AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS vs AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 Comparison

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 is the clear performance leader in this comparison, dominating the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS across every single benchmark in the database. The data shows a decisive generational and architectural advantage for the P185, which delivers more than double the multi-threaded throughput and significantly higher single-thread performance. The Ryzen 5 7533HS, while a capable mobile processor in its own right, is outclassed in every measurable category.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark results are unambiguous. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 wins all 11 recorded comparisons, with margins ranging from 31.1% to 62.8%. No benchmark in the database shows the Ryzen 5 7533HS ahead.

The largest single gap appears in the PassMark find prime numbers test. The P185 scores 129 points against 48 for the 7533HS, a delta of 62.8%. This test is highly sensitive to raw integer execution and memory latency, and the P185's Zen 5 architecture delivers a massive advantage here.

Floating point math shows a similar story. The P185 scores 70,587 points, while the 7533HS manages 27,800 points. That is a 60.6% deficit for the older chip. The extended instructions test follows closely, with the P185 at 26,544 and the 7533HS at 11,219, a 57.7% gap. This indicates the P185 handles AVX-style workloads far more efficiently.

The integer math test reinforces the pattern. The P185 posts 117,832 points versus 50,800 points for the 7533HS, a 56.9% difference. Random string sorting, a memory-heavy workload, shows the P185 at 40,557 against 17,669, a 56.4% delta. Data compression is also heavily in favor of the P185: 374,429 versus 168,692, a 54.9% gap.

Multi-threaded performance is the core differentiator. The PassMark multithread score for the P185 is 31,817, compared to 14,520 for the 7533HS, a 54.4% difference. The physics test, which scales well with core count, shows the P185 at 1,772 and the 7533HS at 821, a 53.7% gap. Data encryption favors the P185 by 45.3%, with scores of 19,612 and 10,718.

The smallest margin, though still decisive, is in single-thread performance. The P185 scores 3,977 in both the PassMark single thread and singlethread tests, while the 7533HS scores 2,740 in both. That is a 31.1% advantage for the P185, indicating that even in lightly threaded scenarios, the newer architecture is substantially faster.

The average benchmark score for the P185 is 62,839, placing it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs. The 7533HS has an average score of 19,364 and sits in the 73rd percentile. The nearest rivals for the P185 include the Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX, which scores 62,738 (a 0.2% delta), and the Intel Core i7-13790F at 63,080 (a 0.4% delta). The 7533HS sits near the Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, which scores 19,368, and the Intel Core i5-1345U at 19,411.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 wins in every benchmark category recorded in the database. There is no workload in the dataset where the Ryzen 5 7533HS takes the lead.

The P185's largest advantages are in integer-heavy and floating-point workloads. The find prime numbers test, with a 62.8% lead, and floating point math, with a 60.6% lead, show that the Zen 5 cores execute computational tasks at a much higher rate. The extended instructions test, with a 57.7% lead, confirms that the P185 handles complex instruction sets more efficiently.

Multi-threaded workloads also strongly favor the P185. The multithread score shows a 54.4% lead, and the physics test shows a 53.7% lead. These results align with the P185's higher core and thread counts, which allow it to process parallel tasks more effectively.

The P185's smallest win is in single-thread performance, where it leads by 31.1%. This is still a substantial margin, and it means the P185 is faster even in applications that do not scale across cores. The Ryzen 5 7533HS has no category where it outperforms the P185. Its only relative strength is that its single-thread score of 2,740 is close to its own multi-thread average performance, but even that is far below the P185's single-thread output.

The Verdict

The data supports only one conclusion: the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 is the superior processor in this comparison. It wins every benchmark, has a higher average score (62,839 versus 19,364), and sits in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs compared to the 73rd percentile for the Ryzen 5 7533HS.

The Ryzen 5 7533HS is not a weak processor in absolute terms. Its average score of 19,364 places it near the Intel Core Ultra 5 226V and the Intel Core i5-1345U. But against the P185, it loses by margins between 31.1% and 62.8% across all tests. The P185's nearest rivals are the Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX and the Intel Core i7-13790F, both of which are high-end desktop or high-performance mobile parts. This places the P185 in a much higher performance tier.

