AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 vs Intel Core i5-14450HX Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a clear overall winner in this matchup: the Intel Core i5-14450HX takes 12 of the 15 head-to-head comparisons, while the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 wins 3. However, the margin of victory matters more than the raw count, and the results split into distinct categories.

The most dramatic gap appears in Cinebench R23 multi-core. Intel scores 20108 against AMD's 13794, a delta of -31.4% from the AMD side. This is the largest single-test difference in the entire dataset. The single-core R23 test tells a similar story: Intel at 2838 versus AMD at 1958, a -31% delta. These two tests alone account for the bulk of Intel's advantage in heavily threaded workloads.

Cinebench R15 results are far closer. In multi-core, Intel edges out AMD by only 3 points (2026 versus 2023), a -0.1% delta that is effectively a tie. In single-core R15, Intel leads 285 to 271, a -4.9% delta. This suggests that the gap widens as the workload scales up, rather than being a fundamental per-core deficiency on the AMD side.

PassMark results show a mixed picture with several moderate Intel wins. Data compression goes to Intel at 278538 versus 256603, a -7.9% delta. Data encryption favors Intel at 15574 versus 13264, a -14.8% delta. Floating point math shows Intel at 58037 versus 46996, a -19% delta. Prime number finding gives Intel 98 versus 76, a -22.4% delta. Physics tests show Intel at 1475 versus 1257, also -14.8%. Multithreaded PassMark shows Intel at 23680 versus 22125, a -6.6% delta. Integer math is nearly even: Intel 78330 versus AMD 77414, only -1.2% delta. Random string sorting has Intel at 29565 versus 28390, a -4% delta.

The AMD wins are concentrated in two specific areas. Extended instructions show AMD at 18029 versus Intel's 17207, a +4.8% delta in AMD's favor. PassMark single-thread shows AMD at 3862 versus Intel's 3643, a +6% delta. The single-thread test appears twice in the dataset with identical scores, confirming the result. This is notable because Intel wins the Cinebench R15 and R23 single-core tests, yet AMD wins the PassMark single-thread test. The two vendors' architectures respond differently to different single-threaded workloads.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design philosophies. AMD uses a Zen 5 architecture on a 4 nm TSMC process, with the codename Strix Point. Intel uses Raptor Lake architecture on a 10 nm Intel process, with the codename Raptor Lake-HX. The process node difference is significant: 4 nm versus 10 nm.

Core counts differ substantially. AMD has 8 cores and 16 threads. Intel has 10 cores and 16 threads. Despite having two fewer physical cores, AMD matches Intel's thread count, indicating that each AMD core supports two threads. Both processors present 16 threads to the operating system.

Cache hierarchies diverge in important ways. AMD has 80 KB of L1 per core, matching Intel's 80 KB per core. For L2, AMD has 1 MB per core, while Intel has 2 MB per core. The L3 cache shows a larger gap: AMD has 8 MB total, Intel has 20 MB shared. Intel's 20 MB L3 is 2.5 times the size of AMD's 8 MB L3. This cache advantage likely contributes to Intel's strong multi-core performance in Cinebench R23.

Clock speeds are close but favor Intel slightly. AMD has a 2.00 GHz base clock and 5.00 GHz boost clock. Intel has a 2.40 GHz base clock and 4.80 GHz boost clock. Intel starts higher at base, AMD peaks higher at boost. Thermal design power differs sharply: AMD is rated at 28 W, Intel at 55 W. The Intel part draws considerably more power under load.

Memory support shows different options. AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X. Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5. AMD has a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s; Intel's memory bandwidth is not recorded in the database. Both use dual-channel memory buses. Both support ECC memory.

PCIe generations differ. AMD offers Gen 4 with 16 CPU lanes. Intel offers Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes. The newer PCIe generation on Intel allows for faster peripheral connectivity in theory.

Integrated graphics are quite different. AMD includes a Radeon 880M. Intel includes UHD Graphics 710. The database does not record benchmarks for these iGPUs, but the model names alone indicate different performance tiers.

Socket types differ as expected: AMD uses Socket FP8, Intel uses BGA 1964. Both are mobile-oriented packages. AMD's die size is 233 mm², Intel's is 257 mm². The Intel die is larger despite using a less advanced process node.

Production status is active for both. AMD was released on 2025-01-05, Intel on 2024-01-07. The AMD part is a year newer. AMD's generation is listed as Ryzen AI PRO 300 with Zen 5 / Zen 5c cores. Intel's generation is Core i5 with Raptor Lake-HX Refresh. AMD's multiplier is locked; Intel's is unlocked.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i5-14450HX dominates in heavily threaded productivity workloads. Cinebench R23 multi-core shows a 31.4% advantage, which is the single largest margin in the dataset. This makes the Intel part the clear choice for rendering, video encoding, and other tasks that can saturate all available cores. The 10-core design versus 8 cores, combined with the 20 MB L3 cache, gives Intel a structural advantage in parallel workloads.

