AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-26-100 Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The recorded data presents an unusual comparison because the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-26-100 has no benchmark entries in the database, while the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS has a full suite of recorded scores. The AMD processor therefore wins every measured category by default, simply because no competing measurements exist for the Qualcomm part. This does not mean the AMD chip is categorically superior in every possible workload, but the database currently contains zero quantifiable results for the Snapdragon X1P-26-100.

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS delivers a comprehensive benchmark profile across rendering, encryption, physics, and general computation. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24565 indicates strong sustained multi-threaded performance, while the single-core score of 3468 shows competitive per-thread capability. Passmark integer math at 97625 and floating point math at 58965 further reinforce a balanced compute profile. Data compression at 343952 and random string sorting at 41867 suggest solid memory and cache handling for data-intensive tasks.

The Snapdragon X1P-26-100, by contrast, is characterized entirely by its specifications and absence of recorded performance data. It uses 8 cores with 8 threads, meaning no simultaneous multithreading, whereas the AMD part offers 16 threads from 8 cores. The Qualcomm chip has a base clock of 3.00 GHz with no listed boost clock, while the AMD processor runs at 3.80 GHz base and 5.10 GHz boost. These differences imply the AMD chip has a theoretical clock advantage, but without benchmark scores for the Snapdragon, no measured win can be assigned to it.

The AMD processor holds an 86th percentile ranking among all CPUs in the database, placing it well above the median. The Snapdragon X1P-26-100 sits at the 50th percentile with an average benchmark score of zero, which reflects the absence of data rather than a measured performance level. The nearest rivals for the AMD chip include the AMD EPYC 4245P with an average score of 39215 and a delta of 0.3 percent, the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 at 39485 with a delta of -0.4 percent, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS at 39603 with a delta of -0.7 percent, and the Intel Core i7-13700F at 39009 with a delta of 0.8 percent. These deltas are all within 1 percent, indicating that the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS sits in a tightly contested performance band.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear choice for anyone selecting between these two mobile processors. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS is the only one of the pair with any recorded benchmark results, and it delivers a robust set of scores across rendering, encryption, and compute workloads. Its average benchmark score of 39325 places it in the 86th percentile of all CPUs, a position that reflects genuine measured capability. The Snapdragon X1P-26-100 has an average benchmark score of zero and no entries in the database, so there is no empirical basis to recommend it for performance-sensitive tasks based on the available information.

For workloads that demand multicore throughput, the AMD part provides 16 threads with a 5.10 GHz boost clock, and its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24565 demonstrates strong rendering performance. The Qualcomm chip has 8 threads with no boost clock listed, and no benchmark data to confirm how its Oryon cores perform under sustained load. For single-threaded tasks, the AMD chip records a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3468 and a Passmark single-thread score of 3762, both of which are meaningful data points. The Snapdragon part has no equivalent measurements.

The AMD processor also supports ECC memory, which the Snapdragon does not, and it uses DDR5 memory with a recorded bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Snapdragon uses LPDDR5X with a higher listed bandwidth of 135.2 GB/s, but this advantage exists only on paper. The AMD chip has a larger L3 cache at 16 MB shared, while the Snapdragon has 6 MB shared L3 and 12 MB L2 per module. These architectural differences matter, but without benchmark results for the Qualcomm part, the performance implications remain unquantified.

The practical verdict is straightforward: the database currently contains no measured performance for the Snapdragon X1P-26-100, so the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS is the only option with verified results. Any selection between the two must rely on the AMD chip's recorded scores, which show a capable mobile processor in the upper tier of the database.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

There are no head-to-head benchmark entries recorded for these two processors. The database lists zero wins for each side, and the head-to-head benchmark array is empty. This means no direct comparison exists in the recorded data, and any analysis must rely on the AMD processor's standalone benchmark suite.

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS delivers its strongest results in Cinebench R23 multicore with a score of 24565, followed by Cinebench R20 multicore at 10317 and Cinebench R15 multicore at 2476. Single-core results are similarly consistent: 3468 in R23, 1456 in R20, and 349 in R15. These scores indicate a processor that scales well from single-threaded to multi-threaded workloads, with the multicore advantage growing as thread count increases.

