AMD Ryzen 3 110 vs AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a clear performance gap between the AMD Ryzen 3 110 and the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS, with the Ryzen 5 winning every benchmark category where both have recorded scores. The Ryzen 5 7533HS achieves an average benchmark score of 19,364, placing it in the 73rd percentile among all CPUs in the database. The Ryzen 3 110 has no recorded individual benchmark scores and sits at the 50th percentile, meaning it falls squarely in the middle of the distribution while the Ryzen 5 outranks roughly three-quarters of the field.

In Cinebench R23, the Ryzen 5 7533HS posts a multi-core score of 12,342 and a single-core score of 1,742. The Ryzen 3 110 has no corresponding Cinebench R23 entries in the database, so direct percentage deltas cannot be calculated. However, the architectural data points to why the gap exists: the Ryzen 5 uses 6 cores and 12 threads versus 4 cores and 8 threads on the Ryzen 3, and the Ryzen 5 carries 16 MB of shared L3 cache versus 8 MB on the Ryzen 3.

Looking at older Cinebench versions, the Ryzen 5 7533HS scores 5,183 in Cinebench R20 multi-core and 731 in single-core. In Cinebench R15, it scores 1,243 multi-core and 175 single-core. These results indicate a processor that scales well across rendering workloads, with multi-core performance roughly seven times its single-core score in R15, which is typical for a 6-core part with simultaneous multithreading.

PassMark results reinforce the same pattern. The Ryzen 5 7533HS achieves a multi-thread score of 14,520 and a single-thread score of 2,740 (listed twice in the database as both "single_thread" and "singlethread"). In integer math, it scores 50,800, while floating-point math reaches 27,800. Data compression hits 168,692, data encryption reaches 10,718, and extended instructions score 11,219. Random string sorting produces 17,669, and the find prime numbers test returns a score of 48. The physics test yields 821.

The Ryzen 3 110 has no PassMark entries in the database, so every comparison against the Ryzen 5 must rely on the specification differences rather than measured deltas. What the data does show is that the Ryzen 5 7533HS sits in a competitive position against its nearest rivals. The Intel Core Ultra 5 226V scores 19,368, a delta of 0% against the Ryzen 5. The Intel Core i5-1345U scores 19,411, which is 0.2% higher. The Intel Core i7-8700K scores 19,238, putting it 0.7% lower. The Intel Core i7-10700F scores 19,499, which is 0.7% higher. These deltas are all within a single percentage point, placing the Ryzen 5 in a tightly contested band of processors.

The Verdict

The data indicates that the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS is the stronger processor for multi-threaded workloads. It offers 50% more cores and 50% more threads than the Ryzen 3 110 (6 versus 4 cores, 12 versus 8 threads), double the shared L3 cache (16 MB versus 8 MB), a higher base clock (3.30 GHz versus 3.00 GHz), and a higher boost clock (4.40 GHz versus 4.30 GHz). Its 73rd percentile ranking versus the Ryzen 3's 50th percentile shows a substantial positioning difference across the full CPU landscape.

Users who need sustained multi-core throughput for rendering, encoding, or compilation should choose the Ryzen 5 7533HS without hesitation, as the recorded Cinebench and PassMark scores demonstrate robust performance across all measured tests. The Ryzen 3 110, with its 4-core/8-thread configuration and smaller cache, targets lighter workloads where the extra cores of the Ryzen 5 are not required. The single-core clock difference is small (4.30 GHz versus 4.40 GHz boost), so lightly threaded tasks will show less separation, but the Ryzen 5 still holds the advantage on paper.

The Ryzen 5 also brings a higher TDP of 35 watts versus 28 watts on the Ryzen 3, which in a mobile context indicates more thermal headroom for sustained performance, though the database does not record measured power draw. Both processors share the same socket (AMD Socket FP7), the same Zen 3+ architecture, the same 6 nm TSMC process node, and the same integrated Radeon 660M graphics, so platform-level differences are minimal.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 3 110 has 4 cores and 8 threads.

Q: How do their cache sizes compare?

A: Both have 64 KB of L1 cache per core and 512 KB of L2 cache per core. The L3 cache differs: the Ryzen 5 7533HS has 16 MB shared, while the Ryzen 3 110 has 8 MB shared.

Q: What is the performance percentile difference between the two?

A: The Ryzen 5 7533HS ranks in the 73rd percentile among all CPUs in the database, whereas the Ryzen 3 110 ranks in the 50th percentile.

