AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i vs Intel Core i7-14700 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results for the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i against the Intel Core i7-14700. The AMD part has no recorded scores in any benchmark test, while the Intel Core i7-14700 has a full suite of measurements. This means the comparison must rely on the Intel chip's absolute scores and its position relative to other CPUs in the database, plus the architectural and specification differences between the two processors.

The Intel Core i7-14700 scores 4061 points in Cinebench R15 multi-core and 299 in single-core. In Cinebench R20, it delivers 14388 multi-core and 2031 single-core. The newer Cinebench R23 workload shows 28398 multi-core and 2080 single-core. Geekbench results show 17087 multi-core and 2409 single-core. PassMark tests add further detail: 40318 in multithread, 4236 in single-thread, 154535 in integer math, 106716 in floating point math, 498198 in data compression, 29601 in data encryption, 28388 in extended instructions, 164 in prime number finding, 54340 in random string sorting, and 2226 in physics.

Since the AMD processor has no benchmark entries, the head-to-head comparison is one-sided. The Intel part's average benchmark score sits at 52301, placing it in the 91st percentile among all CPUs in the database. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i holds a 50th percentile ranking, but this is based on zero recorded scores, so it represents a placeholder rather than a measured result.

The Intel chip's nearest rivals in the database help contextualize its performance. The Intel Xeon Gold 5320H averages 52431, which is 0.2% higher than the i7-14700's score. The AMD EPYC 8124P averages 52121, putting it 0.3% lower. The Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX averages 52073, also 0.3% lower. The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X averages 51947, 0.7% lower. These deltas show the i7-14700 performing within a narrow band of these four processors, with the Xeon Gold 5320H being the only one slightly ahead.

Where Each One Wins

For the Intel Core i7-14700, the recorded data shows wins across every benchmark category where measurements exist. The multi-core Cinebench results indicate strong parallel processing capability, with the R23 score of 28398 reflecting heavy multi-threaded workloads. The single-core scores, particularly the Geekbench 2409 and Cinebench R23 2080, show competitive per-thread performance. PassMark integer and floating point math scores of 154535 and 106716 respectively point to solid general computation throughput. The data compression score of 498198 stands out as particularly high, suggesting strong performance in archiving or compression tasks. Encryption at 29601 and extended instructions at 28388 indicate capable cryptographic and SIMD workloads.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i has no benchmark wins recorded because no benchmark data exists for it in the database. This is not evidence of poor performance, only an absence of measurements. The chip does have architectural features that suggest its intended strengths. Its 10 cores and 20 threads, combined with a 5.00 GHz boost clock, indicate it can handle moderately threaded workloads. The integrated Radeon 880M graphics, while unbenchmarked here, is part of a mobile-focused design. The 28 TDP and Socket FP8 point to a low-power embedded or mobile platform, not a desktop replacement.

Based on the data, the Intel part wins in every measurable category. The AMD part wins in portability and power envelope considerations, but these are qualitative judgments from the specification fields, not benchmark outcomes.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i uses the Gorgon Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI Embedded generation built on Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It is manufactured on a 4 nm process by TSMC, with a die size of 233 mm². The Intel Core i7-14700 uses the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically Raptor Lake-R, and belongs to the Core 14th Gen series. It is built on a 10 nm process by Intel, with a die size of 257 mm².

The AMD chip's cache structure is per-core for L1 and L2, with 80 KB L1 per core and 1 MB L2 per core. Its L3 cache is 16 MB. The Intel chip also has 80 KB L1 per core but doubles the L2 to 2 MB per core. Its L3 cache is 33 MB and shared across all cores. This gives the Intel part more total cache capacity, which typically benefits workloads with large working sets.

Memory support differs significantly. The AMD processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while the Intel processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5. The AMD chip has a measured memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the Intel chip has no bandwidth figure recorded. Both are dual-channel. ECC memory is supported by both processors.

PCIe generation is a notable difference. The AMD chip uses PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The Intel chip uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. This means the Intel part offers newer, higher-bandwidth interconnect for expansion devices.

