Thief
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 75 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 34 | 33 | 47 | 60 |
| 1440p QHD | 58 | 61 | 75 | 102 |
| 1080p Full HD | 82 | 85 | 111 | 151 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Thief with Intel Core i7-12700K + Intel Arc B580, In-Depth Analysis
The Intel Core i7-12700K paired with the Intel Arc B580 delivers a highly playable experience in Thief, though the data shows that settings choices matter more than resolution scaling. This combination ranks in the lower-mid tier of tested systems, but the measured frame rates reveal a clear path to smooth gameplay across all common display resolutions.
Settings Recommendations
The benchmark data indicates that the Medium preset offers the best balance of visual quality and performance for this combo. At 1920x1080, Medium delivers 110.9 FPS average, which is a substantial improvement over High’s 85.2 FPS while remaining well above the 60 FPS threshold. The step from Medium to High costs 25.7 FPS at 1080p, yet the visual uplift from Medium to High is typically less dramatic than the drop from Ultra to High.
For 2560x1440 users, Medium remains the recommended choice. The measured 75.4 FPS average provides a comfortable margin above 60 FPS, whereas High drops to 61.4 FPS—playable but with little headroom for demanding scenes. At 3840x2160, the situation changes: Medium produces 47.4 FPS, which is below the ideal threshold. Here, Low becomes the pragmatic option, yielding 59.7 FPS, nearly matching the 60 FPS target. Ultra at 4K is essentially unusable at 33.6 FPS, and High at 33.2 FPS is equally constrained.
The data shows a consistent pattern: Low settings at 4K outperform Ultra at 1440p by a narrow margin (59.7 vs 57.9 FPS). This suggests that resolution scaling is efficient on this hardware, but the settings scaling is steep. The jump from Low to Medium at 1080p is 40.5 FPS (151.4 to 110.9), while the jump from Medium to High is 25.7 FPS, and High to Ultra costs only 3.0 FPS. For users prioritizing frame rate, Low at 1080p delivers 151.4 FPS, which is excellent for high-refresh displays. However, the Medium preset at 1440p offers the most balanced experience for the majority of users.
GPU Role
The Intel Arc B580’s memory configuration plays a decisive role in Thief’s performance. The GPU features 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing 456.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The measured results indicate that this bandwidth is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p at all settings, as frame rates scale predictably with resolution. However, at 3840x2160, the 4K results show a significant drop, suggesting that the memory subsystem is stressed by the higher pixel count.
The GPU’s clock behavior is notable: the base clock and boost clock are both 2670 MHz, meaning the card runs at a fixed frequency. The memory clock is 2375 MHz, which translates to 19 Gbps effective. This fixed-clock design likely contributes to consistent frame pacing, as the data shows no anomalous dips between settings at the same resolution. The GPU’s 20 ray tracing cores and 2560 shading units are relevant to Thief’s DirectX 12 rendering, but the measured FPS figures suggest that traditional rasterization performance is the primary driver.
The Arc B580’s benchmark scores place it in the 66th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 23021. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon 760M, scores 22999, a delta of 0.1%, meaning the B580 is essentially tied with that integrated solution in synthetic tests. More relevantly, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 scores 23181, which is 0.7% higher—the B580 trails by a negligible margin. This close grouping indicates that the B580 is positioned competitively in its class, and Thief’s measured FPS reflects this mid-range standing. The GPU’s 13.67 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 427.2 GTexel/s texture rate provide ample compute for a 2014 title, though the 4K Ultra result of 33.6 FPS shows the hardware’s limits when pushed to maximum settings at high pixel counts.
How This Combo Ranks
The combination of the Intel Core i7-12700K and Intel Arc B580 achieves a combo rank of 1289 out of 1642 tested combinations in Thief. This places the system in the 78th percentile of tested combos, meaning roughly 353 configurations perform worse. While the rank may seem low, it reflects the age of the game and the fact that many modern high-end systems are included in the database.
The CPU component of this combo is strong. The i7-12700K sits in the 89th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 35684. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845, scores 35802, a delta of -0.3%, meaning the i7-12700K is essentially on par. The Intel Core i5-14500HX scores 35940, which is 0.7% higher, while the Intel Core i7-13700T scores 35468, 0.6% lower. These tight deltas indicate that the CPU is not a bottleneck in Thief.
