AMD Ryzen 3 110 vs AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains benchmark scores for the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132, but no directly comparable scores are recorded for the AMD Ryzen 3 110. This means the head-to-head comparison must be built from the P132's measured results and the architectural data available for both processors. The P132's average benchmark score is 37,804, placing it in the 86th percentile of all CPUs in the database. This is a strong result, but without a direct benchmark score for the Ryzen 3 110, the comparison relies on the P132's absolute performance numbers and the known specifications of the Ryzen 3 110.

Looking at the P132's individual benchmark results, the strongest areas are data compression, integer math, and floating point math. The data compression score of 230,437 is exceptionally high, indicating that the processor handles compression workloads with high efficiency. Integer math scores 62,249, while floating point math scores 42,248. These numbers show a processor that excels in compute-heavy tasks, likely due to its core configuration and modern architecture. The single-thread score of 3,713 is also notable, suggesting strong per-core performance that would benefit lightly threaded applications.

The P132's nearest rivals in the database provide context for its overall performance. It sits 0.1% behind the Intel Core 5 211E, which scores 37,829, and 0.1% ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435, which scores 37,762. It trails the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 by 0.3% and the Intel Core i9-14901E by 0.3%. These deltas are extremely small, placing the P132 in a tight performance cluster. The data shows that the P132 is competitive with these higher-tier processors, despite having fewer cores than some of them. The differences are within measurement noise, but the P132's position in the 86th percentile confirms its overall capability.

The Ryzen 3 110, by contrast, has no recorded benchmark scores in the database and no nearest rivals listed. Its average benchmark score is listed as 0, and its percentile is 50. This does not mean the processor is incapable; it means the database lacks sufficient measurements to place it accurately. The absence of data is a significant limitation for a direct head-to-head comparison. What can be stated is that the P132 has a measured average score of 37,804, while the Ryzen 3 110 has no recorded score to compare against.

Architecture Differences

The two processors differ fundamentally in their underlying architectures. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 uses the Zen 3+ architecture, codenamed Rembrandt-R, built on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 uses a Zen 5 / Zen 5c architecture, codenamed Gorgon Point, built on a 4 nm process, also at TSMC. The newer process node for the P132 suggests higher transistor density and potentially better power efficiency, though the database does not provide transistor counts for either chip.

Core counts differ as well. The Ryzen 3 110 has 4 cores and 8 threads, while the P132 has 6 cores and 12 threads. This gives the P132 a 50% advantage in core count and thread count, which directly impacts multi-threaded workloads. The cache hierarchy also differs. The Ryzen 3 110 has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 cache per core, and 8 MB of shared L3 cache. The P132 has 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and only 4 MB of L3 cache. The larger per-core L1 and L2 caches on the P132 may improve per-core performance, but its smaller L3 cache could limit performance in workloads that rely heavily on shared cache access.

Clock speeds favor the P132 in terms of boost, but the Ryzen 3 110 has a higher base clock. The Ryzen 3 110 has a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.30 GHz. The P132 has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz. The higher boost clock on the P132 gives it an advantage in bursty, single-threaded tasks, while the Ryzen 3 110's higher base clock suggests better sustained performance at lower power states. Both processors have a TDP of 28 Watts, so power consumption is identical on paper.

Memory support differs. The Ryzen 3 110 supports DDR5 memory only, with a dual-channel bus and a recorded bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. The P132 supports both DDR5 and LPDDR5X, also with a dual-channel bus, and has a higher recorded bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. Both support ECC memory. PCIe connectivity also differs: the Ryzen 3 110 has Gen 4 with 20 lanes, while the P132 has Gen 4 with 14 lanes. The Ryzen 3 110 offers more PCIe lanes, which could matter for expansion or storage configurations.

The integrated graphics differ as well. The Ryzen 3 110 includes a Radeon 660M, while the P132 includes a Radeon 840M. The database does not provide benchmark scores for either iGPU, so no performance comparison is possible. The sockets are different: the Ryzen 3 110 uses AMD Socket FP7, while the P132 uses AMD Socket FP8. This means they are not drop-in compatible with each other.

