AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D vs AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D

CORE STATE Raphael
CORE SPECS 6 Cores / 12 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 4 Base / 4.5 GHz Turbo
CACHE 96 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 65W
ARCHITECTURE Raphael
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025
VS
AMD
AMD

Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360

CORE STATE Strix Point
CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 16 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2 Base / 5 GHz Turbo
CACHE 8 MB
MAX TDP 28W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 5
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

passmark_data_compression
271,649
256,603
passmark_data_encryption
15,797
13,264
passmark_extended_instructions
20,455
18,029
passmark_find_prime_numbers
221
76
passmark_floating_point_math
43,594
46,996
passmark_integer_math
70,774
77,414
passmark_multithread
25,047
22,125
passmark_physics
2,779
1,257
passmark_random_string_sorting
32,999
28,390
passmark_single_thread
3,494
3,862
passmark_singlethread
3,494
3,862
cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
N/A
2,023
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
N/A
271
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
N/A
13,794
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
N/A
1,958

Analysis: AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D vs AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360

The Verdict

The recorded data separates these two processors into distinct roles. The AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D is the stronger overall CPU in the PassMark suite, winning 7 of 11 head-to-head tests and posting an average benchmark score of 44573, which places it at the 89th percentile of all CPUs. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 wins 4 tests, holds an average score of 32662, and sits at the 83rd percentile. The desktop part leads by a wide margin in multithreaded throughput (25047 vs 22125, a 13.2% delta) and in several specialized workloads. The mobile part counters with a clear single-thread advantage (3862 vs 3494, a 9.5% delta) and wins in pure math throughput.

The data indicates that the Ryzen 5 7500X3D is the pick for compute-heavy desktop workloads where cache-sensitive tasks and strong all-core performance matter. The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 is the pick for mobile platforms where power efficiency (28W TDP vs 65W TDP) and higher single-core responsiveness take priority. Neither part dominates outright; the choice depends entirely on the platform and workload mix.

Architecture Differences

The two chips use fundamentally different designs. The Ryzen 5 7500X3D is a 6-core, 12-thread desktop processor built on the Zen 4 architecture with the Raphael codename, part of the 7000 series. It uses a 5 nm process from TSMC, packs 11,270 million transistors on a 71 mm² die, and features 96 MB of shared L3 cache. Its L1 cache is 64 KB per core and L2 is 1 MB per core. It runs on AMD Socket AM5 and supports DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth. ECC memory is supported. PCIe is Gen 5 with 24 lanes from the CPU. Integrated graphics are present as Radeon Graphics.

The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 is an 8-core, 16-thread mobile processor built on the Zen 5 architecture with the Strix Point codename, part of the Ryzen AI PRO 300 generation. It uses a 4 nm TSMC process on a 233 mm² die. L3 cache is only 8 MB, L1 is 80 KB per core, and L2 is 1 MB per core. It uses AMD Socket FP8, supports both DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory on a dual-channel bus with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. ECC memory is supported. PCIe is Gen 4 with 16 lanes. Integrated graphics are the Radeon 880M. The architecture combines Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores, which the Raphael chip does not use. The process node difference (4 nm vs 5 nm) and the larger mobile die reflect the different design goals.

Where Each One Wins

The Ryzen 5 7500X3D excels in workloads that benefit from its massive 96 MB L3 cache and higher base clock (4.00 GHz). It wins data compression by 5.9%, data encryption by 19.1%, extended instructions by 13.5%, and random string sorting by 16.2%. Its physics test score of 2779 is 121.1% higher than the mobile chip's 1257, and its prime number finding score of 221 crushes the 76 of the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 by 190.8%. Multithreaded performance is also in its favor: 25047 vs 22125, a 13.2% advantage. These are classic desktop strengths: cache-heavy, all-core, and latency-sensitive tasks.

The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 wins in floating-point math (46996 vs 43594, a 7.2% edge) and integer math (77414 vs 70774, an 8.6% edge). It also delivers a 9.5% higher single-thread score (3862 vs 3494). The mobile chip's higher boost clock (5.00 GHz vs 4.50 GHz) and newer Zen 5 architecture explain this. For single-threaded applications, lightweight math, and any scenario where the CPU must burst to high frequency within a low power envelope, the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 is the stronger part.

FAQ

Q: Which chip has the higher single-thread performance?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360. Its PassMark single-thread score is 3862, which is 9.5% higher than the 3494 of the Ryzen 5 7500X3D.

Q: Which chip has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 has 8 cores and 16 threads. The AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: Does the Ryzen 5 7500X3D support ECC memory?

A: Yes, ECC memory is supported on the Ryzen 5 7500X3D. The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 also supports ECC memory.

Q: Which processor has the larger L3 cache?

A: The Ryzen 5 7500X3D has 96 MB of shared L3 cache. The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 has only 8 MB of L3.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two?

