Fivem

The pairing of an AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D with an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 creates a stark contrast in capability, placing a top-tier 2025 processor alongside a 2019 mid-range graphics card. In Fivem, a multiplayer modification that often strains CPU resources, this combination produces a fascinating bottleneck scenario. The data shows that the RTX 2060, with its 6 GB of VRAM, becomes the limiting factor at higher resolutions, while the 12-core CPU maintains a strong baseline for frame pacing. This analysis explores how the benchmark results quantify that imbalance, examining the CPU's multi-threaded headroom, the GPU's memory constraints, and the specific frame rates achieved across various settings.

FAQ

Q: What is the overall rank of this CPU and GPU combination in Fivem?

A: The combo ranks 2345th out of 3005 tested combinations in Fivem, placing it in the lower half of all tested systems for this specific game.

Q: How does the Ryzen 9 9900X3D compare to its nearest rival CPUs in average benchmark score?

A: The Ryzen 9 9900X3D has an average benchmark score of 54762. Its closest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF, scores 55093, which is 0.6% higher. The AMD processor is 1.3% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 5 245K (score 54053) and 2% ahead of the Intel Xeon 6505P (score 53701).

Q: What is the highest average FPS recorded for this combo at 1080p?

A: The highest average FPS at 1920x1080 is 145, achieved with Low settings. This drops to 115 on Medium, 92 on High, and 71 on Ultra settings.

Q: Does the RTX 2060 outperform its nearest rivals in the benchmark database?

A: The RTX 2060 has an average benchmark score of 15290, placing it in the 58th percentile of all GPUs. It is effectively tied with the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580, which scores 15283 (0% difference). It also edges out the AMD Radeon 680M by 0.1% and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM by 0.6%.

Q: What is the minimum FPS recorded for the Medium preset at 4K resolution?

A: At 3840x2160 with Medium settings, the minimum FPS recorded is 36, with a maximum of 48 and an average of 42 FPS.

Q: How much of a performance gap exists between Low and Ultra settings at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the average FPS on Low settings is 96, whereas on Ultra settings it is 47. This represents a significant drop of 49 FPS, or roughly 51%, when moving from the lowest to the highest quality preset.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D is a 12-core, 24-thread processor based on the Zen 5 architecture, built on a 4 nm process. Its base clock is 4.40 GHz with a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, and it features a substantial 128 MB of L3 cache. In the context of Fivem, a multiplayer platform where game logic, script processing, and player positions are often handled by the CPU, this processor's high core count and large cache are theoretically ideal. The benchmark data indicates a strong performance profile, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 47737 and a single-core score of 6739. This suggests that the CPU has ample headroom to handle the complex simulation tasks that Fivem is known for.

However, the measured FPS data reveals that this CPU's power is not the primary driver of final frame rates in this specific combo. At 1080p Low settings, the system achieves 145 FPS, but this is likely a ceiling determined by the graphics card's ability to render frames quickly. The CPU's PassMark multi-thread score of 56154 and single-thread score of 4646 place it in the 91st percentile of all CPUs, indicating it is a top-tier performer. When comparing to its nearest rivals, the Ryzen 9 9900X3D's average score of 54762 is only 0.6% lower than the Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF, making them near-identical in overall processing power.

The real question the data poses is whether Fivem can fully utilize the 12 cores available. While the CPU's multi-threaded benchmarks are impressive, with a 3DMark max-threads score of 13795, the game's performance at lower resolutions suggests that the single-thread performance, evidenced by a 3DMark single-thread score of 1269, is more than sufficient. The bottleneck is not the processor. Instead, the data implies that the Ryzen 9 9900X3D is providing a stable and powerful foundation, but the final FPS numbers are heavily influenced by the GPU's capabilities, especially as resolution increases. The CPU's high L3 cache and fast DDR5 memory support help ensure that data is fed to the GPU quickly, but the render pipeline can only output what the graphics card can handle.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 is a Turing-architecture GPU with a base clock of 1365 MHz and a boost clock of 1680 MHz. It has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 336.0 GB/s. While this was a capable card at its release, its 6 GB VRAM capacity is a key limiting factor in modern games. The benchmark data for this combo in Fivem shows a clear pattern: as resolution increases, the average FPS drops significantly, which points directly to the GPU struggling to fill the larger frame buffer and process more pixels. For instance, at High settings, the average FPS falls from 92 at 1080p to 60 at 1440p, and then to 33 at 4K.

The RTX 2060's overall benchmark score of 15290 places it in the 58th percentile of all GPUs, which is a mid-range standing. Its nearest rivals are all similarly performing cards, including the GTX 580 and the RTX 3050 OEM, with performance deltas of 0% and 0.6% respectively. This shows that while the card is not a weak performer, it is far from the top tier. The 160W TDP and the fact that it is a dual-slot card with a single 8-pin power connector suggest it is a mainstream power draw, but its processing capabilities are limited by its 1920 shading units and 48 ROPs.

The data indicates that the GPU is the definitive bottleneck for this pairing. At 1080p Low, the system reaches 145 FPS, but this is an outlier; even at Medium settings, the average drops to 115 FPS. The jump to 4K resolution exacerbates the problem, with Ultra settings yielding just 26 FPS. This is a classic sign of a GPU that cannot keep up with the CPU's output. The RTX 2060's memory bandwidth of 336 GB/s and its 6 GB capacity are simply not enough to sustain high frame rates at 4K, and the card's compute power is insufficient for the higher graphical loads. The data suggests that the CPU is waiting on the GPU for most of the frame time, especially beyond 1080p.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 ranks 2345th out of 3005 tested combos in Fivem. This places it in the 22nd percentile of performance, meaning that roughly 78% of other tested combinations deliver higher frame rates. This low ranking is a direct result of the severe imbalance between the CPU and GPU. While the processor is a high-end part, the graphics card is a mid-range model, and the overall system performance is dragged down by the GPU's limitations.