Integrated graphics differ. The AMD chip uses Radeon 880M, while the Intel chip uses UHD Graphics 770. The database records no performance metrics for either GPU, so the comparison is limited to naming and presence.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ on multiple specification fields. Core count: the AMD has 10 cores, the Intel has 20. Thread count: the AMD has 20 threads, the Intel has 28. Base clock: the AMD runs at 2.00 GHz, the Intel at 2.10 GHz. Boost clock: the AMD reaches 5.00 GHz, the Intel reaches 5.40 GHz.

TDP: the AMD is rated at 28 watts, the Intel at 65 watts. Socket: the AMD uses AMD Socket FP8, the Intel uses Intel Socket 1700. Process node: the AMD uses 4 nm, the Intel uses 10 nm. Foundry: the AMD is made by TSMC, the Intel by Intel. Die size: the AMD measures 233 mm², the Intel measures 257 mm².

L2 cache: the AMD has 1 MB per core, the Intel has 2 MB per core. L3 cache: the AMD has 16 MB, the Intel has 33 MB shared. Memory support: the AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, the Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5. Memory bandwidth: the AMD has a recorded 89.6 GB/s, the Intel has none recorded. PCIe: the AMD uses Gen 4 with 16 lanes, the Intel uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes.

Integrated graphics: the AMD uses Radeon 880M, the Intel uses UHD Graphics 770. Market segment: the AMD is Mobile, the Intel is Desktop. Release date: the AMD is dated 2026-02-28, the Intel is dated 2024-01-07. Launch MSRP: the Intel has a launch MSRP of $384, the AMD has none recorded. Multiplier unlocked: both are locked. Part number: the AMD is unknown, the Intel is SRN40.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700 has 20 cores and 28 threads. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i has 10 cores and 20 threads.

Q: What is the boost clock difference between the two?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700 boosts to 5.40 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i boosts to 5.00 GHz.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i and the Intel Core i7-14700 have ECC memory support recorded as true.

Q: Which processor has a higher TDP?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700 has a TDP of 65 watts. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i has a TDP of 28 watts.

Q: What PCIe generation does each processor use?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i uses PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes. The Intel Core i7-14700 uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes.

Q: Which processor has a larger L3 cache?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700 has 33 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i has 16 MB of L3 cache.

The Verdict

The Intel Core i7-14700 is the only processor of the two with recorded benchmark data. Its average benchmark score of 52301 places it in the 91st percentile of all CPUs in the database, and it outperforms its nearest rivals by small margins: 0.2% behind the Intel Xeon Gold 5320H, 0.3% ahead of the AMD EPYC 8124P, 0.3% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX, and 0.7% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X. These results confirm it as a high-performing desktop processor across multi-core, single-core, and specialized workloads.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i has no benchmark scores in the database. Its specifications show a lower-power, mobile-oriented design with fewer cores, a smaller cache, and older PCIe generation. The 28 watt TDP and Socket FP8 indicate a platform intended for embedded or portable systems, not desktop performance competition. The 4 nm process and LPDDR5X memory support suggest efficiency as a design priority.

For a builder choosing between these two, the data points clearly to the Intel part for any workload that requires measured, verified performance. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 28398 and PassMark multithread score of 40318 show strong throughput. The Intel chip also offers more cores, more threads, a higher boost clock, larger L2 and L3 caches, and PCIe Gen 5 support. Its launch MSRP is $384.

The AMD part would only be selected based on its power envelope and mobile form factor, as no performance measurements exist to support a performance-based choice. The 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth is a recorded advantage, but without benchmark scores, its practical impact remains unquantified. The 50th percentile ranking for the AMD chip is derived from no data, so it carries no analytical weight.

The verdict from the recorded data: the Intel Core i7-14700 is the only processor here with demonstrated performance. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i is a specification sheet without empirical results. Any decision favoring the AMD part would rest on its TDP, socket, and embedded market segment, not on measured capability.