Downfall
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 91 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 32 | 52 | 63 | 77 |
| 1440p QHD | 52 | 83 | 102 | 124 |
| 1080p Full HD | 73 | 117 | 142 | 174 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Downfall with AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060, In-Depth Analysis
How This Combo Ranks
The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 produces a combo that ranks 2306 out of 2928 tested combinations in Downfall. This places the pairing in the lower-mid tier of the database, sitting at roughly the 21st percentile of all tested combos. The ranking indicates that while this configuration is fully capable of running the game, it does not leverage the full potential of either component in this specific horror title.
The ranking disparity between the CPU and GPU is notable. The Ryzen 9 9900X3D sits at the 91st percentile among all CPUs, while the RTX 2060 rests at the 58th percentile among all GPUs. This gap suggests the combo's overall rank is constrained by the graphics card. The CPU is a top-tier processor with a 12-core, 24-thread configuration, but in Downfall, the GPU becomes the limiting factor at higher resolutions and settings. The measured frame rates confirm this: the system delivers playable performance at 1080p and 1440p, but struggles to maintain high frame rates at 4K with Ultra settings.
When examining the CPU's benchmark standing against its nearest rivals, the data shows a tightly clustered group. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF scores an average of 55093, which is 0.6% lower than the Ryzen 9 9900X3D's average benchmark score of 54762. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245K trails by 1.3%, the Intel Xeon 6505P by 2%, and the Intel Core i7-14700F by 2.1%. These margins are small, indicating that the Ryzen 9 9900X3D is competitively positioned among its peers, though the differences are unlikely to be perceptible in real-world gaming scenarios.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 is built on the Turing architecture and utilizes the TU106 chip fabricated on a 12 nm process at TSMC. It contains 10,800 million transistors on a 445 mm² die. The GPU operates with a base clock of 1365 MHz and a boost clock of 1680 MHz, with memory clocked at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). The 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus provides a bandwidth of 336.0 GB/s.
In Downfall, the GPU's memory capacity and bandwidth play a critical role at higher resolutions. The 6 GB frame buffer is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming, where the measured frame rates remain respectable. At 4K resolution, however, the memory capacity becomes a constraint, particularly at Ultra settings where the average frame rate drops to 32 FPS. The GPU's 1920 shading units, 120 texture mapping units, and 48 raster output pipelines deliver a pixel rate of 80.64 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 201.6 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance of 6.451 TFLOPS is modest by modern standards but adequate for a horror game of Downfall's era.
The GPU's benchmark results place it at the 58th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 15290. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 (0% delta), the AMD Radeon 680M (0.1% delta), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM (0.6% delta), and the AMD Radeon RX 7600 (0.8% delta). These tight margins indicate that the RTX 2060 performs nearly identically to these alternatives in synthetic benchmarks, though real-world gaming performance can vary.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D is a 12-core, 24-thread processor from the 9000 series, based on the Zen 5 architecture with the Granite Ridge codename. It operates with a base clock of 4.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, drawing 120 W TDP. The processor features 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and a substantial 128 MB of L3 cache. It supports DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, and is compatible with AMD Socket AM5. The CPU is manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC, with 16,630 million transistors across two 70.6 mm² dies.
For Downfall, the CPU's single-thread performance is particularly relevant. The processor scores 1269 in 3dmark_single_thread, 679 in Cinebench R15 single-core, 2830 in Cinebench R20 single-core, and 6739 in Cinebench R23 single-core. These scores indicate strong per-core performance, which is beneficial for games that rely on a few heavily loaded threads. The multi-threaded scores are equally impressive: 12490 in 3dmark_16_threads, 13795 in 3dmark_max_threads, 4811 in Cinebench R15 multi-core, 20049 in Cinebench R20 multi-core, and 47737 in Cinebench R23 multi-core.
The CPU's percentile ranking of 91 among all CPUs reflects its position in the upper echelon of processors. Its average benchmark score of 54762 places it just above the Intel Core Ultra 5 245K (54053) and slightly below the Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF (55093). In Downfall, the CPU's capabilities far exceed what the RTX 2060 can utilize, meaning the processor is rarely the bottleneck in this configuration.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured frame rates for Downfall with this combo reveal a clear pattern of performance degradation as resolution and settings increase. At 1920x1080, the system delivers 174 FPS on Low settings, 142 FPS on Medium, 117 FPS on High, and 73 FPS on Ultra. The Medium preset shows a minimum frame rate of 121 FPS and a maximum of 164 FPS, indicating smooth performance throughout.
Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates drop but remain playable. Low settings produce an average of 124 FPS, Medium averages 102 FPS with a minimum of 86 FPS and a maximum of 117 FPS, High averages 83 FPS, and Ultra drops to 52 FPS. These numbers suggest that 1440p gaming is viable at Medium or High settings, with Ultra being borderline for smooth gameplay.
