AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS vs Intel Core i5-14501E Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data presents an unusual comparison: the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS has a full suite of benchmark results, while the Intel Core i5-14501E has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. This makes a direct score-by-score comparison impossible. The Intel part's average benchmark score is recorded as 0, and its nearest rivals list is empty. The AMD processor, by contrast, has a recorded average benchmark score of 39,325 and sits at the 86th percentile of all CPUs in the database.

For the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS, the multi-threaded results are substantial. Cinebench R23 multi-core shows a score of 24,565, while Cinebench R20 multi-core is 10,317 and Cinebench R15 multi-core is 2,476. Single-core results are 3,468 in Cinebench R23, 1,456 in Cinebench R20, and 349 in Cinebench R15. PassMark multi-thread testing delivers 28,572, with integer math at 97,625 and floating point math at 58,965. Data compression in PassMark reaches 343,952, while data encryption is 20,487 and extended instructions are 25,434. Random string sorting is 41,867, physics is 1,389, and prime number finding is 87. The PassMark single-thread score is 3,762.

Because the Intel Core i5-14501E has no benchmark entries, the head-to-head comparison is one-sided. The database does not record a single winning metric for the Intel processor, and the win count for the AMD part is 0 as well, reflecting the absence of matched tests rather than a true tie. The data can only characterize the AMD processor's absolute performance levels and its position relative to other parts in the database. For the Intel processor, no measured performance data exists to analyze.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS wins in every category where data exists, simply because it is the only one of the two with recorded measurements. Its 8 cores and 16 threads, based on the Zen 4 architecture in the Hawk Point codename, produce strong multi-threaded results across Cinebench and PassMark. The 4 nm process node from TSMC, with 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die, supports these results. The processor also integrates Radeon 780M graphics, which is relevant for systems that rely on the integrated GPU.

The Intel Core i5-14501E, with 6 cores and 12 threads on the Raptor Lake architecture, has no benchmark scores in the database. It is a desktop part with a 65 Watt TDP, uses Intel Socket 1700, and is built on a 10 nm process node from Intel with a 215 mm² die size. Its memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5, and it has a dual-channel memory bus. The integrated graphics are UHD Graphics 770. Its PCIe support is Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. None of these features translate into measured performance scores in the database.

The AMD processor's position in the database is clearer. Its average benchmark score of 39,325 places it near several rivals. The AMD EPYC 4245P has an average score of 39,215, which is 0.3% lower than the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 has an average score of 39,485, which is 0.4% higher. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS has an average score of 39,603, which is 0.7% higher. The Intel Core i7-13700F has an average score of 39,009, which is 0.8% lower. These deltas show the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS sits within a narrow band of performance around these four parts, slightly ahead of the EPYC 4245P and Core i7-13700F, and slightly behind the two other Ryzen parts. The 86th percentile ranking across all CPUs reinforces that this is a high-performing mobile processor in the database's overall distribution.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear conclusion: the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS has extensive recorded benchmark results, while the Intel Core i5-14501E has none. A user choosing between these two based on the database would have no measured performance data for the Intel part, making the AMD processor the only option with verifiable performance. The AMD part delivers strong multi-threaded and single-threaded scores, with Cinebench R23 multi-core at 24,565 and PassMark single-thread at 3,762. Its average benchmark score of 39,325 and 86th percentile ranking place it among the higher-performing CPUs in the database.

The Intel Core i5-14501E, despite being a desktop part with a higher TDP of 65 Watts and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, has no scores to substantiate its performance. Its boost clock is 5.20 GHz, slightly higher than the AMD part's 5.10 GHz, and its base clock is 3.30 GHz versus the AMD part's 3.80 GHz. The Intel part has 6 cores and 12 threads, fewer than the AMD part's 8 cores and 16 threads. Its L3 cache is 24 MB shared, larger than the AMD part's 16 MB shared. These specifications are recorded, but they do not produce benchmark values in the database.

The verdict from the recorded data is straightforward: the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS is the only processor of the two with measurable performance, and its results are strong. The Intel Core i5-14501E cannot be evaluated on performance grounds from the available data. For any workload where benchmark scores matter, the AMD processor is the data-supported choice.

FAQ

Q: Does the Intel Core i5-14501E have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: No. The Intel Core i5-14501E has an empty benchmarks list, an average benchmark score of 0, and no nearest rivals recorded.

Q: What is the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS average benchmark score and percentile ranking?

A: The average benchmark score is 39,325, and it ranks at the 86th percentile of all CPUs in the database.

Q: How does the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS compare to its nearest rivals in average score?

A: It is 0.3% ahead of the AMD EPYC 4245P, 0.4% behind the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450, 0.7% behind the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS, and 0.8% ahead of the Intel Core i7-13700F.

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS has 8 cores and 16 threads. The Intel Core i5-14501E has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: What are the clock speeds for the two processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS has a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The Intel Core i5-14501E has a base clock of 3.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz.

Q: Which processor has a larger L3 cache?

A: The Intel Core i5-14501E has 24 MB of shared L3 cache, while the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS has 16 MB of shared L3 cache.

Architecture Differences

The two processors differ substantially in architecture. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS uses the Zen 4 architecture with the Hawk Point codename, part of the 8000 series and the Ryzen 7 generation. It is built on a 4 nm process node from TSMC, with 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die. The Intel Core i5-14501E uses the Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-R codename, part of the Core 14th Gen series and the Core i5 generation. It is built on a 10 nm process node from Intel, with a 215 mm² die size. Transistor count for the Intel part is not recorded.

Core and cache configurations also differ. The AMD part has 8 cores and 16 threads, with 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel part has 6 cores and 12 threads, with 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. Neither processor has 3D V-Cache recorded.

Memory support separates the two. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS supports DDR5 memory only, with a dual-channel memory bus and a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel Core i5-14501E supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also with a dual-channel memory bus, but its memory bandwidth is not recorded. Both processors support ECC memory.

PCIe capabilities differ by generation. The AMD part uses PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU only. The Intel part uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU only. Integrated graphics also differ: the AMD part has Radeon 780M, while the Intel part has UHD Graphics 770.

The market segments and sockets are distinct. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS is a mobile processor using AMD Socket FP7, with part numbers 100-000001316 (FP7r2) and 100-000001387 (FP7). The Intel Core i5-14501E is a desktop processor using Intel Socket 1700, with part number Q49HSRNJM. The AMD part has a TDP of 45 Watts, while the Intel part has a TDP of 65 Watts. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier, and neither has a recorded launch MSRP. The AMD part was released on 2024-04-15, and the Intel part was released on 2024-06-30. Both are marked as active in production.