Intel Core Ultra 5 238V |

|---|---|---|

| Series | 7000 series | Core Ultra Series 2 |

| Cores | 6 | 8 |

| Threads | 12 | 8 |

| Base Clock | 3.30 GHz | 2.10 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.40 GHz | 4.70 GHz |

| TDP | 35 W | 17 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP7 | Intel BGA 2833 |

| Architecture | Zen 3+ | Lunar Lake |

| Codename | Rembrandt-R | Lunar Lake |

| Process Node | 6 nm | 3 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | TSMC |

| Die Size | 208 mm² | Not specified |

| L1 Cache | 64 KB (per core) | 192 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 512 KB (per core) | 2.5 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 16 MB (shared) | 8 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR5 | Depends on motherboard |

| Memory Bus | Dual-channel | Dual-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | Not specified |

| ECC Memory | No | No |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 20 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 4 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 660M | Arc 130V |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Mobile |

| Production Status | Active | Active |

| Release Date | 2024-08-31 | 2024-09-23 |

| Multiplier Unlocked | No | No |

| Part Number | 100-000001632(FP7), 100-000001634(FP7r2) | SRPN5, SRPN4 |

| Percentile vs All CPUs | 73 | 75 |

| Average Benchmark Score | 19,364 | 21,981 |