AMD Ryzen 3 110 vs AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no head-to-head benchmark entries for the AMD Ryzen 3 110 and the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i. Both processors have an empty benchmarks array, and the headToHeadBenchmarks field is also empty. Consequently, there are no recorded wins for either part, and the winsA and winsB counters both stand at zero. This absence of measured data means any direct performance comparison must be inferred from the specification sheets rather than from actual test results.

The Ryzen 3 110 carries a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.30 GHz. The Ryzen AI Embedded P185i starts lower at 2.00 GHz base but boosts higher to 5.10 GHz. The boost advantage for the embedded part is 0.80 GHz, which suggests a meaningful single-thread ceiling advantage in short bursts, assuming thermal and power limits allow that frequency to be reached. However, without benchmark scores, the practical impact of that higher boost cannot be quantified from the recorded data.

On core count, the Ryzen AI Embedded P185i offers 12 cores and 24 threads, versus 4 cores and 8 threads for the Ryzen 3 110. That is a 3x difference in cores and threads. For workloads that scale with thread count, the embedded chip should decisively outperform the Ryzen 3 110, but again, no measured deltas exist in the database to confirm the magnitude.

Cache capacity also diverges sharply. The Ryzen 3 110 provides 8 MB of shared L3 cache, while the Ryzen AI Embedded P185i has 16 MB of L3. The per-core L2 allocation likewise differs: 512 KB per core on the Ryzen 3 110 versus 1 MB per core on the P185i. The P185i also has a larger L1 at 80 KB per core versus 64 KB per core on the Ryzen 3 110. These cache differences point to better data locality and reduced memory latency pressure for the embedded part in cache-sensitive workloads.

Memory bandwidth favors the Ryzen AI Embedded P185i as well. It supports both DDR5 and LPDDR5X with a recorded bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the Ryzen 3 110 supports DDR5 only at 76.8 GB/s. That is a 12.8 GB/s gap, roughly 17% higher bandwidth for the embedded part. For memory-bound tasks such as large dataset manipulation or integrated graphics workloads, this gap can matter.

Both processors are rated at a 28 W TDP, which is notable given the large core-count difference. The Ryzen 3 110 uses a 6 nm process node from TSMC, while the Ryzen AI Embedded P185i uses a 4 nm node from the same foundry. The smaller node helps explain how the P185i fits three times the cores into the same thermal envelope.

The integrated graphics differ as well. The Ryzen 3 110 ships with Radeon 660M, while the Ryzen AI Embedded P185i has Radeon 890M. No benchmark data for either iGPU is present in the database, so the performance relationship is qualitative. The 890M is the more advanced part in the naming hierarchy, but no numbers back that up here.

Both processors occupy the Mobile market segment and are listed as Active in production status. The Ryzen 3 110 uses AMD Socket FP7, and the Ryzen AI Embedded P185i uses AMD Socket FP8. Neither supports an unlocked multiplier. Both support ECC memory. PCIe connectivity is Gen 4 for both, but the lane counts differ: 20 lanes on the Ryzen 3 110 versus 16 lanes on the P185i. That gives the Ryzen 3 110 a small expansion advantage despite its otherwise lower feature set.

Where Each One Wins

Without benchmark scores, wins must be assigned based on the recorded specifications. The Ryzen AI Embedded P185i wins on core count, thread count, boost clock, L1 cache per core, L2 cache per core, L3 cache total, memory bandwidth, memory type flexibility, and process node. It is the stronger part on nearly every computational metric in the database.

The Ryzen 3 110 wins on base clock, PCIe lane count, and socket compatibility. Its 3.00 GHz base clock is a full 1.00 GHz higher than the P185i's 2.00 GHz base. For sustained all-core workloads that run at base frequency rather than boost, the Ryzen 3 110 may hold an advantage, but the P185i's higher boost and far larger core count make that a narrow and situational benefit. The extra 4 PCIe lanes on the Ryzen 3 110 could support additional Gen 4 devices, though both parts are adequate for typical mobile configurations.

The Ryzen 3 110 also has a later release date in the database: 2025-09-30 versus 2026-02-28 for the P185i. The P185i is the newer part by roughly five months. The Ryzen 3 110 uses the Rembrandt-R codename with Zen 3+ architecture, while the P185i uses Gorgon Point with a Zen 5 / Zen 5c generation label. The P185i is architecturally newer and built on a smaller node.

For users prioritizing single-thread burst performance, the P185i's 5.10 GHz boost is the standout figure. For users prioritizing expansion capability, the Ryzen 3 110's 20 PCIe lanes edge out the P185i's 16. For everything else, the P185i appears dominant on paper.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i has 12 cores and 24 threads. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has 4 cores and 8 threads.

Q: What are the boost clock differences between the two?

A: The Ryzen AI Embedded P185i boosts to 5.10 GHz, while the Ryzen 3 110 boosts to 4.30 GHz. The P185i also has a lower base clock at 2.00 GHz versus 3.00 GHz on the Ryzen 3 110.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen 3 110 and the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i list ECC memory support as true in the database.

Q: Which processor supports faster memory bandwidth?

A: The Ryzen AI Embedded P185i supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Ryzen 3 110 supports DDR5 only at 76.8 GB/s.

Q: Are both processors unlocked for overclocking?

A: No. Both the Ryzen 3 110 and the Ryzen AI Embedded P185i have multiplierUnlocked set to false.

Q: What process nodes do the two processors use?

