AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS vs Intel Core i5-14401TE Comparison

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core i5-14401TE reaches 4.50 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS boosts to 4.40 GHz. The Intel part holds a 0.10 GHz advantage in maximum frequency.

Q: How do the core and thread counts compare?

A: Both processors are identical in this regard. Each has 6 cores and 12 threads, making them direct equals in raw thread-count terms.

Q: Which chip uses a smaller manufacturing process?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS is built on a 6 nm node at TSMC, while the Intel Core i5-14401TE uses Intel's 10 nm process. The AMD part has the smaller process geometry.

Q: Do both processors support the same memory types?

A: No. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS supports DDR5 only, with dual-channel memory and a bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. The Intel Core i5-14401TE supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also dual-channel, but its bandwidth figure is not recorded in the database.

Q: Which processor has ECC memory support?

A: The Intel Core i5-14401TE supports ECC memory. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS does not list ECC support.

Q: What are the market segments for these two chips?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS is a mobile processor on AMD Socket FP7, while the Intel Core i5-14401TE is a desktop processor on Intel Socket 1700. Their target platforms differ entirely.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS belongs to the 7000 series and uses the Zen 3+ architecture under the Rembrandt-R codename. It is a 6 nm part fabricated by TSMC with a die size of 208 mm². The core layout consists of 6 cores and 12 threads, with a base clock of 3.30 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz. The cache hierarchy is 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3.

The Intel Core i5-14401TE is part of the Core 14th Gen lineup and uses the Raptor Lake architecture under the Raptor Lake-R codename. This is a 10 nm part from Intel with a die size of 215 mm². It also has 6 cores and 12 threads, but with a lower base clock of 2.00 GHz and a higher boost clock of 4.50 GHz. The cache arrangement differs significantly: 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 20 MB of shared L3.

The AMD part integrates the Radeon 660M graphics, while the Intel part uses UHD Graphics 730. PCIe support differs as well: AMD provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 CPU lanes, while Intel provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes. The AMD chip is a mobile part on Socket FP7, whereas the Intel chip is a desktop part on Socket 1700. The Intel processor additionally supports ECC memory, which the AMD processor does not.

The process node difference is notable: 6 nm versus 10 nm. This affects transistor density and power characteristics, although the exact transistor counts are not recorded for either chip. The die sizes are close, with AMD at 208 mm² and Intel at 215 mm². The Intel part has a higher TDP of 45 watts compared to the AMD's 35 watts, reflecting its desktop positioning.

Where Each One Wins

The benchmark database contains a full set of results for the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS, covering both Cinebench and Passmark workloads. The Intel Core i5-14401TE, however, has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. This asymmetry means the head-to-head comparison relies entirely on the AMD part's measured performance and its percentile standing.

The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS sits at the 73rd percentile among all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 19364. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core Ultra 5 226V (avg score 19368, delta 0%), the Intel Core i5-1345U (avg score 19411, delta -0.2%), the Intel Core i7-8700K (avg score 19238, delta 0.7%), and the Intel Core i7-10700F (avg score 19499, delta -0.7%). These deltas are all within 0.7 percentage points, placing the AMD chip in a tightly contested performance band.

For workloads that favor the AMD chip, the Cinebench results provide concrete evidence. The R23 multicore score of 12342, the R20 multicore score of 5183, and the R15 multicore score of 1243 all indicate strong multi-threaded capability for a 6-core mobile part. The Passmark multithread score of 14520 and integer math score of 50800 reinforce this picture.

The Intel Core i5-14401TE, lacking benchmark entries, cannot be positioned in any specific workload category from the recorded data. Its architectural traits, such as a higher boost clock and larger L3 cache, suggest potential strengths in lightly threaded and cache-sensitive tasks, but no measured scores exist to confirm this. The database records zero wins for both processors in head-to-head comparisons because no head-to-head benchmark entries are present.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in several key specification fields:

• Base clock: AMD 3.30 GHz, Intel 2.00 GHz. The AMD part runs 1.30 GHz higher at idle baseline.
• Boost clock: AMD 4.40 GHz, Intel 4.50 GHz. The Intel part runs 0.10 GHz higher at maximum.
• TDP: AMD 35 watts, Intel 45 watts. The Intel part consumes more power by the rated figure.
• Socket: AMD Socket FP7, Intel Socket 1700. These are not cross-compatible.
• Process node: AMD 6 nm (TSMC), Intel 10 nm (Intel). The AMD part uses a smaller node.
• Die size: AMD 208 mm², Intel 215 mm². The Intel die is 7 mm² larger.
• L1 cache per core: AMD 64 KB, Intel 80 KB. The Intel part has 16 KB more per core.
• L2 cache per core: AMD 512 KB, Intel 1.25 MB. The Intel part has more than double the L2 per core.
• L3 cache shared: AMD 16 MB, Intel 20 MB. The Intel part has 4 MB more shared L3.
• Memory support: AMD DDR5 only, Intel DDR4 and DDR5. The Intel part supports both older and newer memory standards.
• Memory bandwidth: AMD 76.8 GB/s, Intel not recorded. Only the AMD figure is available.
• ECC memory: AMD false, Intel true. The Intel part supports ECC.
• PCIe: AMD Gen 4 with 20 lanes, Intel Gen 5 with 16 lanes. The AMD part has more lanes but an older standard.
• Integrated graphics: AMD Radeon 660M, Intel UHD Graphics 730. Different GPU solutions.
• Market segment: AMD Mobile, Intel Desktop. Different platform targets.
• Release date: AMD 2024-08-31, Intel 2024-06-30. The Intel part launched two months earlier.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no head-to-head benchmark entries for these two processors, and the Intel Core i5-14401TE has no individual benchmark scores recorded. Consequently, a direct numerical comparison of their performance cannot be produced from the available data. The only measured results belong to the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS.

For the AMD part, the Cinebench R23 multicore score is 12342, and the single-core score is 1742. This gives a multicore-to-single-core ratio of roughly 7.1, indicating strong scaling across its 6 cores. The R20 scores are 5183 multicore and 731 single-core, while the R15 scores are 1243 multicore and 175 single-core.

The Passmark suite for the AMD chip shows a multithread score of 14520 and a single-thread score of 2740. Integer math reaches 50800, floating point math reaches 27800, and extended instructions score 11219. Data compression scores 168692, data encryption scores 10718, and random string sorting scores 17669. The find prime numbers test records 48, and the physics test records 821.

The nearest rival data provides context for the AMD chip's standing. The Intel Core Ultra 5 226V has an average score of 19368 against the AMD's 19364, a delta of 0%. The Intel Core i5-1345U scores 19411, a delta of -0.2%, meaning it is slightly ahead. The Intel Core i7-8700K scores 19238, a delta of 0.7%, meaning the AMD chip is slightly ahead. The Intel Core i7-10700F scores 19499, a delta of -0.7%, meaning it is ahead by the largest margin in this group.

The AMD chip's average benchmark score of 19364 places it in the 73rd percentile of all CPUs. Its closest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, is within 4 points, a negligible difference. The spread across the four nearest rivals is only 261 points, from 19238 to 19499. This places the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS in a dense performance cluster where small architectural differences, rather than raw speed, determine ranking.

Because the Intel Core i5-14401TE has no scores in the database, its percentile of 50 and average score of 0 are placeholders rather than measured outcomes. The absence of data means no win count can be assigned to either processor in head-to-head comparisons. The recorded data supports analysis of the AMD chip's absolute and relative performance, but any claims about the Intel chip's performance would require extrapolation from its specifications alone, which the database does not provide.