AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i vs Intel Core i7-14700T Comparison

AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i vs Intel Core i7-14700T

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i and the Intel Core i7-14700T represent two different approaches to power-conscious computing. The AMD part, built for mobile embedded systems on a 4 nm TSMC process, uses a hybrid Zen 5 / Zen 5c configuration with 10 cores and 20 threads. The Intel part, a desktop-oriented Raptor Lake Refresh chip on Intel’s 10 nm process, offers 20 cores and 28 threads. Benchmark data in the database covers only the Intel i7-14700T, while the AMD P174i has no recorded scores. This analysis relies on the specification differences and the Intel part’s measured performance relative to its nearest rivals.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results between these two processors. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i has an empty benchmarks array and a zero average score, while the Intel Core i7-14700T has a full suite of Cinebench and PassMark results. This means the numerical comparison must focus on what the Intel part achieves in absolute terms and how it stacks against nearby competitors, not against the AMD chip directly.

For the Intel Core i7-14700T, the strongest multi-threaded showing comes from Cinebench R23, where it scores 25980 points. Its Cinebench R20 multicore result is 10911, and the older R15 multicore test yields 2618. These numbers place the chip in the upper tier of desktop processors, with a percentile rank of 88 among all CPUs in the database. The average benchmark score of 41914 confirms that the i7-14700T sits well above the median performer, and its nearest rivals all fall within a narrow band: the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS scores 41963 (0.1% higher), the Intel Core i7-12850HX scores 41779 (0.3% lower), the AMD Ryzen 5 7400 scores 42055 (0.3% higher), and the Intel Core 7 251TE scores 41650 (0.6% lower). The i7-14700T essentially matches these four chips, with the largest delta being just 0.6%.

Single-threaded performance for the Intel part is also recorded. Cinebench R23 single-core returns 3667, R20 single-core returns 1540, and R15 single-core returns 369. PassMark single-thread score is 3905. These figures indicate strong per-core capability, which is useful for lightly threaded workloads. The boost clock of 5.20 GHz on the i7-14700T supports this result, while its base clock sits at 1.30 GHz.

PassMark tests provide additional granularity. Integer math scores 113854, floating point math scores 79042, and extended instructions score 20052. Data compression reaches 354216, while data encryption hits 21277. Random string sorting produces 38546, and prime number finding yields 145. The multithread score is 30571, and physics simulation scores 1946.

Because the AMD P174i has no benchmark entries, there is no way to state a win margin for either side. The data simply shows that the Intel part has measurable performance across many tests, while the AMD part lacks any recorded metrics. The only numerical comparison possible is between the i7-14700T and its listed rivals, not between the two processors in this page.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score of the Intel Core i7-14700T?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700T has an average benchmark score of 41914 and ranks in the 88th percentile among all CPUs in the database.

Q: How does the Intel Core i7-14700T compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS scores 41963, which is 0.1% higher than the i7-14700T’s 41914. This is a negligible difference, effectively a tie.

Q: What is the core and thread count of the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i has 10 cores and 20 threads, with a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz.

Q: What process nodes do the two processors use?

A: The AMD P174i uses a 4 nm process from TSMC, while the Intel i7-14700T uses a 10 nm process from Intel.

Q: Does the Intel Core i7-14700T support DDR4 memory?

A: Yes, the Intel i7-14700T supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, with a dual-channel memory bus. The AMD P174i supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, also dual-channel.

Q: What integrated graphics does each processor include?

A: The AMD P174i includes Radeon 880M graphics, while the Intel i7-14700T includes UHD Graphics 770.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i uses the Gorgon Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI Embedded generation built on Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. This hybrid design combines high-performance and high-efficiency cores in a single die. The process node is 4 nm, fabricated by TSMC, with a die size of 233 mm². The cache hierarchy assigns 80 KB of L1 per core and 1 MB of L2 per core, with a shared 16 MB L3 cache. Memory support includes DDR5 and LPDDR5X, and the memory bandwidth is rated at 89.6 GB/s. ECC memory is supported. The PCIe interface is Gen 4 with 16 lanes from the CPU only. The integrated graphics are Radeon 880M.

The Intel Core i7-14700T uses the Raptor Lake codename, specifically Raptor Lake-R, and belongs to the Core 14th Gen series (Raptor Lake Refresh). It is built on Intel’s 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². The cache layout differs: 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and a shared 33 MB L3 cache. Memory support covers DDR4 and DDR5, both dual-channel, but the database does not list a memory bandwidth figure. ECC memory is supported. PCIe connectivity is Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. Integrated graphics are UHD Graphics 770.

These architectural differences are substantial. The AMD part uses a smaller 4 nm process, which typically allows for better power efficiency, but the Intel part uses a larger 10 nm process. The AMD chip has a larger total cache per core in terms of L2 (1 MB vs 2 MB per core, but with fewer cores), while the Intel chip has more than double the L3 cache (33 MB vs 16 MB). The Intel part also supports PCIe Gen 5, which is newer than the AMD part’s PCIe Gen 4. The AMD part has a specified memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, a figure not provided for the Intel chip.

