AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 vs Intel Core i5-14400F Comparison

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 and Intel Core i5-14400F are both 16-thread processors, but they serve completely different platforms and use cases. The data shows a decisive victory for the Intel chip in nearly every multi-threaded and single-threaded benchmark, with the AMD part winning only the PassMark single-thread test. The verdict is straightforward: if you are building a desktop and need maximum compute throughput, the Intel Core i5-14400F is the clear choice. Its 10 cores and 65W TDP deliver significantly higher scores across Cinebench and PassMark suites. Conversely, the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 is a mobile processor on a 28W TDP, making it the pick for laptops where efficiency and an integrated GPU are priorities. The data shows the Intel chip wins 13 of 15 head-to-head tests, often by double-digit margins, while the AMD chip’s only victories are marginal. For a benchmark database, the Intel part is the performance king; the AMD part is the mobility-focused alternative.

The Verdict

Choose the Intel Core i5-14400F if you are assembling a desktop workstation or gaming PC and want the highest raw performance. The benchmark results are unambiguous: it leads by 36.3% in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 35.9% in single-core, with a 13.1% advantage in PassMark multi-thread. Its 10-core, 16-thread configuration and 65W TDP are desktop-oriented, and the data shows it outpaces the AMD chip in every compute-heavy workload, from data encryption (21.7% faster) to floating-point math (23.4% faster). The Intel part also holds a 83rd percentile ranking among all CPUs, matching the AMD chip’s percentile, but it achieves that with higher absolute scores.

Choose the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 if you need a processor for a thin-and-light laptop. This is a 28W mobile part with a 4nm process node and integrated Radeon 880M graphics, which the Intel part lacks entirely. The data shows it wins only the PassMark single-thread test, scoring 3862 versus 3701, a 4.4% margin. That single victory does not offset the Intel chip’s dominance elsewhere, but the AMD part’s architecture is built for efficiency, not desktop-level throughput. Its 8-core, 16-thread design with Zen 5 cores is sufficient for everyday tasks, but the benchmark results indicate it is not a competitor for the Intel chip in sustained multi-core workloads. If you prioritize portability and an iGPU, the AMD part is the only option here; if you prioritize performance, the Intel part is the only choice.

Architecture Differences

The two processors are built on fundamentally different platforms. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 uses the Zen 5 architecture on a 4nm TSMC process node, with a 233 mm² die size. It features 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. Its cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of L3. The chip is designed for the AMD Socket FP8, which is a mobile socket, and supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory in a dual-channel configuration with 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth. It includes ECC memory support and a Radeon 880M integrated GPU.

The Intel Core i5-14400F uses the Raptor Lake architecture on Intel’s 10nm process node, with a 215 mm² die size. It has 10 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz. Its cache is larger in the L2 and L3 departments: 1.25 MB of L2 per core and 20 MB of shared L3. The part fits the Intel Socket 1700, a desktop socket, and supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode. It also supports ECC memory, but it has no integrated graphics, as indicated by the “F” suffix. The Intel chip offers PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the AMD chip offers PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes. In terms of process node, the AMD part’s 4nm TSMC fabrication is significantly more advanced than Intel’s 10nm, but this does not translate into a performance advantage in the benchmark data.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Core i5-14400F dominates the head-to-head results, winning 13 of 15 tests. The largest gap is in Cinebench R23 multi-core, where the Intel chip scores 21645 versus the AMD chip’s 13794, a 36.3% deficit for AMD. Similarly, in Cinebench R23 single-core, the Intel part scores 3055 against 1958, a 35.9% lead. These are not marginal differences; they represent a massive performance chasm in rendering tasks. In Cinebench R15, the Intel chip leads by 7.2% in multi-core (2181 vs 2023) and 11.7% in single-core (307 vs 271), showing a consistent advantage across generations of the Cinebench test.

