Fivem

The AMD Ryzen 5 2600 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 produces a distinctive performance profile in Fivem, characterized by a strong GPU that is often held in check by an older CPU. The benchmark data shows this combo ranks 649th out of 1792 tested combinations, placing it in the 36th percentile of all configurations. This mid-pack ranking reflects a system where the RTX 3080's raw capabilities are not fully realized in a multiplayer title that leans heavily on CPU throughput. The measured frame rates tell a story of scalability, with the GPU taking over at higher resolutions while the CPU becomes the limiting factor at lower settings.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Fivem?

A: The data shows the highest average frame rates are achieved at 1920x1080, with a peak of 195.7 FPS on Low settings. At 2560x1440, the best result is 165.2 FPS on Low, while 3840x2160 tops out at 92.2 FPS on Low.

Q: How does the CPU's multi-threaded performance compare to its closest rivals?

A: The Ryzen 5 2600 scores 4698 in Cinebench R20 multi-core. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-11600KF, scores 19740 in average benchmark score, representing a 0.6% difference. The AMD Ryzen 5 7530U is nearly identical, with a deltaPct of 0.6% and an average score of 19508.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration and how does it affect performance?

A: The RTX 3080 features 10 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 320-bit bus, delivering 760.3 GB/s of bandwidth. This large bandwidth helps maintain high frame rates in the demanding 3840x2160 resolution, where it still achieves a playable 57.8 FPS on High settings.

Q: Which settings preset provides the highest frame rate at 2560x1440?

A: The Low preset yields the highest average of 165.2 FPS at 2560x1440. The Medium preset follows at 131.2 FPS, then High at 103.2 FPS, with Ultra bringing up the rear at 79.7 FPS.

Q: How does this combo rank among all tested configurations in Fivem?

A: The combination ranks 649th out of 1792 total tested combos. This places it in the upper-middle range, indicating that while it is not a top-tier setup, it outperforms the majority of tested systems in this specific game.

Q: What is the CPU's single-thread performance relative to its multi-core score?

A: In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 1579 in single-core and 11186 in multi-core, showing a ratio of roughly 1:7. This gap is significant for Fivem, as the game's performance at lower resolutions often depends on single-thread capability.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 is built on the Ampere architecture with a GA102 chip, featuring 8704 shading units and 68 RT cores. Its clock speeds are notable: a base of 1440 MHz that boosts to 1710 MHz, with memory running at 1188 MHz for an effective 19 Gbps. This translates to a substantial 760.3 GB/s of memory bandwidth across a 320-bit bus, a figure that becomes crucial when moving from 2560x1440 to 3840x2160.

In Fivem, the GPU's role is most pronounced at higher resolutions. The data reveals a clear trend: going from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160 on High settings reduces the average frame rate from 155.7 FPS to 57.8 FPS, a drop of roughly 63%. This indicates that the RTX 3080's compute power is being heavily taxed at 4K, yet it still maintains a playable experience. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 25086 and its 80th percentile ranking among all GPUs confirm its strong position, though its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE, is only 0.9% ahead in average benchmark score.

The VRAM allocation is also a factor. With 10 GB of GDDR6X, the card has enough capacity for Fivem's assets even at Ultra settings, but the frame rate data suggests that it is the rendering pipeline, not memory capacity, that limits performance. At 3840x2160 Ultra, the average drops to 44.3 FPS, which is below the threshold for smooth gameplay. The GPU's FP32 performance of 29.77 TFLOPS and pixel rate of 164.2 GPixel/s provide theoretical headroom, but the measured results show that the combination of high resolution and Ultra settings overwhelms the system.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo's rank of 649 out of 1792 places it in the 36th percentile of all tested combinations in Fivem. This is a critical data point because it shows that despite the RTX 3080's standing as a top-tier GPU, the overall system performance is dragged down by the Ryzen 5 2600. The CPU's percentile ranking of 77 among all processors is respectable, but its average benchmark score of 19616 is closely matched by its rivals: the Intel Core i5-1345U is 0.4% behind, and the AMD Ryzen 5 7530U is 0.6% ahead.

When interpreting this rank, the data suggests that the system is capable of strong performance but is not optimized for Fivem's specific demands. The 1792 combos in the database include many with newer CPUs, and the Ryzen 5 2600's Zen architecture, running at a base clock of 3.40 GHz and boost of 3.90 GHz, is a limiting factor. The CPU's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1579 is modest compared to its multi-core score of 11186, and this imbalance becomes apparent in the frame rate data. At 1920x1080 Low, the system achieves 195.7 FPS, but this is likely CPU-bound, as the GPU is not fully utilized. The ranking reflects this: the combo is not in the top tier, but it is far from the bottom, making it a viable mid-range option for Fivem players.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive view of performance across three resolutions and four settings presets. At 1920x1080, the system shows its best results, with Low settings hitting 195.7 FPS and Medium achieving 182.8 FPS. High settings drop to 155.7 FPS, while Ultra falls to 123.7 FPS. The scaling here is interesting: the gap between Medium and High is 27.1 FPS, while the gap between High and Ultra is 32 FPS, suggesting that Ultra settings impose a significant additional load.

At 2560x1440, the numbers shift downward but remain strong. Low settings deliver 165.2 FPS, Medium drops to 131.2 FPS, and High manages 103.2 FPS. Ultra is the outlier at 79.7 FPS, which is still playable but shows a substantial 23.5 FPS drop from High. The data indicates that 2560x1440 is a sweet spot for this combo, as it balances the GPU's capabilities with the CPU's limitations.

The 3840x2160 results are where the system struggles. Low settings produce 92.2 FPS, which is respectable, but Medium falls to 69.2 FPS, High to 57.8 FPS, and Ultra to 44.3 FPS. The drop from Low to Medium is 23 FPS, and from Medium to High is 11.4 FPS, showing that the GPU is increasingly the bottleneck at this resolution. The 44.3 FPS at Ultra is below the 60 FPS threshold that many consider minimum for smooth gameplay, although it remains technically playable.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured data, the optimal settings depend heavily on the target resolution and desired frame rate. At 1920x1080, the Medium preset offers an excellent balance, delivering 182.8 FPS while likely providing better visual fidelity than Low. The High preset at 155.7 FPS is also a strong choice for those who prefer higher quality, as it maintains a frame rate well above the 144 Hz refresh rate common on many monitors.

For 2560x1440, the High preset is the recommended sweet spot. At 103.2 FPS, it provides a smooth experience that approaches the 100 FPS threshold, and the drop to Ultra at 79.7 FPS is not worth the visual improvement for most players. The Medium preset at 131.2 FPS is also viable for competitive play, where higher frame rates are prioritized over visual quality.

At 3840x2160, the choices are more constrained. The Low preset at 92.2 FPS is the only option that guarantees a consistently smooth experience. Medium at 69.2 FPS is playable but may exhibit occasional stutters in busy multiplayer scenarios, while High at 57.8 FPS and Ultra at 44.3 FPS are best avoided unless the player is willing to accept reduced frame rates. The data clearly shows that for 4K gameplay, lowering settings is essential to maintain performance, as the GPU is pushed to its limits in this resolution.