AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 vs Intel Core i7-14701E Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 and Intel Core i7-14701E occupy different positions in the database. The Intel part has recorded benchmark scores across multiple test suites, while the AMD part currently has no benchmark entries. This makes a direct win/loss tally impossible. The Intel Core i7-14701E holds an 83rd percentile ranking among all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 33,206. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 sits at the 50th percentile with an average benchmark score of 0, reflecting the absence of recorded measurements.

The Intel Core i7-14701E shows strength in multi-threaded workloads. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22,195 and Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 9,321 indicate substantial parallel throughput. The PassMark multithread score of 26,112 confirms this pattern. Single-thread performance is also strong, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,133 and a PassMark single-thread score of 4,305.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 is designed for a different use case entirely. Its 28 watt TDP, mobile market segment, and AMD Socket FP8 socket point toward embedded and mobile deployments where power efficiency and compact integration matter more than raw benchmark numbers. The Radeon 880M integrated graphics and support for LPDDR5X memory further indicate a platform built for integrated systems rather than desktop towers.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 uses the Gorgon Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI Embedded generation built on Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It is fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC with a die size of 233 mm². The Intel Core i7-14701E uses the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake Refresh generation, built on a 10 nm process at Intel with a die size of 257 mm².

Core configurations differ notably. The AMD part has 10 cores and 20 threads. The Intel part has 8 cores and 16 threads. The AMD processor combines Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores, which typically allows a mix of high-performance and high-efficiency cores, though the database does not specify the exact core distribution. The Intel processor uses the Raptor Lake hybrid design, though the database does not break down its performance-core and efficiency-core counts.

Cache hierarchies show structural differences. Both processors allocate 80 KB of L1 cache per core. The AMD part provides 1 MB of L2 cache per core and 16 MB of L3 cache. The Intel part doubles the per-core L2 allocation to 2 MB and offers 33 MB of shared L3 cache. This gives the Intel processor a larger total cache footprint, which can benefit workloads with repeated data access patterns.

Memory support diverges as well. The AMD processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory across a dual-channel bus with a memory bandwidth rating of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel processor supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus, though the database does not list a memory bandwidth figure. Both processors support ECC memory. PCIe connectivity differs, with the AMD part offering Gen 4 with 16 CPU lanes and the Intel part offering Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

Direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons are not available in the database. The head-to-head benchmark array is empty, and the win counters for both processors show zero. The only recorded benchmark data belongs to the Intel Core i7-14701E. This limits the analysis to the Intel processor's absolute scores and its standing against its nearest rivals.

The Intel Core i7-14701E delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22,195 and a single-core score of 3,133. In Cinebench R20, it scores 9,321 multi-core and 1,315 single-core. The older Cinebench R15 test shows 2,237 multi-core and 315 single-core. These results place the processor in a competitive position for desktop workloads.

PassMark results add further detail. The processor scores 81,325 in integer math and 61,873 in floating-point math. Extended instructions reach 18,528, and data compression hits 282,939. Data encryption scores 14,862, while random string sorting records 29,158. Prime number finding produces a modest 176, and physics simulation scores 2,399.

The nearest rivals in the database provide context. The AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H has an average score of 33,201 with a delta of 0 percent against the Intel part. The AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS scores 33,244 with a delta of -0.1 percent, meaning it is effectively tied with the Intel processor. The AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX scores 33,091 with a delta of 0.3 percent, and the Intel Core i7-13650HX scores 33,089 with a delta of 0.4 percent. These four rivals sit within a narrow band around the Intel Core i7-14701E's average score of 33,206, indicating that the processor is competitive with, but not clearly ahead of, comparable parts in its segment.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every specification category. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 uses 10 cores and 20 threads, while the Intel Core i7-14701E uses 8 cores and 16 threads. Base clock speeds show the Intel part at 2.60 GHz versus the AMD part at 2.00 GHz. Boost clocks favor the Intel part at 5.40 GHz versus 5.00 GHz on the AMD part.