The PassMark suite tells the same story. The Intel chip wins data compression (315521 vs 256603, an 18.7% lead), data encryption (16949 vs 13264, 21.7% lead), extended instructions (19937 vs 18029, 9.6% lead), and find prime numbers (86 vs 76, 11.6% lead). In floating-point math, the Intel part is 23.4% faster (61319 vs 46996), and in integer math, it is 5% faster (81524 vs 77414). The Intel chip also wins PassMark multi-thread (25470 vs 22125, 13.1% lead), physics (1523 vs 1257, 17.5% lead), and random string sorting (32680 vs 28390, 13.1% lead). The only tests the AMD chip wins are PassMark single-thread and singlethread, which are the same test, scoring 3862 versus 3701, a 4.4% margin. This single victory is notable because it shows the Zen 5 core’s efficiency, but it is an outlier in an otherwise one-sided comparison.

FAQ

Q: Which processor is faster in Cinebench R23 multi-core?

A: The Intel Core i5-14400F is significantly faster, scoring 21645 compared to the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360’s 13794. This is a 36.3% lead for Intel.

Q: Does the AMD chip have an integrated GPU?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 includes a Radeon 880M integrated GPU. The Intel Core i5-14400F has no integrated graphics, as indicated by its “F” suffix.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 has a higher boost clock of 5.00 GHz, compared to the Intel Core i5-14400F’s 4.70 GHz. Despite this, the Intel chip wins the majority of benchmarks.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 has a TDP of 28W, while the Intel Core i5-14400F has a TDP of 65W. This reflects the AMD part’s mobile design versus the Intel part’s desktop design.

Q: How do they compare in PassMark single-thread performance?

A: The AMD chip wins PassMark single-thread with a score of 3862, while the Intel chip scores 3701. This gives AMD a 4.4% advantage in this specific test.

Q: Which processor has more L3 cache?

A: The Intel Core i5-14400F has 20 MB of shared L3 cache, while the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 has 8 MB of L3 cache. Intel’s larger cache likely contributes to its strong multi-threaded performance.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i5-14400F wins in every compute-intensive scenario. For rendering, video encoding, or 3D modeling, the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21645 versus 13794 makes it the superior choice. For data-heavy tasks like compression or encryption, the Intel part’s 18.7% and 21.7% leads, respectively, mean it will handle archives and secure file transfers faster. In scientific computing or financial modeling that relies on floating-point math, the Intel chip’s 23.4% advantage (61319 vs 46996) is substantial. Even in integer math, where the gap is smallest at 5%, the Intel part still comes out ahead (81524 vs 77414). The Intel chip also wins in physics simulations (1523 vs 1257, 17.5% lead) and random string sorting (32680 vs 28390, 13.1% lead), making it the pick for almost any task that requires sustained multi-core processing.

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 wins only in PassMark single-thread performance, scoring 3862 versus 3701. This 4.4% advantage suggests that for lightly-threaded tasks that rely on a single core’s speed, the AMD chip may feel slightly snappier. However, this is a narrow victory in a single test. The AMD part’s real wins are not in the benchmark scores but in its platform features: a 28W TDP for longer battery life, a 4nm process for efficiency, and an integrated Radeon 880M GPU for systems without a discrete graphics card. If you need a compact, low-power system with graphics built in, the AMD chip is the only viable choice. If you need raw performance and have a discrete GPU, the Intel chip wins decisively.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every specification. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Core i5-14400F has 10 cores and 16 threads. The AMD chip has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, while the Intel chip has a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz. The TDP is a major difference: the AMD part is rated at 28W, the Intel part at 65W. The AMD chip uses the AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel chip uses Intel Socket 1700. The process node differs, with AMD on 4nm TSMC and Intel on 10nm Intel. The L3 cache is 8 MB on AMD versus 20 MB on Intel, and the L2 cache is 1 MB per core on AMD versus 1.25 MB per core on Intel. The AMD chip supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory, while the Intel chip supports DDR4 and DDR5. Memory bandwidth is 89.6 GB/s for AMD, while it is not listed for Intel. PCIe support differs: AMD has Gen 4 with 16 lanes, Intel has Gen 5 with 16 lanes. The AMD chip includes a Radeon 880M iGPU; the Intel chip has none. The launch MSRP for the Intel Core i5-14400F is $196; the AMD chip has no listed launch MSRP. The Intel chip’s release date is 2024-01-07, while the AMD chip’s release date is 2025-01-05. Both have ECC memory support. The Intel chip has a larger L3 cache and more cores, while the AMD chip has a higher boost clock and a more advanced process node.