Greedfall

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X and Intel Arc B570 combination lands in the lower-mid tier of tested configurations for Greedfall, ranking 2344 out of 2938 combos. This pairing is not a high-refresh-rate powerhouse; instead, it delivers playable frame rates at 1080p and 1440p with careful settings adjustments, while 4K remains a challenge. The benchmark data shows a system that is consistently GPU-limited, where the processor's eight cores provide ample headroom but the graphics card dictates the final performance ceiling.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X is a desktop processor from the 5000 series, built on the Zen 3 architecture (codenamed Vermeer) using a 7 nm process from TSMC. It features 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. This configuration is well-suited for a modern Action RPG like Greedfall, which benefits from multiple threads for game logic, AI, and physics simulations. The processor's 32 MB of shared L3 cache and dual-channel DDR4 memory support (with 51.2 GB/s bandwidth) provide solid data throughput for the game's open-world environments.

In the context of Greedfall's measured performance, the 5700X is rarely the bottleneck. At 1080p with Low settings, the average FPS reaches 130, which is a high number that suggests the CPU can push frames well beyond what the Arc B570 can render at higher settings. The processor's benchmark scores support this interpretation: it achieves a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 13184 and a single-core score of 1499, placing it in the 79th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i5-12600K (average score 27578, 0% delta), the AMD Ryzen 7 5800 (27535, 0.2% faster), and the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X (27636, 0.2% slower), indicating a balanced mid-range performance tier.

For Greedfall specifically, the 8-core/16-thread layout is more than sufficient. The game's demands on the CPU are not extreme; even at 4K Ultra, where the average FPS drops to 24, the processor is likely waiting on the GPU to deliver frames. The data shows a clear pattern: as resolution increases, FPS drops proportionally, which is a classic sign of GPU limitation. The 5700X's high multithreaded performance (Passmark multithread score of 26612) ensures that it will not introduce stutter or frame-pacing issues in this title, even when many NPCs or combat effects are on screen. The processor's 65 W TDP and AM4 socket compatibility make it an efficient choice, but its raw compute is not the deciding factor in this game's frame rates.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

The combination of the Ryzen 7 5700X and the Intel Arc B570 ranks 2344 out of 2938 tested combos for Greedfall. This places it in the bottom 20% of all configurations, a ranking that is driven almost entirely by the GPU's performance ceiling rather than any CPU deficiency. The data indicates that this combo is better suited for 1080p gaming than for higher resolutions, as the rank reflects the average experience across all settings and resolutions tested.

To contextualize this rank, consider the GPU's nearest rivals: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (average score 20534, 0.1% slower), the Intel Arc A750 (20582, 0.1% faster), and the AMD Radeon R9 M390X (20662, 0.5% faster). The Arc B570's average benchmark score is 20556, which is nearly identical to these cards. This suggests that the combo's rank is not an outlier for the GPU; rather, it is typical for a mid-range graphics card paired with a capable CPU. The CPU's own ranking (79th percentile) is far higher than the combo's overall rank, reinforcing that the graphics card is the limiting factor.

In practical terms, a rank of 2344 means that most other tested systems will deliver higher average frame rates in Greedfall. However, this does not imply the combo is unplayable. At 1080p Medium, the system achieves 102 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay. The rank is dragged down by the 4K results, where even High settings only produce 38 FPS. The data suggests that users with this combo should target 1080p or 1440p for a good experience, and the rank should be interpreted as a warning against expecting 4K performance from this pairing.

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

The measured FPS data across resolutions tells a clear story about system bottlenecks. From 1080p to 1440p, the average FPS drops by roughly 30% across most settings. From 1440p to 4K, the drop is another 40-50%. This scaling pattern is characteristic of a GPU-bound system. If the CPU were the limiting factor, the FPS would remain relatively flat as resolution increases, since the processor's workload stays constant. Instead, the FPS falls sharply, indicating that the Arc B570's rendering capacity is being saturated.

For example, at High settings, the average FPS goes from 92 at 1080p to 64 at 1440p (a 30% drop), then to 38 at 4K (a further 41% drop). At Low settings, the trend is similar: 130 FPS at 1080p, 90 FPS at 1440p (a 31% drop), and 54 FPS at 4K (a 40% drop). The consistency of these percentage drops across settings confirms that the GPU is the primary constraint. The Ryzen 7 5700X, with its high single-thread and multithread scores, is not being challenged by Greedfall's engine at these resolutions.

