AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 vs Intel Core i7-14701E Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded benchmark data shows a decisive overall victory for the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392, which takes 9 of the 11 head-to-head comparisons. The Intel Core i7-14701E manages only 2 wins, both in single-threaded tests.

The largest margin comes in extended instructions, where the AMD part scores 45,666 against Intel's 18,528, a 146.5% advantage. This category often reflects AVX and other specialized workload support, and the gap here is substantial. Random string sorting follows closely, with AMD at 59,487 versus Intel's 29,158, a 104% delta. These two results suggest the Zen 5 architecture handles complex instruction streams and data manipulation tasks with significantly higher throughput.

Data compression shows AMD at 554,760 against Intel's 282,939, a 96.1% lead. Integer math delivers 152,414 versus 81,325, an 87.4% advantage. Encryption tests show 27,784 versus 14,862, an 86.9% gap. Prime number finding, a classic integer workload, lands at 320 versus 176, an 81.8% delta. Floating-point math completes the picture with 99,548 versus 61,873, a 60.9% margin.

The multi-threaded PassMark score tells a similar story: AMD posts 45,231, Intel manages 26,112, a 73.2% difference. Physics simulation, another heavily threaded workload, shows AMD at 2,887 and Intel at 2,399, a smaller but still clear 20.3% lead.

Intel's only victories come in the PassMark single-thread test, where it scores 4,305 versus AMD's 3,927, an 8.8% advantage. This is a notable reversal, but it appears in only one benchmark category, and the magnitude is modest compared to AMD's multi-threaded leads.

The average benchmark scores reinforce the overall picture. AMD's average is 90,541, placing it at the 96th percentile of all CPUs in the database. Intel's average is 33,206, at the 83rd percentile. When compared to their nearest rivals, AMD sits within 0.2% to 3% of processors like the Intel Xeon 654, AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX, and Intel Xeon w7-2575X. Intel's nearest rivals, including the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H and AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS, show deltas of 0% to 0.4%, indicating it clusters with mid-range mobile and desktop parts rather than top-tier server silicon.

Architecture Differences

The foundational difference between these two processors lies in their manufacturing processes and core designs. AMD uses a 4 nm process from TSMC, while Intel builds on a 10 nm process at its own foundries. This node advantage contributes to the AMD chip's die size of two 70.6 mm² dies, whereas Intel uses a single 257 mm² die.

Core counts diverge significantly. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 packs 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Intel Core i7-14701E offers 8 cores and 16 threads. Both use an 80 KB L1 cache per core, but the L2 cache differs: AMD provides 1 MB per core, Intel doubles that to 2 MB per core. The L3 cache heavily favors AMD, which shares 64 MB across all cores, compared to Intel's 33 MB shared pool.

Clock speeds show Intel's advantage in raw frequency. AMD's base clock is 3.20 GHz with a 5.00 GHz boost, while Intel starts at 2.60 GHz but boosts to 5.40 GHz. The higher boost clock aligns with Intel's single-thread benchmark win. However, AMD's higher base clock and larger core count help explain its multi-threaded dominance.

Memory architecture differs substantially. AMD supports LPDDR5X over a quad-channel bus, achieving 256.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth. Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5 over a dual-channel bus, with no memory bandwidth figure recorded in the database. Both processors support ECC memory.

PCIe connectivity also separates the two. AMD provides Gen 4 with 16 CPU lanes, while Intel offers Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes. The newer PCIe standard on Intel allows for faster data transfer to compatible devices, though the practical impact depends on the peripherals used.

Integrated graphics differ as well. AMD includes the Radeon 8060S, while Intel pairs the UHD Graphics 770. The AMD part also targets the mobile market segment with a 55 W TDP, whereas Intel's is a desktop processor with a 65 W TDP. The AMD chip uses the AMD Socket FP11, Intel uses the Intel Socket 1700.

Architecture names highlight the generational split: AMD runs Zen 5 under the Strix Halo codename, while Intel uses Raptor Lake, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh. The AMD processor belongs to the Ryzen AI Max generation, Intel to the Core 14th Gen series. Both are currently active in production, with AMD released on January 5, 2026, and Intel on June 30, 2024.

Where Each One Wins

The data points to AMD as the clear choice for multi-threaded and data-intensive workloads. Its 73.2% lead in PassMark multithread, 96.1% lead in compression, and 146.5% lead in extended instructions indicate strong performance for rendering, video encoding, scientific computation, and database operations. The 60.9% floating-point advantage further supports math-heavy applications such as simulations or financial modeling.

