Fivem
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 61 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 20 | 25 | 38 | 43 |
| 1440p QHD | 37 | 52 | 64 | 85 |
| 1080p Full HD | 60 | 78 | 98 | 127 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Fivem with AMD Ryzen 5 5600 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti, In-Depth Analysis
# CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results
The AMD Ryzen 5 5600 is a 6-core, 12-thread processor built on the Zen 3 architecture (codenamed Vermeer) using TSMC's 7 nm process node. It operates with a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The processor's cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and a shared 32 MB L3 cache. Memory support is DDR4 with dual-channel configuration, offering a memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s.
In Fivem, a multiplayer modification framework that often presents variable CPU load depending on server-side scripts and player counts, the Ryzen 5 5600's multi-threaded capabilities are relevant. Its benchmark scores demonstrate strong scaling: the 3DMark 16-thread score is 5641, while the max-thread score reaches 5659, indicating that the processor maintains consistent throughput even when all threads are engaged. The single-thread score of 882 in 3DMark, paired with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2584, suggests that the processor's per-core performance is robust — a factor that matters in Fivem, where game logic often relies on a limited number of primary threads.
The processor's PassMark single-thread score of 3256 and multithread score of 21541 reveal a balanced profile. When comparing to nearest rivals, the Ryzen 5 5600 sits within a tight band: it is 0.6% ahead of the Intel Xeon D-1746TER (avg score 21635), and 0.9% behind the Intel Core i7-11700F (avg score 21957). The AMD EPYC 9554P and EPYC 9534 both score 21899 and 21900 respectively, placing the Ryzen 5 5600 just 0.6% behind them. This cluster of scores (within roughly 1.5% total spread) indicates that the CPU's overall benchmark average of 21765 is highly competitive, though not class-leading, positioning it at the 79th percentile among all CPUs.
Given Fivem's tendency to be sensitive to both single-thread responsiveness and multi-thread handling of background tasks, the Ryzen 5 5600's 6-core/12-thread configuration appears well-matched to the game's demands. The 32 MB shared L3 cache helps with data locality, which can be beneficial in the sprawling, mod-heavy environments typical of Fivem servers.
# GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results
The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is built on the Turing architecture with a TU116 chip, fabricated on a 12 nm process at TSMC. It features 1536 shading units, 96 texture mapping units, and 48 raster operation units. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1500 MHz and a boost clock of 1770 MHz, with memory running at 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective). It is equipped with 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s.
The GTX 1660 Ti's compute capabilities include an FP32 throughput of 5.437 TFLOPS and an FP16 rate of 10.87 TFLOPS (2:1). Its pixel rate is 84.96 GPixel/s and texture rate is 169.9 GTexel/s. In benchmark terms, the GPU achieves a PassMark G3D score of 12871 and a PassMark GPU compute score of 5226. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 1061, while Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan scores are 60863 and 58014 respectively. The GPU sits at the 55th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 13925.
When compared to its nearest rivals, the GTX 1660 Ti is 0.4% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 570X (avg score 13871) and 0.8% ahead of both the NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile (13821) and the GeForce GTX 680 (13812). It trails the NVIDIA Tesla K10 by 0.7% (14029). These deltas are minimal, indicating that the GTX 1660 Ti performs in a tightly contested tier of GPUs.
For Fivem, the 6 GB VRAM capacity is a critical consideration. At 1920x1080 with Ultra settings, the measured average FPS is 59.7, which suggests that the VRAM allocation and memory bandwidth are sufficient for this resolution/settings combination. However, as resolution increases to 2560x1440, the Ultra preset drops to 37.4 FPS, and at 3840x2160, it falls to 20 FPS — indicating that the GPU becomes a limiting factor at higher resolutions, likely due to both memory capacity and bandwidth constraints. The 288.0 GB/s bandwidth appears adequate for 1080p gaming but becomes strained at 4K.
# FAQ
Q: How does the Ryzen 5 5600 compare to its closest CPU rivals in overall benchmark scores?
A: The Ryzen 5 5600 has an average benchmark score of 21765, placing it 0.6% ahead of the Intel Xeon D-1746TER (21635) and 0.9% behind the Intel Core i7-11700F (21957). It is also 0.6% behind both the AMD EPYC 9554P (21899) and EPYC 9534 (21900).
Q: What is the GTX 1660 Ti's ranking relative to its nearest GPU competitors?
A: The GTX 1660 Ti (avg score 13925) is 0.4% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 570X (13871), 0.8% ahead of both the NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile (13821) and GeForce GTX 680 (13812), and 0.7% behind the NVIDIA Tesla K10 (14029).
Q: What is the best measured FPS for this combo at 1080p?
A: The highest measured FPS is 126.7 at 1920x1080 with Low settings. At Medium settings, it achieves 98.3 FPS, at High it reaches 78.1 FPS, and at Ultra it drops to 59.7 FPS.
Q: How does the combo perform at 1440p compared to 1080p?
A: At 2560x1440, the Low preset yields 85 FPS, Medium produces 63.7 FPS, High delivers 52 FPS, and Ultra falls to 37.4 FPS. These represent drops of approximately 33% to 37% from the corresponding 1080p settings.
Q: Is 4K gaming viable with this combination?
A: At 3840x2160, the highest measured average is 42.8 FPS at Low settings. Medium yields 38.4 FPS, High produces 25.4 FPS, and Ultra drops to 20 FPS. Only the Low preset approaches playable territory.
Q: How does this combo rank among all tested combinations in Fivem?
