AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS vs Intel Core i5-14401TE Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS and Intel Core i5-14401TE occupy different positions in the database, and the recorded data shows a clear split in their intended roles. The AMD part is a mobile processor aimed at high-performance laptops and workstations, while the Intel part is a desktop chip with a lower clock profile. The benchmark database contains a full set of measurements for the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS, with scores across Cinebench R15, R20, R23, and PassMark tests. The Intel Core i5-14401TE has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, so its performance must be assessed from its architectural and specification data alone.

The AMD processor wins in every measured category by default, simply because it has recorded scores and the Intel part does not. The AMD chip posts a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24565 and a single-core score of 3468, which places it in the 86th percentile of all CPUs tracked in the database. The Intel Core i5-14401TE sits at the 50th percentile with an average benchmark score of zero, indicating no measured results are available. In terms of raw capability, the AMD part delivers 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel part offers 6 cores and 12 threads. That core and thread advantage, combined with a higher boost clock of 5.10 GHz versus 4.50 GHz, gives the AMD processor a structural lead in both multi-threaded and single-threaded workloads.

For use-case planning, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS is the processor to select when the workload requires measured, verified performance. Its PassMark multithread score of 28572 and integer math score of 97625 indicate strong throughput for compilation, rendering, and data processing. The Intel Core i5-14401TE, with its desktop socket, may appeal to builders who need a LGA 1700 platform, but the lack of benchmark data means its performance cannot be quantified in this database. The AMD part also includes the Radeon 780M integrated graphics, which is a more capable iGPU than the UHD Graphics 730 found on the Intel chip, making the AMD processor the better choice for systems without a discrete graphics card.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different manufacturers and use fundamentally different designs. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS uses the Zen 4 architecture under the Hawk Point codename, part of the 8000 series. It is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC, with 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die. Cache is organized as 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3. The Intel Core i5-14401TE uses the Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-R codename, part of the Core 14th Gen series. It is built on a 10 nm process at Intel with a 215 mm² die size. Cache is larger per core on the Intel side: 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 20 MB of shared L3.

The process node difference is substantial. TSMC's 4 nm process gives AMD a density and efficiency advantage, while Intel's 10 nm process is comparatively older. The transistor count for the Intel part is not recorded in the database, so no direct comparison is possible on that metric. The AMD processor supports DDR5 memory only, with dual-channel access and a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also dual-channel, but its memory bandwidth is not recorded. Both support ECC memory, which is notable for workstation and server-adjacent use cases.

PCIe support differs significantly. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS provides Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU, while the Intel Core i5-14401TE provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The Intel part offers a newer PCIe generation, which could matter for storage and GPU bandwidth, but it has fewer lanes. The AMD part uses AMD Socket FP7, a mobile socket, while the Intel part uses Intel Socket 1700, a desktop socket. The integrated graphics also differ: AMD pairs the CPU with Radeon 780M, while Intel uses UHD Graphics 730. The AMD processor's release date is recorded as 2024-04-15, and the Intel part's release date as 2024-06-30, making the Intel chip the later release by roughly two and a half months. Both processors are listed as Active in production status, and neither has an unlocked multiplier.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark entries for these two processors, and the Intel Core i5-14401TE has no recorded scores at all. The analysis therefore relies on the AMD part's full benchmark suite and the Intel part's specification profile. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS records a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24565 and a single-core score of 3468. In Cinebench R20, it posts 10317 multicore and 1456 single-core. In Cinebench R15, the scores are 2476 multicore and 349 single-core. These results place it in the 86th percentile of all CPUs tracked.

PassMark results for the AMD chip cover multiple workload types. The multithread score is 28572, single-thread is 3762, integer math is 97625, floating point math is 58965, and extended instructions score 25434. Data compression scores 343952, data encryption scores 20487, and random string sorting scores 41867. The find prime numbers score is 87, and the physics score is 1389. The average benchmark score for the AMD processor is 39325.

The nearest rivals in the database provide context for the AMD part's standing. The AMD EPYC 4245P has an average score of 39215, which is 0.3% lower than the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 scores 39485, which is 0.4% higher. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS scores 39603, which is 0.7% higher. The Intel Core i7-13700F scores 39009, which is 0.8% lower. These margins are small, indicating the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS sits in a tightly clustered performance band.

