AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 vs Intel Core i5-14501TE Comparison

FAQ

Q: What are the core and thread counts of each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has 10 cores and 20 threads. The Intel Core i5-14501TE has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock speed?

A: The Intel Core i5-14501TE has a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 boosts to 5.00 GHz.

Q: What is the process node for each chip?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 is built on a 4 nm process by TSMC. The Intel Core i5-14501TE uses a 10 nm process from Intel.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 and the Intel Core i5-14501TE support ECC memory.

Q: What integrated graphics does each processor include?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 includes Radeon 880M graphics. The Intel Core i5-14501TE includes UHD Graphics 770.

Q: What are the release dates for these two processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 was released on 2026-02-28. The Intel Core i5-14501TE was released on 2024-06-30.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 and Intel Core i5-14501TE represent fundamentally different design philosophies. The AMD part, codenamed Gorgon Point, belongs to the Ryzen AI Embedded generation built on Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It uses a 4 nm process manufactured by TSMC. The Intel part, codenamed Raptor Lake-R, belongs to the Core 14th Gen series and uses Raptor Lake architecture on a 10 nm process from Intel.

The core configurations differ substantially. The AMD processor provides 10 cores and 20 threads, which indicates simultaneous multithreading across all cores. The Intel processor provides 6 cores and 12 threads, also with multithreading. This gives the AMD chip a 4-core and 8-thread advantage in raw thread count.

Cache hierarchies are organized differently. Both processors allocate 80 KB of L1 cache per core. The L2 cache differs: AMD uses 1 MB per core, while Intel uses 1.25 MB per core. The L3 cache is a major distinction. AMD provides 16 MB of L3 cache, while Intel provides 24 MB of shared L3 cache. Intel's larger L3 cache may benefit workloads with repeated data access patterns, while AMD's per-core L2 allocation could help with per-thread working sets.

The memory interfaces also differ. AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode, though no bandwidth figure is recorded in the database. The Intel part's support for DDR4 provides backward compatibility with older memory platforms.

PCIe connectivity differs by generation and lane count. The AMD processor uses PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The Intel processor uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The Intel part offers a newer PCIe generation, which doubles the per-lane bandwidth potential for compatible devices.

Die sizes are similar but not identical. The AMD processor measures 233 mm², while the Intel processor measures 215 mm². Both are active production parts, and neither has an unlocked multiplier. The AMD part targets the mobile market segment with a 28 W TDP, while the Intel part targets desktop with a 45 W TDP. The AMD chip uses AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel chip uses Intel Socket 1700.

The integrated graphics solutions are from different vendors. AMD includes Radeon 880M, while Intel includes UHD Graphics 770. Both processors support ECC memory, which suits embedded and workstation environments where data integrity is critical.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 wins on thread count and power efficiency. With 10 cores and 20 threads versus 6 cores and 12 threads, the AMD part provides 66.7% more threads for parallel workloads. The 28 W TDP is substantially lower than the Intel part's 45 W TDP, which makes the AMD chip better suited for thermally constrained or power-sensitive embedded applications. The AMD part also uses a smaller 4 nm process, which contributes to its efficiency profile.

The Intel Core i5-14501TE wins on raw clock speed and cache capacity. The Intel part boosts to 5.10 GHz, which is 0.10 GHz higher than the AMD part's 5.00 GHz boost. The Intel part also has a higher base clock at 2.20 GHz versus 2.00 GHz. Intel provides 24 MB of shared L3 cache versus 16 MB on the AMD side, which is a 50% advantage in L3 capacity. The Intel part also supports PCIe Gen 5, which doubles the per-lane bandwidth compared to AMD's PCIe Gen 4.

The Intel part's larger L3 cache and higher clock speeds may benefit single-threaded or lightly threaded workloads where per-core performance matters most. The AMD part's higher thread count and lower power envelope may benefit heavily threaded workloads in power-constrained environments. The Intel part's support for DDR4 memory gives it flexibility in systems where DDR4 is already deployed.