Where Each One Wins

Based on the recorded data, the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 wins in every measurable category. Its multi-thread score is 19,262, which directly reflects its 6-core, 12-thread configuration. The Ryzen 3 110 has no recorded multi-thread score, so it cannot be compared directly. The P132's single-thread score of 3,713 indicates strong per-core performance, and its boost clock of 4.50 GHz supports this. The Ryzen 3 110 has a lower boost clock of 4.30 GHz, which suggests it would trail in single-threaded tasks, but without a benchmark score, this remains an inference from the clock data.

The P132 also wins on memory bandwidth, with 89.6 GB/s compared to the Ryzen 3 110's 76.8 GB/s. This gives the P132 an advantage in memory-intensive workloads such as data compression, where its score of 230,437 is the highest recorded among its benchmark suite. The P132's LPDDR5X support adds flexibility for mobile designs, while the Ryzen 3 110 is limited to DDR5. The P132's newer 4 nm process and Zen 5 architecture likely contribute to its higher performance per watt, though the database does not provide efficiency metrics.

The Ryzen 3 110 does have some advantages from its specification sheet. It offers more PCIe lanes, 20 versus 14, which could be beneficial for systems requiring additional expansion. Its higher base clock of 3.00 GHz versus 2.00 GHz suggests it may sustain performance better under continuous load without boosting. Its larger L3 cache of 8 MB versus 4 MB could benefit workloads that share data across cores. However, none of these advantages are backed by benchmark scores in the database, so they remain theoretical strengths rather than measured ones.

The Verdict

The data clearly favors the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132. It has a measured average benchmark score of 37,804, placing it in the 86th percentile of all CPUs. The Ryzen 3 110 has no recorded benchmark score and sits at the 50th percentile by default. The P132 offers more cores, more threads, a higher boost clock, newer architecture, a smaller process node, and higher memory bandwidth. Every measurable metric in the database points to the P132 as the stronger processor.

The Ryzen 3 110 may still be suitable for scenarios where its specific features matter. Its higher base clock and larger L3 cache could be advantageous in certain sustained workloads, and its additional PCIe lanes might serve systems that need more expansion capacity. Its smaller die size of 210 mm² is recorded, while the P132's die size is not listed. However, the absence of benchmark data for the Ryzen 3 110 means it cannot be recommended on measured performance. The P132's benchmark results, including its high data compression score and competitive standing against processors like the Intel Core 5 211E and AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, make it the clear choice based on the available information.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score of the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132?

A: The recorded average benchmark score is 37,804.

Q: How does the P132 compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core 5 211E?

A: The P132 trails the Intel Core 5 211E by 0.1%, with the rival scoring 37,829.

Q: How many cores and threads does each processor have?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has 4 cores and 8 threads, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: What is the boost clock difference between the two processors?

A: The Ryzen 3 110 has a boost clock of 4.30 GHz, while the P132 has a boost clock of 4.50 GHz.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen 3 110 and the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 support ECC memory.

Q: What is the process node for each processor?

A: The Ryzen 3 110 is built on a 6 nm process, while the P132 is built on a 4 nm process, both at TSMC.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 3 110 | AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 |

| --- | --- | --- |

| Cores | 4 | 6 |

| Threads | 8 | 12 |

| Base Clock | 3.00 GHz | 2.00 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.30 GHz | 4.50 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 28 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP7 | AMD Socket FP8 |

| Architecture | Zen 3+ | Zen 5 / Zen 5c |

| Codename | Rembrandt-R | Gorgon Point |

| Process Node | 6 nm | 4 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | TSMC |

| Die Size | 210 mm² | Not listed |

| L1 Cache | 64 KB per core | 80 KB per core |

| L2 Cache | 512 KB per core | 1 MB per core |

| L3 Cache | 8 MB shared | 4 MB |

| Memory Support | DDR5 | DDR5, LPDDR5X |

| Memory Bus | Dual-channel | Dual-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 89.6 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | Yes | Yes |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 20 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 4, 14 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 660M | Radeon 840M |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Mobile |

| Production Status | Active | Active |

| Release Date | 2025-09-30 | 2026-03-08 |

| Multiplier Unlocked | No | No |

| Part Number | 100-000000549 (FP7r2) | Unknown |