AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS vs Intel Core Ultra 5 245K Comparison

The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS is a 6-core, 12-thread mobile processor built on TSMC’s 6 nm node, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 245K is a 14-core, 14-thread desktop part on a 3 nm process. The database shows a complete sweep for Intel across all 17 head-to-head benchmark comparisons, with the Ultra 5 245K delivering massive multi-threaded and substantial single-threaded advantages. The Ryzen 5 7533HS, however, operates at a 35 W TDP, making it a low-power mobile option, whereas the Core Ultra 5 245K is a 125 W desktop processor. The following sections break down the architectural differences, benchmark deltas, and what the recorded data indicates for each part’s intended segment.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 245K has 14 cores and 14 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS has 6 cores and 12 threads. The Intel part lacks hyperthreading on its performance cores, giving it a 1:1 core-to-thread ratio, whereas the AMD chip uses simultaneous multithreading.

Q: What is the average benchmark score difference between the two?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 245K has an average benchmark score of 54053, compared to the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS’s 19364. The Intel part sits in the 91st percentile of all CPUs, while the AMD chip is in the 73rd percentile.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 245K boosts to 5.20 GHz, which is higher than the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS’s 4.40 GHz max boost. The base clocks are 4.20 GHz for Intel and 3.30 GHz for AMD.

Q: Do both processors support DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, both support DDR5 memory with dual-channel buses. However, the Intel Core Ultra 5 245K has a higher memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s, while the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS is rated at 76.8 GB/s.

Q: Are the integrated graphics different?

A: Yes. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS uses Radeon 660M graphics, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 245K uses Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU. The Intel part also supports ECC memory, which the AMD chip does not.

Q: What is the release date and market segment for each?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS was released on 2024-08-31 and is a mobile processor. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245K was released on 2024-10-23 and is a desktop processor.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS is built on the Zen 3+ architecture with the Rembrandt-R codename, part of the 7000 series. It uses a 6 nm process from TSMC and has a die size of 208 mm². The chip features 6 cores and 12 threads, with a base clock of 3.30 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz. Its cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The processor is designed for the AMD Socket FP7 and operates at a 35 W TDP, indicating a power-efficient mobile design. It supports PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU and has a dual-channel DDR5 memory bus delivering 76.8 GB/s. The integrated Radeon 660M graphics handle display output.

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245K uses the Arrow Lake-S architecture, part of the Core Ultra Series 2. It is fabricated on a 3 nm process from TSMC and has a larger die size of 243 mm², with 17,800 million transistors. This desktop processor has 14 cores and 14 threads, with a base clock of 4.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. Its cache is substantially larger: 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The chip fits into Intel Socket 1851 and has a 125 W TDP. It supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes and dual-channel DDR5 memory at 102.4 GB/s. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU provides visual output, and the processor supports ECC memory, which the AMD part lacks.

The process node difference is significant: 6 nm for AMD versus 3 nm for Intel. The Intel chip also has an unlocked multiplier, while the AMD chip is locked. The market segments are clearly divided: mobile for the Ryzen 5 7533HS and desktop for the Core Ultra 5 245K. The Intel part’s higher TDP and larger cache reflect its desktop positioning, whereas the AMD chip’s low TDP is tailored for laptops.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245K wins all 17 head-to-head benchmark comparisons in the database. The most decisive victory comes in the PassMark find prime numbers test, where Intel scores 414 against AMD’s 48, a delta of -88.4% for the Ryzen chip. This indicates a massive gap in integer-heavy prime computation workloads. In floating-point math, the Intel part scores 130678 versus 27800, a -78.7% delta, showing a strong advantage in scientific and simulation tasks.

In Cinebench tests, the multi-threaded results show the Intel processor at 3850 in R15, 15368 in R20, and 25066 in R23. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS scores 1243, 5183, and 12342 respectively. The deltas are -67.7% for R15, -66.3% for R20, and -50.8% for R23. The single-core Cinebench results are closer but still favor Intel: R15 single-core shows 322 versus 175 (-45.7%), R20 single-core shows 2169 versus 731 (-66.3%), and R23 single-core shows 2132 versus 1742 (-18.3%). The R23 single-core gap is the smallest relative margin in the entire dataset, indicating that the AMD chip’s Zen 3+ architecture holds up reasonably well in lightly threaded workloads.

