AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 vs Intel Core i5-14600 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark entries for the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 versus the Intel Core i5-14600. The Intel part, however, carries a full set of recorded scores across Cinebench, Geekbench, and Passmark tests, while the AMD entry lists zero benchmark results. This asymmetry means the comparison relies entirely on the Intel data and the architectural characteristics of both processors.

The Intel Core i5-14600 delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30464 points and a single-core score of 4300 points. In Cinebench R20, it scores 12794 multi-core and 1806 single-core, while the older R15 test yields 3070 multi-core and 433 single-core. Geekbench results show 14680 multi-core and 2424 single-core. These figures place the chip at the 89th percentile among all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 44889.

The nearest rivals in the database confirm the i5-14600 sits in a tightly contested performance band. The Intel Core i9-12900KS posts an average score of 45094, which is 0.5% lower than the i5-14600. The AMD EPYC 4344P also sits 0.5% lower at 45122. The AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D trails by 0.7% with 44573, and the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H is 1% behind at 44466. The i5-14600 effectively matches or slightly edges all four rivals in aggregate score, despite being positioned as a mid-range desktop part.

Passmark results for the Intel chip show strong throughput in specific workloads. Integer math scores 117078, floating point math reaches 85759, and extended instructions hit 25674. Data compression records 434620, while random string sorting produces 48043. Data encryption scores 25082, find prime numbers returns 155, and physics simulation records 2330. The multithread score is 35848, and single-thread performance sits at 4167.

Because the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has no benchmark scores in the database, its percentile ranking of 50 and average benchmark score of 0 reflect the absence of recorded data rather than measured performance. Any comparison of actual workload results between the two parts is therefore impossible from the recorded measurements alone.

Architecture Differences

The two processors diverge sharply in manufacturing and design. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 uses a 4 nm process fabricated by TSMC, while the Intel Core i5-14600 uses a 10 nm process from Intel's own fabs. The AMD chip carries the codename Gorgon Point and belongs to the Ryzen AI Embedded generation built on Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. The Intel chip uses the Raptor Lake architecture under the Raptor Lake-R codename, part of the Core 14th Gen family.

Core counts differ as well. The AMD part provides 10 cores and 20 threads, while the Intel part provides 14 cores and 20 threads. Both support 20 threads, but Intel achieves that with four additional physical cores. The AMD chip has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The Intel chip runs at a 2.70 GHz base clock and boosts to 5.20 GHz.

Cache hierarchies show notable differences. Both processors share an 80 KB L1 cache per core. The AMD chip uses 1 MB of L2 per core and a 16 MB L3 cache. The Intel chip uses 2 MB of L2 per core and a 24 MB shared L3 cache. Die size differs modestly: the AMD processor measures 233 mm², while the Intel processor measures 257 mm².

Memory support separates the two as well. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X across a dual-channel bus with a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel Core i5-14600 supports DDR4 and DDR5 on a dual-channel bus, with no bandwidth figure recorded in the database. Both processors support ECC memory.

PCIe connectivity also differs. The AMD chip provides Gen 4 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The Intel chip provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. Integrated graphics differ: the AMD part uses a Radeon 880M, while the Intel part uses UHD Graphics 770.

Socket and market positioning reinforce the architectural split. The AMD processor uses AMD Socket FP8 and targets the mobile segment. The Intel processor uses Intel Socket 1700 and targets the desktop segment. The AMD chip has a TDP of 28 watts, while the Intel chip has a TDP of 65 watts. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier. The Intel part carries the part number SRN44, while the AMD part lists an unknown part number.

The Intel Core i5-14600 launched on 2024-01-07 with a launch MSRP of $255. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has a later release date of 2026-02-28 and no recorded launch MSRP.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more physical cores?

A: The Intel Core i5-14600 has 14 cores, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has 10 cores. Both provide 20 threads.

Q: What are the boost clock speeds of the two processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 boosts to 5.00 GHz, and the Intel Core i5-14600 boosts to 5.20 GHz.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 and the Intel Core i5-14600 have ECC memory support enabled.

Q: Which processor supports PCIe Gen 5?

