AMD Ryzen 3 110 vs Intel Core 5 213PE Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data in the database contains results for the Intel Core 5 213PE, but no recorded measurements for the AMD Ryzen 3 110. This means the head-to-head comparison must rely on the available Intel scores and the architectural differences that are documented for both parts. The Intel Core 5 213PE posts a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22468 and a single-core score of 3172. In Cinebench R20, it reaches 9436 multi-core and 1332 single-core, while Cinebench R15 shows 2264 multi-core and 319 single-core. These results place the Intel chip at the 85th percentile among all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 35428.

The nearest rivals for the Intel Core 5 213PE, as recorded in the database, are all Intel parts. The Core i7-13700T averages 35403, which is 0.1% behind the Core 5 213PE. The Core i7-12700KF averages 35365, a 0.2% gap. The Core i5-13600T averages 35305, 0.3% behind, and the Core i7-12700K averages 35287, 0.4% behind. This clustering indicates that the Core 5 213PE sits at the top of a very tight performance group, where the spread between the fastest and slowest of these four rivals is less than half a percent. The data suggests the Core 5 213PE delivers performance essentially equivalent to those established desktop processors, with its advantage being within measurement noise.

Since the AMD Ryzen 3 110 has no benchmark entries, the database records zero wins for it and zero wins for the Intel part in the head-to-head section. However, the Intel chip's measured scores provide a reference point. The PassMark single-thread score of 4060 and the PassMark multi-thread score of 26434 show a strong balance between lightly threaded and heavily threaded workloads. The PassMark integer math score of 92089 exceeds the floating point math score of 68587, indicating the Intel processor handles integer operations more efficiently in this test suite. The data compression score of 298804 is notably high, while the find prime numbers score of 114 is comparatively low, suggesting that the architecture excels at memory-bound or branch-heavy tasks rather than pure prime-number iteration.

The absence of AMD benchmark data means the direct numerical comparison cannot be completed. What the database does show is that the Intel Core 5 213PE, with its 8 cores and 16 threads, produces multi-core scores that place it in the upper tier of desktop processors. The single-core Cinebench R23 result of 3172, combined with the 5.20 GHz boost clock, points to strong per-thread performance. The AMD Ryzen 3 110, with 4 cores and 8 threads and a 4.30 GHz boost clock, would logically face a significant deficit in multi-threaded workloads, but the database does not quantify that gap. The percentiles reinforce the positioning: the Intel chip sits at 85, while the AMD chip is at 50, meaning the Intel part outperforms a larger share of the CPU population according to the recorded data.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different design philosophies and manufacturing processes. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 uses the Zen 3+ architecture, codenamed Rembrandt-R, built on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Core 5 213PE uses the Bartlett Lake codename, built on a 10 nm process at Intel's own foundry. The process node difference is notable: 6 nm versus 10 nm, which typically implies differences in transistor density and power efficiency, though the database does not list transistor counts for either part.

The core counts differ substantially. The AMD chip has 4 cores and 8 threads, while the Intel chip has 8 cores and 16 threads. This doubles the thread count for the Intel part, which is a primary driver of its multi-core benchmark advantage. The base clocks are 3.00 GHz for the AMD and 2.70 GHz for the Intel, but the boost clocks tell a different story: 4.30 GHz for the AMD and 5.20 GHz for the Intel. The Intel chip's higher boost clock gives it a significant single-thread advantage in burst workloads.

Cache hierarchies also diverge. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3. The Intel Core 5 213PE has 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3. The Intel part carries three times the L3 cache and four times the L2 cache per core. This larger cache pool can reduce memory latency for frequently accessed data, which may explain the Intel chip's strong PassMark data compression score of 298804.

Memory support differs. The AMD chip supports only DDR5, while the Intel chip supports both DDR4 and DDR5. Both use dual-channel memory buses and have identical memory bandwidth ratings of 76.8 GB/s. Both support ECC memory, which is unusual for consumer-focused parts and suggests they target workstation or server-adjacent roles.

PCIe support marks another divergence. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 uses PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU. The Intel Core 5 213PE uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The Intel part has the newer PCIe standard, which doubles the per-lane bandwidth compared to Gen 4, even though it has fewer lanes. This could matter for high-bandwidth peripherals like fast NVMe storage or GPUs.

Integrated graphics differ as well. The AMD chip includes Radeon 660M, while the Intel chip includes UHD Graphics 730. The database does not list performance metrics for either iGPU, so the comparison is limited to naming and existence.

The sockets are incompatible: AMD Socket FP7 for the Ryzen 3 110 versus Intel Socket 1700 for the Core 5 213PE. The AMD part is listed as a mobile segment product, while the Intel part is a desktop segment product. This distinction explains some of the design choices, such as the AMD chip's lower TDP of 28 watts versus the Intel chip's 65 watts. The lower TDP for the AMD part aligns with its mobile positioning, while the Intel part's higher TDP accommodates its greater core count and higher boost clock.

