AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS vs Intel Core i9-14901TE Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS and the Intel Core i9-14901TE. The head-to-head record shows zero recorded wins for either processor. This absence of direct measurements means the comparison must rely on the broader benchmark profile recorded for the AMD part and the qualitative specification data for the Intel part.

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS has a substantial set of benchmark scores in the database. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 24565, while its single-core score in the same test is 3468. In Cinebench R20, the multi-core result is 10317 and the single-core result is 1456. The older Cinebench R15 test shows a multi-core score of 2476 and a single-core score of 349. These results place the AMD processor at the 86th percentile among all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 39325.

The Intel Core i9-14901TE has no recorded benchmark scores. Its percentile ranking stands at 50, and its average benchmark score is listed as zero. The database does not contain performance measurements for this processor, which limits the quantitative comparison. The Intel part appears in the database with full specification details but without any test results.

The nearest rivals for the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS provide context for interpreting its scores. The AMD EPYC 4245P averages 39215, which is 0.3% below the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 averages 39485, which is 0.4% above. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS averages 39603, 0.7% higher. The Intel Core i7-13700F averages 39009, 0.8% lower. These deltas are small, indicating that the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS sits in a tightly clustered performance band among its closest competitors.

The PassMark results for the AMD processor show varied strengths. The multi-thread score is 28572, while the single-thread score is 3762. Integer math scores 97625, floating point math scores 58965, and extended instructions score 25434. Data compression scores 343952, data encryption scores 20487, and random string sorting scores 41867. Physics tests score 1389, and the find prime numbers test scores 87. These numbers reveal a processor that handles compression and encryption workloads particularly well relative to its own other scores.

Since the Intel processor has no measurements, the head-to-head section cannot report exact deltas between the two. The AMD processor's scores stand as the only quantitative benchmark data available for this comparison. The Intel part's lack of data means no win can be assigned to either side based on direct testing.

FAQ

Q: What benchmark scores are available for the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS?

A: The database records Cinebench R15 multi-core at 2476, R15 single-core at 349, R20 multi-core at 10317, R20 single-core at 1456, R23 multi-core at 24565, and R23 single-core at 3468. PassMark results include multi-thread at 28572, single-thread at 3762, integer math at 97625, floating point math at 58965, and data compression at 343952.

Q: Does the Intel Core i9-14901TE have any recorded benchmarks?

A: No. The benchmark array for the Intel Core i9-14901TE is empty. Its average benchmark score is zero, and its percentile versus all CPUs is 50.

Q: How does the AMD processor compare to its nearest rivals in the database?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS has an average benchmark score of 39325. The AMD EPYC 4245P is 0.3% lower at 39215, the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 is 0.4% higher at 39485, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS is 0.7% higher at 39603, and the Intel Core i7-13700F is 0.8% lower at 39009.

Q: What are the core and thread counts for both processors?

A: Both the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS and the Intel Core i9-14901TE have 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: What is the thermal design power for each processor?

A: Both processors have a TDP of 45 watts.

Q: What is the release date for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS was released on 2024-04-15. The Intel Core i9-14901TE was released on 2024-06-30.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS wins in every category where benchmark data exists, because the Intel Core i9-14901TE has no recorded measurements. The AMD part's Cinebench scores indicate strong multi-threaded rendering performance, with the R23 multi-core score of 24565 suggesting capability in CPU-intensive workloads such as video encoding and 3D rendering. Its single-core R23 score of 3468 indicates solid responsiveness in lightly threaded applications.

The PassMark data for the AMD processor points to specific strengths. The data compression score of 343952 is exceptionally high relative to its own multi-thread score of 28572, suggesting the processor handles compression workloads with particular efficiency. Data encryption at 20487 and extended instructions at 25434 further indicate robust cryptographic and SIMD workload performance. The floating point math score of 58965 and integer math score of 97625 show balanced arithmetic capability.

The Intel Core i9-14901TE cannot be assigned wins in any benchmark category because the database has no measurements for it. The specification sheet shows a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, which is higher than the AMD part's 5.10 GHz boost clock, but without benchmark data, no performance conclusion can be drawn from that figure alone.