The implication is that lowering resolution will yield significant FPS gains, but lowering settings at a fixed resolution will have a smaller impact. For instance, at 1080p, moving from Ultra (59 FPS) to Low (130 FPS) more than doubles the frame rate, but that is still a GPU-side change. The data shows that the system is most efficient at 1080p, where the GPU can keep up with the CPU's output. At 4K, even the lowest settings only produce 54 FPS, which is below the ideal for fast-paced combat. This scaling analysis strongly suggests that users should prioritize resolution over settings to achieve the best balance of visual quality and performance.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

The measured FPS data provides a complete picture of performance across three resolutions and four quality presets. At 1920x1080, the system delivers its best results. Low settings produce an average of 130 FPS, Medium settings yield 102 FPS (with a minimum of 87 and maximum of 117), High settings reach 92 FPS, and Ultra settings drop to 59 FPS. This resolution is clearly the sweet spot for this combo, as even Ultra settings maintain a playable frame rate, though it is close to the 60 FPS threshold.

Moving to 2560x1440, performance takes a noticeable hit. Low settings average 90 FPS, Medium settings average 71 FPS (with a range of 60 to 81), High settings average 64 FPS, and Ultra settings fall to 41 FPS. The 1440p results are still playable at Medium and High settings, but Ultra is not recommended for a smooth experience. The drop from 1080p to 1440p is roughly 30%, which aligns with the increased pixel count of 1.78x (though the FPS drop is less than proportional, indicating some headroom).

At 3840x2160, the system struggles. Low settings average 54 FPS, Medium settings average 42 FPS (with a range of 36 to 48), High settings average 38 FPS, and Ultra settings drop to 24 FPS. None of these results meet the 60 FPS target, and even Low settings are borderline playable at best. The 4K data shows that the Arc B570's 10 GB of VRAM and 380.0 GB/s bandwidth are insufficient for this game at high resolutions with demanding presets. The minimum FPS at 4K Medium (36) indicates that there are moments of significant frame drops, which could affect gameplay smoothness.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Intel Arc B570 is a desktop GPU based on the Xe2-HPG architecture (codenamed Battlemage, Arc 5 generation), built on a 5 nm process from TSMC. It features 10 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, with a memory clock of 2375 MHz (19 Gbps effective) and a bandwidth of 380.0 GB/s. The GPU has 2304 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 80 raster output units, along with 18 ray tracing cores. Its boost clock is 2500 MHz, and it has a TDP of 150 W.

In Greedfall, the GPU's 10 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p at most settings, but it becomes a limiting factor at 4K. The game's texture and geometry demands at 4K Ultra likely exceed the VRAM capacity, contributing to the low 24 FPS average. The GPU's compute performance (11.52 TFLOPS FP32) is moderate, and its benchmark scores reflect this: it ranks in the 65th percentile of all GPUs, with a Passmark G3D score of 14195. Its nearest rivals, such as the Intel Arc A750 (0.1% faster) and the NVIDIA RTX 3070 Mobile (0.1% slower), confirm that it is a mid-range card.

The GPU's role in this combo is to be the primary performance limiter. The data shows that at 1080p Low, the system hits 130 FPS, which is a high number but still lower than what a top-tier GPU would achieve with the same CPU. At 4K, the GPU's limitations are severe, with the average FPS dropping below 40 at all settings except Low. The 380.0 GB/s bandwidth is likely a bottleneck at high resolutions, as the game's data throughput requirements increase with pixel count. The B570's performance in Greedfall suggests that it is best paired with a 1080p or 1440p monitor, where it can deliver smooth frame rates at medium-to-high settings.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings for this combo depend on the target resolution and desired frame rate. For 1080p, the Medium preset offers the best balance of visual quality and performance, with an average of 102 FPS and a minimum of 87 FPS. This ensures smooth gameplay without the visual downgrades of Low settings. High settings at 1080p (92 FPS) are also viable, but Medium provides a larger safety margin for demanding scenes.

For 1440p, the Medium preset is again the recommended choice, with an average of 71 FPS and a minimum of 60 FPS. This hits the 60 FPS target on average, though the minimum suggests occasional dips. High settings at 1440p (64 FPS) are playable but offer less headroom, making Medium the safer option for consistent performance. Low settings at 1440p (90 FPS) provide a high frame rate but at a significant visual cost, which may not be worth it for an Action RPG where immersion matters.

For 4K, no preset delivers a fully satisfying experience. Low settings (54 FPS) are the only option that approaches playability, but the visual quality is heavily compromised. Medium (42 FPS) and High (38 FPS) are below the 60 FPS target and will feel sluggish during combat. Ultra (24 FPS) is not recommended. Given these results, 4K gaming is not practical with this combo, and users should either lower their resolution to 1440p or accept a sub-60 FPS experience at 4K Low.

In summary, the best experience per the measured rows is achieved at 1080p Medium or 1440p Medium, depending on the user's monitor. These settings provide a smooth frame rate with acceptable visual quality, while avoiding the performance pitfalls of Ultra presets and the visual downgrades of Low presets. The data clearly indicates that this combo is not designed for 4K gaming, and users should prioritize resolution scaling over settings adjustments to get the most out of the system.