Thief
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 147 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 80 | 80 | 106 | 140 |
| 1440p QHD | 129 | 136 | 168 | 187 |
| 1080p Full HD | 169 | 172 | 189 | 207 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Thief with Intel Core i7-14700F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080, In-Depth Analysis
# How This Combo Ranks
The Intel Core i7-14700F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 delivers a 45th-place finish out of 1,642 tested combos in Thief. That places this configuration in the top 2.7% of all CPU-GPU pairings the database has recorded for this title. The ranking reflects a combination that comfortably outpaces the vast majority of systems, though a handful of higher-end pairings do sit ahead.
The GPU's own percentile ranking of 89 across all tested graphics cards aligns closely with the combo's overall position, while the CPU's 94th-percentile standing among all processors suggests the i7-14700F is slightly overqualified relative to the graphics card's tier. In practical terms, the combo rank indicates that this pairing is well-balanced for Thief, with neither component dragging the other down.
Against the nearest rival GPUs, the RTX 5080 posts an average benchmark score of 59,188. That puts it 1.6% ahead of the Intel Arc A570M, 2.5% ahead of the Intel Arc A580, and 2.6% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro W5500X, while trailing the Intel Arc Pro A60 by 1.9%. These are narrow margins, but they confirm the RTX 5080 sits in a competitive mid-high tier rather than at the absolute top. For Thief specifically, the measured frame rates show this combo delivers strong playable performance across all tested settings, with the headroom to handle even the most demanding configurations.
# FAQ
Q: What is the best resolution to play Thief with this combo?
A: The data shows that at 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo achieves 206.9 FPS average, which is the highest measured result. At 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, it still maintains 79.7 FPS average, indicating that 4K is viable for smooth play.
Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?
A: The i7-14700F has an average benchmark score of 54,097. It trails the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X by 0.6% and the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D by 1.1%, while leading the Intel Xeon Phi 7290 by 1.2% and the AMD EPYC 7313P by 1.7%.
Q: What is the GPU's performance headroom compared to its closest competitors?
A: The RTX 5080's average benchmark score of 59,188 puts it 1.6% above the Intel Arc A570M and 2.5% above the Intel Arc A580, but 1.9% below the Intel Arc Pro A60. These deltas are small enough that real-world gaming performance will vary by title.
Q: Does the combo maintain playable frame rates at 4K with maximum settings?
A: Yes. At 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the average FPS is 79.7, which is above the 60 FPS threshold typically considered smooth. With High settings at the same resolution, it rises to 80.4 FPS.
Q: How much faster is the CPU in multi-threaded workloads versus single-threaded?
A: In Cinebench R23, the multicore score is 35,443 while the singlecore score is 5,003. This roughly seven-fold difference reflects the CPU's 20 cores and 28 threads, which scale well in parallel workloads.
Q: What memory and platform features does this CPU support?
A: The i7-14700F supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, uses Intel Socket 1700, and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. It also supports ECC memory.
# CPU Role
The Intel Core i7-14700F is a 20-core, 28-thread processor built on Intel's Raptor Lake architecture, manufactured on a 10 nm process. Its base clock runs at 2.10 GHz, boosting up to 5.40 GHz under load. These specifications position it as a high-core-count desktop part, and its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 35,443 reflects substantial parallel throughput. The single-core score of 5,003 in the same test indicates strong per-thread performance, which matters for games like Thief that depend on a few heavily loaded threads.
For Thief specifically, the CPU's 33 MB of shared L3 cache and 2 MB per-core L2 cache help keep frequently accessed game data close to the execution cores. The 65 W TDP is modest for a 20-core part, suggesting efficient power delivery, though the processor can still sustain high boost clocks when thermals allow. The data shows the CPU sits in the 94th percentile among all tested processors, with an average benchmark score of 54,097, just 0.6% behind the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X and 1.1% behind the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D.
In Thief's measured results, the CPU's contribution is most evident at lower resolutions and settings where the GPU is not the bottleneck. At 1920x1080 Low, the combo hits 206.9 FPS average, a figure that relies on the CPU's ability to feed frames quickly. The gap between Low and Ultra at 1080p is 38.4 FPS, which is modest compared to the resolution scaling seen at higher settings, indicating the CPU holds up well even as the GPU workload changes.
# Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the combo delivers its highest frame rates. With Low settings, the average FPS is 206.9. Moving to Medium drops the average to 188.6, while High yields 172.2 FPS. Ultra settings produce 168.5 FPS average, which is still exceptionally smooth for a stealth title. The spread from Low to Ultra is 38.4 FPS, showing that Thief's settings have a noticeable but not overwhelming impact at this resolution.
At 2560x1440, performance remains strong but scales down predictably. Low settings average 186.6 FPS, Medium drops to 167.7 FPS, and High comes in at 135.9 FPS. Ultra settings average 129 FPS, a 57.6 FPS drop from Low. The gap between High and Ultra at 1440p is just 6.9 FPS, suggesting diminishing returns from the highest quality preset.
At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the limiting factor. Low settings average 139.5 FPS, Medium drops to 106 FPS, and High yields 80.4 FPS. Ultra settings average 79.7 FPS, nearly identical to High. The difference between High and Ultra at 4K is only 0.7 FPS, indicating that the Ultra preset's additional graphical effects have minimal performance cost at this resolution, likely because the GPU is already saturated.
Across all resolutions, the Low-to-Ultra scaling is most pronounced at 1440p, where the drop is 57.6 FPS, compared to 38.4 FPS at 1080p and 59.8 FPS at 4K. This pattern suggests that 1440p is the resolution where both CPU and GPU are meaningfully engaged, while at 1080p the CPU has more headroom and at 4K the GPU dominates the frame time budget.
# Resolution Scaling
The measured FPS data reveals how this combo scales across resolutions. Moving from 1920x1080 to 2560x1440 at High settings, the average FPS drops from 172.2 to 135.9, a 36.3 FPS reduction. That represents a 21.1% performance loss for a 77.8% increase in pixel count, indicating the GPU is not the sole bottleneck at 1440p. At Ultra settings, the same resolution step costs 39.5 FPS, from 168.5 to 129, a 23.4% drop.
The jump from 2560x1440 to 3840x2160 is far more punishing. At High settings, FPS falls from 135.9 to 80.4, a 55.5 FPS or 40.8% reduction. At Ultra, the drop is from 129 to 79.7, a 49.3 FPS or 38.2% loss. These steeper declines indicate that the RTX 5080's 16 GB of GDDR7 memory and 960.0 GB/s bandwidth are being taxed heavily at 4K, and the GPU's compute resources become the primary constraint.
The scaling pattern suggests that at 1080p, the combo is partially CPU-limited. The i7-14700F's strong single-thread performance, evidenced by its Cinebench R23 singlecore score of 5,003, allows frame rates to approach 207 FPS at Low settings. However, the GPU still manages to push frame rates above 168 FPS even at Ultra, so the CPU is not fully saturating the graphics card's potential. At 1440p, the balance shifts toward the GPU, as evidenced by the larger FPS drops when raising settings. At 4K, the GPU is clearly the limiting component, with High and Ultra settings producing nearly identical frame rates of 80.4 and 79.7 FPS, respectively.
This behavior is consistent with a combo where the CPU has more headroom than the GPU. The 20-core processor can handle Thief's game logic and draw calls without breaking a sweat, but the RTX 5080's 56.28 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 293.1 GPixel/s pixel rate define the upper bound at higher resolutions. For users targeting 4K, the data shows that dropping from Ultra to High saves only 0.7 FPS, so there is little reason to sacrifice visual quality. At 1080p and 1440p, the combo delivers frame rates well above 120 FPS across all settings, making it suitable for high-refresh-rate displays.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core i7-14700F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core i7-14700F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 in Thief
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 139.5 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 106.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 80.4 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 79.7 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 186.6 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 167.7 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 135.9 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 129.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 206.9 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 188.6 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 172.2 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 168.5 |
Thief with ii7-14700F + Other GPUs
See how Thief performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Thief with RTX 5080 + Other CPUs
See how Thief performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with ii7-14700F + RTX 5080
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.