AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 vs Intel Core i5-14400 Comparison

The Intel Core i5-14400 and AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 are fundamentally different processors: one is a desktop part built for sustained multi-core workloads, while the other is a mobile chip designed for efficiency. Benchmark data shows the Intel chip dominates in raw computational output, winning 13 of the 15 head-to-head comparisons, but the AMD chip takes a clear lead in single-threaded performance metrics. The Intel Core i5-14400 sits at the 82nd percentile of all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 32,115, while the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 ranks marginally higher at the 83rd percentile with an average score of 32,662, indicating that the AMD chip's efficiency advantage translates into competitive overall performance despite its lower core count.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most striking disparity appears in Cinebench R23 multi-core testing, where the Intel Core i5-14400 scores 21,315 against the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360's 13,794, representing a massive 54.5% lead. This is the single largest delta between the two processors across all tests. The single-core Cinebench R23 result follows a similar pattern, with Intel scoring 3,009 versus AMD's 1,958, a 53.7% advantage. These numbers suggest that in heavily threaded rendering workloads, the Intel chip is in a different performance class entirely.

The gap narrows considerably in older Cinebench R15 tests, where Intel wins multi-core by 6.2% (2,148 vs 2,023) and single-core by 11.8% (303 vs 271). This smaller delta in R15 compared to R23 indicates that the Intel's advantage scales with workload duration and complexity, likely benefiting from its higher sustained power delivery. In PassMark integer math, the Intel chip leads by a modest 5.9% (82,017 vs 77,414), but in floating-point math the lead expands to 31% (61,549 vs 46,996), suggesting the Intel architecture handles non-integer calculations far more efficiently.

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360's only victories come in PassMark single-thread tests, where it scores 3,862 against Intel's 3,741, a 3.1% edge. This is a notable result because it indicates that despite the Intel chip's higher boost clock of 4.70 GHz versus AMD's 5.00 GHz, the AMD architecture extracts more performance per clock cycle in single-threaded scenarios. However, this 3.1% advantage is minimal compared to the Intel chip's 54.5% lead in multi-core Cinebench R23, making the overall picture heavily skewed toward Intel.

In data-heavy workloads, Intel maintains consistent leadership: data compression shows a 22.8% edge (314,995 vs 256,603), data encryption a 26.1% edge (16,731 vs 13,264), and extended instructions a 9.9% edge (19,816 vs 18,029). The PassMark multi-thread test gives Intel a 13.4% win (25,080 vs 22,125), while physics and random string sorting see Intel ahead by 11.1% and 13.9% respectively. The only other AMD win is a narrow 5.3% margin in the find prime numbers test, where Intel scores 80 against AMD's 76.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Core i5-14400 is built on Raptor Lake architecture using a 10 nm process at Intel's foundry, with a die size of 215 mm². It houses 10 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and boost clock of 4.70 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 20 MB of shared L3 cache. This configuration is designed for desktop use with a 65 W TDP and fits the Intel Socket 1700.

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 employs Zen 5 architecture on a 4 nm process from TSMC, with a slightly larger die at 233 mm². It features 8 cores and 16 threads, a lower base clock of 2.00 GHz but a higher boost clock of 5.00 GHz. Its cache layout is more modest: 80 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and only 8 MB of L3 cache. This is a mobile chip with a 28 W TDP, using the AMD Socket FP8.

The process node difference is significant: 10 nm versus 4 nm. The smaller 4 nm process allows AMD to pack more transistors into a similar die area, though the Intel chip actually has a smaller die. The AMD chip supports both DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory with a rated bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the Intel chip supports DDR4 and DDR5 but lists no specific bandwidth figure. Both support ECC memory, but the Intel chip uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes while the AMD chip uses PCIe Gen 4 with 16 CPU lanes.

Integrated graphics differ as well: Intel pairs the chip with UHD Graphics 730, while AMD integrates the Radeon 880M. The Intel chip was released on January 7, 2024, while the AMD chip followed nearly a year later on January 5, 2025. Both are currently listed as active production parts.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i5-14400 is the clear winner for multi-threaded desktop workloads. Its 54.5% lead in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 31% advantage in floating-point math make it the preferred choice for video rendering, 3D modeling, scientific simulations, and any task that scales across many cores. The 22.8% lead in data compression and 26.1% lead in encryption also position it well for content creation pipelines, database operations, and file archiving. Its 13.4% multi-thread and 11.1% physics advantages reinforce its suitability for gaming, though the integrated UHD Graphics 730 is not a gaming solution by itself.