The core count difference is significant: the Intel i7-14700T has 20 cores and 28 threads, while the AMD P174i has 10 cores and 20 threads. This gives the Intel chip a 2x advantage in physical cores and a 1.4x advantage in threads. However, the AMD chip’s Zen 5 architecture may offer higher instructions per clock, though no benchmark data confirms this. The Intel chip’s boost clock of 5.20 GHz is higher than the AMD chip’s 5.00 GHz, but the AMD chip has a higher base clock of 2.00 GHz versus 1.30 GHz.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in several key specification fields. Core count: AMD has 10, Intel has 20. Threads: AMD has 20, Intel has 28. Base clock: AMD is 2.00 GHz, Intel is 1.30 GHz. Boost clock: AMD is 5.00 GHz, Intel is 5.20 GHz. TDP: AMD is 28 W, Intel is 35 W. Socket: AMD uses AMD Socket FP8, Intel uses Intel Socket 1700. Process node: AMD is 4 nm (TSMC), Intel is 10 nm (Intel). Die size: AMD is 233 mm², Intel is 257 mm². L2 cache per core: AMD is 1 MB, Intel is 2 MB. L3 cache: AMD is 16 MB, Intel is 33 MB shared. Memory support: AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5. Memory bandwidth: AMD lists 89.6 GB/s, Intel lists none. PCIe: AMD is Gen 4 with 16 lanes, Intel is Gen 5 with 16 lanes. Integrated graphics: AMD has Radeon 880M, Intel has UHD Graphics 770. Market segment: AMD is Mobile, Intel is Desktop. Release date: AMD is 2026-02-28, Intel is 2024-01-07. Part number: AMD is unknown, Intel is SRN41. The Intel chip has a launch MSRP of $384; the AMD chip has no listed launch MSRP.

The TDP difference is notable: 28 W for the AMD part versus 35 W for the Intel part. This suggests the AMD chip is designed for lower-power embedded or mobile environments, while the Intel chip targets desktop systems with slightly more thermal headroom. The socket difference also points to different platforms: FP8 is a mobile/embedded socket, while LGA1700 is a desktop socket.

The L3 cache disparity is large: 33 MB on Intel versus 16 MB on AMD. The Intel part also has twice the L2 cache per core, which can benefit workloads that repeatedly access small data sets. However, the AMD part has a smaller die and a more advanced process node, which may offset some of the cache disadvantage through lower latency or higher clock efficiency per watt.

Where Each One Wins

Based on the recorded data, the Intel Core i7-14700T wins in every measurable benchmark category because the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i has no benchmark scores in the database. The Intel part’s 20 cores and 28 threads provide a clear advantage for multi-threaded workloads like video rendering, data compression, and scientific computing. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 25980 and PassMark multithread score of 30571 indicate strong parallel performance. The 88th percentile ranking confirms that it outperforms the vast majority of CPUs in the database.

The Intel part also wins on single-threaded performance, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3667 and a PassMark single-thread score of 3905. This makes it suitable for applications that rely on high clock speeds, such as legacy software or certain simulation tasks. The boost clock of 5.20 GHz supports this.

The AMD part, despite lacking benchmarks, has specifications that suggest potential wins in specific areas. Its lower TDP of 28 W versus 35 W means it could fit into thermally constrained systems. The 4 nm process and smaller die size (233 mm² vs 257 mm²) imply better efficiency per watt, though no data confirms this. The memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s is specified for the AMD part, while the Intel part has no such figure, suggesting the AMD chip may have an advantage in memory-heavy workloads if that bandwidth is fully utilized. The Radeon 880M integrated graphics are likely more capable than Intel’s UHD Graphics 770, but no benchmark scores exist to verify this.

For market segments, the AMD part is classified as Mobile and the Intel part as Desktop. This means the AMD chip is intended for embedded or portable systems where power and size matter, while the Intel chip targets desktop builds where performance and upgradeability are priorities. The release dates differ: the Intel part launched on 2024-01-07, while the AMD part is dated 2026-02-28, indicating a later arrival for the AMD chip.

In terms of raw performance, the Intel i7-14700T is the clear winner based on the available data. Its average benchmark score of 41914 and percentile rank of 88 place it well above the median, and its nearest rivals are all within 0.6% of its score. The AMD P174i, with no recorded scores, cannot be compared numerically. The specification sheet suggests the AMD chip may excel in power efficiency and memory bandwidth, but without benchmark data, any such claim is speculative. The database only supports conclusions for the Intel part, which shows strong multi-threaded and single-threaded performance, while the AMD part remains an unmeasured entry with a distinct architectural profile.