AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i vs Intel Core i5-14400F Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i and the Intel Core i5-14400F address different computing priorities. The AMD part carries 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Intel processor provides 10 cores and 16 threads. This core and thread disparity shapes where each processor demonstrates its strengths.

The Intel Core i5-14400F belongs to the desktop market segment and holds an 83rd percentile ranking among all CPUs in the database. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i sits at the 50th percentile. The Intel chip has an average benchmark score of 32,279, whereas the AMD part has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. This absence of measured data for the AMD processor means direct comparisons rely on architectural specifications rather than observed performance.

The Intel Core i5-14400F delivers a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, which supports single-thread workloads. Its single-core Cinebench R23 score reaches 3,055, and its Geekbench single-core score is 2,058. These figures indicate strong responsiveness for applications that depend on one or two cores, such as everyday desktop tasks and lightly threaded productivity software.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i offers a higher boost clock at 5.10 GHz, which suggests potential for competitive single-thread performance despite lacking recorded benchmark scores. Its 12-core, 24-thread configuration provides more parallel execution capacity than the Intel part's 10-core, 16-thread layout. For heavily threaded workloads like rendering, video encoding, and scientific computing, the AMD processor's additional cores and threads create a structural advantage.

The Intel part shows strong multi-thread results in recorded data. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score reaches 21,645, and its Passmark multithread score is 25,470. These numbers place it well ahead of several nearby rivals in the database, including the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U by 0.1 percent, the Intel Core i9-11900 by 0.2 percent, and the Intel Core i7-12800H by 0.5 percent. It trails the AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS by 0.2 percent.

The AMD embedded processor targets the mobile segment with a 28 W TDP, whereas the Intel desktop chip consumes 65 W. This power envelope difference points to distinct use cases: the AMD part suits power-constrained mobile or embedded systems, while the Intel chip fits conventional desktop builds where power draw matters less.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different architectural lineages. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i uses the Gorgon Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI Embedded generation built on Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. The Intel Core i5-14400F uses Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R variant, and represents the Core 14th Gen family as part of the Raptor Lake Refresh.

Manufacturing processes differ substantially. AMD fabricates its chip on a 4 nm process at TSMC, while Intel uses a 10 nm process at its own foundry. The AMD process node offers higher transistor density, which typically enables better power efficiency per unit of performance. The die sizes also differ: AMD measures 233 mm², while Intel comes in at 215 mm².

Cache hierarchies present another contrast. Both processors allocate 80 KB of L1 cache per core. The L2 cache differs: AMD provides 1 MB per core, while Intel offers 1.25 MB per core. The L3 cache shows a notable split. AMD has 16 MB total, while Intel provides 20 MB shared. The Intel chip's larger shared L3 cache can benefit workloads with repeated data access across cores.

Memory support diverges as well. The AMD processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory through a dual-channel bus with a rated bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel processor supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus, though the database records no bandwidth figure for it. Both processors support ECC memory, which matters for reliability-focused systems.

PCIe capabilities differ significantly. The AMD chip provides Gen 4 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The Intel chip provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The Intel part's PCIe Gen 5 support enables faster connectivity for compatible storage and graphics devices, while the AMD part's Gen 4 implementation remains adequate for most current peripherals.

Integrated graphics separate the two clearly. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i includes a Radeon 890M integrated GPU, making it suitable for systems without a discrete graphics card. The Intel Core i5-14400F has no integrated graphics, as indicated by the N/A designation, so it requires a separate GPU for any display output.

The AMD processor uses AMD Socket FP8, a mobile and embedded socket. The Intel processor uses Intel Socket 1700, a desktop socket. This socket difference reinforces their distinct market positions: the AMD part targets compact, power-efficient embedded systems, while the Intel part targets standard desktop platforms.

The Verdict

The recorded data indicates the Intel Core i5-14400F delivers proven multi-thread performance with a 32,279 average benchmark score and an 83rd percentile ranking. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21,645 and Geekbench multi-core score of 11,268 establish a solid baseline for desktop workloads. The processor nearly matches the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U with a 0.1 percent score difference and stays within 0.5 percent of the Intel Core i7-12800H.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i offers architectural advantages that the Intel part cannot match. Its 24 threads versus 16 threads provide more parallel capacity. Its 5.10 GHz boost clock exceeds the Intel part's 4.70 GHz. The 4 nm TSMC process node suggests better power efficiency than Intel's 10 nm process. The 28 W TDP compared to 65 W makes the AMD chip suitable for thermally constrained environments.