The release timing also differs. The Intel part was released on 2024-06-30, while the AMD part was released on 2026-02-28. This means the AMD part is a newer design by nearly two years.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 | Intel Core i5-14501TE |

|----------------|---------------------------|----------------------|

| Cores | 10 | 6 |

| Threads | 20 | 12 |

| Base Clock | 2.00 GHz | 2.20 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.00 GHz | 5.10 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 45 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Codename | Gorgon Point | Raptor Lake-R |

| Generation | Ryzen AI Embedded (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) | Core i5 (Raptor Lake Refresh) |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die Size | 233 mm² | 215 mm² |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 24 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR5, LPDDR5X | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | Not recorded |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 880M | UHD Graphics 770 |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Release Date | 2026-02-28 | 2024-06-30 |

| Part Number | Unknown | Q49KSRNJN |

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded database contains no head-to-head benchmark results for these two processors. The winsA and winsB fields are both zero, and the headToHeadBenchmarks array is empty. The average benchmark score for each processor is also zero, and the percentileVsAllCpus for both is 50. Without recorded performance measurements, the analysis must rely on architectural and specification differences.

The most significant differentiator in the recorded data is the core and thread count. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 provides 10 cores and 20 threads, which is 4 more cores and 8 more threads than the Intel Core i5-14501TE. In heavily threaded workloads, the AMD part has a theoretical advantage of 66.7% more threads. However, the Intel part counters with a higher boost clock of 5.10 GHz versus 5.00 GHz, which could favor lightly threaded workloads that depend on single-core speed.

The cache hierarchy presents a trade-off. Intel's 24 MB of shared L3 cache is 50% larger than AMD's 16 MB. This larger cache could reduce memory latency for workloads with moderate working sets. AMD's per-core L2 cache of 1 MB is smaller than Intel's 1.25 MB per core, but the AMD part has more cores, so total L2 capacity across all cores is 10 MB versus 7.5 MB on the Intel side. This gives AMD a 33% advantage in aggregate L2 capacity.

Memory bandwidth is another point of differentiation. The AMD part records 89.6 GB/s of memory bandwidth, while the Intel part has no recorded bandwidth figure. The AMD part supports LPDDR5X in addition to DDR5, which could provide lower power memory options for embedded designs. The Intel part supports DDR4, which offers a lower-cost memory ecosystem but at lower bandwidth potential.

The power envelope is a major architectural difference. The AMD part has a 28 W TDP, while the Intel part has a 45 W TDP. This 17 W difference represents a 60.7% higher TDP for the Intel part. For embedded systems with strict thermal budgets, the AMD part allows for smaller cooling solutions and lower operating costs. The Intel part's higher TDP may allow for sustained performance in systems that can dissipate the heat.

The PCIe generation difference also matters for system integration. Intel's PCIe Gen 5 support provides twice the per-lane bandwidth of AMD's PCIe Gen 4. For applications using high-bandwidth peripherals such as network interfaces or storage controllers, the Intel part offers more headroom. The AMD part's PCIe Gen 4 may suffice for many embedded workloads, but the bandwidth ceiling is lower.

Both processors are active production parts, and neither has an unlocked multiplier. Both support ECC memory, which aligns with the embedded and workstation segments. The AMD part targets mobile, while the Intel part targets desktop. This market segment difference influences the socket choices: AMD Socket FP8 for mobile and Intel Socket 1700 for desktop.

Given the absence of benchmark scores, the analysis cannot rank these processors based on measured performance. The specification data indicates that the AMD part is designed for throughput-oriented, power-constrained environments, while the Intel part is designed for clock-speed-sensitive, cache-dependent workloads. The release dates suggest the AMD part benefits from a newer process node, which typically enables higher efficiency per watt. The Intel part's older 10 nm process and higher TDP indicate a more conventional desktop design approach.