AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 vs AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS Comparison

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score in the database?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 has an average benchmark score of 90541, placing it in the 96th percentile of all CPUs. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS has no recorded benchmark scores in the database and sits at the 50th percentile.

Q: How do the core and thread counts differ between these two processors?

A: The Ryzen AI Max+ 392 uses 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Ryzen Embedded 8845HS uses 8 cores and 16 threads. This gives the AI Max+ a 50% advantage in core count and a 50% advantage in thread count.

Q: What are the architectural generations of these two chips?

A: The Ryzen AI Max+ 392 is built on Zen 5 architecture with the codename Strix Halo. The Ryzen Embedded 8845HS uses Zen 4 architecture with the codename Hawk Point.

Q: Which processor supports higher memory bandwidth?

A: The Ryzen AI Max+ 392 supports 256.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth through its quad-channel LPDDR5X interface. The Ryzen Embedded 8845HS supports 89.6 GB/s via dual-channel DDR5.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the Ryzen AI Max+ 392 and the Ryzen Embedded 8845HS support ECC memory according to the recorded specifications.

Q: What are the clock speeds of each processor?

A: The Ryzen AI Max+ 392 has a base clock of 3.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The Ryzen Embedded 8845HS has a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz.

Architecture Differences

The Ryzen AI Max+ 392 and the Ryzen Embedded 8845HS represent two distinct architectural approaches from AMD. The AI Max+ 392 uses the Zen 5 architecture under the Strix Halo codename, while the Embedded 8845HS relies on the Zen 4 architecture under Hawk Point. Both are fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC, but the similarities largely end there.

The AI Max+ 392 features a dual-die design with a reported die size of 2x 70.6 mm². The Embedded 8845HS uses a monolithic die of 178 mm² and contains 25,000 million transistors. Cache configurations differ substantially. The AI Max+ 392 offers 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and a shared 64 MB L3 cache. The Embedded 8845HS provides 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and only 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The AI Max+ 392 therefore has four times the shared L3 capacity.

Memory architecture also separates these two processors. The AI Max+ 392 uses LPDDR5X memory over a quad-channel bus, delivering 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Embedded 8845HS uses DDR5 over a dual-channel bus with 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth. That is a 2.86x bandwidth advantage for the AI Max+ 392.

PCIe connectivity differs as well. The AI Max+ 392 provides Gen 4 with 16 CPU lanes, while the Embedded 8845HS provides Gen 4 with 20 CPU lanes. The integrated graphics solutions are different: the AI Max+ 392 uses a Radeon 8060S, while the Embedded 8845HS uses a Radeon 780M. Both processors support ECC memory and have locked multipliers.

Where Each One Wins

The benchmark data in the database shows a clear performance hierarchy. The Ryzen AI Max+ 392 records scores across all PassMark test categories, while the Ryzen Embedded 8845HS has no recorded benchmark results. The AI Max+ 392 therefore wins every measured workload by default of having data available.

Looking at the AI Max+ 392's individual scores, the processor demonstrates particular strength in data compression with a score of 554760, which is its single highest recorded result. Integer math reaches 152414, floating point math reaches 99548, and random string sorting reaches 59487. The extended instructions score of 45666 indicates solid SIMD and cryptography performance. Data encryption scores 27784.

The multithread score of 45231 reflects strong parallel throughput, consistent with the 12-core, 24-thread configuration. The single-thread score of 3927 indicates competitive per-core performance for the Zen 5 architecture. Physics score of 2887 and find prime numbers score of 320 round out the workload coverage.

The Embedded 8845HS, with its 8 cores and 16 threads, would logically be positioned for embedded and industrial applications where the 45 W TDP and compact FP8 socket matter more than peak throughput. The AI Max+ 392 consumes 55 W TDP and uses the FP11 socket, which is a larger physical package. The data does not contain any benchmark wins for the Embedded 8845HS, so all measured performance advantages belong to the AI Max+ 392.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every recorded specification field.