The database contains no benchmark scores for the AMD processor, so its actual performance remains unquantified. The Intel processor has extensive recorded measurements across Cinebench, Geekbench, and Passmark suites. Buyers seeking verified desktop performance should favor the Intel chip. Buyers prioritizing thread count, power efficiency, and integrated graphics in a mobile or embedded form factor should consider the AMD part.

The launch MSRP for the Intel Core i5-14400F is $196. The AMD processor has no recorded launch MSRP in the database.

FAQ

Q: How many cores and threads does each processor have?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i has 12 cores and 24 threads. The Intel Core i5-14400F has 10 cores and 16 threads.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: Both processors support ECC memory. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i and the Intel Core i5-14400F both list ECC memory as enabled.

Q: Does the Intel Core i5-14400F have integrated graphics?

A: No. The Intel Core i5-14400F lists integrated graphics as N/A, meaning it requires a discrete graphics card for display output. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i includes a Radeon 890M integrated GPU.

Q: What is the difference in boost clock speeds?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i boosts to 5.10 GHz. The Intel Core i5-14400F boosts to 4.70 GHz.

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core i5-14400F has an average benchmark score of 32,279. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i has no recorded benchmark scores in the database.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X. The Intel Core i5-14400F supports DDR4 and DDR5.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains recorded benchmark scores only for the Intel Core i5-14400F. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i has no benchmark entries, so direct head-to-head numerical comparisons cannot be made. However, the Intel chip's scores against its nearest rivals provide context for its performance tier.

In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the Intel Core i5-14400F scores 2,181. Its single-core score reaches 307. These figures show the chip's balanced output across multi-thread and single-thread rendering workloads.

Cinebench R20 results show 9,090 multi-core and 1,283 single-core. Cinebench R23 results show 21,645 multi-core and 3,055 single-core. The progression from R15 through R23 demonstrates consistent scaling across Cinebench versions.

Geekbench results place the Intel chip at 11,268 multi-core and 2,058 single-core. These scores align with its percentile ranking of 83 among all CPUs in the database.

Passmark suite results cover a range of workload types. The Intel chip scores 315,521 in data compression, 16,949 in data encryption, and 19,937 in extended instructions. It achieves 86 in finding prime numbers, 61,319 in floating point math, and 81,524 in integer math. Its multithread score is 25,470, physics score is 1,523, and random string sorting score is 32,680. Single-thread performance registers at 3,701.

The Intel chip's nearest rivals in the database include the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U with an average score of 32,233, placing the Intel part 0.1 percent ahead. The Intel Core i9-11900 scores 32,226, putting the i5-14400F 0.2 percent ahead. The AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS scores 32,354, which places the Intel part 0.2 percent behind. The Intel Core i7-12800H scores 32,121, putting the i5-14400F 0.5 percent ahead.

These narrow margins indicate the Intel Core i5-14400F sits in a competitive cluster of mid-range and upper-mid-range processors. Its performance relative to these rivals shows consistency across workloads, with no single competitor dominating by a large margin.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across multiple specification fields. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i belongs to the Ryzen AI Embedded series with Gorgon Point codename, while the Intel Core i5-14400F belongs to the Core 14th Gen series with Raptor Lake codename.

Core counts differ: AMD provides 12 cores and 24 threads, Intel provides 10 cores and 16 threads. Base clocks differ: AMD runs at 2.00 GHz, Intel runs at 2.50 GHz. Boost clocks differ: AMD reaches 5.10 GHz, Intel reaches 4.70 GHz.

TDP values differ substantially: AMD draws 28 W, Intel draws 65 W. Sockets differ: AMD uses AMD Socket FP8, Intel uses Intel Socket 1700.

Process nodes differ: AMD uses 4 nm from TSMC, Intel uses 10 nm from Intel. Die sizes differ: AMD measures 233 mm², Intel measures 215 mm².

L2 cache differs: AMD provides 1 MB per core, Intel provides 1.25 MB per core. L3 cache differs: AMD has 16 MB, Intel has 20 MB shared.

Memory support differs: AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5. Memory bandwidth differs: AMD records 89.6 GB/s, Intel records no figure.

PCIe support differs: AMD provides Gen 4 with 16 lanes, Intel provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes. Integrated graphics differ: AMD includes Radeon 890M, Intel has N/A.

Market segments differ: AMD targets Mobile, Intel targets Desktop. Release dates differ: AMD releases on 2026-02-28, Intel releases on 2024-01-07. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $196, while the AMD part records no launch MSRP.

Both processors use dual-channel memory buses, support ECC memory, and ship with locked multipliers. Neither processor has unlocked overclocking capability.