A: The Ryzen 5 7500X3D is rated at 65W TDP, while the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 is rated at 28W TDP.

Q: Which chip wins the majority of head-to-head benchmark tests?

A: The Ryzen 5 7500X3D wins 7 of the 11 recorded head-to-head tests. The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 wins the remaining 4.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The largest win for the Ryzen 5 7500X3D is in prime number finding, where its score of 221 is 190.8% higher than the 76 of the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360. The physics test also shows a massive gap: 2779 vs 1257, a 121.1% delta. These results indicate that the desktop chip's cache layout and core design handle algorithmic and simulation workloads far more effectively.

The Ryzen 5 7500X3D also wins data encryption by 19.1% (15797 vs 13264), random string sorting by 16.2% (32999 vs 28390), and extended instructions by 13.5% (20455 vs 18029). The multithread test shows a 13.2% lead (25047 vs 22125). Data compression is closer, with a 5.9% edge (271649 vs 256603). In every one of these tests, the 96 MB L3 cache and higher base clock provide a measurable advantage.

The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 takes its biggest win in single-thread performance: 3862 vs 3494, a 9.5% delta. It also wins integer math by 8.6% (77414 vs 70774) and floating-point math by 7.2% (46996 vs 43594). These wins come from its higher boost clock of 5.00 GHz and the Zen 5 architecture. The mobile chip's 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth is also higher than the desktop chip's 83.2 GB/s, which likely contributes to its math throughput.

The overall average benchmark score difference is substantial: 44573 for the Ryzen 5 7500X3D vs 32662 for the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, a 36.5% gap in favor of the desktop part. Its nearest rivals in the database are the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H (0.2% behind), Intel Core i9-13950HX (0.5% behind), and AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 (0.6% behind). The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 sits near the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (0.1% behind), Intel Core i5-14600T (0.1% behind), and AMD Ryzen 5 7400F (0.3% behind). These positions confirm that the desktop chip competes in a higher performance tier overall.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in nearly every specification category. The Ryzen 5 7500X3D has 6 cores and 12 threads; the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 has 8 cores and 16 threads. Base clocks are 4.00 GHz vs 2.00 GHz. Boost clocks are 4.50 GHz vs 5.00 GHz. TDP is 65W vs 28W. Sockets differ: AM5 vs FP8. The process node is 5 nm vs 4 nm. Die size is 71 mm² vs 233 mm². Transistor count is 11,270 million for the desktop chip, while the mobile chip has no recorded transistor count.

Cache configurations diverge sharply. L1 is 64 KB per core vs 80 KB per core. L2 is 1 MB per core for both. L3 is 96 MB shared vs 8 MB. Memory support is DDR5 vs DDR5 and LPDDR5X. Memory bandwidth is 83.2 GB/s vs 89.6 GB/s. PCIe is Gen 5 with 24 lanes vs Gen 4 with 16 lanes. Integrated graphics are Radeon Graphics vs Radeon 880M. Market segments are Desktop vs Mobile. The Ryzen 5 7500X3D launched on 2025-11-11 with a launch MSRP of $269, while the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 launched on 2025-01-05 with no recorded launch MSRP. Neither chip has an unlocked multiplier.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
5 7500X3D
AI 7 PRO 360
Core Specs
Cores
6
8 +33.3%
Threads
12
16 +33.3%
Base Clock (GHz)
4
2 -50.0%
Boost Clock (GHz)
4.5
5 +11.1%
Frequency (GHz)
4
2 -50.0%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
4.5
5 +11.1%
Multiplier
40
20 -50.0%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
64 KB (per core)
80 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
1 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
96 MB (shared)
8 MB
Power
TDP (W)
65
28 -56.9%
PPT
88 W
—
Configurable TDP
—
15-54 W
Architecture
Architecture
—
Zen 5
Codename
Raphael
Strix Point
Generation
Ryzen 5 (Zen 4 (Raphael))
Ryzen AI PRO 300 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c)
Process Size
5 nm
4 nm
Transistors
11,270 million
—
Die Size
71 mm²
233 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Memory
Memory Support
DDR5
DDR5, LPDDR5X
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
83.2 GB/s
89.6 GB/s
ECC Memory
Yes
Yes
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket AM5
AMD Socket FP8
Chipsets
X870E, X870, B850, B840, X670E, X670, B650E, B650, A620
—
PCIe
Gen 5, 24 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 4, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
—
3 + 5
E-Core Frequency
—
2000 MHz up to 3.3 GHz
AMD Multi-Die
IO Process Size
6 nm
—
AI/NPU
NPU
—
Yes / 50 TOPS
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Radeon Graphics
Radeon 880M
Other
Market
Desktop
Mobile
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
$269
—
Part Number
100-000001904
100-000001571
Package
FC-LGA1718
FP8
Tj Max
89°C
100°C
Bundled Cooler
None
—
View Ryzen 5 7500X3D Details View Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 Details