• Cores: 12 (AI Max+ 392) vs 8 (Embedded 8845HS)
• Threads: 24 vs 16
• Base clock: 3.20 GHz vs 3.80 GHz
• Boost clock: 5.00 GHz vs 5.10 GHz
• TDP: 55 W vs 45 W
• Socket: AMD Socket FP11 vs AMD Socket FP8
• Architecture: Zen 5 vs Zen 4
• Codename: Strix Halo vs Hawk Point
• Die size: 2x 70.6 mm² vs 178 mm²
• Transistors: not recorded vs 25,000 million
• L1 cache per core: 80 KB vs 64 KB
• L3 cache shared: 64 MB vs 16 MB
• Memory support: LPDDR5X vs DDR5
• Memory bus: Quad-channel vs Dual-channel
• Memory bandwidth: 256.0 GB/s vs 89.6 GB/s
• PCIe: Gen 4, 16 Lanes vs Gen 4, 20 Lanes
• Integrated graphics: Radeon 8060S vs Radeon 780M
• Release date: 2026-01-05 vs 2024-04-01
• Series: not recorded vs 8000 series
• Part number: 100-000001979 vs unknown

Both processors share the same 4 nm TSMC process node, 1 MB L2 cache per core, ECC memory support, Gen 4 PCIe, mobile market segment, active production status, and locked multipliers.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between the Ryzen AI Max+ 392 and the Ryzen Embedded 8845HS. The wins counters show zero for both processors in the head-to-head section. However, the AI Max+ 392 has a full set of PassMark scores recorded, while the Embedded 8845HS has none.

The AI Max+ 392's average benchmark score of 90541 places it in the 96th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals in the database provide context for its positioning. The Intel Xeon 654 scores 90717, which is 0.2% higher than the AI Max+ 392. The AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX scores 91199, 0.7% higher. The Intel Xeon w7-2575X scores 88172, which is 2.7% lower than the AI Max+ 392. The Intel Xeon 6736P scores 87864, 3.0% lower.

These comparisons show the AI Max+ 392 sitting in a tight cluster near the top of the performance range. It trails the leading rival by less than one percentage point while leading the lower rivals by roughly three percentage points. The Embedded 8845HS, with an average benchmark score of 0 and the 50th percentile ranking, has no comparable data points in the database.

The AI Max+ 392's individual scores demonstrate where its strengths concentrate. Its data compression score of 554760 is its largest absolute result, indicating strong throughput for compression workloads. The floating point math score of 99548 and integer math score of 152414 both indicate robust general-purpose compute capability. The multithread score of 45231 aligns with the 12-core, 24-thread design. The single-thread score of 3927 is competitive for the Zen 5 architecture.

The Verdict

The data in the database clearly favors the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 for any workload where computing performance matters. It has a 96th percentile ranking, an average benchmark score of 90541, and a complete set of PassMark results. The Ryzen Embedded 8845HS has no recorded benchmark scores and sits at the 50th percentile.

The AI Max+ 392 delivers 12 cores and 24 threads compared to the Embedded 8845HS's 8 cores and 16 threads. It provides 64 MB of shared L3 cache versus 16 MB, and 256.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth versus 89.6 GB/s. The Zen 5 architecture with its 80 KB L1 per core represents a generational step over the Zen 4 design in the Embedded 8845HS.

The Embedded 8845HS does hold advantages in specific areas. It has a higher base clock of 3.80 GHz versus 3.20 GHz, a slightly higher boost clock of 5.10 GHz versus 5.00 GHz, and a lower TDP of 45 W versus 55 W. It also offers more PCIe lanes at 20 versus 16. These factors make it suitable for embedded applications where power efficiency and I/O flexibility take priority over raw compute throughput.

Buyers choosing between these two processors should base their decision on the workload requirements. The Ryzen AI Max+ 392 is the superior choice for compute-heavy tasks, multithreaded applications, and memory-bandwidth-sensitive workloads, as evidenced by its benchmark scores and architectural specifications. The Ryzen Embedded 8845HS, with its lower TDP and higher clock speeds, is the appropriate selection for embedded deployments where the 45 W envelope and smaller FP8 socket are mandatory constraints. The database's recorded data supports the AI Max+ 392 as the higher-performing processor by a substantial margin.