AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS vs AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The benchmark data available in the database paints a clear picture for the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS: it is the only one of the two processors with recorded performance results. The Ryzen 5 7533HS delivers a full suite of Cinebench and PassMark scores, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 currently has no benchmark entries, no average score, and no recorded wins in any test category. This means the 7533HS wins every measurable comparison by default, not because of a narrow margin, but because the P174 has no data to contest any workload.

Looking at the 7533HS specifically, its strengths are distributed across both single-threaded and multi-threaded tasks. In Cinebench R23, the multicore score of 12342 places it firmly in the upper mid-range of mobile processors, while the single-core score of 1742 shows a balanced design that does not sacrifice lightly threaded responsiveness. The PassMark suite further confirms this: the multithread score of 14520 and the single-thread score of 2740 both sit at levels that suggest a capable all-rounder for productivity, content creation, and general desktop replacement workloads.

The P174, by contrast, enters the database with a percentile rank of 50 against all CPUs, which is the median baseline, but its average benchmark score is recorded as zero. This is not a case of a processor being slower; it is a case of missing measurements. The hardware specifications exist, but the performance validation does not. For any use-case split, the data only supports one side: the 7533HS wins where scores exist, and the P174 cannot claim a single workload advantage from the recorded information.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different architectural generations and use different manufacturing approaches. The Ryzen 5 7533HS is built on the Zen 3+ architecture, codenamed Rembrandt-R, and belongs to the 7000 series. It uses a 6 nm process node from TSMC with a die size of 208 mm². The P174 uses a newer design, codenamed Gorgon Point, and belongs to the Ryzen AI Embedded generation with a hybrid Zen 5 / Zen 5c core configuration. Its process node is 4 nm from TSMC, and the die size is larger at 233 mm².

Core and thread counts differ substantially. The 7533HS has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the P174 has 10 cores and 20 threads. Cache hierarchies also diverge: the 7533HS has 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3. The P174 has 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and also 16 MB of L3. The per-core cache increases on the P174 reflect the newer Zen 5 design, which typically uses larger caches.

Clock speeds favor the P174 in raw boost potential. The 7533HS runs at a base clock of 3.30 GHz and boosts to 4.40 GHz. The P174 has a lower base clock of 2.00 GHz but a much higher boost clock of 5.00 GHz. This indicates that the P174 is designed to scale aggressively under load, while the 7533HS relies on a higher sustained base frequency.

Power envelopes differ as well. The 7533HS has a TDP of 35 watts, while the P174 is rated at 28 watts. Despite having more cores and a higher boost clock, the P174 is configured for a lower thermal budget, which suggests architectural efficiency gains from the 4 nm node and the Zen 5 core design. Socket compatibility also differs: the 7533HS uses AMD Socket FP7, while the P174 uses AMD Socket FP8.

Memory support and bandwidth show another split. The 7533HS supports DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration with a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. The P174 supports both DDR5 and LPDDR5X, also dual-channel, but with a higher memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. ECC memory is not supported on the 7533HS, while the P174 supports ECC, a notable feature for embedded and reliability-focused workloads.

Integrated graphics differ as well. The 7533HS uses the Radeon 660M, while the P174 uses the Radeon 880M. PCIe lanes are close but not identical: the 7533HS provides Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU, while the P174 provides Gen 4 with 16 lanes. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier, and both are listed as active production parts.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has 10 cores and 20 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: What is the boost clock difference between the two?

A: The P174 boosts to 5.00 GHz, which is 0.60 GHz higher than the 7533HS boost clock of 4.40 GHz. The base clocks are 2.00 GHz for the P174 and 3.30 GHz for the 7533HS.

Q: Does either processor support ECC memory?

A: Only the P174 supports ECC memory. The 7533HS does not list ECC support in its specifications.

Q: Which processor has a higher memory bandwidth?

A: The P174 has a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, compared to 76.8 GB/s for the 7533HS. Both use dual-channel memory, but the P174 also supports LPDDR5X in addition to DDR5.

Q: Are there any benchmark scores for the P174?

A: No. The database records no benchmark entries for the P174, giving it an average score of zero and a percentile rank of 50. The 7533HS has a full set of Cinebench and PassMark scores.

Q: What is the process node for each chip?

A: The 7533HS uses a 6 nm process node from TSMC, while the P174 uses a 4 nm process node from TSMC. The die sizes are 208 mm² and 233 mm², respectively.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every core specification field in the database. The 7533HS has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the P174 has 10 cores and 20 threads. Base clocks are 3.30 GHz versus 2.00 GHz, and boost clocks are 4.40 GHz versus 5.00 GHz. TDP ratings are 35 watts for the 7533HS and 28 watts for the P174.

Socket types differ: FP7 for the 7533HS and FP8 for the P174. The architectural generation is Zen 3+ (Rembrandt-R) for the 7533HS and Zen 5 / Zen 5c (Gorgon Point) for the P174. Process nodes are 6 nm versus 4 nm, and die sizes are 208 mm² versus 233 mm².

Cache sizes differ at the L1 and L2 levels. The 7533HS has 64 KB of L1 per core and 512 KB of L2 per core, while the P174 has 80 KB of L1 per core and 1 MB of L2 per core. Both share 16 MB of L3.

Memory support differs in scope: the 7533HS supports DDR5 only, while the P174 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X. Memory bandwidth is 76.8 GB/s for the 7533HS and 89.6 GB/s for the P174. ECC memory is absent on the 7533HS and present on the P174.

PCIe lane counts differ: the 7533HS has Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU, while the P174 has Gen 4 with 16 lanes. Integrated graphics are the Radeon 660M on the 7533HS and the Radeon 880M on the P174. Release dates also differ: the 7533HS launched on 2024-08-31, while the P174 launched on 2026-02-28.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

There are no direct head-to-head benchmark entries in the database for these two processors. The wins counter shows zero for each side, and the head-to-head benchmark list is empty. This means the database does not contain any side-by-side test results where both chips ran the same workload under identical conditions.

What exists instead is a full benchmark profile for the 7533HS and an empty profile for the P174. For the 7533HS, the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 12342 and single-core score of 1742 provide the primary reference points. The PassMark results add more texture: multithread at 14520, single-thread at 2740, integer math at 50800, floating point math at 27800, data compression at 168692, data encryption at 10718, extended instructions at 11219, physics at 821, and random string sorting at 17669. The find prime numbers score is 48.

The 7533HS also holds an average benchmark score of 19364 and a percentile rank of 73 against all CPUs. Its nearest rivals in the database include the Intel Core Ultra 5 226V with an average score of 19368 and a delta of 0 percent, the Intel Core i5-1345U at 19411 with a delta of -0.2 percent, the Intel Core i7-8700K at 19238 with a delta of 0.7 percent, and the Intel Core i7-10700F at 19499 with a delta of -0.7 percent. These deltas show that the 7533HS sits within a tight performance band around these desktop and mobile parts, with no rival deviating by more than 0.7 percent in either direction.

For the P174, the only recorded figures are a percentile rank of 50 and an average benchmark score of zero. There are no nearest rivals listed and no benchmark entries to compare. The specification sheet suggests a processor with higher core count, higher boost clock, and newer architecture, but the database currently contains no measured evidence to confirm how those specifications translate into real-world performance. The head-to-head comparison therefore resolves entirely in favor of the 7533HS, which is the only one of the two with validated results.