Inside

Inside

AVERAGE FPS
149
excellent

This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 149 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 64 67 107 134
1440p QHD 101 106 170 213
1080p Full HD 141 148 237 296

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 134
3840x2160 Medium 107
3840x2160 High 67
3840x2160 Ultra 64
2560x1440 Low 213
2560x1440 Medium 170
2560x1440 High 106
2560x1440 Ultra 101
1920x1080 Low 296
1920x1080 Medium 237
1920x1080 High 148
1920x1080 Ultra 141

Inside with Intel Core i7-14700KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050, In-Depth Analysis

Inside is a 2016 puzzle platformer with modest visual demands, and the measured data for the Intel Core i7-14700KF paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 shows that this combination is overwhelmingly GPU-limited at higher resolutions, while the CPU’s substantial headroom becomes apparent only at 1080p. The i7-14700KF is a 20-core, 28-thread Raptor Lake Refresh part with a 3.40 GHz base and 5.60 GHz boost clock, placing it in the 94th percentile of all CPUs, while the RTX 5050, based on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, sits in the 66th percentile of all GPUs. This pairing produces playable frame rates across all tested settings and resolutions, but the scaling behavior reveals that the RTX 5050 is the primary bottleneck for most of the tested configurations.

Resolution Scaling

The frame rate progression from 1080p to 4K clearly demonstrates that the RTX 5050 is the limiting component in this combo. At High settings, the average frame rate drops from 148 FPS at 1920x1080 to 106 FPS at 2560x1440 (a 28% reduction), and then further to 67 FPS at 3840x2160 (a 55% reduction from 1080p). This steep decline is characteristic of GPU-bound scenarios, where the rendering resolution directly impacts the workload on the graphics card. The 4K High result of 67 FPS is still above the 60 FPS threshold, but the trend indicates that any additional visual fidelity would push this configuration below playable levels at 4K.

At Low settings, the resolution scaling becomes even more pronounced, with the average frame rate plummeting from 296 FPS at 1080p to 213 FPS at 1440p and then to 134 FPS at 4K. The 4K Low result represents a 55% drop from 1080p Low, which is nearly identical to the percentage drop seen at High settings. This consistency suggests that even at the lowest graphical preset, the RTX 5050's pixel throughput capabilities are the decisive factor, as the GPU's 82.30 GPixel/s pixel rate and 320.0 GB/s memory bandwidth cannot keep pace with the increasing pixel count. The CPU, with its 33 MB of shared L3 cache and high single-thread performance (6,235 points in Cinebench R23 single-core), is clearly not the constraint here.

The Medium settings row provides the only min/max FPS data in the entire set, offering additional insight into frame time consistency. At 1080p Medium, the average is 237 FPS with a minimum of 201 FPS and a maximum of 272 FPS, yielding a spread of 71 FPS. At 1440p Medium, the average drops to 170 FPS with a minimum of 145 FPS and maximum of 196 FPS (a 51 FPS spread), and at 4K Medium, the average is 107 FPS with a minimum of 91 FPS and maximum of 123 FPS (a 32 FPS spread). The narrowing spread at higher resolutions indicates that the GPU is working near its limits, reducing the variance between frames as it saturates. The 4K Medium minimum of 91 FPS is notably close to the 4K High average of 67 FPS, suggesting that the gap between Medium and High settings at 4K is relatively small in absolute terms.

The Ultra settings show the most dramatic resolution sensitivity, with 141 FPS at 1080p dropping to 101 FPS at 1440p (a 28% reduction) and then to 64 FPS at 4K (a 55% reduction from 1080p). This mirrors the High settings pattern almost exactly, confirming that the RTX 5050's performance ceiling is consistently hit regardless of the preset. The fact that 4K Ultra (64 FPS) and 4K High (67 FPS) are within 3 FPS of each other indicates that the GPU is fully saturated at 4K, and further graphical enhancements have diminishing returns. This behavior is typical of a GPU that is being pushed to its limits, and it underscores the importance of resolution selection over preset selection when playing at 4K with this hardware.

How This Combo Ranks

The measured data places this specific combination at rank 1719 out of 2887 tested combos for Inside, which puts it in the 59.5th percentile of all tested configurations. This ranking reflects the fact that while the i7-14700KF is a high-end CPU (94th percentile overall), the RTX 5050 is a mid-range GPU (66th percentile overall), and the game's performance is predominantly GPU-bound. The combo's ranking suggests that many other pairings with faster GPUs but slower CPUs outperform it, which is consistent with the resolution scaling analysis showing the GPU as the bottleneck.

Looking at the individual component comparisons, the i7-14700KF's average benchmark score of 70,163 places it just 0.2% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F (69,996), 0.4% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX (69,875), and 0.9% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X (69,515). It trails the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K by 1% (70,879). These deltas are all within 1.5% of each other, indicating that the CPU's performance level is comparable to several other top-tier processors. However, in the context of Inside, this CPU performance is largely irrelevant because the game's frame rates are dictated by the GPU.