PassMark tests reinforce the multi-threaded dominance. In data compression, Intel scores 458817 against 168692 (-63.2%). Data encryption shows 33286 versus 10718 (-67.8%). Extended instructions show 37617 versus 11219 (-70.2%). Integer math shows 98524 versus 50800 (-48.4%), which is the narrowest PassMark delta. The multithread test shows 43047 versus 14520 (-66.3%), while physics shows 3081 versus 821 (-73.4%). Random string sorting shows 55098 versus 17669 (-67.9%). In single-thread PassMark, Intel scores 4714 versus 2740 (-41.9%).

The average benchmark score difference is stark: 54053 for Intel versus 19364 for AMD. The Intel part’s nearest rivals include the Intel Xeon 6505P (delta 0.7%) and the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D (delta -1.3%), while the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS sits near the Intel Core Ultra 5 226V (delta 0%) and Intel Core i7-8700K (delta 0.7%). The Core Ultra 5 245K is clearly in a higher performance class, as reflected by its 91st percentile ranking versus the 73rd percentile for the Ryzen chip.

The Verdict

The recorded data shows a one-sided matchup. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245K is faster in every single benchmark, with multi-threaded advantages ranging from -50.8% to -88.4% and single-threaded advantages from -18.3% to -66.3%. The Intel part’s 14 cores, higher clocks, and newer 3 nm process deliver a decisive performance edge across Cinebench and PassMark workloads. For users seeking maximum throughput in desktop workloads such as rendering, encryption, or data compression, the Core Ultra 5 245K is the clear choice based on the dataset.

The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS, however, occupies a different role. Its 35 W TDP and mobile socket make it suitable for laptop platforms where power efficiency is a priority. The data shows it is competitive on a per-watt basis conceptually, though the benchmarks do not normalize for power. Its nearest rivals, such as the Intel Core Ultra 5 226V and Intel Core i5-1345U, are also mobile or low-power parts, indicating where it sits in the performance hierarchy. For a mobile processor, the Ryzen 5 7533HS delivers a reasonable single-core score of 1742 in Cinebench R23, but its multi-threaded score of 12342 is far below the desktop Intel part.

The choice between these two depends entirely on the platform. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245K is a desktop processor with an unlocked multiplier, 125 W TDP, and PCIe Gen 5 support, aimed at high-performance builds. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS is a locked, mobile chip with a 35 W TDP and PCIe Gen 4, designed for laptops. The launch MSRP for the Intel part is $319, while the AMD chip has no listed launch MSRP. The data confirms that the Intel chip is the superior performer in absolute terms, but the AMD chip’s low power envelope makes it a viable option for portable systems where battery life and thermals matter more than raw compute.

Specification Differences

The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS and Intel Core Ultra 5 245K differ across nearly every specification field. The Intel part has 14 cores versus 6 for AMD, and 14 threads versus 12. The base clock is 4.20 GHz for Intel and 3.30 GHz for AMD; the boost clock is 5.20 GHz versus 4.40 GHz. The TDP is 125 W for Intel and 35 W for AMD. The socket types are Intel Socket 1851 and AMD Socket FP7. The architecture is Arrow Lake versus Zen 3+, with codenames Arrow Lake-S and Rembrandt-R. The process node is 3 nm for Intel and 6 nm for AMD, both from TSMC. The Intel die is 243 mm² with 17,800 million transistors, while the AMD die is 208 mm² with no transistor count listed.

Cache configurations differ substantially: Intel has 192 KB L1 per core, 3 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB shared L3; AMD has 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and 16 MB shared L3. Memory bandwidth is 102.4 GB/s for Intel and 76.8 GB/s for AMD, both dual-channel DDR5. ECC memory is supported on Intel but not AMD. PCIe is Gen 5 with 20 lanes for Intel and Gen 4 with 20 lanes for AMD. Integrated graphics are Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU for Intel and Radeon 660M for AMD. The Intel part has an unlocked multiplier, AMD does not. The market segment is Desktop for Intel and Mobile for AMD. The Intel part number is SRQCT, while AMD has two part numbers: 100-000001632(FP7) and 100-000001634(FP7r2).