For single-threaded Cinebench tests, Intel also wins, though by smaller margins: 4.9% in R15 and 31% in R23. The R23 single-core gap is surprisingly large and suggests Intel's higher base clock and larger L2 cache per core help in sustained single-threaded execution.

PassMark physics and floating-point math both favor Intel by roughly 15% to 19%. These results indicate Intel's strength in scientific and simulation workloads that rely heavily on floating-point arithmetic. Data encryption and compression also go to Intel with margins of 14.8% and 7.9% respectively.

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 wins in exactly three recorded tests. PassMark single-thread gives AMD a 6% edge, which is the largest AMD victory. This suggests AMD's Zen 5 architecture has better per-thread efficiency in certain lightweight workloads. PassMark extended instructions give AMD a 4.8% lead, indicating that AMD handles SIMD or specialized instruction set workloads more effectively. Integer math is nearly a tie at 1.2% for Intel, so this is not a strong differentiator.

For use-case splitting, Intel wins in: multi-threaded rendering, Cinebench single-core, physics simulation, floating-point math, data compression, encryption, prime number finding, multithreaded PassMark, and random string sorting. AMD wins in: single-thread PassMark, extended instructions, and is effectively tied in integer math and Cinebench R15 multi-core.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has better multi-core performance?

A: The Intel Core i5-14450HX wins decisively in multi-core tests. Cinebench R23 multi-core shows Intel at 20108 versus AMD at 13794, a 31.4% advantage.

Q: Which processor wins in single-threaded tests?

A: Results are mixed. Intel wins Cinebench R15 single-core (285 versus 271) and R23 single-core (2838 versus 1958). AMD wins PassMark single-thread (3862 versus 3643). The two vendors trade wins depending on the benchmark methodology.

Q: What is the core and thread configuration for each?

A: AMD has 8 cores and 16 threads. Intel has 10 cores and 16 threads. Both present 16 threads to the operating system, but Intel uses more physical cores.

Q: How do the cache sizes compare?

A: AMD has 80 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 8 MB L3. Intel has 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 20 MB shared L3. Intel's L3 cache is 2.5 times larger.

Q: What are the power ratings?

A: AMD is rated at 28 W TDP. Intel is rated at 55 W TDP. The Intel part consumes significantly more power.

Q: Which processor supports PCIe Gen 5?

A: Intel supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes. AMD supports PCIe Gen 4 with 16 CPU lanes.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 | Intel Core i5-14450HX |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 8 | 10 |

| Base clock | 2.00 GHz | 2.40 GHz |

| Boost clock | 5.00 GHz | 4.80 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 55 W |

| Architecture | Zen 5 | Raptor Lake |

| Codename | Strix Point | Raptor Lake-HX |

| Process node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die size | 233 mm² | 257 mm² |

| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |

| L3 cache | 8 MB | 20 MB (shared) |

| Memory support | DDR5, LPDDR5X | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | Not recorded |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 16 lanes | Gen 5, 16 lanes |

| Integrated graphics | Radeon 880M | UHD Graphics 710 |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Intel BGA 1964 |

| Release date | 2025-01-05 | 2024-01-07 |

| Multiplier | Locked | Unlocked |

| Part number | 100-000001571 | SRMXK |

The Verdict

The database shows a clear performance hierarchy. The Intel Core i5-14450HX wins 12 of 15 head-to-head benchmarks, including all of the most demanding multi-threaded tests. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20108 is over 31% higher than the AMD part's 13794. For users who prioritize raw compute throughput in rendering, simulation, or data processing, the Intel part is the data-backed choice.

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 wins only 3 tests, but those wins are meaningful. PassMark single-thread shows a 6% advantage, and extended instructions show a 4.8% advantage. The AMD part also has a much lower TDP at 28 W versus 55 W, which is not a benchmark score but a recorded specification that matters for laptop battery life and thermal management. The newer 4 nm process node and 5.00 GHz boost clock suggest efficiency advantages that do not appear in raw compute scores.

For users who need maximum multi-core performance and do not care about power consumption, the Intel Core i5-14450HX is the obvious selection. For users who value single-thread efficiency in PassMark-style workloads, extended instruction processing, and significantly lower power draw, the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 has documented strengths. The average benchmark scores reflect this: AMD sits at 32662 with an 83rd percentile, Intel at 32040 with an 82nd percentile. The overall average scores are close, but the distribution of wins is lopsided. The data indicates that Intel's wins are larger and more frequent in high-demand workloads, while AMD's wins are narrower and concentrated in specialized areas.