AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 vs Intel Core i5-14401TE Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The recorded database separates these two processors along clear architectural and workload boundaries. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, a mobile part built on TSMC's 4 nm process, dominates in every measured benchmark category available in the database. Its 8 cores and 16 threads, paired with a Zen 5 architecture, produce consistently higher scores across Cinebench and Passmark workloads. The Intel Core i5-14401TE, a desktop Raptor Lake Refresh part with 6 cores and 12 threads, has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, meaning its competitive positioning rests on its architectural traits rather than measured performance data.

The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 wins on multi-threaded workloads by a substantial margin. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 13794, paired with a Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 2023, indicates strong parallel throughput for rendering, compilation, or scientific workloads. The single-core results, 1958 in Cinebench R23 and 271 in Cinebench R15, show that the Zen 5 cores deliver high per-thread performance as well. In Passmark tests, the AMD part records 77414 in integer math, 46996 in floating point math, and 22125 in multithread, all figures that reflect a well-balanced compute engine.

The Intel part, lacking benchmark entries, cannot claim wins in any measured test. However, its specifications suggest strengths in memory flexibility and PCIe connectivity. The Core i5-14401TE supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, whereas the AMD part supports only DDR5 and LPDDR5X. The Intel processor also provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the AMD part offers PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes. These differences point toward different platform priorities: the AMD chip emphasizes power efficiency and integrated graphics performance, while the Intel chip targets desktop systems that may rely on older memory or newer storage and expansion standards.

The AMD processor's integrated Radeon 880M graphics stand out against Intel's UHD Graphics 730. While no specific graphics benchmarks appear in the database, the naming and positioning of these iGPUs indicate that the Radeon 880M is designed for more demanding visual tasks. The data shows the AMD part has a process node advantage, 4 nm versus Intel's 10 nm, and a smaller die size, 233 mm² versus 215 mm², though the AMD die is actually larger in absolute terms despite the finer process.

The Verdict

The database clearly favors the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 wherever performance scores exist. Its average benchmark score of 32662 places it at the 83rd percentile among all CPUs in the database. The nearest rivals, including the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H with an average score of 32697 and a delta of -0.1 percent, and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H at 32812 with a delta of -0.5 percent, show that the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 sits in a tight performance cluster near the top of mobile processors. The Intel Core i5-14401TE, with a 50th percentile ranking and an average benchmark score of zero, has no measured performance data to compare.

For users prioritizing raw compute in a mobile form factor, the AMD part is the clear selection. Its 28 watt TDP, compared to Intel's 45 watts, suggests it achieves higher performance while consuming less power, a critical advantage for laptops and compact systems. The AMD processor also offers a higher boost clock, 5.00 GHz versus 4.50 GHz on the Intel part, and a larger thread count, 16 versus 12.

The Intel Core i5-14401TE serves a different role. Its desktop socket, Intel Socket 1700, and support for DDR4 memory make it a viable option for upgrading existing desktop platforms without replacing memory modules. The PCIe Gen 5 interface also future-proofs storage and GPU connectivity. However, without benchmark scores, the database cannot substantiate any performance claims for this part. The verdict from the recorded data is straightforward: the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 outperforms the Intel Core i5-14401TE in every measured category, and the Intel part's advantages are limited to platform compatibility and memory options.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark entries for these two processors. However, the AMD part's own benchmark suite provides a full picture of its capabilities, while the Intel part's empty benchmark array leaves no comparable figures. The largest wins for the AMD processor appear in multi-core and math-heavy tests. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the AMD part scores 13794, which is a strong result for an 8-core mobile chip. The single-core score of 1958 also indicates high per-thread efficiency. In Passmark integer math, the score of 77414 shows that the Zen 5 cores handle arithmetic operations quickly. Floating point math, at 46996, reinforces this trend.

