AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS vs Intel Core i5-14401E Comparison

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS and the Intel Core i5-14401E occupy different corners of the processor market, one designed for mobile efficiency and the other for desktop stability. The recorded benchmark data shows a clear and consistent performance gap across all tested workloads, with the AMD part winning every head-to-head comparison in the database. The Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS delivers higher raw scores in both single-core and multi-core tests, while the Core i5-14401E offers a distinct feature set including a different socket, memory compatibility, and PCIe generation support.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Cinebench suite provides the primary comparison data for these two processors. Across all six recorded tests, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS outperforms the Intel Core i5-14401E by a uniform margin of 35.3 percent. This consistency across different rendering workloads indicates a fundamental performance advantage rather than a test-specific anomaly.

In Cinebench R15, the AMD processor scores 2476 points in the multi-core test, while the Intel part scores 1830 points. The single-core test shows a similar pattern: 349 points for the AMD versus 258 points for the Intel. Both results represent a 35.3 percent advantage for the Ryzen part. The Cinebench R20 test follows the same trajectory, with the AMD processor achieving 10317 points in multi-core and 1456 points in single-core, compared to 7627 and 1076 points respectively for the Intel.

The Cinebench R23 results reinforce this trend. The Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS scores 24565 points in multi-core and 3468 points in single-core. The Core i5-14401E scores 18161 points and 2564 points in the corresponding tests. The consistent 35.3 percent delta across every benchmark suggests that the performance difference scales evenly with workload complexity, from short single-threaded tasks to sustained multi-threaded rendering.

The database records six total wins for the AMD processor and zero wins for the Intel processor in direct head-to-head comparisons. This is not a close contest by any metric. The AMD part's advantage appears in every recorded test, and the margin remains identical regardless of whether the workload favors single-thread speed or multi-core throughput.

The average benchmark scores further illustrate the gap. The Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS holds an average score of 39325, placing it in the 86th percentile of all CPUs in the database. The Core i5-14401E averages 5253 points, which places it in the 60th percentile. The difference in average scores is substantial, though this metric includes a different set of tests for each processor due to the available data.

The Verdict

The benchmark data shows that the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS is the stronger performer in every recorded comparison. Users who prioritize raw processing power, whether for rendering, compilation, or general productivity, will find the AMD part delivers consistently higher scores. The 35.3 percent advantage in Cinebench tests applies equally to single-core and multi-core scenarios, which means the AMD processor excels in both lightly-threaded applications and heavily parallel workloads.

The Intel Core i5-14401E, while clearly behind in performance, still offers a valid option for specific system requirements. Its desktop market segment and support for both DDR4 and DDR5 memory provide flexibility for system builders working with existing memory infrastructure. The Intel part also uses Socket 1700, which offers compatibility with a different motherboard ecosystem than the AMD processor's FP7 socket.

For users who need maximum performance from the data, the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS is the clear choice. The 86th percentile ranking versus the 60th percentile ranking places the AMD part in a different performance tier entirely. The nearest rivals to the AMD processor include the AMD EPYC 4245P with an average score of 39215 and a performance difference of 0.3 percent, and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 with a score of 39485 and a 0.4 percent difference. These competitors are far closer in performance than the Intel Core i5-14401E.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS uses the Zen 4 architecture under the codename Hawk Point, built on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Core i5-14401E uses the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake Refresh generation, built on a 10 nm process at Intel. The process node difference is significant, though the database does not record direct power efficiency comparisons.

The AMD processor features 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel part has 6 cores and 12 threads. This core count difference contributes to the multi-core performance gap, but the single-core advantage shows that architectural efficiency plays a role as well. The AMD processor has a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The Intel processor has a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz.

Cache configurations differ between the two parts. The AMD processor provides 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel processor provides 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 20 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel part actually has a larger cache per core and more L3 cache in total, yet it still trails in performance, indicating that the AMD architecture extracts more efficiency from its cache hierarchy.

Memory support shows another divergence. The AMD processor supports DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus and a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus, though the database does not record a bandwidth figure for it. Both processors support ECC memory, which matters for workstation and server applications.

PCIe connectivity differs by generation. The AMD processor provides Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU. The Intel processor provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The newer PCIe standard on the Intel side offers higher potential bandwidth for compatible devices, though the AMD part provides more lanes.

The integrated graphics solutions also differ. The AMD processor includes Radeon 780M graphics, while the Intel processor includes UHD Graphics 730. The database does not record graphics benchmark scores for either processor, so the comparison remains limited to the CPU-focused data available.

The transistor count and die size provide additional context. The AMD processor contains 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die. The Intel processor has no recorded transistor count but uses a 215 mm² die. The smaller die with more transistors reflects the denser 4 nm manufacturing process used by TSMC.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS has 8 cores and 16 threads. The Intel Core i5-14401E has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: What is the performance difference in Cinebench R23 multi-core?

A: The AMD processor scores 24565 points, while the Intel processor scores 18161 points. This represents a 35.3 percent advantage for the AMD part.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS and the Intel Core i5-14401E support ECC memory according to the database records.

Q: What socket types do these processors use?

A: The AMD processor uses AMD Socket FP7. The Intel processor uses Intel Socket 1700.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS has a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The Intel Core i5-14401E has a boost clock of 4.70 GHz.

Q: What PCIe generation does each processor support?

A: The AMD processor supports PCIe Gen 4 with 20 CPU lanes. The Intel processor supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS wins in every recorded benchmark category. The Cinebench R15, R20, and R23 tests all show the AMD part ahead by 35.3 percent in both single-core and multi-core configurations. This translates to advantages in rendering workloads, video encoding, software compilation, and any CPU-bound productivity task. The higher core count of 8 versus 6 helps in multi-threaded scenarios, while the higher boost clock of 5.10 GHz versus 4.70 GHz contributes to single-thread performance.

The AMD processor also benefits from its mobile market segment designation. The 45 watt TDP, while not directly compared to the Intel part's 65 watt TDP in the data, suggests the AMD processor is designed for systems where power consumption matters. The 4 nm manufacturing process and smaller die size of 178 mm² versus 215 mm² indicate a more compact and potentially more efficient design.

The Intel Core i5-14401E wins in specific platform considerations rather than raw performance. Its desktop market segment means it targets tower and workstation builds. The Socket 1700 interface provides access to a wide range of Intel motherboards. The dual memory support for DDR4 and DDR5 offers flexibility for system builders who want to reuse existing DDR4 memory modules or adopt newer DDR5 technology.

The Intel processor's PCIe Gen 5 support provides compatibility with the latest generation of high-bandwidth devices, including modern graphics cards and NVMe storage. The 16 lanes available from the CPU are fewer than the AMD part's 20 lanes, but the newer standard offers higher per-lane bandwidth. The UHD Graphics 730 integrated solution provides basic display output for systems without a discrete graphics card.

For users building a new desktop system with DDR4 memory already available, the Intel part offers a path forward without requiring a memory upgrade. For users who prioritize maximum CPU performance in a mobile or compact form factor, the AMD processor delivers superior scores across the board. The data shows no scenario where the Intel processor outperforms the AMD part in processing capability, but the platform features and memory flexibility give the Intel processor a distinct role in specific system configurations.