AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i vs Intel Core i5-14450HX Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i

CORE STATE Gorgon Point
CORE SPECS 10 Cores / 20 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2 Base / 5 GHz Turbo
CACHE 16 MB
MAX TDP 28W
ARCHITECTURE Gorgon Point
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core i5-14450HX

CORE STATE Raptor Lake-HX
CORE SPECS 10 Cores / 16 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.4 Base / 4.8 GHz Turbo
CACHE 20 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 55W
ARCHITECTURE Raptor Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
N/A
2,026
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
N/A
285
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
N/A
8,445
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
N/A
1,191
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
N/A
20,108
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
N/A
2,838
passmark_data_compression
N/A
278,538
passmark_data_encryption
N/A
15,574
passmark_extended_instructions
N/A
17,207
passmark_find_prime_numbers
N/A
98
passmark_floating_point_math
N/A
58,037
passmark_integer_math
N/A
78,330
passmark_multithread
N/A
23,680
passmark_physics
N/A
1,475
passmark_random_string_sorting
N/A
29,565
passmark_single_thread
N/A
3,643
passmark_singlethread
N/A
3,643

Analysis: AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i vs Intel Core i5-14450HX

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data for this comparison is one-sided, as the database contains benchmark results for the Intel Core i5-14450HX but none for the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i. The Intel chip's average benchmark score of 32040 places it in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs, while the AMD part sits at the 50th percentile with an average score of zero due to the absence of measured tests.

The Intel Core i5-14450HX delivers its strongest results in multi-threaded workloads. Cinebench R23 multicore shows a score of 20108, while R20 multicore reaches 8445 and R15 multicore lands at 2026. These figures indicate sustained high throughput across rendering tasks, a pattern consistent with the chip's 10 cores and 16 threads. The PassMark multithread score of 23680 reinforces this, along with PassMark integer math at 78330 and floating-point math at 58037.

Single-thread performance on the Intel part is also solid. Cinebench R23 singlecore records 2838, R20 singlecore hits 1191, and R15 singlecore scores 285. PassMark single-thread and singlethread results both show 3643. The boost clock of 4.80 GHz supports these numbers, allowing the chip to handle lightly threaded applications with agility.

Specialized workloads on the Intel Core i5-14450HX show a mixed picture. PassMark data compression scores 278538, a strong figure for archiving and compression tasks. Data encryption reaches 15574, while extended instructions score 17207. Random string sorting posts 29565, and the find prime numbers test returns a modest 98. Physics simulation scores 1475, indicating adequate but not exceptional performance in that specific test.

The absence of benchmark data for the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i means no head-to-head comparisons can be drawn from direct measurements. The nearest rivals for the Intel part provide context for its standing: the Intel Core i7-13705H scores 32076, a delta of -0.1%; the Intel Core i5-14400 scores 32115, a delta of -0.2%; the Intel Core i7-12800H scores 32121, a delta of -0.3%; and the Intel Core i9-11900 scores 32226, a delta of -0.6%. The Core i5-14450HX trails all four by fractions of a percent, placing it within a tightly clustered performance band.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i uses the Gorgon Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI Embedded generation built on Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. Its process node is 4 nm, fabricated by TSMC, with a die size of 233 mm². The Intel Core i5-14450HX is based on Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-HX refresh, and uses a 10 nm process from Intel with a die size of 257 mm².

Core and thread counts differ despite both having 10 cores. The AMD part offers 20 threads, while the Intel part provides 16 threads. This suggests the AMD chip uses simultaneous multithreading across all cores, whereas the Intel chip reserves some threads, likely due to its hybrid core structure, though the database does not specify performance and efficiency core splits.

Cache hierarchies diverge. Both share 80 KB of L1 per core, but L2 differs: the AMD chip has 1 MB per core, while the Intel chip has 2 MB per core. L3 cache totals 16 MB on the AMD part versus 20 MB shared on the Intel part. The larger L2 and L3 on Intel could benefit workloads with high data reuse, though the AMD chip's newer Zen 5 design may compensate through other means.

Clock speeds show the AMD part with a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, while the Intel part runs a base of 2.40 GHz and a boost of 4.80 GHz. The AMD chip has a higher ceiling, but the Intel chip starts from a higher base. Power envelopes differ sharply: the AMD part has a TDP of 28, while the Intel part draws 55. This indicates the AMD chip targets efficiency, while the Intel chip prioritizes sustained performance at higher power.

Memory support reflects generational differences. The AMD chip supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, with dual-channel memory and a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel chip supports DDR4 and DDR5, also dual-channel, but no bandwidth figure is recorded. Both support ECC memory, a feature for reliability-sensitive environments.

PCIe capabilities differ. The AMD chip uses Gen 4 with 16 lanes from the CPU, while the Intel chip uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The newer PCIe standard on Intel enables faster data transfer to compatible devices, though the AMD chip's lower power budget may influence real-world integration.

Integrated graphics vary. The AMD part includes a Radeon 880M, a more capable iGPU for embedded or light graphics work. The Intel part uses UHD Graphics 710, which is a basic display adapter. This distinction matters for systems that rely on the processor's graphics output without a discrete GPU.

Production status is active for both. Release dates differ: the AMD chip launched on 2026-02-28, while the Intel chip launched earlier on 2024-01-07. The AMD chip uses AMD Socket FP8, and the Intel chip uses Intel BGA 1964. The Intel part has an unlocked multiplier, enabling overclocking, while the AMD part is locked.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i has 20 threads, while the Intel Core i5-14450HX has 16 threads, despite both having 10 cores.