The AMD processor also performs well in data compression and encryption. Passmark data compression yields a score of 256603, while data encryption reaches 13264. Extended instructions score 18029, and random string sorting reaches 28390. Prime number finding, a test sensitive to branch prediction and integer performance, returns a score of 76, which is a modest figure but still represents a functional result. The physics test score of 1257 and the single-thread score of 3862 complete the picture of a processor that excels across general-purpose tasks.

Because the Intel part has no scores, the head-to-head comparison is one-sided. The AMD processor's Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 2023 and single-core score of 271 are the only recorded data points for that benchmark generation. The absence of Intel scores means the database cannot calculate any delta percentages, win counts, or rival comparisons for the Core i5-14401TE. The recorded data simply shows that the AMD part is a high-performing mobile processor, while the Intel part remains unmeasured.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Core i5-14401TE has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: What are the boost clock speeds for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 boosts up to 5.00 GHz, while the Intel Core i5-14401TE boosts up to 4.50 GHz.

Q: Which processor supports DDR4 memory?

A: Only the Intel Core i5-14401TE supports DDR4 memory. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 has a TDP of 28 watts, while the Intel Core i5-14401TE has a TDP of 45 watts.

Q: Which processor has a higher benchmark percentile ranking?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 ranks at the 83rd percentile among all CPUs, while the Intel Core i5-14401TE ranks at the 50th percentile.

Q: What PCIe generation does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 supports PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes, while the Intel Core i5-14401TE supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 uses the Zen 5 architecture on the Strix Point codename, part of the Ryzen AI PRO 300 generation that mixes Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It is built on TSMC's 4 nm process with a die size of 233 mm². The Intel Core i5-14401TE uses the Raptor Lake architecture on the Raptor Lake-R codename, part of the Core i5 generation with a Raptor Lake Refresh. It is built on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 215 mm².

Cache layouts differ significantly. The AMD part has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 8 MB of L3 cache. The Intel part also has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, but its L2 cache is larger at 1.25 MB per core, and its L3 cache is substantially larger at 20 MB shared. This larger L3 cache on the Intel part may help in certain workloads, but no benchmark scores exist to confirm any advantage.

The AMD processor uses an AMD Socket FP8, indicating a mobile platform, while the Intel processor uses Intel Socket 1700, a desktop socket. The AMD part's integrated graphics are the Radeon 880M, while the Intel part uses UHD Graphics 730. Both support ECC memory, a feature that suggests server or workstation use cases. The AMD part has a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the Intel part has no recorded memory bandwidth figure. The AMD part's release date is January 2025, while the Intel part's release date is June 2024.

Specification Differences

The table below highlights only the fields where the two processors differ, based on the recorded database.

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 | Intel Core i5-14401TE |

| --- | --- | --- |

| Series | null | Core 14th Gen |

| Cores | 8 | 6 |

| Threads | 16 | 12 |

| Boost Clock | 5.00 GHz | 4.50 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 45 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Architecture | Zen 5 | Raptor Lake |

| Codename | Strix Point | Raptor Lake-R |

| Generation | Ryzen AI PRO 300 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) | Core i5 (Raptor Lake Refresh) |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die Size | 233 mm² | 215 mm² |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 8 MB | 20 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR5, LPDDR5X | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | null |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 880M | UHD Graphics 730 |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Release Date | 2025-01-05 | 2024-06-30 |

| Part Number | 100-000001571 | Q4T4SRNJP |

| Percentile vs All CPUs | 83 | 50 |

| Average Benchmark Score | 32662 | 0 |

The base clock is identical at 2.00 GHz for both. Both processors have locked multipliers, meaning they cannot be overclocked. Neither has a recorded launch MSRP. The AMD part's benchmark suite includes 15 entries, while the Intel part has none. The AMD part's nearest rivals include the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Core i5-14600T, AMD Ryzen 5 7400F, and AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H, all with average scores within 0.5 percent of the AMD part. The Intel part has no nearest rivals recorded.