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 wins specifically in single-threaded PassMark tests, scoring 3.1% higher than Intel. This suggests it may feel snappier in everyday desktop interactions, lightweight applications, and tasks that rely heavily on single-core responsiveness. Its 28 W TDP makes it dramatically more power-efficient than the Intel's 65 W TDP, which is critical for laptops and ultraportable devices where battery life and thermal management are paramount. The AMD chip's support for LPDDR5X memory and its mobile socket indicate it is intended for thin-and-light systems where the Intel chip cannot physically fit.

For users who need a balance of performance and portability, the AMD chip's 83rd percentile ranking versus Intel's 82nd percentile shows that despite losing most benchmarks, its overall average score is slightly higher, meaning the efficiency-oriented design does not sacrifice total capability. However, for anyone with access to wall power and a desktop chassis, the Intel chip's overwhelming lead in multi-core tests makes it the obvious choice.

Specification Differences

The core count differs: Intel has 10 cores and 16 threads, while AMD has 8 cores and 16 threads. The base clocks are 2.50 GHz for Intel and 2.00 GHz for AMD, but the boost clocks reverse this with Intel at 4.70 GHz and AMD at 5.00 GHz. TDP is a major differentiator: Intel runs at 65 W, AMD at 28 W. The process nodes are 10 nm for Intel and 4 nm for AMD. Cache configurations vary, with Intel offering 1.25 MB L2 per core and 20 MB L3, while AMD provides 1 MB L2 per core and 8 MB L3. Memory support differs: Intel accepts DDR4 and DDR5, AMD accepts DDR5 and LPDDR5X, with AMD listing a specific bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. PCIe generations are different, with Intel using Gen 5 and AMD using Gen 4, though both have 16 CPU lanes. Sockets are incompatible: Intel Socket 1700 versus AMD Socket FP8. The integrated graphics are UHD Graphics 730 for Intel and Radeon 880M for AMD. Release dates are January 2024 for Intel and January 2025 for AMD, with Intel having a launch MSRP of $221 and AMD having no listed launch MSRP.

FAQ

Q: Which processor is faster in multi-core workloads?

A: The Intel Core i5-14400 is significantly faster, leading by 54.5% in Cinebench R23 multi-core (21,315 vs 13,794) and by 13.4% in PassMark multi-thread (25,080 vs 22,125).

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 win any benchmarks?

A: Yes, it wins the PassMark single-thread test by 3.1% (3,862 vs 3,741) and the PassMark find prime numbers test by 5.3% (80 vs 76), though these are its only two wins out of 15 comparisons.

Q: How do their power requirements compare?

A: The Intel chip has a 65 W TDP, while the AMD chip has a 28 W TDP, making the AMD chip substantially more power-efficient for mobile use.

Q: What memory types does each support?

A: The Intel Core i5-14400 supports DDR4 and DDR5, while the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, with the AMD chip listing a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s.

Q: Which has more L3 cache?

A: The Intel chip has 20 MB of shared L3 cache, while the AMD chip has 8 MB of L3 cache, giving Intel a 12 MB advantage.

Q: Are these processors compatible with the same motherboards?

A: No, the Intel chip uses Intel Socket 1700, while the AMD chip uses AMD Socket FP8, so they require entirely different platforms.

The Verdict

The data overwhelmingly favors the Intel Core i5-14400 for any scenario where multi-core performance matters. Its 54.5% lead in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 31% advantage in floating-point math are decisive, and its 22.8% edge in data compression and 26.1% edge in encryption make it the superior choice for content creation, data processing, and heavy multitasking. The Intel chip also wins 13 of 15 benchmarks overall, with its only losses being a 3.1% single-thread deficit and a 5.3% prime-number deficit. For desktop users with a 65 W power budget, the Intel chip is the clear winner.

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 is the better choice only for laptop buyers who prioritize battery life and mobility, given its 28 W TDP versus Intel's 65 W. Its 3.1% single-thread win suggests better responsiveness in light tasks, and its higher overall average benchmark score (32,662 vs 32,115) indicates that its efficiency does not come at a catastrophic performance cost. However, the 8 MB L3 cache and 8-core configuration place it at a significant disadvantage in sustained multi-threaded workloads. Users who need desktop-class rendering performance should choose Intel; users who need a capable mobile processor with reasonable performance should choose AMD. The Intel chip's launch MSRP is $221, though no pricing data is available for the AMD chip.