AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-26-100 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS and the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-26-100. The head-to-head section is empty, and the win counters for both processors stand at zero. This means there are no paired measurements where both chips ran the same workload under identical conditions in the database.

What does exist is a full benchmark profile for the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS and no benchmark entries at all for the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-26-100. The Qualcomm chip's average benchmark score is recorded as zero, and its percentile versus all CPUs is 50. The AMD part, by contrast, carries a percentile of 73 and an average benchmark score of 19,364.

Without direct comparisons, the only quantitative path is to look at the AMD processor's standalone scores and its nearest rivals from the database. The Ryzen 5 7533HS delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12,342 and a single-core score of 1,742. In Cinebench R20, it reaches 5,183 multi-core and 731 single-core. Cinebench R15 shows 1,243 multi-core and 175 single-core. Passmark results include multi-thread at 14,520, single-thread at 2,740, integer math at 50,800, floating point math at 27,800, extended instructions at 11,219, data compression at 168,692, data encryption at 10,718, physics at 821, random string sorting at 17,669, and find prime numbers at 48.

The nearest rival data for the AMD chip places it within a tight band. The Intel Core Ultra 5 226V scores 19,368, a delta of 0 percent. The Intel Core i5-1345U scores 19,411, which is 0.2 percent higher. The Intel Core i7-8700K scores 19,238, which is 0.7 percent lower. The Intel Core i7-10700F scores 19,499, which is 0.7 percent higher. These deltas show the Ryzen 5 7533HS sits nearly level with a set of mid-range desktop and mobile parts from Intel, neither clearly ahead nor behind by more than a fraction of a percent.

For the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-26-100, the absence of benchmark data means no numerical comparison is possible. The database records no scores for any test, no average, and no rival list. The only quantitative marker is its 50th percentile rank, which indicates it sits at the median of all CPUs in the database, but with no measured scores attached, that percentile cannot be verified against any workload.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS uses the Zen 3+ architecture under the codename Rembrandt-R, part of the 7000 series. It is built on a 6 nm process at TSMC with a die size of 208 mm². The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-26-100 uses the Oryon codename, part of the Snapdragon X (Plus) generation, and is fabricated on a 4 nm process, also at TSMC. No die size is recorded for the Qualcomm part.

Core counts differ. The AMD chip has 6 cores and 12 threads, enabling simultaneous multithreading. The Qualcomm chip has 8 cores and 8 threads, with no multithreading. This means the AMD part can process two threads per core while the Qualcomm part processes one thread per core. The AMD base clock is 3.30 GHz with a boost clock of 4.40 GHz. The Qualcomm base clock is 3.00 GHz with no boost clock recorded.

Cache hierarchies are structured differently. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS provides 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-26-100 provides 288 KB of L1 per core, 12 MB of L2 per module, and 6 MB of shared L3. The Qualcomm L1 is substantially larger per core, while the AMD L3 is larger overall. The L2 organization also differs: AMD uses per-core L2, while Qualcomm uses per-module L2.

Memory support diverges. The AMD chip supports DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus with a recorded bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. The Qualcomm chip supports LPDDR5X memory on a dual-channel bus with a recorded bandwidth of 135.2 GB/s. That bandwidth figure is nearly double the AMD number, reflecting the lower-power, higher-bandwidth LPDDR5X standard. Neither chip supports ECC memory.

PCIe connectivity also differs. The AMD processor offers PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only). The Qualcomm processor offers PCIe Gen 4 with 12 lanes (CPU only). The AMD part has more PCIe lanes available for attached devices.

Integrated graphics are different as well. The AMD chip uses a Radeon 660M. The Qualcomm chip uses an Adreno X1-45. No benchmark scores exist for either integrated GPU in the database.

Power envelopes are distinct. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS has a TDP of 35 watts. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-26-100 has a TDP of 25 watts. That 10-watt difference puts the Qualcomm part in a lower power class, which typically correlates with lower sustained performance but better efficiency in thin-and-light designs.

Sockets and packaging are not interchangeable. The AMD part uses AMD Socket FP7, while the Qualcomm part uses Qualcomm BGA 2073. The AMD part numbers are 100-000001632 (FP7) and 100-000001634 (FP7r2); the Qualcomm part number is X1P26100.

Release dates are close. The Qualcomm chip was released on 2024-08-27, and the AMD chip on 2024-08-31, four days later. Both are marked as active production and target the mobile segment. Neither has a recorded launch MSRP, and neither has an unlocked multiplier.

Where Each One Wins

Given the lack of head-to-head data, the analysis must rely on architecture and configuration differences to infer where each processor holds an advantage.

The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS wins on thread count. With 12 threads versus 8, it can handle more concurrent software threads. This is relevant for workloads that scale with thread count, such as video encoding, 3D rendering, and compilation. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12,342 reflects this capability in a real workload, as does the Passmark multi-thread score of 14,520. The single-core performance is also recorded at 1,742 in Cinebench R23 and 2,740 in Passmark single-thread, indicating a strong per-thread showing.

The AMD chip also wins on L3 cache capacity. At 16 MB shared, it holds more than double the Qualcomm's 6 MB shared L3. Larger shared caches can benefit workloads with repeated data access across cores, such as database operations or certain scientific simulations. The Passmark data compression score of 168,692 and data encryption score of 10,718 suggest the AMD chip handles data-intensive tasks well.

The AMD chip wins on PCIe lane count. With 20 lanes versus 12, it can support more high-bandwidth peripherals, such as multiple NVMe drives or a discrete GPU, without lane sharing. This makes it more suitable for a mobile workstation or a performance laptop with expandable storage.

