AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS vs AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data is unambiguous: the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS wins every recorded head-to-head comparison against the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS. Across all 17 benchmark tests, the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS posts higher scores, with the Ryzen 5 7533HS recording zero wins. The margins are substantial, ranging from 27.2% to 57.8% depending on the workload.

The largest single-core advantage appears in the Cinebench R15 single-core test, where the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS scores 349 against the Ryzen 5 7533HS's 175, a delta of 49.9%. The same pattern holds in Cinebench R20 single-core (1456 vs 731, 49.8% delta) and Cinebench R23 single-core (3468 vs 1742, 49.8% delta). These results indicate that the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS delivers roughly double the single-threaded performance in these rendering workloads.

Multi-core results follow the same trajectory. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS scores 24565, while the Ryzen 5 7533HS manages 12342, a 49.8% delta. Cinebench R20 multi-core shows 10317 versus 5183 (49.8% delta), and Cinebench R15 multi-core shows 2476 versus 1243 (49.8% delta). The consistency of these deltas suggests a systematic architectural advantage rather than workload-specific behavior.

The widest margin in the entire dataset appears in PassMark random string sorting, where the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS scores 41867 against 17669, a 57.8% delta. PassMark extended instructions also shows a large gap: 25434 versus 11219, a 55.9% delta. Floating-point math trails closely at 58965 versus 27800, a 52.9% delta. Data compression shows a 51% delta (343952 versus 168692).

The narrowest advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS is in PassMark single-thread, where it scores 3762 versus 2740, a 27.2% delta. This is still a commanding lead, but it indicates that the single-threaded gap, while large, is smaller than the multi-threaded gap. PassMark physics shows a 40.9% delta (1389 versus 821), and PassMark find prime numbers shows a 44.8% delta (87 versus 48).

Where Each One Wins

The Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS wins in every category measured. There is no benchmark test in the database where the Ryzen 5 7533HS comes out ahead. For workloads that stress single-core performance, such as the PassMark single-thread test, the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS leads by 27.2%. For workloads that leverage multiple cores, such as Cinebench R23 multi-core, the lead expands to 49.8%. The Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS also dominates in memory-sensitive tasks like data compression and random string sorting, where the deltas reach 51% and 57.8% respectively.

The Ryzen 5 7533HS is not without merit in absolute terms. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12342 and PassMark single-thread score of 2740 are respectable figures for a mobile processor. However, in direct comparison, it trails the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS across all recorded workloads. The data shows no scenario where the Ryzen 5 7533HS provides a performance advantage.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different architectural generations. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS uses Zen 3+ architecture under the codename Rembrandt-R, while the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS uses Zen 4 architecture under the codename Hawk Point. This generational gap is reflected in the process node: the Ryzen 5 7533HS is built on a 6 nm process, whereas the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS uses a 4 nm process. Both are fabricated by TSMC.

The Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS carries 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die. The Ryzen 5 7533HS has no transistor count recorded in the database, but its die size is listed as 208 mm². The smaller die with a more advanced process node helps explain the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS's performance lead despite having more cores.

Cache configurations differ as well. Both processors share 64 KB of L1 cache per core and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The L2 cache, however, is doubled in the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS: 1 MB per core versus 512 KB per core in the Ryzen 5 7533HS. This larger L2 cache likely contributes to the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS's advantage in data-heavy workloads.

The integrated graphics differ between the two. The Ryzen 5 7533HS includes a Radeon 660M, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS includes a Radeon 780M. Both processors support DDR5 memory with dual-channel memory buses, but the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS has a higher memory bandwidth at 89.6 GB/s compared to 76.8 GB/s for the Ryzen 5 7533HS. The Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS also supports ECC memory, which the Ryzen 5 7533HS does not.

Specification Differences

The core and thread counts are the most immediate differentiator. The Ryzen 5 7533HS has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS has 8 cores and 16 threads. Clock speeds also favor the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS: its base clock is 3.80 GHz and boost clock is 5.10 GHz, compared to 3.30 GHz base and 4.40 GHz boost for the Ryzen 5 7533HS.

Thermal design power reflects this difference: the Ryzen 5 7533HS has a 35 W TDP, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS has a 45 W TDP. Both use the AMD Socket FP7 and are mobile segment parts with active production status. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

The release dates differ. The Ryzen 5 7533HS launched on 2024-08-31, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS launched earlier on 2024-04-15. Both support PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only). The part numbers differ: the Ryzen 5 7533HS uses 100-000001632(FP7) and 100-000001634(FP7r2), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS uses 100-000001316(FP7r2) and 100-000001387(FP7).

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: How large is the single-core performance gap?

A: In Cinebench R23 single-core, the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS scores 3468 versus 1742 for the Ryzen 5 7533HS, a 49.8% delta. In PassMark single-thread, the gap narrows to 27.2% with scores of 3762 versus 2740.

Q: What is the difference in process node?

A: The Ryzen 5 7533HS uses a 6 nm process, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS uses a 4 nm process. Both are fabricated by TSMC.

Q: Does the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS supports ECC memory. The Ryzen 5 7533HS does not support ECC memory.

Q: Which processor has a higher memory bandwidth?

A: The Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS has a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, compared to 76.8 GB/s for the Ryzen 5 7533HS. Both support DDR5 with dual-channel memory buses.

Q: How do the integrated graphics compare?

A: The Ryzen 5 7533HS includes a Radeon 660M, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS includes a Radeon 780M.

The Verdict

The data points to a clear conclusion: the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS is the superior processor in every benchmark test recorded. It wins all 17 head-to-head comparisons, with deltas ranging from 27.2% to 57.8%. The Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS also holds a higher percentile ranking at 86 versus 73 for the Ryzen 5 7533HS, and its average benchmark score of 39325 nearly doubles the Ryzen 5 7533HS's 19364.

The Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS is the appropriate choice for users who need maximum performance in both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads. Its 8-core, 16-thread configuration, higher clock speeds, larger L2 cache, and 4 nm process node all contribute to its dominance. The 45 W TDP is higher than the 35 W TDP of the Ryzen 5 7533HS, which reflects the additional performance capability.

The Ryzen 5 7533HS remains a functional mobile processor with a 6-core, 12-thread configuration and a 35 W TDP. Its lower TDP may suit systems with tighter thermal constraints, but the benchmark data shows that it sacrifices significant performance relative to the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS. For workloads that rely on rendering, data compression, or math-intensive calculations, the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS delivers scores that are roughly double or better across the board.

The Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS also offers advantages in memory bandwidth and ECC support, which may matter for professional or server-like mobile use cases. The Ryzen 5 7533HS does not support ECC memory and has lower memory bandwidth. Based on the recorded data, the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS is the stronger processor in all measured dimensions.