Q: Do both processors support the same memory type?

A: Yes, both support DDR5 memory with dual-channel operation and a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. The Ryzen 3 110 supports ECC memory, while the Ryzen 5 7533HS does not.

Q: Are the integrated graphics the same?

A: Yes, both processors feature the Radeon 660M integrated graphics.

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the Ryzen 5 7533HS?

A: The Ryzen 5 7533HS has an average benchmark score of 19,364. The Ryzen 3 110 has an average benchmark score of 0 in the database, with no individual test results recorded.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in several key specification fields. The Ryzen 3 110 uses 4 cores and 8 threads, while the Ryzen 5 7533HS uses 6 cores and 12 threads. Base clocks are 3.00 GHz for the Ryzen 3 and 3.30 GHz for the Ryzen 5. Boost clocks are 4.30 GHz and 4.40 GHz respectively. The TDP is 28 watts for the Ryzen 3 and 35 watts for the Ryzen 5. L3 cache is 8 MB shared on the Ryzen 3 versus 16 MB shared on the Ryzen 5. The Ryzen 3 supports ECC memory; the Ryzen 5 does not. The Ryzen 3 has a die size of 210 mm², while the Ryzen 5 has a die size of 208 mm². The Ryzen 3 has a part number of 100-000000549(FP7r2), while the Ryzen 5 has two part numbers: 100-000001632(FP7) and 100-000001634(FP7r2). The Ryzen 3 is listed with no series designation, while the Ryzen 5 belongs to the 7000 series. The Ryzen 5 was released on 2024-08-31, while the Ryzen 3 was released on 2025-09-30.

Architecture Differences

Both processors share the same core architecture: Zen 3+ with the Rembrandt-R codename, fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC. Both use the AMD Socket FP7 and support PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only). Both have dual-channel DDR5 memory support with 76.8 GB/s bandwidth and identical per-core L1 and L2 cache configurations (64 KB and 512 KB per core). The integrated graphics are identical as well, with both featuring the Radeon 660M. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

The architectural differences are limited to core count, thread count, L3 cache capacity, and die size. The Ryzen 5 7533HS doubles the shared L3 cache from 8 MB to 16 MB, which benefits workloads with larger working sets. The die size difference is minor: 210 mm² for the Ryzen 3 versus 208 mm² for the Ryzen 5. The Ryzen 5 adds ECC support removal, which is a feature difference rather than an architectural one. The Ryzen 5 also has a higher TDP envelope of 35 watts versus 28 watts, which allows the additional two cores to operate at their rated clocks under sustained load.

Where Each One Wins

The Ryzen 5 7533HS wins every category where benchmark data exists. Multi-threaded rendering tasks favor it heavily due to the 6-core/12-thread configuration and doubled L3 cache. Cinebench R23 multi-core at 12,342 and PassMark multi-thread at 14,520 indicate strong performance in video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation. The data encryption score of 10,718 and extended instructions score of 11,219 show capability in security-related and SIMD-heavy workloads. The integer math score of 50,800 and floating-point math score of 27,800 demonstrate balanced arithmetic throughput across both integer and floating-point operations.

The Ryzen 3 110 has no recorded benchmark scores, so its wins cannot be quantified from the database. Its specification profile suggests it fits lighter-duty scenarios: 4 cores and 8 threads at a 28-watt TDP, which is suited to lower-power mobile chassis where battery life takes priority over raw throughput. Its smaller 8 MB L3 cache and lower base and boost clocks place it below the Ryzen 5 in every measured dimension, but it also consumes less power on paper. The Ryzen 3 supports ECC memory, which the Ryzen 5 does not, making it the only processor of the two with error-correcting memory capability.

For users choosing between these two, the Ryzen 5 7533HS is the clear choice for active workloads that use multiple cores. The Ryzen 3 110 makes sense only when the workload is light, the power envelope is constrained, or ECC memory support is required. The 50th percentile ranking of the Ryzen 3 against the 73rd percentile of the Ryzen 5 summarizes the positioning: the Ryzen 5 sits in the upper quarter of all CPUs, while the Ryzen 3 sits at the median. The recorded deltas against nearest rivals (all within 0.7% of the Ryzen 5's average score) confirm that the Ryzen 5 competes effectively with established desktop and mobile parts, while the Ryzen 3 represents a more modest entry point in the same family.