The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-26-100 wins on memory bandwidth. At 135.2 GB/s, it offers roughly 76 percent more bandwidth than the AMD part's 76.8 GB/s. Higher memory bandwidth benefits workloads that stream large datasets, such as image processing, AI inference, or certain analytics tasks. The LPDDR5X support also implies lower power consumption per access, which aligns with its 25-watt TDP.

The Qualcomm chip wins on process node. At 4 nm versus 6 nm, it uses a more advanced fabrication process. This generally improves transistor density and power efficiency per operation. The lower TDP of 25 watts, combined with a smaller process node, suggests the Qualcomm part is better suited for fanless or ultra-thin designs where heat dissipation is limited.

The Qualcomm chip also wins on L1 cache per core. At 288 KB per core, it provides significantly more fast-access storage than the AMD part's 64 KB per core. This can reduce latency for frequently used data within a single core, potentially improving single-thread responsiveness in bursty workloads.

The Qualcomm part's 8 physical cores, even without multithreading, may offer better raw multi-core throughput per watt in scenarios where the AMD chip's multithreading overhead or higher power draw becomes a liability. However, without benchmark data for the Qualcomm chip, this remains a structural inference rather than a measured result.

FAQ

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS have more threads than the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-26-100?

A: Yes. The AMD part has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Qualcomm part has 8 cores and 8 threads. The AMD chip supports simultaneous multithreading, giving it 4 more threads overall.

Q: Which processor has higher memory bandwidth?

A: The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-26-100 has a recorded memory bandwidth of 135.2 GB/s, compared to the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS at 76.8 GB/s. The Qualcomm part uses LPDDR5X memory, while the AMD part uses DDR5.

Q: What is the process node difference between the two chips?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS is fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-26-100 is fabricated on a 4 nm process, also at TSMC. The Qualcomm part uses a smaller process node.

Q: Are there any direct benchmark comparisons between these two processors in the database?

A: No. The head-to-head benchmark section is empty, and the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-26-100 has no recorded benchmark scores. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS has a full set of Cinebench and Passmark scores, but no paired results exist.

Q: Which processor has a higher TDP?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS has a TDP of 35 watts. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-26-100 has a TDP of 25 watts. The AMD part draws more power under load.

Q: How does the AMD chip compare to its nearest rivals in the database?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS has an average benchmark score of 19,364. Its nearest rivals are the Intel Core Ultra 5 226V at 19,368 (0 percent delta), the Intel Core i5-1345U at 19,411 (0.2 percent higher), the Intel Core i7-8700K at 19,238 (0.7 percent lower), and the Intel Core i7-10700F at 19,499 (0.7 percent higher). The AMD chip sits essentially level with these parts.

The Verdict

The data in the database does not support a head-to-head verdict between the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS and the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-26-100. There are no paired benchmark results, no win counts, and no benchmark scores for the Qualcomm processor. The only quantitative comparison available is structural: core counts, cache sizes, memory bandwidth, process node, and TDP.

For workloads that depend on thread count and shared L3 cache, the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS is the better choice based on the recorded data. Its 12 threads, 16 MB of L3, and 35-watt TDP indicate it can sustain multi-threaded rendering, compilation, and data compression tasks. The measured Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12,342 and Passmark multi-thread score of 14,520 confirm that capability. The AMD chip's 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes also make it more suitable for systems with multiple high-bandwidth devices.

For workloads that depend on memory bandwidth and power efficiency, the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-26-100 has the structural advantage. Its 135.2 GB/s memory bandwidth is nearly double the AMD part, and its 4 nm process node with 25-watt TDP suggests lower power draw. The larger L1 cache per core (288 KB versus 64 KB) may also reduce latency for single-threaded accesses. However, without any measured benchmark scores, these advantages remain untested in the database.

The percentile data also separates the two. The AMD chip sits at the 73rd percentile of all CPUs, indicating it outperforms roughly three-quarters of the recorded processors. The Qualcomm chip sits at the 50th percentile, the median, but with no average score to support that rank. A user choosing between these two should recognize that the AMD part has verified performance data, while the Qualcomm part does not.

The final decision rests on use case and the weight given to measured versus structural evidence. For verified multi-threaded performance, the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS is the only one with data. For bandwidth-sensitive, power-constrained designs, the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-26-100 offers a compelling configuration, but its performance remains unquantified in the database.

Specification Differences

| Field | AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS | Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-26-100 |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 6 | 8 |

| Threads | 12 | 8 |

| Base clock | 3.30 GHz | 3.00 GHz |

| Boost clock | 4.40 GHz | Not recorded |

| TDP | 35 watts | 25 watts |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP7 | Qualcomm BGA 2073 |

| Codename | Rembrandt-R | Oryon |

| Generation | Ryzen 5 (Zen 3+ (Rembrandt)) | Snapdragon X (Plus) |

| Process node | 6 nm | 4 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | TSMC |

| Die size | 208 mm² | Not recorded |

| L1 cache | 64 KB per core | 288 KB per core |

| L2 cache | 512 KB per core | 12 MB per module |

| L3 cache | 16 MB shared | 6 MB shared |

| Memory support | DDR5 | LPDDR5X |

| Memory bus | Dual-channel | Dual-channel |

| Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 135.2 GB/s |

| ECC memory | No | No |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 20 lanes (CPU only) | Gen 4, 12 lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated graphics | Radeon 660M | Adreno X1-45 |

| Market segment | Mobile | Mobile |

| Production status | Active | Active |

| Release date | 2024-08-31 | 2024-08-27 |

| Launch MSRP | Not recorded | Not recorded |

| Multiplier unlocked | No | No |