AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 vs Intel Core i5-14401E Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The recorded benchmark data covers only the Intel Core i5-14401E; the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has no entries in the benchmark database. Consequently, the head-to-head comparison is one-sided. The Intel part holds all measurable wins by default, but the analysis must rely on architectural and platform characteristics to differentiate the two.

The Intel Core i5-14401E delivers a multi-core Cinebench R23 score of 18,161, a single-core score of 2,564, and an average benchmark score of 5,253. Its nearest rivals in the database are the Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 (average score 5,259, delta -0.1%), the Intel Core i7-11700B (average score 5,241, delta 0.2%), the Intel Core i9-10850K (average score 5,240, delta 0.2%), and the Intel Core i5-13400T (average score 5,210, delta 0.8%). This places the i5-14401E essentially at parity with the Xeon E5-2699A v4, while edging out the i7-11700B and i9-10850K by a slim margin, and leading the i5-13400T by 0.8%.

For the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174, no benchmark scores exist in the database. Its percentile rank among all CPUs is 50, which is a neutral midpoint, whereas the Intel part sits at the 60th percentile. The absence of AMD benchmark data means the database cannot confirm any performance win for the P174; the Intel i5-14401E is the only chip with verified results.

The use-case split therefore falls along platform lines rather than measured performance. The Intel i5-14401E, with its 65 W TDP, desktop socket (Intel Socket 1700), and support for both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, targets conventional desktop builds with a broad memory ecosystem. The AMD P174, with a 28 W TDP, AMD Socket FP8, and support for DDR5 and LPDDR5X, targets embedded and mobile applications where lower power consumption and compact integration matter more than raw multi-threaded throughput. The Intel chip's 6 cores and 12 threads versus the AMD chip's 10 cores and 20 threads suggests the AMD part could have a thread-count advantage in highly parallel workloads, but without benchmark data, that remains speculative.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 uses a hybrid Zen 5 / Zen 5c core arrangement within the Gorgon Point codename, fabricated on a 4 nm TSMC process. It integrates 10 cores and 20 threads, with a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. Its cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3. The chip supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory via a dual-channel bus, with a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. ECC memory is supported. PCIe connectivity is Gen 4 with 16 CPU lanes. Integrated graphics come from the Radeon 880M. The die size is 233 mm², and the package uses AMD Socket FP8. The release date is recorded as 2026-02-28, and the production status is Active. The multiplier is locked, and there is no listed launch MSRP.

The Intel Core i5-14401E belongs to the Core 14th Gen family, codename Raptor Lake-R, built on Intel's 10 nm process (Raptor Lake architecture). It has 6 cores and 12 threads, with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz. Cache allocations are 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 20 MB of shared L3. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 over a dual-channel bus; no memory bandwidth figure is recorded. ECC memory is supported. PCIe connectivity is Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes. Integrated graphics are UHD Graphics 730. The die size is 215 mm², using Intel Socket 1700. The release date is 2024-06-30, and production status is Active. The multiplier is locked, and the part number is Q49JSRNJS. No launch MSRP is listed.

Key architectural differences: the AMD part uses a smaller 4 nm process versus Intel's 10 nm, offering 10 cores and 20 threads against Intel's 6 cores and 12 threads. AMD's boost clock reaches 5.00 GHz, higher than Intel's 4.70 GHz. AMD supports only DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5, giving the Intel part backward compatibility with older memory. AMD's memory bandwidth is recorded at 89.6 GB/s, while Intel's is not in the database. AMD uses PCIe Gen 4, Intel uses PCIe Gen 5, giving the Intel platform newer I/O. AMD integrates the Radeon 880M, Intel integrates UHD Graphics 730. AMD's TDP is 28 W, Intel's is 65 W, a significant power envelope difference. AMD's die is 233 mm², Intel's is 215 mm². AMD's L3 cache is 16 MB, Intel's is 20 MB.

The Verdict

The database presents a clear asymmetry: the Intel Core i5-14401E has a full set of Cinebench R15, R20, and R23 scores, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has none. Therefore, any buyer relying on measured performance must choose the Intel part, as it is the only one with verified numbers. The Intel chip's average benchmark score of 5,253 places it at the 60th percentile among all CPUs, and its nearest rivals are all within 0.8% of its average score, indicating competitive parity with several older high-end parts.

For workloads where the Intel chip's 6 cores and 12 threads suffice, the data supports it. The multi-core Cinebench R23 score of 18,161 and single-core score of 2,564 are concrete figures that can guide purchasing decisions. The AMD part, despite its higher core count of 10 and 20 threads, lacks any recorded scores, so its actual performance remains unverified in this database.

The AMD part's advantages are architectural: a 28 W TDP, 4 nm process, integrated Radeon 880M graphics, and support for LPDDR5X memory. These features suggest suitability for embedded systems, fanless designs, or mobile form factors where power efficiency and integrated graphics are priorities. The Intel part's 65 W TDP and desktop socket indicate a conventional desktop processor with higher power draw but broader memory compatibility (DDR4 and DDR5) and PCIe Gen 5 support.

From the data alone, the Intel Core i5-14401E is the only chip with measurable performance, so it is the default pick for any performance-oriented use case. The AMD P174 should be selected only in scenarios where its specific embedded features (28 W TDP, LPDDR5X, Radeon 880M, 5.00 GHz boost) outweigh the lack of verified benchmark results. No recommendation can be made for the AMD part based on performance, as none exists in the database.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, while the Intel Core i5-14401E has a boost clock of 4.70 GHz.

Q: How many cores and threads does each processor have?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has 10 cores and 20 threads. The Intel Core i5-14401E has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the Intel Core i5-14401E?

A: The Intel Core i5-14401E has an average benchmark score of 5,253, placing it at the 60th percentile among all CPUs.

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No, the database contains no benchmark scores for the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174. Its percentile rank is 50, but no average score is recorded.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X. The Intel Core i5-14401E supports DDR4 and DDR5.

Q: Which processor has a lower TDP?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has a TDP of 28 W, while the Intel Core i5-14401E has a TDP of 65 W.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no head-to-head benchmark entries for this pair. All recorded Cinebench scores belong to the Intel Core i5-14401E. The Intel chip's multi-core Cinebench R23 score is 18,161, and its single-core score is 2,564. For Cinebench R20, the multi-core score is 7,627, and the single-core score is 1,076. For Cinebench R15, the multi-core score is 1,830, and the single-core score is 258.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has no Cinebench scores, no average benchmark score, and no nearest rivals listed in the database. Therefore, the largest win in either direction is undefined: the Intel part wins every benchmark by virtue of being the only scored chip.

The Intel part's nearest rivals provide context for its performance. The Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 has an average score of 5,259, which is 0.1% higher than the i5-14401E's 5,253, meaning the i5-14401E trails that Xeon by a negligible margin. The Intel Core i7-11700B has an average score of 5,241, which is 0.2% lower, so the i5-14401E leads by 0.2%. The Intel Core i9-10850K also averages 5,240, again 0.2% lower. The Intel Core i5-13400T averages 5,210, which is 0.8% lower, giving the i5-14401E its largest lead among these rivals.

In the absence of AMD benchmark data, the only quantitative comparison possible is between the Intel i5-14401E and its nearest rivals. The i5-14401E sits effectively at the same performance level as the Xeon E5-2699A v4, while slightly outperforming the i7-11700B, i9-10850K, and i5-13400T. For the AMD P174, the database records only architectural specifications, not performance results, so no head-to-head numerical analysis can be produced for that chip.