The GPU, however, is the limiting factor. The Arc B580’s 66th percentile standing among all GPUs, combined with its near-tie with the RTX 4060, suggests that the combo’s overall rank is driven by GPU performance. The data shows that the i7-12700K’s multi-threaded capabilities—evidenced by its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 29241 and Passmark multithread score of 34404—are more than sufficient for Thief. The game’s engine, released in 2014, does not heavily tax modern CPUs. Consequently, the measured FPS figures are primarily limited by the Arc B580’s rendering throughput, not the CPU’s processing power.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the combo delivers its best results. Low settings produce 151.4 FPS, which is a 36.5% improvement over Medium’s 110.9 FPS. Medium is 30.2% faster than High’s 85.2 FPS, and High is only 3.6% faster than Ultra’s 82.2 FPS. The scaling from Low to Ultra is a 45.7% drop, indicating that the Ultra preset imposes a significant load. For 1080p gaming, the data shows that Medium is the sweet spot, offering 110.9 FPS which is 25.7 FPS higher than High and 28.7 FPS higher than Ultra.
At 2560x1440, the pattern shifts. Low delivers 101.5 FPS, which is a 34.6% improvement over Medium’s 75.4 FPS. Medium is 22.4% faster than High’s 61.4 FPS, and High is 6.0% faster than Ultra’s 57.9 FPS. The 1440p results show that High and Ultra are both above 57 FPS, making them viable for 60 Hz displays, but the margin is thin. Low at 1440p is the only preset that provides a comfortable buffer, with 101.5 FPS.
At 3840x2160, the results are more constrained. Low produces 59.7 FPS, which is 25.9% faster than Medium’s 47.4 FPS. Medium is 42.9% faster than Ultra’s 33.6 FPS, and High at 33.2 FPS is essentially identical to Ultra. The 4K data reveals that Low is the only preset that approaches 60 FPS, while Medium, High, and Ultra all fall below 50 FPS. The difference between High and Ultra at 4K is just 0.4 FPS, indicating that the Ultra preset offers no performance penalty over High but also no benefit.
Comparing resolutions at the same settings, the scaling is consistent. At Low, 1080p yields 151.4 FPS, 1440p yields 101.5 FPS, and 4K yields 59.7 FPS. This represents a 49.1% drop from 1080p to 1440p and a 41.2% drop from 1440p to 4K. At Medium, the figures are 110.9, 75.4, and 47.4 FPS respectively, with a 32.0% drop from 1080p to 1440p and a 37.1% drop to 4K. The data shows that the combo handles 1440p well at Medium and High, while 4K requires Low settings to maintain playability.
FAQ
Q: What is the best settings preset for 1080p gaming with this combo?
A: The Medium preset at 1920x1080 delivers 110.9 FPS average, which is the best combination of visual quality and performance. Low yields 151.4 FPS but sacrifices detail, while High and Ultra drop to 85.2 and 82.2 FPS respectively.
*Q: Can this combo handle 4K resolution in Thief?*
A: At 3840x2160, only the Low preset approaches playable frame rates, delivering 59.7 FPS. Medium drops to 47.4 FPS, and both High and Ultra fall below 34 FPS (33.2 and 33.6 FPS respectively), making them unsuitable for smooth gameplay.
Q: How does the Intel Arc B580 compare to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060?
A: In synthetic benchmarks, the Arc B580 scores 23021 on average, while the RTX 4060 scores 23181, a delta of -0.7%. This means the B580 trails the RTX 4060 by less than 1%, making them effectively equivalent in performance.
Q: Is the Intel Core i7-12700K a bottleneck in this game?
A: No. The i7-12700K ranks in the 89th percentile of all CPUs with an average score of 35684, and its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845, is only 0.3% apart. The CPU’s performance is more than sufficient for Thief, so the GPU is the limiting factor.
Q: What frame rate can I expect at 1440p with Ultra settings?
A: The measured average FPS at 2560x1440 with Ultra settings is 57.9 FPS. This is just below the 60 FPS threshold, so gameplay will be mostly smooth but may dip in demanding scenes.
*Q: How does this combo rank among all tested systems in Thief?*
A: This combo ranks 1289 out of 1642 tested combinations, placing it in the lower-mid tier. The rank is primarily driven by the GPU’s 66th percentile standing, while the CPU performs in the 89th percentile.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core i7-12700K
Intel Arc B580
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core i7-12700K + Intel Arc B580 in Thief
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 59.7 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 47.4 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 33.6 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 33.2 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 101.5 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 75.4 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 61.4 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 57.9 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 151.4 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 110.9 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 85.2 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 82.2 |
Thief with ii7-12700K + Other GPUs
See how Thief performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Thief with Arc B580 + Other CPUs
See how Thief performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with ii7-12700K + Arc B580
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.