Q: What is the boost clock difference between the two chips?

A: The AMD chip boosts to 5.00 GHz, while the Intel chip boosts to 4.80 GHz. The base clocks are 2.00 GHz for AMD and 2.40 GHz for Intel.

Q: How does the cache configuration compare?

A: Both have 80 KB of L1 per core. The AMD chip has 1 MB of L2 per core and 16 MB of L3, while the Intel chip has 2 MB of L2 per core and 20 MB of shared L3.

Q: Which processor has a lower power draw?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i has a TDP of 28, significantly lower than the Intel Core i5-14450HX at 55.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD and Intel parts support ECC memory. The AMD chip supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while the Intel chip supports DDR4 and DDR5.

Q: What are the benchmark scores for the AMD processor?

A: The database contains no benchmark results for the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i. Its average benchmark score is zero, and its percentile rank is 50. The Intel Core i5-14450HX has an average score of 32040 and an 82nd percentile rank.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i | Intel Core i5-14450HX |

| --- | --- | --- |

| Threads | 20 | 16 |

| Base Clock | 2.00 GHz | 2.40 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.00 GHz | 4.80 GHz |

| TDP | 28 | 55 |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Intel BGA 1964 |

| Codename | Gorgon Point | Raptor Lake-HX |

| Generation | Ryzen AI Embedded (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) | Core i5 (Raptor Lake-HX Refresh) |

| Process Node | 4 nm (TSMC) | 10 nm (Intel) |

| Die Size | 233 mm² | 257 mm² |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 20 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR5, LPDDR5X | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | Not recorded |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 880M | UHD Graphics 710 |

| Multiplier Unlocked | No | Yes |

| Part Number | Unknown | SRMXK |

| Release Date | 2026-02-28 | 2024-01-07 |

The Verdict

The data supports a clear distinction between these two mobile processors. The Intel Core i5-14450HX has measured performance across 17 benchmark tests, with an average score of 32040 and an 82nd percentile ranking. Its nearest rivals all score within 0.6% higher, indicating the chip sits at the top of a tight competitive cluster. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 20108 and PassMark multithread score of 23680 show strong sustained throughput for demanding applications.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i has no recorded benchmarks, making direct performance comparison impossible from the database. Its specifications indicate a different design target: a 28 TDP, a 4 nm process from TSMC, and a 5.00 GHz boost clock suggest efficiency and peak responsiveness over raw sustained load. The 20 threads provide more parallelism than the Intel chip's 16 threads, and the Radeon 880M integrated graphics far exceed the UHD Graphics 710 in capability. The 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth on the AMD chip is a recorded advantage, though the Intel chip's bandwidth is unspecified.

The Intel chip appeals to users who need proven, benchmark-verified performance in multi-threaded and single-threaded tasks. Its 55 TDP and unlocked multiplier indicate a willingness to trade power for speed, and the PCIe Gen 5 support future-proofs storage and GPU connectivity. The AMD chip appeals to those prioritizing low power consumption and a modern fabrication node, with a newer release date and embedded-specific features like ECC memory and LPDDR5X support.

No recommendation can be derived from benchmark scores for the AMD part, as none exist in the database. The Intel part's measurable results confirm its capability, while the AMD part remains a specification-based option whose real-world performance is unverified. Buyers seeking immediate, data-backed performance should look to the Intel Core i5-14450HX. Buyers constrained by power budgets or requiring the Radeon 880M's graphics output may consider the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i, but its performance profile is not established by the recorded measurements.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
AI Embedded P174i
i5-14450HX
Core Specs
Cores
10
10 0.0%
Threads
20
16 -20.0%
Base Clock (GHz)
2
2.4 +20.0%
Boost Clock (GHz)
5
4.8 -4.0%
Frequency (GHz)
2
2.4 +20.0%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
5
4.8 -4.0%
Multiplier
20
24 +20.0%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
80 KB (per core)
80 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
16 MB
20 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
28
55 +96.4%
PL1
—
55 W
PL2
—
157 W
Configurable TDP
15-54 W
—
Architecture
Architecture
—
Raptor Lake
Codename
Gorgon Point
Raptor Lake-HX
Generation
Ryzen AI Embedded (Zen 5 / Zen 5c)
Core i5 (Raptor Lake-HX Refresh)
Process Size
4 nm
10 nm
Die Size
233 mm²
257 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR5, LPDDR5X
DDR4, DDR5
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
89.6 GB/s
—
ECC Memory
Yes
Yes
DDR4 Speed
—
3200 MT/s
DDR5 Speed
—
5600 MT/s
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket FP8
Intel BGA 1964
Chipsets
—
WM790, HM770
PCIe
Gen 4, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
4 + 6
P-Cores: 6 E-Cores: 4
E-Core Frequency
1400 MHz up to 3.2 GHz
1800 MHz up to 3.5 GHz
AI/NPU
NPU
Yes / 50 TOPS
—
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Radeon 880M
UHD Graphics 710
Other
Market
Mobile
Mobile
Production Status
Active
Active
Part Number
unknown
SRMXK
Package
FP8
FC-BGA16F
Tj Max
105°C
100°C
View Ryzen AI Embedded P174i Details View Core i5-14450HX Details