AMD Radeon R7 240
AMD graphics card specifications and benchmark scores
At a Glance
AMDAMD Radeon R7 240 Specifications
Radeon R7 240 GPU Core
Shader units and compute resources
The AMD Radeon R7 240 GPU core specifications define its raw processing power for graphics and compute workloads. Shading units (also called CUDA cores, stream processors, or execution units depending on manufacturer) handle the parallel calculations required for rendering. TMUs (Texture Mapping Units) process texture data, while ROPs (Render Output Units) handle final pixel output. Higher shader counts generally translate to better GPU benchmark performance, especially in demanding games and 3D applications.
R7 240 Clock Speeds
GPU and memory frequencies
Clock speeds directly impact the Radeon R7 240's performance in GPU benchmarks and real-world gaming. The base clock represents the minimum guaranteed frequency, while the boost clock indicates peak performance under optimal thermal conditions. Memory clock speed affects texture loading and frame buffer operations. The Radeon R7 240 by AMD dynamically adjusts frequencies based on workload, temperature, and power limits to maximize performance while maintaining stability.
AMD's Radeon R7 240 Memory
VRAM capacity and bandwidth
VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory for storing textures, frame buffers, and shader data. The Radeon R7 240's memory capacity determines how well it handles high-resolution textures and multiple displays. Memory bandwidth, measured in GB/s, affects how quickly data moves between the GPU and VRAM. Higher bandwidth improves performance in memory-intensive scenarios like 4K gaming. The memory bus width and type (GDDR6, GDDR6X, HBM) significantly influence overall GPU benchmark scores.
Radeon R7 240 by AMD Cache
On-chip cache hierarchy
On-chip cache provides ultra-fast data access for the R7 240, reducing the need to fetch data from slower VRAM. L1 and L2 caches store frequently accessed data close to the compute units. AMD's Infinity Cache (L3) dramatically increases effective bandwidth, improving GPU benchmark performance without requiring wider memory buses. Larger cache sizes help maintain high frame rates in memory-bound scenarios and reduce power consumption by minimizing VRAM accesses.
R7 240 Theoretical Performance
Compute and fill rates
Theoretical performance metrics provide a baseline for comparing the AMD Radeon R7 240 against other graphics cards. FP32 (single-precision) performance, measured in TFLOPS, indicates compute capability for gaming and general GPU workloads. FP64 (double-precision) matters for scientific computing. Pixel and texture fill rates determine how quickly the GPU can render complex scenes. While real-world GPU benchmark results depend on many factors, these specifications help predict relative performance levels.
GCN 1.0 Architecture & Process
Manufacturing and design details
The AMD Radeon R7 240 is built on AMD's GCN 1.0 architecture, which defines how the GPU processes graphics and compute workloads. The manufacturing process node affects power efficiency, thermal characteristics, and maximum clock speeds. Smaller process nodes pack more transistors into the same die area, enabling higher performance per watt. Understanding the architecture helps predict how the R7 240 will perform in GPU benchmarks compared to previous generations.
AMD's Radeon R7 240 Power & Thermal
TDP and power requirements
Power specifications for the AMD Radeon R7 240 determine PSU requirements and thermal management needs. TDP (Thermal Design Power) indicates the heat output under typical loads, guiding cooler selection. Power connector requirements ensure adequate power delivery for stable operation during demanding GPU benchmarks. The suggested PSU wattage accounts for the entire system, not just the graphics card. Efficient power delivery enables the Radeon R7 240 to maintain boost clocks without throttling.
Radeon R7 240 by AMD Physical & Connectivity
Dimensions and outputs
Physical dimensions of the AMD Radeon R7 240 are critical for case compatibility. Card length, height, and slot width determine whether it fits in your chassis. The PCIe interface version affects bandwidth for communication with the CPU. Display outputs define monitor connectivity options, with modern cards supporting multiple high-resolution displays simultaneously. Verify these specifications against your case and motherboard before purchasing to ensure a proper fit.
AMD API Support
Graphics and compute APIs
API support determines which games and applications can fully utilize the AMD Radeon R7 240. DirectX 12 Ultimate enables advanced features like ray tracing and variable rate shading. Vulkan provides cross-platform graphics capabilities with low-level hardware access. OpenGL remains important for professional applications and older games. CUDA (NVIDIA) and OpenCL enable GPU compute for video editing, 3D rendering, and scientific applications. Higher API versions unlock newer graphical features in GPU benchmarks and games.