In Passmark tests, the AMD chip shows particular strength in data compression at 343952 and random string sorting at 41867, both of which benefit from memory bandwidth and cache efficiency. Integer math at 97625 and floating point math at 58965 demonstrate balanced arithmetic capability. Extended instructions score 25434, and data encryption reaches 20487, indicating solid cryptographic throughput. The multithread score of 28572 and physics score of 1389 round out the compute profile.

The nearest rival comparisons for the AMD chip are tightly clustered. The AMD EPYC 4245P scores 39215 on average, which is 0.3 percent below the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 scores 39485, putting it 0.4 percent ahead. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS scores 39603, 0.7 percent ahead. The Intel Core i7-13700F scores 39009, 0.8 percent behind. All four rivals fall within a 0.8 percent range of the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS, showing that this processor sits in a highly competitive performance cluster.

The Snapdragon X1P-26-100 has no rival data and no benchmark scores, so no head-to-head assessment is possible. The database records its percentile as 50, which is the median, but this value appears to reflect the absence of data rather than a measured performance level. Its average benchmark score of zero confirms that no tests have been recorded.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has better multi-threaded performance according to the database?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS is the only one with recorded multi-threaded scores. Its Cinebench R23 multicore result is 24565, while the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-26-100 has no benchmark entries.

Q: Does the Snapdragon X1P-26-100 have any recorded benchmark wins?

A: No. The database shows zero wins for the Snapdragon X1P-26-100, and its benchmark array is empty. The AMD processor also has zero wins in head-to-head comparisons, but it has a full set of standalone scores.

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS has 8 cores and 16 threads. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-26-100 has 8 cores and 8 threads.

Q: How do the clock speeds compare?

A: The AMD processor has a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The Snapdragon has a base clock of 3.00 GHz and no boost clock listed.

Q: What memory types do the two processors support?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS supports DDR5 memory with dual-channel configuration and 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. The Snapdragon X1P-26-100 supports LPDDR5X with dual-channel configuration and 135.2 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Where does each processor rank among all CPUs in the database?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS ranks in the 86th percentile with an average benchmark score of 39325. The Snapdragon X1P-26-100 ranks in the 50th percentile with an average benchmark score of zero.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS uses the Zen 4 architecture under the codename Hawk Point, built on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The package contains 25,000 million transistors on a die size of 178 mm². It has 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The thermal design power is 45 watts, and it uses the AMD Socket FP7. Cache is distributed as 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 16 MB shared L3. The integrated graphics are Radeon 780M, and the chip supports ECC memory.

The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-26-100 uses the Oryon codename under the Snapdragon X Plus generation, also built on a 4 nm process at TSMC. It has 8 cores and 8 threads, with a base clock of 3.00 GHz and no boost clock listed. The thermal design power is 25 watts, and it uses the Qualcomm BGA 2073 socket. Cache is organized as 288 KB L1 per core, 12 MB L2 per module, and 6 MB shared L3. The integrated graphics are Adreno X1-45, and it does not support ECC memory.

Both processors use a 4 nm TSMC process, but their cache organizations differ substantially. The AMD chip allocates 64 KB L1 per core and 1 MB L2 per core, while the Snapdragon allocates 288 KB L1 per core and 12 MB L2 per module. The AMD chip has 16 MB shared L3, compared to 6 MB shared L3 on the Snapdragon. These differences affect how each processor handles working sets and data locality, though the Snapdragon's larger L1 per core could benefit certain single-threaded patterns.

Memory support also differs. The AMD processor uses DDR5 with dual-channel configuration and 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. The Snapdragon uses LPDDR5X with dual-channel configuration and 135.2 GB/s bandwidth. The higher bandwidth on the Qualcomm part suggests a design aimed at power efficiency and mobile memory, but the AMD part offers ECC support, which the Qualcomm does not.

PCIe connectivity varies as well. The AMD chip provides Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU, while the Snapdragon provides Gen 4 with 12 lanes from the CPU. The AMD part has a higher thermal design power of 45 watts versus 25 watts for the Snapdragon, reflecting a more aggressive power envelope. The AMD chip also has a higher base and boost clock, and it was released on 2024-04-15, while the Snapdragon was released on 2024-08-27. Both are classified as mobile processors and remain in active production.