Fivem

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 combination delivers a strictly 1080p experience in Fivem, with the data showing a stark performance cliff at higher resolutions. While the CPU is a strong modern part, the GTX 1650’s 4 GB VRAM and modest compute capabilities cap the system’s potential, placing this combo at rank 1686 out of 1792 tested configurations.

FAQ

Q: What is the average FPS at 1080p with Low settings?

A: The measured average is 77.9 FPS, which is the highest score recorded for this combination in the dataset.

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 5600 compare to its nearest rival in CPU benchmarks?

A: The Ryzen 5 5600 has an average benchmark score of 21765, placing it 0.6% above the Intel Xeon D-1746TER and 0.9% above the Intel Core i7-11700F.

Q: What is the GPU's performance percentile relative to all tested GPUs?

A: The GTX 1650 sits in the 43rd percentile, with an average benchmark score of 8713, putting it in the lower half of all GPUs.

Q: What is the best 4K result achievable with this combo?

A: The highest 4K average is 30.3 FPS, achieved only at Low settings; the Ultra preset drops to 14.8 FPS.

Q: Does the GTX 1650 have a specific performance advantage over its closest rival?

A: The data shows the GTX 1650 (avg score 8713) is 0.5% ahead of the NVIDIA Quadro P2200 (avg score 8671) in benchmark scores.

Q: What is the combo’s overall rank among all tested systems?

A: This specific CPU-GPU pairing holds a rank of 1686 out of 1792 tested combinations in Fivem, indicating it is among the lower-performing setups for this game.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 is built on the Turing architecture with a TU117 chip, featuring 896 shading units and 32 ROPs. Its clock speeds are rated at 1485 MHz base and 1665 MHz boost, with a 128-bit memory bus connected to 4 GB of GDDR5 memory. The memory bandwidth is 128.1 GB/s, which is a critical bottleneck for a game like Fivem that can be demanding on VRAM at higher resolutions and settings.

The GPU’s compute capability is rated at 2.984 TFLOPS for FP32, which is modest by modern standards. Its pixel rate is 53.28 GPixel/s and texture rate is 93.24 GTexel/s. These figures explain why the GTX 1650 manages playable frame rates at 1080p Low (77.9 FPS) but struggles significantly as resolution increases. The 4 GB VRAM capacity is a hard limit; at 4K Ultra, the system averages only 14.8 FPS, suggesting the render target exceeds the memory buffer and forces heavy bandwidth thrashing.

The GPU’s performance percentile of 43 indicates it is weaker than the majority of the database’s tested GPUs. Its average benchmark score of 8713 places it within 1% of rivals like the AMD Radeon 550X and NVIDIA Quadro P2200, but all of these are entry-level parts. The GTX 1650’s lack of dedicated ray tracing or tensor cores further limits its feature set, though Fivem’s engine does not appear to leverage those in the measured data.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data shows a clear pattern of resolution dominance, with the CPU and GPU balance shifting as pixel count increases. At 1080p, the combo achieves a spread from 36 FPS (Ultra) to 77.9 FPS (Low), indicating that the GPU is the primary limiting factor even at the lowest settings. The jump from Low to Medium at 1080p costs 15.7 FPS (77.9 to 62.2), while the jump from Medium to High costs another 12.2 FPS (62.2 to 50), showing a steep scaling curve with quality presets.

Moving to 1440p, the average FPS drops by roughly 34-36% across all settings compared to 1080p. For example, High settings fall from 50 FPS at 1080p to 29 FPS at 1440p, and Low settings fall from 77.9 to 51.3 FPS. This consistent drop suggests the GPU is bandwidth-limited, as the resolution increase demands more memory throughput than the 128.1 GB/s can provide.

At 4K, the performance collapses. The best 4K result is 30.3 FPS at Low settings, which is a 61% reduction from the 1080p Low score. High settings at 4K (18.7 FPS) and Ultra (14.8 FPS) are effectively unplayable. The data indicates that the GTX 1650 cannot sustain a 60 FPS target at any resolution above 1080p, and even at 1080p, only the Low preset exceeds 60 FPS. This highlights that the GPU, not the Ryzen 5 5600, is the definitive bottleneck for Fivem in this configuration.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the Ryzen 5 5600 and GTX 1650 produce a range of results. The Low preset delivers an average of 77.9 FPS, which is the only setting that clears the 60 FPS threshold. Medium settings yield 62.2 FPS, High settings drop to 50 FPS, and Ultra falls to 36 FPS. The delta between Low and Ultra is 41.9 FPS, illustrating the significant performance cost of higher visual fidelity.

At 2560x1440, all averages fall below 60 FPS. Low settings achieve 51.3 FPS, Medium reaches 39.7 FPS, High manages 29 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 26.8 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra at 1440p is 24.5 FPS, which is a smaller absolute difference than at 1080p, but the relative drop is steeper.

At 3840x2160, the results are marginal. Low settings produce 30.3 FPS, Medium drops to 22.7 FPS, High yields 18.7 FPS, and Ultra is the lowest at 14.8 FPS. The difference between Low and Ultra at 4K is just 15.5 FPS, showing that the GPU is so heavily saturated that preset changes have diminishing returns. Across all resolutions, the data shows a consistent pattern: the GTX 1650’s memory bandwidth and 4 GB capacity prevent it from scaling effectively with resolution.

How This Combo Ranks

In the overall database of tested CPU-GPU combinations for Fivem, this pairing ranks 1686th out of 1792, placing it in the bottom 6% of all tested systems. This low rank is primarily attributable to the GTX 1650, which has a GPU percentile of 43 and an average benchmark score of 8713. The GPU’s nearest rivals, such as the NVIDIA RTX 3050 A Mobile (score 8746) and AMD Radeon 550X (score 8749), are within 0.5% of its performance, confirming that the GTX 1650 is at the entry-level tier.

The CPU, in contrast, is a relatively strong component. The AMD Ryzen 5 5600 has a percentile rank of 79 against all CPUs and an average benchmark score of 21765. Its nearest rival, the Intel Xeon D-1746TER, is only 0.6% slower, and the AMD EPYC 9554P is 0.6% faster, showing the 5600 is competitive in synthetic CPU tests. However, the CPU’s 6 cores and 12 threads with a boost clock of 4.40 GHz are not the limiting factor in Fivem’s measured FPS; the data shows that the GPU’s 4 GB VRAM and 128.1 GB/s bandwidth create a ceiling that the CPU cannot overcome.

The rank of 1686 out of 1792 suggests that while the CPU is overkill for the GPU in this pairing, the system as a whole is underpowered for Fivem at higher settings. The benchmark results indicate that users of this combo should target 1080p with Low or Medium settings to achieve playable frame rates, as the 4K and 1440p data points are consistently below 60 FPS. The GPU’s end-of-life production status and the CPU’s active status further underscore the imbalance, with the GPU being the clear bottleneck in this configuration.