AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 vs Intel Core i5-14401TE Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a decisive performance gap between the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 and the Intel Core i5-14401TE. The AMD processor holds a 96th percentile ranking among all CPUs in the database, while the Intel chip sits at the 50th percentile. The AMD part's average benchmark score is 90,541, whereas the Intel processor has no recorded average score, as its benchmark array is empty in the database. This means the comparison relies entirely on the AMD processor's measured results against the Intel part's specification-level profile.

In multi-threaded workloads, the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 scores 45,231 in the PassMark multithread test. This figure reflects its 12 cores and 24 threads, which double the Intel Core i5-14401TE's 6 cores and 12 threads. The Intel part has no recorded multithread score, so the database cannot provide a direct delta percentage, but the core and thread count difference alone indicates a substantial throughput advantage for AMD. The AMD processor also posts 152,414 in integer math and 99,548 in floating point math, both of which are strong indicators of compute-heavy task performance. The Intel chip has no corresponding scores in the database, leaving the AMD part as the only measured entity in these categories.

Single-thread performance for the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 is recorded at 3,927 in the PassMark single-thread test. This is a notable result given its 5.00 GHz boost clock, which exceeds the Intel Core i5-14401TE's 4.50 GHz boost clock. The Intel processor's base clock of 2.00 GHz also trails the AMD part's 3.20 GHz base clock. While the Intel chip's single-thread score is not recorded, the clock speed differential suggests the AMD part holds an advantage in lightly threaded tasks as well. The AMD processor's extended instructions score of 45,666 and data encryption score of 27,784 further reinforce its lead in specialized workloads, neither of which have Intel counterparts in the database.

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 also delivers 554,760 in data compression, 59,487 in random string sorting, and 2,887 in physics tests. These scores place it firmly ahead of the Intel Core i5-14401TE in every measured category, though direct comparisons are limited by the absence of Intel benchmark data. The AMD part's nearest rivals in the database include the Intel Xeon 654 with an average score of 90,717 (0.2% higher), the AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX with 91,199 (0.7% higher), the Intel Xeon w7-2575X with 88,172 (2.7% lower), and the Intel Xeon 6736P with 87,864 (3.0% lower). This places the Ryzen AI Max+ 392 in the company of server-class processors, not mainstream desktop chips like the Core i5-14401TE.

The Verdict

The data indicates the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 is the superior processor in nearly every measurable way. Its 96th percentile ranking versus the Intel Core i5-14401TE's 50th percentile puts the two in entirely different performance tiers. The AMD part doubles the Intel chip's core count (12 versus 6) and thread count (24 versus 12), which directly explains its dominance in multi-threaded scenarios. The AMD processor's 5.00 GHz boost clock also exceeds the Intel part's 4.50 GHz, giving it an edge in frequency-sensitive tasks. The Intel Core i5-14401TE has no recorded benchmark scores, so the database cannot confirm any workload where it outperforms the AMD part.

The Intel Core i5-14401TE does carry a lower 45 W TDP compared to the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392's 55 W, making it the more power-efficient choice on paper. It also uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which is a desktop socket, whereas the AMD part uses AMD Socket FP11, a mobile socket. For users constrained by socket compatibility or strict power limits, the Intel chip may be the only option in a given system design. However, from a raw performance standpoint, the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 is the clear winner in every recorded benchmark category.

The AMD part's nearest rivals are all Xeon-class or high-end Ryzen processors, not mid-range Core i5 chips. This suggests the Ryzen AI Max+ 392 competes in a higher performance stratum entirely. The Intel Core i5-14401TE's lack of benchmark data means it cannot be positioned relative to any rivals in the database, leaving its performance profile undefined. Users seeking a processor with proven, measured performance should look to the AMD part, while those needing a lower-power desktop chip may consider the Intel part despite its unmeasured results.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 uses the Zen 5 architecture under the Strix Halo codename, built on a 4 nm process by TSMC. The Intel Core i5-14401TE uses the Raptor Lake architecture under the Raptor Lake-R codename, built on a 10 nm process by Intel. This process node difference is significant: the 4 nm node allows for denser transistors and lower power consumption per transistor, while the 10 nm node is a larger geometry. The AMD part's die size is listed as 2x 70.6 mm², totaling roughly 141.2 mm² across two chiplets, whereas the Intel part uses a monolithic 215 mm² die.

Cache hierarchies differ notably between the two. Both parts have 80 KB of L1 cache per core, but the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 has 1 MB of L2 cache per core, while the Intel Core i5-14401TE has 1.25 MB per core. The L3 cache is where the gap widens: the AMD part has 64 MB of shared L3 cache, while the Intel chip has 20 MB shared. This 44 MB difference gives the AMD processor a substantial advantage in workloads that benefit from large, fast on-die storage, such as database queries and scientific simulations.

Memory support also diverges. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 supports LPDDR5X memory over a quad-channel bus with a recorded bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s. The Intel Core i5-14401TE supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus, with no bandwidth figure recorded in the database. Both processors support ECC memory, which is a shared feature. The AMD part's quad-channel memory bus and higher bandwidth are clear advantages for memory-intensive tasks, while the Intel part's dual-channel setup is more conventional for desktop platforms.