The Intel Core i5-14401TE cannot be compared on scores because none exist. Its base clock of 2.00 GHz and boost clock of 4.50 GHz are both lower than the AMD part's 3.80 GHz base and 5.10 GHz boost. With 6 cores and 12 threads versus 8 cores and 16 threads, the Intel chip is at a structural disadvantage in multi-threaded workloads. Its 20 MB of shared L3 is larger than the AMD part's 16 MB, which may help in some cache-sensitive single-threaded tasks, but the lower clocks and fewer threads limit its overall ceiling.

Specification Differences

The following fields differ between the two processors:

• Cores: AMD 8, Intel 6
• Threads: AMD 16, Intel 12
• Base clock: AMD 3.80 GHz, Intel 2.00 GHz
• Boost clock: AMD 5.10 GHz, Intel 4.50 GHz
• Socket: AMD Socket FP7, Intel Socket 1700
• Architecture: Zen 4, Raptor Lake
• Codename: Hawk Point, Raptor Lake-R
• Generation: Ryzen 7 (Zen 4 Hawk Point), Core i5 (Raptor Lake Refresh)
• Process node: 4 nm, 10 nm
• Foundry: TSMC, Intel
• Die size: 178 mm², 215 mm²
• Transistors: 25,000 million, not recorded
• L1 cache: 64 KB per core, 80 KB per core
• L2 cache: 1 MB per core, 1.25 MB per core
• L3 cache: 16 MB shared, 20 MB shared
• Memory support: DDR5, DDR4 and DDR5
• Memory bandwidth: 89.6 GB/s, not recorded
• PCIe: Gen 4 with 20 lanes, Gen 5 with 16 lanes
• Integrated graphics: Radeon 780M, UHD Graphics 730
• Market segment: Mobile, Desktop
• Release date: 2024-04-15, 2024-06-30
• Part number: 100-000001316 (FP7r2) and 100-000001387 (FP7), Q4T4SRNJP

Fields that are the same: both are dual-channel memory designs, both support ECC memory, both have a 45 W TDP, both are Active in production status, and neither has an unlocked multiplier. Neither processor has a recorded launch MSRP in the database.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Core i5-14401TE has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: Does the Intel Core i5-14401TE have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No. The database shows no benchmark entries for the Intel Core i5-14401TE, and its average benchmark score is recorded as zero. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS has a full set of Cinebench and PassMark scores.

Q: Which processor supports faster PCIe?

A: The Intel Core i5-14401TE supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS supports PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS and the Intel Core i5-14401TE support ECC memory.

Q: What is the process node difference?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC, while the Intel Core i5-14401TE is built on a 10 nm process at Intel.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS boosts to 5.10 GHz, while the Intel Core i5-14401TE boosts to 4.50 GHz.

The Verdict

The data in the database supports a clear choice for most scenarios. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS is the only one of the two with measured performance, and those measurements are strong. It sits in the 86th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 39325. Its nearest rivals are all within 0.8% of its average score, which shows it is competitively positioned against a range of desktop and mobile parts. The Intel Core i7-13700F, a desktop chip, is 0.8% behind the AMD part in average score, which indicates the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS holds its own against desktop hardware despite being a mobile processor.

The Intel Core i5-14401TE offers no measured data, which makes a performance-based recommendation impossible from the database. Its specification profile shows a lower base clock, lower boost clock, fewer cores, and fewer threads than the AMD part. It does have a larger L3 cache, support for both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, and PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, which are genuine advantages for certain system configurations. The desktop socket, Intel Socket 1700, makes it a fit for standard desktop motherboards, and the later release date of 2024-06-30 means it is a newer product. However, the lack of benchmark scores and the structural disadvantages in core count and clock speed place it behind the AMD part in any workload that scales with parallelism or frequency.

For a mobile workstation or high-performance laptop, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS is the processor with verified results. Its Radeon 780M integrated graphics, 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth, and 4 nm process make it a complete package for a compact system. For a desktop build on LGA 1700, the Intel Core i5-14401TE has platform-level appeal, but the database cannot quantify its performance. The recorded data, where it exists, favors the AMD processor across every measured category. The verdict from the database is straightforward: the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS is the part with demonstrated performance, and the Intel Core i5-14401TE remains unmeasured.