The RTX 5050's average benchmark score of 21,035 places it 0.6% behind the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL (21,153), 1% behind the AMD Radeon HD 8970M (21,237), and 1.6% behind the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT (20,713). It trails the NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile by 1.6% (21,379). These rival comparisons show that the RTX 5050 performs in a tightly contested mid-range segment, with all four rivals within a 1.6% delta. This suggests that swapping the RTX 5050 for any of these similar-performing GPUs would yield nearly identical frame rates in Inside, reinforcing that the combo's rank is determined by the GPU's mid-range positioning rather than any outlier characteristics.

The rank of 1719 out of 2887 is a solidly middle-of-the-pack result. It indicates that this combo delivers acceptable but not exceptional performance for Inside, with the CPU's high-end nature being somewhat wasted in this GPU-bound scenario. Users with this pairing who are considering an upgrade would see far greater gains from a GPU upgrade than a CPU upgrade, as the data clearly shows the RTX 5050 as the limiting factor across all resolutions.

FAQ

Q: Is the Intel Core i7-14700KF + RTX 5050 combo capable of running Inside at 4K?

A: Yes, but with caveats. The measured data shows 4K High averaging 67 FPS and 4K Ultra averaging 64 FPS, both above the 60 FPS threshold. However, 4K Medium reaches 107 FPS, indicating that the GPU is the bottleneck at this resolution.

Q: How does the i7-14700KF compare to its nearest CPU rivals in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The i7-14700KF scores 70,163 on average, which is 0.2% higher than the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F (69,996), 0.4% higher than the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX (69,875), and 0.9% higher than the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X (69,515). It is 1% lower than the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K (70,879).

Q: What is the frame rate difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080, Low settings produce 296 FPS average, while Ultra settings produce 141 FPS average. This represents a 155 FPS difference, with Low being more than double the frame rate of Ultra.

Q: Does the RTX 5050 have a performance advantage over its nearest rivals?

A: The RTX 5050 scores 21,035 on average, which is 0.6% lower than the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL (21,153), 1% lower than the AMD Radeon HD 8970M (21,237), and 1.6% lower than both the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT (20,713) and the NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile (21,379). It trails all four rivals, but the largest delta is only 1.6%.

Q: Which resolution provides the most consistent frame times based on the available data?

A: The Medium settings rows are the only ones with min/max data. At 4K Medium, the spread between min (91 FPS) and max (123 FPS) is 32 FPS, which is the narrowest spread of the three resolutions with this data. At 1440p Medium, the spread is 51 FPS, and at 1080p Medium, it is 71 FPS.

Q: How does the combo's ranking in Inside compare to the total number of tested configurations?

A: The combo ranks 1719 out of 2887 tested combos for Inside. This places it in the upper-middle range of all tested pairings, indicating it outperforms roughly 40% of configurations but falls short of the top performers.

Settings Recommendations

The measured data indicates that Medium settings provide the best balance of visual quality and frame rate stability across all resolutions. At 1080p Medium, the average frame rate of 237 FPS with a minimum of 201 FPS ensures that even the most demanding scenes remain well above the refresh rate of most high-refresh-rate monitors. The 1440p Medium result of 170 FPS average (with a 145 FPS minimum) is similarly excellent, offering a smooth experience on 144Hz displays without the need to drop to Low settings. At 4K Medium, the 107 FPS average with a 91 FPS minimum is still highly playable, and the narrow 32 FPS spread between minimum and maximum indicates consistent frame pacing.

Low settings are only recommended for users prioritizing absolute maximum frame rates, particularly at 1080p where the 296 FPS average is achievable. However, the visual sacrifice is substantial, and given that Medium settings deliver 237 FPS at 1080p (only 20% lower), the trade-off is rarely worth it for a puzzle platformer where visual clarity can aid in environmental puzzles. High settings offer a slight visual improvement over Medium, but the frame rate cost is significant: 148 FPS at 1080p (37% lower than Medium), 106 FPS at 1440p (38% lower), and 67 FPS at 4K (37% lower). The consistency of this ~37% penalty across resolutions suggests that High settings impose a uniform GPU load increase over Medium.

Ultra settings are not recommended for this combo. At 4K Ultra, the average frame rate of 64 FPS is barely above the 60 FPS threshold, and the lack of min/max data for Ultra settings means there is no guarantee of consistent performance. At 1080p Ultra, the 141 FPS average is nearly identical to 1080p High (148 FPS), indicating that the GPU is already saturated and the additional visual features of Ultra provide minimal benefit for the performance cost. The data strongly suggests that Medium is the optimal preset for this hardware combination, offering the best frame rate headroom while maintaining a playable experience at all three tested resolutions.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The complete measured FPS dataset for the Intel Core i7-14700KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 combination in Inside is as follows. At 3840x2160, the average frame rates are 67 FPS on High, 134 FPS on Low, 107 FPS on Medium (with a minimum of 91 FPS and maximum of 123 FPS), and 64 FPS on Ultra. At 2560x1440, the averages are 106 FPS on High, 213 FPS on Low, 170 FPS on Medium (minimum 145 FPS, maximum 196 FPS), and 101 FPS on Ultra. At 1920x1080, the averages are 148 FPS on High, 296 FPS on Low, 237 FPS on Medium (minimum 201 FPS, maximum 272 FPS), and 141 FPS on Ultra.