A: The Ryzen 3 110 uses a 6 nm TSMC node. The Ryzen AI Embedded P185i uses a 4 nm TSMC node.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ on nearly every major specification field. Core count is 4 versus 12. Thread count is 8 versus 24. Base clock is 3.00 GHz versus 2.00 GHz. Boost clock is 4.30 GHz versus 5.10 GHz. Both are rated at 28 W TDP, so power draw is identical on paper despite the vast core-count gap.

Socket type differs: FP7 for the Ryzen 3 110, FP8 for the Ryzen AI Embedded P185i. These sockets are not interchangeable, so motherboard compatibility is mutually exclusive. Process node differs: 6 nm versus 4 nm, both TSMC. Die size differs: 210 mm² for the Ryzen 3 110 versus 233 mm² for the P185i. The P185i is slightly larger physically despite the smaller node, which aligns with its higher core count and larger cache.

Cache hierarchy differs completely. L1 is 64 KB per core on the Ryzen 3 110 versus 80 KB per core on the P185i. L2 is 512 KB per core versus 1 MB per core. L3 is 8 MB shared versus 16 MB. Every cache level is larger on the P185i.

Memory support differs. The Ryzen 3 110 lists DDR5 only. The P185i lists DDR5 and LPDDR5X. Memory bandwidth is 76.8 GB/s versus 89.6 GB/s. Both are dual-channel.

PCIe support differs in lane count: 20 lanes on the Ryzen 3 110 versus 16 lanes on the P185i. Both are Gen 4. Integrated graphics differ: Radeon 660M on the Ryzen 3 110 versus Radeon 890M on the P185i.

Release dates differ. The Ryzen 3 110 is dated 2025-09-30. The P185i is dated 2026-02-28. The part number for the Ryzen 3 110 is 100-000000549 (FP7r2), while the P185i part number is listed as unknown.

Architecture Differences

The Ryzen 3 110 uses the Zen 3+ architecture under the codename Rembrandt-R, built on a 6 nm TSMC process. The Ryzen AI Embedded P185i uses a Zen 5 / Zen 5c hybrid design under the codename Gorgon Point, built on a 4 nm TSMC process. This is a two-generation architectural jump, and the database records the P185i generation label as "Ryzen AI Embedded (Zen 5 / Zen 5c)" versus "Ryzen 3 (Zen 3+ (Rembrandt))" for the Ryzen 3 110.

The Zen 3+ design in the Ryzen 3 110 uses a 210 mm² die with 4 cores. The Zen 5 / Zen 5c design in the P185i uses a 233 mm² die with 12 cores. The P185i packs three times the cores into only 23 mm² more silicon, which reflects both the node shrink and the higher-density Zen 5c cores.

Cache architecture differs in both capacity and per-core allocation. The Ryzen 3 110 provides 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and 8 MB shared L3. The P185i provides 80 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 16 MB L3. The larger per-core L1 and L2 on the P185i suggest a deeper, more aggressive core design. The total L3 on the P185i is double that of the Ryzen 3 110.

The integrated graphics represent a generational leap. The Ryzen 3 110 uses Radeon 660M, while the P185i uses Radeon 890M. No benchmark scores are recorded for either GPU, but the naming and the architecture generation indicate the 890M is the newer and presumably more capable iGPU. The P185i also supports LPDDR5X memory in addition to DDR5, which can benefit integrated graphics performance due to the higher bandwidth ceiling.

Both parts are built by TSMC, so foundry is identical. Both support ECC memory. Both are locked. The P185i is the more advanced part in every architectural dimension recorded in the database.

The Verdict

The recorded data points to the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i as the stronger processor on almost every measurable specification. It has 3x the cores, 3x the threads, double the L3 cache, larger per-core L1 and L2 caches, higher boost clock, higher memory bandwidth, broader memory type support, a newer architecture generation, and a smaller process node. All of these are objective specification advantages, and none are offset by a higher TDP, since both parts are rated at 28 W.

The AMD Ryzen 3 110 retains advantages in base clock, PCIe lane count, and release timing. A 3.00 GHz base clock versus 2.00 GHz gives it a sustained frequency edge for workloads that run at base speeds. The extra 4 PCIe lanes may matter for configurations that need additional Gen 4 devices. Its earlier release date of 2025-09-30 means it has been on the market longer than the P185i, which is dated 2026-02-28.

For a user choosing between these two for a mobile or embedded build, the P185i is the clear pick on computational capability. The higher core count and thread count, combined with the larger cache and faster boost, make it suitable for heavily threaded workloads such as compilation, rendering, or data processing. The Radeon 890M iGPU and LPDDR5X support also make it the stronger choice for integrated-graphics scenarios.

The Ryzen 3 110 makes sense only in a narrow set of conditions: when the FP7 socket is already required, when the base clock advantage is the dominant factor for the workload, or when the extra PCIe lanes are essential. Its lower core count and smaller cache will limit it in multi-threaded tasks, and its older Zen 3+ architecture and 6 nm node place it behind the P185i in efficiency potential.

The database shows no benchmark results for either part, so these conclusions rest entirely on specification analysis. The percentileVsAllCpus field is 50 for both, indicating neither part has a recorded performance percentile advantage in the current dataset. Buyers should treat the P185i as the higher-capability part based on its specification sheet, while the Ryzen 3 110 remains a viable lower-core-count alternative for socket-specific or lane-specific requirements.