For a system builder prioritizing raw computational performance, the P185 is the clear choice. The Ryzen 5 7533HS would be selected only if the specific workload profile matches its capabilities, but the recorded data shows no such advantage. The P185 is faster in every category, from single-threaded tasks to heavily parallel workloads.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher benchmark average?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 has an average benchmark score of 62,839, compared to 19,364 for the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS.

Q: How large is the performance gap in single-threaded workloads?

A: The P185 scores 3,977 in the PassMark single thread test, while the 7533HS scores 2,740. This gives the P185 a 31.1% advantage, the smallest margin of any benchmark in the comparison.

Q: What is the biggest performance difference between the two CPUs?

A: The PassMark find prime numbers test shows the largest gap. The P185 scores 129, while the 7533HS scores 48, a difference of 62.8%.

Q: How does the P185 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The P185 has an average score of 62,839. Its nearest rivals are the Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX at 62,738 (0.2% slower), the Intel Core i7-13790F at 63,080 (0.4% faster), and the Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX at 63,173 (0.5% faster).

Q: How does the 7533HS compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The 7533HS has an average score of 19,364. Its nearest rivals are the Intel Core Ultra 5 226V at 19,368 (0% difference), the Intel Core i5-1345U at 19,411 (0.2% faster), and the Intel Core i7-8700K at 19,238 (0.7% slower).

Q: Does the 7533HS win any benchmark against the P185?

A: No. The P185 wins all 11 head-to-head benchmarks, with margins ranging from 31.1% to 62.8%.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different architectural eras. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS is based on Zen 3+ architecture with the Rembrandt-R codename, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 uses a combination of Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores with the Gorgon Point codename. The P185's generation is listed as Ryzen AI Embedded with Zen 5 / Zen 5c, while the 7533HS is a Ryzen 5 from the Zen 3+ (Rembrandt) generation.

The core counts differ significantly. The 7533HS has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the P185 has 12 cores and 24 threads. This doubling of cores and threads directly explains the P185's large advantage in multi-threaded benchmarks.

Cache structures also differ. The 7533HS has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 cache per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The P185 has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 16 MB of L3 cache. The larger per-core L1 and L2 caches on the P185 contribute to its superior single-thread performance.

The process nodes differ as well. The 7533HS is manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC, while the P185 uses a 4 nm process, also at TSMC. The die size is larger on the P185 at 233 mm², compared to 208 mm² for the 7533HS.

Memory support and bandwidth also differ. The 7533HS supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. The P185 supports both DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory, also dual-channel, with a higher bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The P185 also supports ECC memory, while the 7533HS does not.

The integrated graphics differ. The 7533HS uses the Radeon 660M, while the P185 uses the Radeon 890M. PCIe support is similar in generation but different in lane count: the 7533HS offers Gen 4 with 20 lanes, while the P185 offers Gen 4 with 16 lanes.

Specification Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 has 12 cores and 24 threads, double the 6 cores and 12 threads of the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS. Base clock speeds differ, with the 7533HS at 3.30 GHz and the P185 at 2.00 GHz. However, the boost clock favors the P185 at 5.10 GHz, compared to 4.40 GHz for the 7533HS.

The thermal design power (TDP) also differs. The 7533HS has a TDP of 35 watts, while the P185 has a lower TDP of 28 watts. This is notable because the P185 delivers significantly higher performance while being rated for lower power consumption.

The sockets are different. The 7533HS uses AMD Socket FP7, while the P185 uses AMD Socket FP8. The process node differs, with the 7533HS at 6 nm and the P185 at 4 nm. The P185 supports ECC memory, while the 7533HS does not. Memory support on the P185 includes LPDDR5X in addition to DDR5, while the 7533HS supports only DDR5. The memory bandwidth is higher on the P185 at 89.6 GB/s versus 76.8 GB/s. PCIe lane counts differ, with the 7533HS offering 20 lanes and the P185 offering 16 lanes, both at Gen 4. The integrated graphics units are different, and the part number for the 7533HS is listed as 100-000001632(FP7) and 100-000001634(FP7r2), while the P185 part number is unknown. The release dates differ, with the 7533HS released in 2024 and the P185 in 2026.