The scaling from 1080p to 1440p at each setting shows a consistent reduction: High drops from 148 to 106 FPS (42 FPS loss), Low from 296 to 213 FPS (83 FPS loss), Medium from 237 to 170 FPS (67 FPS loss), and Ultra from 141 to 101 FPS (40 FPS loss). The scaling from 1440p to 4K shows a similar pattern: High drops from 106 to 67 FPS (39 FPS loss), Low from 213 to 134 FPS (79 FPS loss), Medium from 170 to 107 FPS (63 FPS loss), and Ultra from 101 to 64 FPS (37 FPS loss). The Low and Medium settings show larger absolute frame rate losses due to their higher starting points, but the percentage reductions are consistent across all settings, with each resolution step costing roughly 28-37% of the previous frame rate.

The Medium settings rows provide the only min/max data, which allows for an analysis of frame time consistency. At 1080p Medium, the spread between minimum (201 FPS) and maximum (272 FPS) is 71 FPS, which represents 30% of the average. At 1440p Medium, the spread is 51 FPS (30% of the 170 FPS average), and at 4K Medium, the spread narrows to 32 FPS (30% of the 107 FPS average). The consistent 30% spread relative to the average suggests that frame pacing is uniform across resolutions, and the absolute narrowing at higher resolutions is simply a function of the lower average frame rates. The 4K Medium minimum of 91 FPS is notably higher than the 4K High average of 67 FPS, meaning that even the worst-case Medium frame rate at 4K outperforms the average High frame rate at the same resolution.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i7-14700KF is a 20-core, 28-thread processor from the Core 14th Gen series, built on Intel's 10 nm process with a 257 mm² die size. It features a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz, with a 125 W TDP. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 33 MB of shared L3 cache. In synthetic benchmarks, it scores 44,167 in Cinebench R23 multicore and 6,235 in single-core, along with 21,462 in Geekbench multicore and 2,578 in single-core. Its Passmark multithread score is 52,425, and its single-thread score is 4,480.

In the context of Inside, the CPU's role is minimal because the game is not computationally demanding. The measured frame rates show no evidence of CPU bottlenecking, as even at 1080p Low with 296 FPS average, the frame rate is more likely limited by the GPU's rendering capabilities than by the CPU's ability to feed the graphics card. The i7-14700KF's 94th percentile ranking among all CPUs, combined with its 0.2% performance advantage over the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F and 0.4% over the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX, indicates that it is more than sufficient for this title. The CPU's high boost clock of 5.60 GHz and strong single-thread performance (6,235 in Cinebench R23 single-core) provide ample headroom for the game's logic and physics calculations, which are typically single-threaded in puzzle platformers.

The data suggests that the CPU's 20 cores and 28 threads are largely underutilized in Inside, as the game's workload does not scale to take advantage of such high core counts. The Passmark physics score of 2,961 points, which is relatively low compared to the multicore score of 52,425, further indicates that the CPU's raw computing power is not the limiting factor in game scenarios. Instead, the RTX 5050's 13.17 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 205.8 GTexel/s texture rate are the determining factors for frame rates, as evidenced by the consistent ~37% frame rate penalty when moving from Medium to High settings across all resolutions. For users of this combo, the CPU is effectively a non-issue; the RTX 5050's mid-range positioning (66th percentile) is what defines the gaming experience in Inside.

Hardware Specifications

Intel Core i7-14700KF

Cores / Threads 20 / 28
Base Clock 3400 MHz
Boost Clock 5600 MHz
TDP 125W
Socket Intel Socket 1700
View Full CPU Details →

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050

VRAM 8 GB GDDR6
Base Clock
Boost Clock 2572 MHz MHz
TDP 130 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for Intel Core i7-14700KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 in Inside

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 134.0
3840x2160 Medium 107.0
3840x2160 High 67.0
3840x2160 Ultra 64.0
2560x1440 Low 213.0
2560x1440 Medium 170.0
2560x1440 High 106.0
2560x1440 Ultra 101.0
1920x1080 Low 296.0
1920x1080 Medium 237.0
1920x1080 High 148.0
1920x1080 Ultra 141.0

Inside with ii7-14700KF + Other GPUs

See how Inside performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Inside with RTX 5050 + Other CPUs

See how Inside performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with ii7-14700KF + RTX 5050

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.