Thermal design power differs substantially. The AMD processor is rated at 28 watts, while the Intel processor is rated at 65 watts. This reflects the different market segments: the AMD part is classified as Mobile, while the Intel part is classified as Desktop. The AMD processor uses AMD Socket FP8, and the Intel processor uses Intel Socket 1700.

Process technology separates the two as well. The AMD part uses a 4 nm process at TSMC with a 233 mm² die. The Intel part uses a 10 nm process at Intel with a 257 mm² die. The AMD part has a 16 MB L3 cache, while the Intel part has a 33 MB shared L3 cache. The AMD part offers 1 MB of L2 per core, while the Intel part offers 2 MB of L2 per core.

Memory support shows the AMD part limited to DDR5 and LPDDR5X with a rated bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the Intel part supports both DDR4 and DDR5 without a listed bandwidth figure. PCIe generation differs, with the AMD part on Gen 4 and the Intel part on Gen 5, both with 16 CPU lanes. Integrated graphics differ as well: the AMD part uses Radeon 880M, and the Intel part uses UHD Graphics 770.

Release dates place the Intel part earlier. The Intel Core i7-14701E was released on 2024-06-30, and the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 was released on 2026-02-28. Both processors are marked as Active in production status. Neither processor has a launch MSRP listed in the database, and neither has an unlocked multiplier. The Intel part has a known part number, Q49FSRNJK, while the AMD part's part number is listed as unknown.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has 10 cores and 20 threads. The Intel Core i7-14701E has 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: What is the performance ranking of the Intel Core i7-14701E?

A: The Intel Core i7-14701E holds an 83rd percentile ranking among all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 33,206.

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 have any benchmark scores?

A: The database currently lists no benchmark scores for the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174. Its average benchmark score is recorded as 0, and its percentile ranking is 50.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory. The Intel Core i7-14701E supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory. Both use a dual-channel memory bus, and both support ECC memory.

Q: How does the Intel Core i7-14701E compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Core i7-14701E has an average score of 33,206. The AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H scores 33,201 with a delta of 0 percent. The AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS scores 33,244 with a delta of -0.1 percent. The AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX scores 33,091 with a delta of 0.3 percent. The Intel Core i7-13650HX scores 33,089 with a delta of 0.4 percent.

Q: What are the TDP ratings for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 is rated at 28 watts. The Intel Core i7-14701E is rated at 65 watts.

The Verdict

The data supports different conclusions for different users. The Intel Core i7-14701E is the only one of the two with recorded benchmark results. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22,195, PassMark multithread score of 26,112, and single-thread score of 4,305 make it a capable desktop processor for tasks that benefit from both parallel and single-thread performance. Its 83rd percentile ranking and average score of 33,206 place it in the upper half of the database, competitive with the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H, AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS, AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, and Intel Core i7-13650HX, all of which sit within a 0.4 percent delta of its score.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 cannot be evaluated on the same basis. With no benchmark scores recorded, its average score of 0 and 50th percentile ranking reflect missing data rather than measured performance. What the specification sheet shows is a low-power mobile processor with a 28 watt TDP, a 4 nm TSMC process, 10 cores and 20 threads, and support for LPDDR5X memory. These characteristics point toward embedded and mobile platforms where power consumption and integration are primary concerns.

The choice between the two depends on the deployment context. For a desktop system where benchmark performance matters and the 65 watt TDP is acceptable, the Intel Core i7-14701E has verified scores that demonstrate its capability. For an embedded or mobile application where the 28 watt TDP, AMD Socket FP8, and Radeon 880M integrated graphics fit the platform requirements, the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 offers a modern 4 nm design with Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores, though its actual performance remains unmeasured in the database. The Intel part supports PCIe Gen 5, while the AMD part uses PCIe Gen 4. The Intel part has a larger L3 cache at 33 MB versus 16 MB on the AMD part. The AMD part has a higher core count at 10 versus 8, but the Intel part has higher base and boost clocks. The recorded data favors the Intel processor for users who require proven benchmark results; the AMD processor is a specification-driven choice for power-constrained embedded designs.