A: The Intel Core i5-14600 supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 supports PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes.

Q: How does the Intel Core i5-14600 compare to its nearest rivals in average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core i5-14600 has an average benchmark score of 44889. It sits 0.5% ahead of the Intel Core i9-12900KS (45094) and the AMD EPYC 4344P (45122), 0.7% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D (44573), and 1% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H (44466).

Q: What is the L3 cache size for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has 16 MB of L3 cache. The Intel Core i5-14600 has 24 MB of shared L3 cache.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 | Intel Core i5-14600 |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 10 | 14 |

| Threads | 20 | 20 |

| Base clock | 2.00 GHz | 2.70 GHz |

| Boost clock | 5.00 GHz | 5.20 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 65 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Codename | Gorgon Point | Raptor Lake-R |

| Generation | Ryzen AI Embedded (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) | Core i5 (Raptor Lake Refresh) |

| Process node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die size | 233 mm² | 257 mm² |

| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |

| L3 cache | 16 MB | 24 MB (shared) |

| Memory support | DDR5, LPDDR5X | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | Not recorded |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 16 lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 16 lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated graphics | Radeon 880M | UHD Graphics 770 |

| Market segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Release date | 2026-02-28 | 2024-01-07 |

| Launch MSRP | Not recorded | $255 |

| Part number | Unknown | SRN44 |

The L1 cache is identical at 80 KB per core for both processors. Both use a dual-channel memory bus, and both support ECC memory. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i5-14600 holds the only recorded benchmark data in this comparison, so its wins are documented across every test category in the database. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30464 and single-core score of 4300 place it comfortably in the upper tier of recorded CPUs, with an 89th percentile ranking. Geekbench multi-core at 14680 and single-core at 2424 reinforce that positioning. Passmark integer math at 117078 and floating point math at 85759 show strong general compute throughput, while data compression at 434620 indicates robust memory and cache handling for that workload.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has no recorded benchmark scores, so it cannot claim any measured performance wins in the database. Its architectural advantages, however, point to different strengths. The 4 nm TSMC process node gives it a manufacturing lead in density and efficiency potential over Intel's 10 nm process. The 28 W TDP, versus 65 W for the Intel part, suggests a substantially lower power envelope, which matters for mobile and embedded deployments. The LPDDR5X memory support and the 89.6 GB/s recorded memory bandwidth give it a defined memory pathway for bandwidth-sensitive tasks. The Radeon 880M integrated graphics outclasses the UHD Graphics 770 in naming terms, though no benchmark data exists to quantify the difference.

The Intel chip wins on core count, clock speed, cache capacity, and PCIe generation. Its 14 cores against 10, a 2.70 GHz base clock against 2.00 GHz, a 5.20 GHz boost against 5.00 GHz, 2 MB L2 per core against 1 MB, and 24 MB L3 against 16 MB all favor the desktop part. PCIe Gen 5 connectivity provides double the transfer capability of the AMD chip's Gen 4 interface. The Intel part also supports DDR4 in addition to DDR5, which broadens platform compatibility.

The AMD part wins on efficiency metrics and platform characteristics. The 28 W TDP against 65 W represents a 37 watt difference in thermal design power, a substantial gap for compact systems. The mobile socket and market segment target a different deployment class than the desktop Intel part. The later release date of 2026-02-28 versus 2024-01-07 means the AMD chip benefits from a more recent design cycle. The 233 mm² die size versus 257 mm² also reflects the denser 4 nm process.

The nearest rival data for the Intel chip shows how its wins stack up against other CPUs in the database. It leads the Intel Core i9-12900KS by 0.5%, the AMD EPYC 4344P by 0.5%, the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D by 0.7%, and the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H by 1%. Those margins are narrow, indicating the i5-14600 sits at the center of a closely matched performance cluster rather than at the top of a wide gap.

For users selecting between these two, the Intel Core i5-14600 is the only one with measured performance data, and that data shows a strong all-around desktop processor. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 offers no recorded scores, so its case rests on architecture, power efficiency, and platform fit. The database cannot confirm a single benchmark win for the AMD part, while the Intel part claims every recorded test result.