Radeon R7 240 Product Information
Release and pricing details
The AMD Radeon R7 240 is manufactured by AMD as part of their graphics card lineup. Release date and launch pricing provide context for comparing GPU benchmark results with competing products from the same era. Understanding the product lifecycle helps evaluate whether the Radeon R7 240 by AMD represents good value at current market prices. Predecessor and successor information aids in tracking generational improvements and planning future upgrades.
Radeon R7 240 Benchmark Scores
geekbench_openclSource
Geekbench OpenCL tests GPU compute performance using the cross-platform OpenCL API. This shows how AMD Radeon R7 240 handles parallel computing tasks like video encoding and scientific simulations. OpenCL is widely supported across different GPU vendors and platforms.
Top 5 Performers
Top 5 PerformersNearby Performers
Nearby PerformersAbout AMD Radeon R7 240
The AMD Radeon R7 240 is a discrete entry-level graphics card built on the 28 nm GCN 1.0 architecture, featuring the Oland chip with 950 million transistors on a 77 mm² die. It operates at a base clock of 730 MHz with a boost up to 780 MHz, and its benchmark data places it at the 30th percentile among all GPUs, indicating a position squarely aimed at basic computing and light multimedia tasks rather than demanding gaming workloads.
Benchmark Performance
The sole benchmark score recorded for the R7 240 is a Geekbench OpenCL result of 5280 points. This score places it in a tight cluster of competing mobile and entry-level desktop parts, where the differences are measured in fractions of a percent rather than substantial margins. Against the NVIDIA GeForce 940M, which scores 5297, the R7 240 trails by a mere 0.3%, a gap so small it falls within typical run-to-run variance. Similarly, the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti, scoring 5316, is only 0.7% ahead, and the GeForce 930A at 5317 also leads by 0.7%. These deltas suggest that in raw compute throughput, the R7 240 is effectively on par with these rivals, despite being an older desktop part competing against newer mobile solutions.
Interestingly, the R7 240 actually leads the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M, which scores 5235, by 0.9%. This positive delta, while modest, indicates that the R7 240 holds a slight computational edge over at least one comparable NVIDIA part from a similar era. The narrow spread across all four rivals—from 5235 to 5317 points—reveals a performance tier where architectural differences and clock speeds largely cancel out, leaving the user with near-identical compute capabilities. The data implies that for OpenCL workloads, the R7 240 is not a performance outlier in either direction; it sits comfortably within a well-established baseline for entry-level hardware from the mid-2010s.
Ray Tracing and Feature Set
The R7 240 does not include dedicated ray tracing cores or tensor cores, as those hardware units were not part of the GCN 1.0 architecture. Instead, the card relies on its 320 shading units, 20 texture mapping units, and 8 raster operation pipelines to handle graphics processing. The feature set is defined by API support rather than specialized hardware. It supports DirectX 12 (feature level 11_1), which means it can run DirectX 12 titles but only at the more limited 11_1 feature set, potentially excluding some modern rendering techniques that require higher feature levels. OpenGL 4.6 support ensures compatibility with a wide range of older and current applications that use this API, while Vulkan 1.2.170 provides a modern low-overhead graphics and compute interface.
Without hardware ray tracing, any ray-traced effects in games would have to be handled through compute shaders, which would be exceedingly slow given the R7 240's compute throughput of 499.2 GFLOPS FP32. The absence of tensor cores also means no hardware-accelerated AI features like DLSS. The card's rendering capabilities are further defined by its pixel rate of 6.240 GPixel/s and texture rate of 15.60 GTexel/s, which are modest figures that align with its entry-level positioning. Display outputs include 1x DVI, 1x HDMI 1.4a, and 1x VGA, and the card connects via a PCIe 3.0 x8 interface. The API list suggests a card designed for broad compatibility rather than cutting-edge features.
Who Should Consider It
The benchmark data positions the R7 240 as a solution for users whose primary needs are not gaming at high settings. Given its OpenCL score of 5280 and its performance parity with the GeForce 940M, this card is suitable for basic desktop acceleration, video playback, and older or less demanding games at lower resolutions and detail settings. The 2 GB of DDR3 memory and 28.80 GB/s bandwidth are limiting factors for modern titles, particularly at 1080p with high texture quality, where the card would likely struggle. The data suggests that at 720p or 1366x768 with low to medium settings, the R7 240 could handle esports titles or games from several years ago.
