Fivem

Fivem

AVERAGE FPS
74
good

This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 74 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 26 33 42 53
1440p QHD 48 64 76 99
1080p Full HD 76 99 118 153

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 53
3840x2160 Medium 42
3840x2160 High 33
3840x2160 Ultra 26
2560x1440 Low 99
2560x1440 Medium 76
2560x1440 High 64
2560x1440 Ultra 48
1920x1080 Low 153
1920x1080 Medium 118
1920x1080 High 99
1920x1080 Ultra 76

Fivem with Intel Core i7-12700K + Intel Arc B580, In-Depth Analysis

The Intel Core i7-12700K paired with the Intel Arc B580 presents a compelling, if nuanced, performance profile in Fivem. The benchmark data reveals a system capable of high refresh rate gaming at mainstream resolutions, but one that requires careful attention to settings to avoid falling into performance dips at higher visual presets. This analysis explores the measured FPS across resolutions and settings, examining how the CPU and GPU each contribute to the final experience and where the system ranks among other tested configurations.

Settings Recommendations

The data strongly suggests that the Low preset offers the most balanced experience across all tested resolutions, delivering the highest average frame rates while avoiding the sharp performance penalties seen at higher settings. At 1920x1080, the Low preset achieves 152.5 FPS, which is 34.8 FPS higher than the next best option, Medium, at 117.7 FPS. This gap widens further at 2560x1440, where Low produces 98.6 FPS compared to Medium's 76.4 FPS, and at 3840x2160, Low hits 52.9 FPS versus Medium's 41.5 FPS. For players prioritizing smoothness and responsiveness, particularly in a multiplayer environment like Fivem, the Low preset provides the most headroom.

However, the Medium preset represents a favorable middle ground for those who value visual fidelity alongside playable performance. At 1920x1080, Medium delivers 117.7 FPS, which remains well above the 60 FPS threshold and retains a significant performance buffer. At 2560x1440, Medium's 76.4 FPS is still comfortably playable, though the margin narrows. The High preset is viable at lower resolutions, with 98.6 FPS at 1080p and 64.4 FPS at 1440p, but it struggles at 4K, dipping to 32.7 FPS, which is below a smooth playability threshold. The Ultra preset is only recommended for 1080p gaming, where it achieves 76.1 FPS; at 1440p it falls to 47.5 FPS, and at 4K it drops to 26.2 FPS, making it unsuitable for competitive or fast-paced play.

The data implies that the scaling between presets is not linear. The jump from Low to Medium costs roughly 34.8 FPS at 1080p, while the jump from High to Ultra costs a similar 22.5 FPS. This suggests that the system is more sensitive to the transition from High to Ultra than from Medium to High, indicating a potential bottleneck in the GPU's shader or memory subsystem when pushing the highest quality settings.

GPU Role

The Intel Arc B580's specifications provide context for its performance in Fivem. With 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, the GPU has a memory bandwidth of 456.0 GB/s, which is substantial for a card in its class. The base and boost clocks are both listed at 2670 MHz, and the memory operates at an effective speed of 19 Gbps. The GPU's compute capabilities include 2560 shading units, 160 TMUs, and 80 ROPs, with an FP32 performance of 13.67 TFLOPS. These figures place the B580 in a position where it can handle modern titles, but the measured FPS data reveals its limitations in Fivem at higher settings.

The frame rate drops from 152.5 FPS at 1080p Low to 76.1 FPS at 1080p Ultra, a reduction of 76.4 FPS (roughly 50%). This performance scaling indicates that the GPU is the primary constraint when visual quality is increased, as the CPU is likely capable of feeding more frames. The pixel rate of 213.6 GPixel/s and texture rate of 427.2 GTexel/s suggest that the card can fill pixels quickly, but the complexity of the Ultra preset's effects and geometry likely overwhelm these resources. The GPU's performance percentile of 66 places it above the median of all tested GPUs, but its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060, which has a very similar average benchmark score (23181 vs. 23021), yet the B580's real-world gaming performance in Fivem is what we see here. The data shows the B580 is a capable 1080p card for this game, but its 4K Ultra performance of 26.2 FPS reinforces that it is not a high-resolution, high-fidelity part.

FAQ

Q: What is the best settings preset for a smooth 1080p experience in Fivem?

A: Based on the measured data, the Low preset provides the highest average frame rate at 1920x1080 with 152.5 FPS. If you prefer higher visual quality, the Medium preset still offers a strong 117.7 FPS, which is well above the standard 60 FPS target.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming in Fivem?

A: The data shows that 4K (3840x2160) performance is limited. The Low preset achieves 52.9 FPS, which is playable but not ideal for high-refresh displays. The Medium preset drops to 41.5 FPS, and the High and Ultra presets fall to 32.7 FPS and 26.2 FPS respectively, which are generally not smooth enough for a multiplayer game.

Q: How does the Intel Arc B580's performance compare to its closest rival, the RTX 4060?

A: The average benchmark scores are very close, with the B580 scoring 23021 and the RTX 4060 scoring 23181. However, this Fivem-specific data shows the B580's actual gaming performance, which is independent of synthetic benchmarks and indicates its real-world capabilities in this title.

Q: Which component is more likely to be the bottleneck at 1440p with Ultra settings?

A: The frame rate at 2560x1440 Ultra is 47.5 FPS, which is a significant drop from the 76.4 FPS at Medium. This large performance penalty from increasing settings strongly indicates that the GPU is the limiting factor at this resolution and preset combination.