At 3840x2160, the GPU's limitations become apparent. Low settings average 77 FPS, Medium averages 63 FPS with a minimum of 54 FPS and a maximum of 73 FPS, High averages 52 FPS, and Ultra drops to just 32 FPS. The 4K Ultra result is below the threshold for comfortable gaming, indicating that this resolution is only suitable for lower settings with this GPU.
Resolution Scaling
The frame rate scaling from 1080p to 4K reveals the GPU-bound nature of this configuration. At Low settings, the system delivers 174 FPS at 1080p, 124 FPS at 1440p, and 77 FPS at 4K. This represents a 28.7% drop from 1080p to 1440p and a 55.7% drop from 1080p to 4K. The scaling is consistent with a GPU that is reaching its fill-rate and bandwidth limits at higher resolutions.
At Medium settings, the frame rates are 142 FPS at 1080p, 102 FPS at 1440p, and 63 FPS at 4K. The percentage drops are 28.2% from 1080p to 1440p and 55.6% from 1080p to 4K. High settings show 117 FPS at 1080p, 83 FPS at 1440p, and 52 FPS at 4K, with drops of 29.1% and 55.6% respectively. Ultra settings produce 73 FPS at 1080p, 52 FPS at 1440p, and 32 FPS at 4K, with drops of 28.8% and 56.2%.
The consistency of these percentage drops across all settings indicates that the limiting factor is the GPU's raw processing power rather than memory bandwidth or capacity. The nearly identical scaling ratios suggest that the RTX 2060 is being pushed to its limits at 4K regardless of the quality preset. The CPU's performance headroom is not being utilized at higher resolutions, confirming that the graphics card is the primary constraint in this configuration.
Settings Recommendations
Based on the measured frame rates, the optimal settings for this combo depend heavily on the target resolution. At 1920x1080, the High preset at 117 FPS offers an excellent balance of visual quality and performance. The Ultra preset at 73 FPS is also playable and provides the best visual experience, though the frame rate is significantly lower. For competitive play or maximum smoothness, the Medium preset at 142 FPS is the best choice.
At 2560x1440, the High preset at 83 FPS is recommended for a good balance of quality and fluidity. The Medium preset at 102 FPS offers smoother gameplay with a minor visual compromise. The Ultra preset at 52 FPS is borderline; it may be acceptable for a horror game where atmosphere matters more than fast-paced action, but the lower frame rate could be noticeable during intense sequences.
At 3840x2160, the Low preset at 77 FPS is the only setting that provides consistently smooth gameplay. The Medium preset at 63 FPS is playable but may experience occasional dips, as indicated by the 54 FPS minimum. The High preset at 52 FPS and Ultra at 32 FPS are not recommended for 4K gaming, as the frame rates fall below comfortable thresholds for most players. For 4K, players should prioritize the Low or Medium presets to maintain acceptable performance.
FAQ
Q: What is the combo's overall ranking in Downfall?
A: This combo ranks 2306 out of 2928 tested combinations in Downfall, placing it in the lower-mid tier of the database.
Q: How does the Ryzen 9 9900X3D compare to its nearest rivals?
A: The Ryzen 9 9900X3D has an average benchmark score of 54762, which is 0.6% lower than the Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF (55093), and 1.3%, 2%, and 2.1% higher than the Intel Core Ultra 5 245K (54053), Intel Xeon 6505P (53701), and Intel Core i7-14700F (53620) respectively.
Q: What is the best settings preset for 1080p gaming?
A: At 1920x1080, the High preset delivers 117 FPS on average, offering a good balance of visual quality and performance. The Medium preset provides 142 FPS for smoother gameplay.
Q: Can this combo handle 4K gaming?
A: At 3840x2160, the Low preset averages 77 FPS and Medium averages 63 FPS. High and Ultra settings drop to 52 FPS and 32 FPS respectively, making them unsuitable for smooth 4K gameplay.
Q: How does the RTX 2060 compare to its nearest GPU rivals?
A: The RTX 2060 has an average benchmark score of 15290, with the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 at 0% delta, the AMD Radeon 680M at 0.1%, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM at 0.6%, and the AMD Radeon RX 7600 at 0.8%.
Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking among all processors?
A: The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D is at the 91st percentile among all CPUs, indicating it is a top-tier processor. In contrast, the RTX 2060 is at the 58th percentile among all GPUs.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 in Downfall
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 77.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 63.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 52.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 32.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 124.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 102.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 83.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 52.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 174.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 142.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 117.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 73.0 |
Downfall with Ryzen 9 9900X3D + Other GPUs
See how Downfall performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Downfall with RTX 2060 + Other CPUs
See how Downfall performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 9 9900X3D + RTX 2060
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.