Users who require a quiet, low-power solution for a home theater PC or a basic office machine will find the R7 240's capabilities adequate, as its 30 W TDP requires no auxiliary power connectors and only a 200 W power supply. However, those expecting to play recent AAA releases at playable frame rates will be disappointed, as the compute performance is simply too low. The card's position at the 30th percentile of all GPUs underscores its status as an entry-level part, best suited for users who prioritize low cost and low power consumption over gaming performance.
FAQ
Q: How does the R7 240 compare to the NVIDIA GeForce 940M?
A: The R7 240 scores 5280 in Geekbench OpenCL, which is 0.3% lower than the GeForce 940M's 5297, making them essentially equivalent in compute performance.
Q: Does the R7 240 support DirectX 12?
A: Yes, it supports DirectX 12 with feature level 11_1, which allows it to run DirectX 12 applications but with a reduced feature set compared to newer cards.
Q: What is the memory configuration of the R7 240?
A: The card comes with 2 GB of DDR3 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 28.80 GB/s.
Q: What power supply is recommended for the R7 240?
A: The suggested PSU rating is 200 W, and the card has a TDP of 30 W with no power connectors required.
Q: What APIs are supported by the R7 240?
A: It supports DirectX 12 (11_1), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.2.170.
Q: Is the R7 240 faster than the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M?
A: Yes, the R7 240 scores 0.9% higher than the GTX 760M's 5235, indicating a slight performance advantage in OpenCL workloads.
Power and Cooling
The R7 240 has a thermal design power of just 30 W, making it one of the most power-efficient discrete GPUs in its class. This low power draw means that the card does not require any external power connectors, drawing all its power from the PCIe slot. The suggested power supply rating is a modest 200 W, which is well within the range of most standard desktop power supplies, including those found in pre-built office systems. The single-slot cooling design and 168 mm length (6.6 inches) allow it to fit into compact cases, and its 69 mm height (2.7 inches) is standard for a low-profile bracket. The combination of low TDP and no connectors makes installation straightforward, even in systems with limited cooling or power headroom. The 28 nm process node contributes to this efficiency, though the transistor density of 12.3M per mm² is relatively low by modern standards.
Memory Subsystem
The R7 240 is equipped with 2 GB of DDR3 memory operating at 900 MHz (1800 Mbps effective) across a 128-bit bus, yielding a total bandwidth of 28.80 GB/s. This bandwidth figure is a critical bottleneck for the card's performance, as it is significantly lower than what GDDR5-based cards of the same era offered. The 128-bit bus width is adequate for the card's compute capabilities, but the DDR3 memory type limits data transfer rates, which becomes apparent at higher resolutions. For 1080p gaming, the 2 GB capacity is sufficient for lower texture settings, but the bandwidth constraints will cause frame rate drops in scenes with heavy texture streaming. At 4K resolutions, the memory subsystem would be overwhelmed, as the bandwidth is insufficient to feed the GPU's pixel processing requirements. The memory configuration is clearly designed for entry-level workloads, where the 28.80 GB/s bandwidth is acceptable for 720p gaming or desktop applications but not for high-resolution or high-detail gaming.
How It Compares
NVIDIA GeForce 940M: The R7 240 trails the GeForce 940M by just 0.3% in OpenCL scores (5280 vs 5297). This near parity is notable because the 940M is a mobile part, while the R7 240 is desktop hardware, but the compute results put them in the same performance bracket.
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti: The GTX 1050 Ti scores 5316, which is 0.7% higher than the R7 240. Despite the GTX 1050 Ti being a much newer and more capable gaming card, the OpenCL benchmark shows only a marginal difference, highlighting that synthetic compute tests do not always reflect real-world gaming performance differences.
NVIDIA GeForce 930A: With a score of 5317, the GeForce 930A is also 0.7% ahead of the R7 240. This desktop part, like the 940M, is positioned for entry-level use, and the benchmark data confirms that the R7 240 is competitive with it in compute tasks.
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M: The R7 240 leads this mobile GPU by 0.9% (5280 vs 5235). The GTX 760M is an older mobile solution, and the R7 240's slight advantage in OpenCL performance suggests that the desktop card holds up well against its laptop counterpart from the same generation.
The NVIDIA Equivalent of Radeon R7 240
Looking for a similar graphics card from NVIDIA? The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 offers comparable performance and features in the NVIDIA lineup.
Popular AMD Radeon R7 240 Comparisons
See how the Radeon R7 240 stacks up against similar graphics cards from the same generation and competing brands.
Compare Radeon R7 240 with Other GPUs
Select another GPU to compare specifications and benchmarks side-by-side.
Browse GPUs