A: It ranks 1570 out of 1792 tested combos, placing it in the lower-middle tier of all tested configurations for this game.
# How This Combo Ranks
The combination of AMD Ryzen 5 5600 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti achieves a rank of 1570 out of 1792 tested combos in Fivem. This places the combo in the 12th percentile of all tested configurations, meaning roughly 88% of tested combos deliver higher measured FPS in this game. The ranking reflects the balance between the CPU and GPU: while the Ryzen 5 5600 is a capable processor (79th percentile among all CPUs), the GTX 1660 Ti sits at the 55th percentile among all GPUs, and the measured frame rates suggest the GPU is the primary constraint in Fivem.
The data shows a clear pattern across resolutions. At 1920x1080, the combo delivers playable frame rates across all settings, from 59.7 FPS at Ultra to 126.7 FPS at Low. At 2560x1440, performance degrades noticeably, with only Low (85 FPS) and Medium (63.7 FPS) maintaining playable levels. At 3840x2160, none of the settings reach 60 FPS, and only Low (42.8 FPS) stays above 30 FPS. This progression indicates that the combo is best suited for 1080p gaming, with 1440p playable at lower settings, and 4K only marginally usable at the lowest quality preset.
Relative to the broader field, this ranking suggests that Fivem's demands — which can be variable due to multiplayer server load — favor combos with stronger GPUs. The CPU's performance is unlikely to be the bottleneck at 1080p, given its strong multi-threaded scores, but the GPU's 6 GB VRAM and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth begin to limit performance as resolution increases.
# Settings Recommendations
Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings depend on the target resolution and desired frame rate.
At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset delivers 59.7 FPS, which is just below the 60 FPS threshold but acceptable for most players. However, the High preset at 78.1 FPS provides a comfortable margin above 60 FPS while maintaining high visual quality. For players prioritizing smoothness, Medium at 98.3 FPS is an excellent choice, offering a significant FPS boost over High with only a modest visual reduction. Low at 126.7 FPS is available for competitive play or for users with high refresh rate monitors.
At 2560x1440, the Medium preset at 63.7 FPS offers the best balance between visual fidelity and playability, staying above 60 FPS. The High preset at 52 FPS is playable but may feel less smooth, while Ultra at 37.4 FPS is not recommended for action-heavy gameplay. Low at 85 FPS is the best choice for maintaining high frame rates at this resolution.
At 3840x2160, none of the settings achieve 60 FPS. The Low preset at 42.8 FPS is the only option that remains above 30 FPS, making it the sole reasonable choice for 4K gaming. Medium at 38.4 FPS is marginally acceptable, but High (25.4 FPS) and Ultra (20 FPS) should be avoided.
The data indicates that the "sweet spot" for this combo is 1920x1080 with High or Medium settings, where performance is robust and visual quality remains strong. For 1440p users, Medium is the recommended preset, while 4K should be reserved for Low settings only.
# Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data covers three resolutions and four settings presets, providing a comprehensive view of the combo's performance envelope.
1920x1080 (Full HD):
- Low: 126.7 FPS average
- Medium: 98.3 FPS average
- High: 78.1 FPS average
- Ultra: 59.7 FPS average
At 1080p, the combo shows a clear linear scaling from Ultra to Low. The jump from Ultra to High is 18.4 FPS (from 59.7 to 78.1), and from High to Medium is 20.2 FPS (from 78.1 to 98.3). The step from Medium to Low is 28.4 FPS (from 98.3 to 126.7), indicating diminishing returns as settings are lowered.
2560x1440 (Quad HD):
- Low: 85 FPS average
- Medium: 63.7 FPS average
- High: 52 FPS average
- Ultra: 37.4 FPS average
At 1440p, the relative performance drop from 1080p is consistent. Low loses 41.7 FPS (from 126.7), Medium loses 34.6 FPS (from 98.3), High loses 26.1 FPS (from 78.1), and Ultra loses 22.3 FPS (from 59.7). The absolute differences between settings narrow compared to 1080p, with only 47.6 FPS separating Low from Ultra (versus 67 FPS at 1080p).
3840x2160 (4K UHD):
- Low: 42.8 FPS average
- Medium: 38.4 FPS average
- High: 25.4 FPS average
- Ultra: 20 FPS average
At 4K, the combo is heavily constrained. The gap between Low and Medium is just 4.4 FPS, while Medium to High drops by 13 FPS, and High to Ultra falls another 5.4 FPS. The scaling from 1440p to 4K is steep: Low drops from 85 to 42.8 (a 49.6% reduction), Medium from 63.7 to 38.4 (a 39.7% reduction), High from 52 to 25.4 (a 51.2% reduction), and Ultra from 37.4 to 20 (a 46.5% reduction).
Across all resolutions, the data shows that the GTX 1660 Ti's 6 GB VRAM and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for 1080p at any settings, adequate for 1440p at low-to-medium settings, and only marginally sufficient for 4K at the lowest settings. The Ryzen 5 5600's strong multi-threading (3DMark max-thread score of 5659) ensures that CPU-side bottlenecks are minimal, allowing the GPU to be the primary determinant of performance in Fivem.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 5 5600
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 5600 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti in Fivem
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 42.8 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 38.4 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 25.4 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 20.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 85.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 63.7 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 52.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 37.4 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 126.7 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 98.3 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 78.1 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 59.7 |
Fivem with Ryzen 5 5600 + Other GPUs
See how Fivem performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Fivem with GTX 1660 Ti + Other CPUs
See how Fivem performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 5 5600 + GTX 1660 Ti
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.