Q: Is the CPU's performance sufficient to avoid bottlenecking the GPU?

A: The Intel Core i7-12700K has 12 cores and 20 threads with a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. Its high multi-threaded and single-threaded scores, such as the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 29241 and singlecore score of 4128, suggest it has ample processing power. The data shows a large FPS increase from 1080p to 1440p at the same settings (e.g., High goes from 98.6 to 64.4 FPS), which indicates the GPU is the primary limiter, not the CPU.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a clear picture of the system's performance envelope. At 1920x1080, the frame rates are consistently high. The Low preset leads with 152.5 FPS, followed by Medium at 117.7 FPS, High at 98.6 FPS, and Ultra at 76.1 FPS. The spread between settings is 76.4 FPS, showing a wide range of performance depending on user preference.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance drops noticeably. The Low preset still manages a strong 98.6 FPS, which is identical to the 1080p High preset score. Medium follows at 76.4 FPS, High at 64.4 FPS, and Ultra at 47.5 FPS. The scaling from Low to Ultra is a 51.1 FPS difference, indicating that the higher resolutions amplify the GPU's workload.

At 3840x2160, the system's limitations become clear. The Low preset produces 52.9 FPS, which is the only setting that approaches playability. Medium drops to 41.5 FPS, High to 32.7 FPS, and Ultra to 26.2 FPS. The performance at 4K is roughly half of what is seen at 1080p for equivalent settings, confirming that this configuration is best suited for lower resolutions.

Resolution Scaling

The data shows a clear and predictable pattern of frame rate decline as resolution increases. From 1920x1080 to 2560x1440, the average FPS across all settings drops by approximately 35-40%. For example, the High preset falls from 98.6 FPS to 64.4 FPS, a 34.2 FPS reduction. From 2560x1440 to 3840x2160, the drop is even more severe, with the High preset falling from 64.4 FPS to 32.7 FPS, a 49% reduction.

This scaling pattern reveals that the system is heavily GPU-bound when moving to higher resolutions. The number of pixels to process quadruples from 1080p to 4K, and the Arc B580's fixed compute resources (13.67 TFLOPS) and memory bandwidth (456.0 GB/s) are strained. The CPU's role becomes less significant as resolution increases, as the GPU struggles to keep up with the increased pixel fill rate demands. The fact that Low settings at 4K (52.9 FPS) are similar to Ultra settings at 1440p (47.5 FPS) further illustrates that the GPU is the primary limiting component, rather than the CPU.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i7-12700K is a high-end desktop processor with 12 cores and 20 threads, featuring a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. Its benchmark scores are impressive, with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 29241 and a singlecore score of 4128. The Geekbench scores are also strong, with 13892 for multicore and 2561 for singlecore. These numbers indicate that the CPU has exceptional processing power, capable of handling complex game logic and physics calculations in Fivem's multiplayer environment.

In the context of this benchmark, the CPU's role is to feed the GPU with data. The measured FPS data suggests that the CPU is not a bottleneck at lower resolutions. At 1080p Low, the system achieves 152.5 FPS, which is a high frame rate that requires significant CPU throughput. However, the performance does not scale linearly with resolution, and the GPU becomes the limiting factor at higher resolutions. The CPU's average benchmark score of 35684 places it in the 89th percentile of all CPUs, and its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845, has a nearly identical average score (35802 vs. 35684, a -0.3% delta). This indicates that the i7-12700K is a very capable performer, and its 12 cores and 20 threads provide ample headroom for the demands of Fivem, even with many players and entities in a server.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the Intel Core i7-12700K and Intel Arc B580 ranks 1411 out of 1792 tested combos in Fivem. This ranking places it in the lower half of all tested systems, which is surprising given the individual component strengths. This rank suggests that while the CPU is powerful, the GPU's performance in this specific title holds the combo back. The B580's 66th percentile ranking among all GPUs is below the CPU's 89th percentile, creating an imbalance where the GPU is the weak link.

The ranking implies that many other CPU and GPU combinations outperform this setup in Fivem. The data shows that the combo's performance is not competitive with top-tier systems, particularly at higher resolutions and settings. The rank of 1411 out of 1792 means that roughly 21% of tested configurations are slower, but a significant majority are faster. This is a clear indicator that for users seeking the highest frame rates in Fivem, a more powerful GPU would be necessary to fully utilize the i7-12700K's capabilities. The combo is a solid mid-range option, but it does not reach the upper echelons of performance, and its ranking reflects that.

Hardware Specifications

Intel Core i7-12700K

Cores / Threads 12 / 20
Base Clock 3600 MHz
Boost Clock 5000 MHz
TDP 125W
Socket Intel Socket 1700
View Full CPU Details →

Intel Arc B580

VRAM 12 GB GDDR6
Base Clock
Boost Clock 2670 MHz MHz
TDP 190 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for Intel Core i7-12700K + Intel Arc B580 in Fivem

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 52.9
3840x2160 Medium 41.5
3840x2160 High 32.7
3840x2160 Ultra 26.2
2560x1440 Low 98.6
2560x1440 Medium 76.4
2560x1440 High 64.4
2560x1440 Ultra 47.5
1920x1080 Low 152.5
1920x1080 Medium 117.7
1920x1080 High 98.6
1920x1080 Ultra 76.1

Fivem with ii7-12700K + Other GPUs

See how Fivem performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Fivem with Arc B580 + Other CPUs

See how Fivem performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with ii7-12700K + Arc B580

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.