For use-case analysis, the AMD processor's recorded scores suggest strong suitability for multi-threaded productivity workloads, content creation, and data-heavy tasks like compression and encryption. The lack of Intel benchmark data means the comparison cannot extend beyond the AMD processor's demonstrated strengths.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in several specification fields. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS has a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The Intel Core i9-14901TE has a base clock of 2.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz. The Intel part has a higher boost clock by 0.40 GHz, while the AMD part has a higher base clock by 1.50 GHz.

The socket types differ completely. The AMD processor uses AMD Socket FP7, while the Intel processor uses Intel Socket 1700. This means the two processors are not interchangeable in any motherboard.

Memory support differs. The AMD processor supports DDR5 memory only, while the Intel processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5. Both use dual-channel memory buses. The AMD processor has a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the Intel processor has no memory bandwidth figure in the database. Both support ECC memory.

PCI Express support differs. The AMD processor uses PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only). The Intel processor uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The Intel part offers a newer PCIe generation but fewer lanes.

The integrated graphics differ. The AMD processor uses Radeon 780M, while the Intel processor uses UHD Graphics 770. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

The market segments differ. The AMD processor is classified as Mobile, while the Intel processor is classified as Desktop. This aligns with the socket differences and suggests different intended platforms.

Part numbers also differ: the AMD processor lists 100-000001316 (FP7r2) and 100-000001387 (FP7), while the Intel processor lists Q49CSRNJJ.

Architecture Differences

The architectural differences between the two processors are substantial. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS uses the Zen 4 architecture under the codename Hawk Point, part of the 8000 series. The Intel Core i9-14901TE uses the Raptor Lake architecture under the codename Raptor Lake-R, part of the Core 14th Gen series. The AMD generation is listed as Ryzen 7 (Zen 4 (Hawk Point)), while the Intel generation is Core i9 (Raptor Lake Refresh).

The manufacturing process differs significantly. The AMD processor uses a 4 nm process node fabricated by TSMC. The Intel processor uses a 10 nm process node fabricated by Intel. The AMD processor has a transistor count of 25,000 million and a die size of 178 mm². The Intel processor has no transistor count listed but has a die size of 257 mm². The Intel die is larger by 79 mm², while the AMD die packs more transistors into a smaller area.

Cache configurations differ notably. The AMD processor has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel processor has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel part has larger cache at every level, with its L3 cache more than double the AMD part's L3 cache. Neither processor has 3D V-Cache.

Both processors have 8 cores and 16 threads, so the thread count is identical. The AMD processor's Zen 4 architecture uses a different core design philosophy than Intel's Raptor Lake, but the database does not include microarchitectural details beyond the cache and process specifications.

The production status for both is Active. The Intel processor was released later by about two and a half months, with the AMD release on 2024-04-15 and the Intel release on 2024-06-30.

The Verdict

The data in the database presents an incomplete picture. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS has a full set of benchmark measurements, placing it at the 86th percentile among all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 39325. The Intel Core i9-14901TE has no benchmark measurements at all, with an average score of zero and a 50th percentile ranking that reflects its default position rather than any tested performance.

For users selecting a processor based on recorded performance data, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS is the only option with verified measurements. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24565 and single-core score of 3468 demonstrate strong performance in both threaded and single-threaded workloads. Its PassMark data shows particular strength in data compression with a score of 343952, which is notable given the multi-thread score of 28572.

The Intel Core i9-14901TE offers a higher boost clock of 5.50 GHz compared to 5.10 GHz, larger caches (36 MB L3 versus 16 MB L3), PCIe Gen 5 support, and support for both DDR4 and DDR5 memory. These specifications suggest potential advantages in certain scenarios, but the database contains no measurements to confirm or quantify those advantages.

The AMD processor benefits from a smaller manufacturing process (4 nm versus 10 nm), a higher base clock (3.80 GHz versus 2.30 GHz), and a higher recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. Its mobile classification and FP7 socket indicate a different target platform than the Intel part's desktop classification with Socket 1700.

The verdict from the available data is straightforward: the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS is the only processor in this comparison with demonstrated performance results. The Intel Core i9-14901TE remains unmeasured in the database. Any decision between the two processors must account for the fact that the Intel part's performance is unknown, while the AMD part's performance is documented across multiple benchmark suites. The 86th percentile ranking for the AMD processor indicates it performs better than most CPUs in the database. The Intel processor's 50th percentile ranking is a placeholder value, not a test result. Users seeking a processor with verified benchmark data should consider the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS. Users considering the Intel Core i9-14901TE should note that its performance characteristics are not recorded in the database at this time.