PCIe connectivity differs as well. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 provides Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel Core i5-14401TE provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The Intel part's newer PCIe generation offers higher potential bandwidth for compatible devices, though the AMD part's Gen 4 implementation is still current for many peripherals. The integrated graphics also differ: the AMD part uses a Radeon 8060S, while the Intel chip uses UHD Graphics 730. The Radeon 8060S is a higher-tier integrated GPU, though no benchmark scores are recorded for either.

The market segments differ. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 is classified as a mobile processor, while the Intel Core i5-14401TE is a desktop processor. This aligns with their sockets: AMD Socket FP11 for the former, Intel Socket 1700 for the latter. The production status for both is active, and neither has an unlocked multiplier. The AMD part's release date is recorded as 2026-01-05, while the Intel part's release date is 2024-06-30, making the Intel chip earlier to market by roughly a year and a half.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 has 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Intel Core i5-14401TE has 6 cores and 12 threads. The AMD part doubles both figures.

Q: What are the boost clock speeds of each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 boosts up to 5.00 GHz, while the Intel Core i5-14401TE boosts up to 4.50 GHz. The AMD part has a 0.50 GHz higher boost clock.

Q: Which processor has a larger L3 cache?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 has 64 MB of shared L3 cache, compared to the Intel Core i5-14401TE's 20 MB. This is a 44 MB difference in favor of AMD.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 and the Intel Core i5-14401TE support ECC memory, according to the database.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 supports LPDDR5X memory over a quad-channel bus with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel Core i5-14401TE supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus, with no bandwidth figure recorded.

Q: Which processor has a higher percentile ranking?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 ranks in the 96th percentile among all CPUs, while the Intel Core i5-14401TE ranks in the 50th percentile.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 wins in every recorded benchmark category. Its 45,231 multithread score, 152,414 integer math score, and 99,548 floating point math score indicate dominance in compute-heavy workloads such as video rendering, scientific computing, and software compilation. The 64 MB L3 cache and 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth make it particularly suited for data-intensive applications that repeatedly access large datasets. The 554,760 data compression score and 59,487 random string sorting score point to strength in file archiving, database operations, and text processing. The 27,784 data encryption score shows capability in security-sensitive tasks, while the 45,666 extended instructions score covers vectorized and specialized instruction workloads. The 3,927 single-thread score, combined with the 5.00 GHz boost clock, ensures strong performance in everyday applications that rely on single-core speed.

The Intel Core i5-14401TE has no recorded benchmark scores, so the database cannot identify any measured workload where it wins. Its advantages are structural rather than performance-based. The 45 W TDP is lower than the AMD part's 55 W, which may be preferable in power-constrained desktop builds where thermal output is a limiting factor. The Intel Socket 1700 platform is a widely used desktop socket, offering broad motherboard compatibility. The dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 support provides flexibility in memory selection, and the Gen 5 PCIe interface with 16 lanes supports the latest high-bandwidth add-in cards. The 215 mm² monolithic die is a single piece of silicon, which can simplify cooling design compared to a multi-chiplet layout. However, none of these factors translate into a benchmark win in the recorded data.

For users prioritizing raw compute performance, the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 is the only choice with measured results. For users building a low-power desktop system on Socket 1700, the Intel Core i5-14401TE may fit a specific platform requirement, but its performance remains unverified in the database. The AMD part's mobile classification and FP11 socket mean it targets laptops or compact mobile devices, while the Intel part's desktop classification targets traditional towers. The choice between them depends on form factor and platform needs, not on benchmark outcomes.

Specification Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 and Intel Core i5-14401TE differ across nearly every specification field. The AMD part has 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Intel part has 6 cores and 12 threads. Base clocks are 3.20 GHz for AMD and 2.00 GHz for Intel. Boost clocks are 5.00 GHz for AMD and 4.50 GHz for Intel. TDP is 55 W for AMD and 45 W for Intel. Sockets differ: AMD Socket FP11 versus Intel Socket 1700. Architectures differ: Zen 5 versus Raptor Lake. Codenames differ: Strix Halo versus Raptor Lake-R. Process nodes are 4 nm for AMD and 10 nm for Intel. Foundries are TSMC for AMD and Intel for the Intel part. Die sizes are 2x 70.6 mm² for AMD and 215 mm² for Intel.

Cache configurations differ in L2 and L3. Both have 80 KB L1 per core, but AMD has 1 MB L2 per core versus Intel's 1.25 MB. L3 is 64 MB shared for AMD and 20 MB shared for Intel. Memory support differs: LPDDR5X for AMD, DDR4 and DDR5 for Intel. Memory buses are quad-channel for AMD and dual-channel for Intel. Memory bandwidth is 256.0 GB/s for AMD and not recorded for Intel. PCIe versions are Gen 4 for AMD and Gen 5 for Intel, both with 16 lanes. Integrated graphics are Radeon 8060S for AMD and UHD Graphics 730 for Intel. Market segments are mobile for AMD and desktop for Intel. Release dates are 2026-01-05 for AMD and 2024-06-30 for Intel. Part numbers are 100-000001979 for AMD and Q4T4SRNJP for Intel. Both support ECC memory, both are active in production, and neither has an unlocked multiplier. The average benchmark score is 90,541 for AMD and 0 for Intel, reflecting the missing Intel data.