Fivem

FAQ

Q: What is the overall performance ranking of the Intel Core Ultra 5 235 and AMD Radeon RX 6600 combo in Fivem?

A: The combo ranks 2318th out of 3005 tested combinations, placing it in the lower-middle tier of systems. This position indicates that while it can run the game, many other hardware pairings deliver higher frame rates.

Q: What is the highest average FPS the combo achieves at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo achieves its peak average frame rate of 146 FPS. This is the only tested configuration that surpasses the 144 FPS threshold, which is often considered a target for high-refresh-rate monitors.

Q: At which setting does the combo maintain a 60+ FPS average at 1440p?

A: The system sustains an average of 76 FPS at 2560x1440 with Medium settings. It also averages 61 FPS at the same resolution with High settings, but only the Medium preset provides a comfortable margin above the 60 FPS baseline.

Q: What are the minimum and maximum frame rates recorded for the Ultra preset at 4K?

A: The data shows that at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the combo averages 26 FPS, but the minimum and maximum FPS values are not listed. The only complete data set for a 4K preset is for Medium, which shows a minimum of 36 FPS and a maximum of 48 FPS.

Q: How does the CPU's benchmark score compare to its nearest rival?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 235 has an average benchmark score of 46062, which is 0.1% higher than the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375's score of 46030. It is also essentially tied with the Intel Core i9-13900HX, which scores 46098, a difference of -0.1%.

Q: What is the GPU's benchmark percentile ranking?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6600 sits in the 63rd percentile of all GPUs. This shows that it outperforms a majority of graphics cards on the market, but it is not a high-end performer, which aligns with its mid-range positioning.

Settings Recommendations

The measured data for this combo in Fivem reveals a clear trade-off between visual quality and frame rate. For players prioritizing a smooth and responsive experience, the Medium preset at 1920x1080 presents the most balanced option, delivering an average of 115 FPS. This is a significant jump from the 92 FPS average at High settings and remains well above the 60 FPS standard. The frame time consistency is also better, with a minimum of 98 FPS and a maximum of 132 FPS, indicating fewer stutters than lower settings might produce.

For those with 1440p monitors, the Medium preset is again the sweet spot, yielding an average of 76 FPS. This is the only 1440p setting that provides a comfortable buffer above the 60 FPS playability threshold. Stepping up to High drops the average to 61 FPS, which is playable but leaves little headroom for demanding scenes in a multiplayer environment. At 4K, the situation becomes challenging; the best average FPS is 53 at Low settings, which is below the ideal smoothness target. The Medium preset at 4K averages 42 FPS, which is a more cinematic but less competitive experience.

Choosing the Ultra preset is not recommended for any resolution. At 1080p, it drops the average to 71 FPS, a 38% reduction from Medium. At 1440p, it falls to 47 FPS, and at 4K, it plummets to a 26 FPS average, which is largely unplayable for a fast-paced multiplayer game. Therefore, the data strongly suggests that Medium settings offer the best overall experience, balancing visual fidelity with the performance necessary for a fluid gameplay loop in Fivem.

CPU Role

The Intel Core Ultra 5 235 is a 14-core, 14-thread processor based on the Arrow Lake architecture. It has a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, which allows it to handle both multi-threaded workloads and single-threaded tasks effectively. The processor's benchmark scores are solid, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 14769 and a single-core score of 2085. These figures place the CPU in the 89th percentile of all processors, showing it is a capable part that should not bottleneck a mid-range GPU in most scenarios.

In the context of Fivem, a multiplayer modification for Grand Theft Auto V, CPU performance is often a critical factor. The game is known for being heavily dependent on single-thread performance, but also for its ability to leverage multiple cores for physics and streaming. The 235's high boost clock of 5.00 GHz suggests it can provide strong single-thread performance, which is crucial for maintaining high frame rates in the game's main thread. Its 24 MB of shared L3 cache helps with data access speeds, potentially reducing stutters when the game world streams in new assets.

However, the measured FPS data shows a significant drop when moving from 1080p to 4K, indicating that the GPU quickly becomes the limiting factor at higher resolutions. At 1080p, the CPU can push frame rates high enough to expose the GPU's limits. The combo's rank of 2318 out of 3005 suggests that while the CPU is strong, the overall pairing is held back by the graphics card. The CPU's performance, relative to rivals like the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 (which it beats by 0.1%), is more than sufficient for this game. The bottleneck is clearly shifting to the GPU as resolution increases, a conclusion supported by the FPS data across the three resolutions.

How This Combo Ranks

The Intel Core Ultra 5 235 and AMD Radeon RX 6600 combination is positioned at rank 2318 out of 3005 tested combos in Fivem. This places it in the 23rd percentile of all tested systems, meaning roughly 77% of tested hardware combinations deliver better performance in this specific game. This ranking is notably lower than what the individual component percentiles might suggest. The CPU is in the 89th percentile, and the GPU is in the 63rd percentile, yet their combined performance in Fivem is in the lower half of the pack.