Intel's single-thread win, with an 8.8% margin, positions it better for lightly threaded tasks where one core dominates, such as legacy software, certain database queries, or user interface responsiveness. The higher 5.40 GHz boost clock and larger per-core L2 cache contribute to this strength. Intel's Gen 5 PCIe support also favors setups with the latest NVMe storage or high-bandwidth add-in cards.

For mixed workloads, the AMD processor's combination of 12 cores, 24 threads, and 64 MB L3 cache provides a broader performance envelope. The 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth, more than any recorded figure for Intel, benefits applications that stream large datasets. The 55 W TDP, lower than Intel's 65 W, suggests AMD achieves these results with less thermal overhead, though both are reasonable for their respective market segments.

The percentile ranking reinforces the split: AMD at 96th percentile versus Intel at 83rd. This places AMD among the top few percent of all CPUs in the database, while Intel sits in the upper range but below elite territory. For users whose software scales across cores, the data strongly favors AMD. For those running single-threaded applications exclusively, Intel's edge, while real, is narrow and confined to one benchmark.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher multi-threaded benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 scores 45,231 in PassMark multithread, while the Intel Core i7-14701E scores 26,112. AMD leads by 73.2%.

Q: Does the Intel Core i7-14701E win any benchmark categories?

A: Yes, it wins the PassMark single-thread test with 4,305 points versus AMD's 3,927, an 8.8% advantage. This appears in both single-thread entries in the database.

Q: What is the difference in L3 cache size?

A: AMD provides 64 MB of shared L3 cache, while Intel offers 33 MB. Both use 80 KB L1 per core, but Intel's L2 is 2 MB per core versus AMD's 1 MB per core.

Q: How does memory bandwidth compare?

A: AMD supports LPDDR5X over a quad-channel bus with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth. Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5 over a dual-channel bus, with no bandwidth figure recorded in the database.

Q: What process nodes do these processors use?

A: AMD uses a 4 nm process from TSMC. Intel uses a 10 nm process from its own foundry. AMD's die consists of two 70.6 mm² sections, Intel's is a single 257 mm² die.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: Intel reaches 5.40 GHz boost, while AMD boosts to 5.00 GHz. Intel's base clock is 2.60 GHz, lower than AMD's 3.20 GHz.

The Verdict

The benchmark data indicates that the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 is the superior processor for most computing tasks. It wins 9 of 11 head-to-head comparisons, with margins ranging from 20.3% in physics to 146.5% in extended instructions. Its 96th percentile ranking versus Intel's 83rd percentile places it in a different performance tier. The 12-core, 24-thread configuration, combined with 64 MB of L3 cache and 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth, delivers consistent advantages across integer math, floating-point math, encryption, compression, and multi-threaded workloads.

The Intel Core i7-14701E retains a specific niche: single-threaded performance. Its 8.8% lead in the PassMark single-thread test, driven by the 5.40 GHz boost clock, makes it suitable for applications that cannot utilize multiple cores effectively. The Gen 5 PCIe support and larger per-core L2 cache provide additional benefits for certain hardware configurations. However, these advantages are narrow compared to AMD's broad dominance.

The average benchmark scores tell the complete story: AMD at 90,541 versus Intel at 33,206. This nearly threefold difference in average performance leaves little ambiguity. For users running modern, multi-threaded software, the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 is the data-supported choice. For single-threaded legacy workloads, the Intel Core i7-14701E offers a modest edge, but the overall performance envelope favors AMD.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 | Intel Core i7-14701E |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 12 | 8 |

| Threads | 24 | 16 |

| Base Clock | 3.20 GHz | 2.60 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.00 GHz | 5.40 GHz |

| TDP | 55 W | 65 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP11 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Architecture | Zen 5 | Raptor Lake |

| Codename | Strix Halo | Raptor Lake-R |

| Generation | Ryzen AI Max (Zen 5 (Strix Halo)) | Core i7 (Raptor Lake Refresh) |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die Size | 2x 70.6 mm² | 257 mm² |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 64 MB (shared) | 33 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | LPDDR5X | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bus | Quad-channel | Dual-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | 256.0 GB/s | Not recorded |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 8060S | UHD Graphics 770 |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Release Date | 2026-01-05 | 2024-06-30 |

| Part Number | 100-000001979 | Q49FSRNJK |