AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D vs Intel Core Ultra 5 336H Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data presents a clear overall winner in raw throughput: the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H takes 9 of the 11 recorded comparisons, while the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D secures only 2. However, the margin of victory varies widely by workload, and the AMD part dominates in one specific area.

The most decisive result is in floating point math. The Intel chip scores 82415 against 43594 for AMD, a massive 47.1% advantage. This is the largest delta in the entire comparison and indicates a fundamental difference in execution resources. Similarly, in data encryption, Intel leads by 25.8% (21291 vs 15797), and in prime number finding, Intel is ahead by 26.1% (299 vs 221). Extended instruction throughput also favors Intel by 16.7% (24542 vs 20455). These results show Intel’s architecture handles mathematically intensive and cryptographic workloads far more efficiently.

In contrast, the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D wins integer math decisively. It scores 70774 against Intel’s 62070, a 14% advantage. This is a substantial margin and suggests the AMD design excels at integer-heavy logic. The AMD part also wins the physics test, though by a narrow 3.6% (2779 vs 2682). These two victories, while fewer in number, are not trivial; integer math is foundational to many general-purpose computing tasks.

The remaining workloads show Intel ahead but with varying margins. In multithreaded performance, Intel leads by 12.3% (28545 vs 25047). Single-thread performance also favors Intel by 12.9% (4013 vs 3494). Data compression is a close contest, with Intel ahead by just 3.1% (280340 vs 271649). Random string sorting shows a modest 4.1% Intel advantage (34402 vs 32999). These results indicate that while Intel is consistently faster in most tasks, the AMD chip remains competitive in several.

It is important to contextualize these head-to-head figures against the overall benchmark averages. The AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D has an average benchmark score of 44573, placing it in the 89th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H, scores 44466, a delta of just 0.2%. The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H, by contrast, has an average score of 34485, placing it in the 84th percentile. Its closest competitor, the Intel Core i7-13700HX, scores 34554, a delta of -0.2%. Therefore, while the Intel chip wins most head-to-head tests, it sits in a lower performance tier overall.

The Verdict

The data leads to a straightforward conclusion: the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H is the faster processor for the majority of benchmark workloads. Its wins in floating point, encryption, multithread, and single-thread tests are backed by substantial margins in several cases. The 47.1% lead in floating point math is particularly notable and suggests a decisive advantage in scientific, engineering, and multimedia rendering tasks.

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D, however, is not without merit. Its 14% victory in integer math is the second-largest delta in the comparison. This indicates a strong performance in general-purpose logic, database operations, and other integer-heavy applications. The narrow 3.6% win in physics also shows it can hold its own in simulation workloads.

For a user prioritizing maximum throughput across a wide range of tasks, the Intel part is the clear choice based on the recorded measurements. For a user whose workload is specifically integer-bound, the AMD part offers a measurable advantage. The overall percentile ranking, however, places the AMD chip higher (89th vs 84th), and its average benchmark score of 44573 is far above Intel’s 34485. This suggests that the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D belongs to a higher performance class, despite losing most individual comparisons to this specific Intel mobile processor.

Architecture Differences

The two processors are built on fundamentally different foundations. The AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D uses the Raphael codename and is part of the Zen 4 generation, fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC. It packs 11,270 million transistors into a 71 mm² die. The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H uses the Panther Lake architecture, fabricated on Intel’s own 3 nm process, and is part of the Core Ultra Series 3.

Core counts differ significantly. The AMD chip has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel chip has 16 cores and 16 threads. This means Intel offers more than twice the physical cores, though without hyper-threading. The AMD chip’s threads are equal to its cores multiplied by two, indicating simultaneous multithreading.

Cache configurations also diverge sharply. The AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a massive 96 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H has 192 KB of L1 per core, 2.5 MB of L2 per core, but only 18 MB of shared L3. The AMD chip’s 96 MB L3 is over five times larger than Intel’s 18 MB, which likely contributes to its strong integer performance by reducing memory access latency.

Memory support shows another difference. The AMD part supports DDR5 only, with a dual-channel bus and a recorded bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. The Intel part supports both DDR5 and LPDDR5X, also dual-channel, but with a higher recorded bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s. This 32 GB/s difference likely contributes to Intel’s wins in memory-sensitive tasks like data compression.

Integrated graphics also differ. AMD includes Radeon Graphics, while Intel includes Xe3 Graphics. The AMD part uses Socket AM5, while the Intel part uses BGA 2540, reflecting its mobile market segment. The AMD chip is a desktop part, while the Intel chip is designed for mobile platforms.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher base clock speed?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D has a base clock of 4.00 GHz, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H has a base clock of 1.90 GHz.

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock speed?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H has a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, which is slightly higher than the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D’s 4.50 GHz.

Q: What is the TDP of each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D has a TDP of 65 watts, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H has a TDP of 25 watts.

Q: Does either processor support ECC memory?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D supports ECC memory, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H does not.

Q: What is the release date for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D was released on 2025-11-11, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H was released on 2026-01-04.

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D has an average benchmark score of 44573, which is higher than the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H’s 34485.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D wins in two specific benchmark categories. Its 14% lead in integer math is the standout result, indicating superior performance in logic-heavy operations such as database processing, encryption key generation, and general-purpose application logic. The 3.6% win in physics simulation also suggests an edge in certain computational physics workloads. These wins point toward a processor that handles integer-bound tasks with exceptional efficiency, likely aided by its large 96 MB L3 cache.

The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H wins in the remaining nine categories. The most decisive victories are in floating point math (47.1% ahead), data encryption (25.8% ahead), and prime number finding (26.1% ahead). These results indicate a strong advantage in scientific computing, 3D rendering, financial modeling, and any workload that relies heavily on floating point operations. The 12.3% lead in multithreaded performance and 12.9% lead in single-thread performance further cement its position as the more versatile performer. The Intel chip also wins in data compression, random string sorting, and extended instructions, showing broad competence across memory-intensive and specialized instruction workloads.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D | Intel Core Ultra 5 336H |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 6 | 16 |

| Threads | 12 | 16 |

| Base Clock | 4.00 GHz | 1.90 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.50 GHz | 4.60 GHz |

| TDP | 65 W | 25 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket AM5 | Intel BGA 2540 |

| Process Node | 5 nm | 3 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| L1 Cache | 64 KB (per core) | 192 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2.5 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 96 MB (shared) | 18 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR5 | DDR5, LPDDR5X |

| Memory Bandwidth | 83.2 GB/s | 115.2 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe | Gen 5, 24 Lanes | Gen 5, 12 Lanes |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics | Intel Xe3 Graphics |

| Market Segment | Desktop | Mobile |

| Production Status | Active | Active |