This discrepancy indicates that the pairing is not optimized for this specific game's engine. A high-performing CPU is often paired with a more powerful GPU to yield top-tier results. The RX 6600, while a capable 1080p card, is clearly the limiting factor in this combination. The performance ranking suggests that Fivem is demanding enough on the GPU that the CPU's headroom is largely unused at higher resolutions. This is a classic case of a bottleneck, where the GPU's frame rendering capacity caps the overall performance.

The data implies that users with this combo will have a moderate experience in Fivem. It is not a low-end system, as evidenced by its ability to hit 146 FPS at 1080p Low, but it lacks the power to maintain high frame rates at 4K or with Ultra settings. The rank of 2318 serves as a realistic indicator of its standing, showing that for the best experience, a more powerful GPU would be required to fully unlock the potential of the Core Ultra 5 235.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 6600 is a mid-range graphics card built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture, featuring the Navi 23 chip. It has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s. Its boost clock is 2491 MHz, and it offers 8.928 TFLOPS of FP32 performance. These specifications are typical for a card designed for smooth 1080p gaming. Its benchmark scores, such as a Passmark G3D score of 15096, place it in the 63rd percentile of all GPUs, indicating it is a solid, but not exceptional, performer.

In Fivem, the GPU's role becomes increasingly dominant as resolution and graphical settings are increased. The measured FPS data clearly illustrates this. At 1080p, the GPU is able to produce high frame rates, from 71 FPS at Ultra to 146 FPS at Low. This shows it has enough raw power to handle the game at this resolution with ease. However, the performance drops off significantly when moving to 1440p and 4K. At 4K, even the Low preset only manages an average of 53 FPS, while the Ultra preset falls to a mere 26 FPS.

This sharp decline is a direct result of the GPU's memory bandwidth and compute capabilities being overwhelmed by the higher pixel count. The 8 GB of VRAM is also a potential limitation at higher resolutions, as texture data can exceed this capacity. The data indicates that the RX 6600 is best suited for 1080p gaming in Fivem. Its performance at 1440p is acceptable on Medium settings, but for a consistent high-refresh-rate experience, it is out of its depth at higher resolutions. The GPU is the primary component determining the frame rate ceiling for this combo, especially when compared to the strong performance of the CPU.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive look at the combo's performance across twelve different configurations. At 1920x1080, the results are as follows: with Low settings, the average is 146 FPS; with Medium, it is 115 FPS (with a minimum of 98 and maximum of 132); with High, it is 92 FPS; and with Ultra, it drops to 71 FPS. This shows a clear linear progression of decreasing performance with increasing graphical fidelity.

At 2560x1440, the same pattern is observed but with lower overall numbers. The Low preset yields an average of 96 FPS, while Medium produces 76 FPS (with a minimum of 64 and maximum of 87). High settings average 61 FPS, and Ultra falls to an average of 47 FPS. The margin between Low and Ultra is 49 FPS, which is a substantial difference. This indicates that the GPU is working harder at this resolution, and the impact of settings is more pronounced.

At 3840x2160, the performance becomes marginal. The Low preset averages 53 FPS, Medium averages 42 FPS (with a minimum of 36 and maximum of 48), High averages 34 FPS, and Ultra averages a very low 26 FPS. The data shows that from Low to Ultra at 4K, there is a 27 FPS difference. No configuration at this resolution reaches the 60 FPS target, confirming that the GPU is a significant bottleneck. These figures underscore that the combo is most effective at 1080p, where it can deliver high frame rates across all settings.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS scaling from 1080p to 4K demonstrates a significant performance drop, highlighting the shift in system bottleneck. Starting with the Medium preset, the average FPS goes from 115 at 1080p to 76 at 1440p, a reduction of 39 FPS (or about 34%). Moving from 1440p to 4K, the average drops further to 42 FPS, another 34 FPS reduction (or about 45%). This trend shows that the performance cost of each resolution increase is not linear but grows more severe at higher pixel counts.

This scaling behavior is a classic indicator of a GPU-limited system. The CPU is capable of feeding the GPU with data, but the GPU's rendering power is insufficient to handle the increased pixel workload. The fact that the percentage drop from 1080p to 1440p is smaller than from 1440p to 4K suggests that the GPU's memory bandwidth and processing units are saturated at 4K. The 8 GB VRAM might also be a factor, as the larger textures and frame buffers required at 4K could exceed its capacity, causing a more dramatic performance hit.

For the Low preset, the scaling is similar. The average FPS drops from 146 at 1080p to 96 at 1440p (a 34% reduction), and then to 53 at 4K (a 45% reduction from 1440p). This pattern is also present in the High and Ultra presets. The data implies that regardless of the settings, the GPU is the limiting component at 1440p and especially at 4K. The CPU, with its high boost clock and strong benchmark scores, shows no signs of being the constraint. This analysis suggests that users aiming for 4K gaming would need a significantly more powerful GPU than the RX 6600, while the current CPU would be more than adequate for that upgrade.