This ranking makes sense when looking at the individual component scores. The CPU's 91st percentile ranking is excellent, but the GPU's 58th percentile ranking is only average. In a game like Fivem, where the CPU is heavily involved in simulation, one might expect the high-end CPU to offset some of the GPU's weaknesses. However, the measured FPS data shows that the GPU is the limiting factor. The low combo rank reflects the fact that an unbalanced system, regardless of how strong one component is, will not perform optimally.

The data implies that this combo is severely GPU-bound. The CPU has so much headroom that it is never the bottleneck, but the GPU cannot translate that CPU power into high frame rates. For example, at 1080p Low, the system achieves 145 FPS, but this is likely a near-best-case scenario for the GPU. When the settings are increased to Ultra, the FPS drops to 71, which is a significant reduction. At 4K, the GPU is overwhelmed, with average FPS in the 20s and 30s. The ranking reflects this reality: it is a system that can play the game, but it will not provide a high-refresh-rate experience at higher graphical settings.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a clear picture of the system's capabilities across different resolutions and settings. At 1920x1080, the system performs admirably, starting with an average of 145 FPS on Low settings. This drops to 115 FPS on Medium, with a minimum of 97 and a maximum of 132 FPS. High settings yield 92 FPS, and Ultra settings produce 71 FPS. These numbers show that at 1080p, the system is capable of smooth gameplay on all presets, though the 71 FPS on Ultra is less impressive.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance impact of the GPU becomes more apparent. Low settings produce an average of 96 FPS, which is still playable. Medium settings drop to 75 FPS, with a minimum of 64 and a maximum of 87 FPS. High settings yield 60 FPS, which is borderline for smooth gameplay on many displays. Ultra settings are the most demanding, with an average of just 47 FPS. At this resolution, the 6 GB VRAM and the card's compute power are starting to be stretched.

At 3840x2160, the GPU is clearly the limiting factor. Low settings produce an average of 53 FPS, which is the only playable option. Medium settings drop to 42 FPS, with a minimum of 36 and a maximum of 48 FPS. High settings yield just 33 FPS, and Ultra settings are nearly unplayable at 26 FPS. The data shows a dramatic decline in performance as resolution increases, highlighting the GPU's inability to handle 4K rendering in Fivem. The gap between 1080p and 4K is massive, with the 145 FPS at Low 1080p dropping to 53 FPS at Low 4K.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the best experience for this combo in Fivem depends heavily on the target resolution. For 1920x1080, the High preset offers the best balance, providing an average of 92 FPS. This is a significant step up from the 71 FPS on Ultra, and it maintains a frame rate that is well above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay. The Medium preset at 115 FPS is also viable, but the visual improvement from High is often worth the 23 FPS loss. The Low preset at 145 FPS is for those seeking maximum performance, but the visual quality sacrifices are likely not worth it.

For 2560x1440, the Medium preset is the recommended choice. It delivers an average of 75 FPS with a minimum of 64 FPS, ensuring that frame times are mostly stable. The High preset at 60 FPS is playable but leaves little headroom for demanding scenes. The Ultra preset at 47 FPS is not recommended, as it will likely lead to noticeable stuttering and a less responsive experience. The Low preset at 96 FPS is an option for competitive play, but the Medium setting provides a much better visual experience for a relatively small performance cost.

At 3840x2160, the Low preset is the only viable option, yielding an average of 53 FPS. The Medium preset at 42 FPS is borderline, and the High and Ultra presets are not playable. The data suggests that this combo is not suited for 4K gaming in Fivem, as even the lowest settings do not provide a consistently smooth 60 FPS experience. If 4K is a priority, the user would need to consider a more powerful GPU, but the data shows that the RTX 2060 is simply not up to the task.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS data reveals a clear trend in resolution scaling. At High settings, the average FPS drops from 92 at 1080p to 60 at 1440p, a 35% reduction. The drop from 1440p to 4K is even more severe, falling from 60 to 33 FPS, a 45% reduction. This pattern is consistent across all settings presets. At Low settings, the FPS drops from 145 at 1080p to 96 at 1440p (a 34% drop) and then to 53 at 4K (a 45% drop). This accelerating decline in performance at higher resolutions is a classic indicator of a GPU bottleneck.

The data strongly suggests that the limiting component is the GPU. When the resolution increases, the number of pixels the GPU must render increases exponentially. The RTX 2060, with its 6 GB of VRAM and 192-bit memory bus, simply cannot handle the increased workload. The CPU, on the other hand, is not affected by resolution in the same way. Its workload is more dependent on game logic and draw calls, which remain relatively constant across resolutions. Therefore, as the resolution increases, the GPU becomes the sole limiting factor, and the frame rate drops accordingly.

The scaling from 1080p to 4K is particularly telling. At 1080p Low, the system achieves 145 FPS, but at 4K Low, it drops to 53 FPS. This is a 63% reduction in performance. If the CPU were the bottleneck, we would expect to see similar FPS numbers across resolutions, as the CPU's workload would not change. Instead, the significant drop in FPS points to the GPU being overwhelmed. The data implies that the Ryzen 9 9900X3D has more than enough power to feed the RTX 2060, but the GPU cannot process the frames fast enough to take advantage of the CPU's capabilities. This combination is therefore best used at 1080p or 1440p, where the GPU can keep up with the CPU's output.