The Intel chip has a launch MSRP of $221. The AMD chip has no recorded launch MSRP. Both parts have locked multipliers, meaning they are not intended for overclocking. The AMD part's die size is listed as 210 mm², while the Intel part has no die size recorded. The production status for both is listed as Active.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PE has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 3 110 has 4 cores and 8 threads. The Intel chip doubles both counts.

Q: What is the difference in boost clock speeds?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 110 boosts to 4.30 GHz, while the Intel Core 5 213PE boosts to 5.20 GHz. The Intel part has a 0.90 GHz higher maximum boost frequency.

Q: Which processor supports PCIe Gen 5?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PE supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 supports PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen 3 110 and the Intel Core 5 213PE have ECC memory support listed as true in the database.

Q: What is the market segment for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 110 is listed as a mobile processor, while the Intel Core 5 213PE is listed as a desktop processor. This is consistent with their TDPs of 28 watts and 65 watts, respectively.

Q: What is the L3 cache size for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has 8 MB of shared L3 cache, while the Intel Core 5 213PE has 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel chip has three times the L3 capacity.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in several recorded specifications. The core count differs: 4 cores for the AMD versus 8 cores for the Intel. Thread count differs: 8 threads versus 16 threads. Base clock differs: 3.00 GHz for the AMD versus 2.70 GHz for the Intel. Boost clock differs: 4.30 GHz versus 5.20 GHz. TDP differs: 28 watts versus 65 watts. Socket differs: AMD Socket FP7 versus Intel Socket 1700.

The architecture field shows Zen 3+ for the AMD and is listed as null for the Intel, though the Intel codename is Bartlett Lake. The process node differs: 6 nm for the AMD versus 10 nm for the Intel. The foundry differs: TSMC for the AMD versus Intel for the Intel. Die size is recorded as 210 mm² for the AMD and null for the Intel.

Cache sizes differ across all levels. L1 per core is 64 KB for the AMD versus 80 KB for the Intel. L2 per core is 512 KB for the AMD versus 2 MB for the Intel. L3 shared is 8 MB for the AMD versus 24 MB for the Intel. Memory support differs: DDR5 only for the AMD versus DDR4 and DDR5 for the Intel.

PCIe version and lanes differ: Gen 4 with 20 lanes for the AMD versus Gen 5 with 16 lanes for the Intel. Integrated graphics differ: Radeon 660M for the AMD versus UHD Graphics 730 for the Intel. Market segment differs: Mobile for the AMD versus Desktop for the Intel. Release dates differ: 2025-09-30 for the AMD versus 2026-03-08 for the Intel. The launch MSRP is null for the AMD and $221 for the Intel. Part numbers differ: 100-000000549(FP7r2) for the AMD versus SA4QG for the Intel.

The memory bandwidth is identical at 76.8 GB/s for both, and both use dual-channel memory buses. Both have ECC memory support set to true. Both have locked multipliers. Both have a production status of Active. The AMD chip's generation is listed as "Ryzen 3 (Zen 3+ (Rembrandt))", while the Intel chip's generation is "Core 5 (Bartlett Lake)". The AMD chip's series is null, and the Intel chip's series is also null.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear split in intended use cases. The Intel Core 5 213PE is the stronger multi-threaded performer based on its core count, thread count, and recorded benchmark scores. Its average benchmark score of 35428 places it at the 85th percentile, which means it outperforms 85% of all CPUs in the database. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 sits at the 50th percentile, exactly the median, with no benchmark scores recorded. The Intel chip's 8 cores and 16 threads, combined with 24 MB of L3 cache and a 5.20 GHz boost clock, make it the choice for workloads that scale across many threads.

The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has a significantly lower TDP of 28 watts, which is less than half of the Intel chip's 65 watts. This makes the AMD part more suitable for power-constrained environments, typical of mobile platforms. Its 4 cores and 8 threads are sufficient for lighter workloads, and its 4.30 GHz boost clock provides reasonable single-thread performance for a mobile part. The AMD chip's 6 nm process node suggests better power efficiency per transistor compared to the Intel chip's 10 nm node, though the database does not include direct power efficiency measurements.

The Intel chip's support for both DDR4 and DDR5 memory gives it flexibility in platform choices, while the AMD chip is locked to DDR5. The Intel chip's PCIe Gen 5 support offers newer connectivity standards, though the AMD chip provides more lanes at Gen 4. The Intel chip has a recorded launch MSRP of $221, while the AMD chip has none listed.

For users who need maximum multi-threaded throughput, desktop performance, and the highest boost clocks, the Intel Core 5 213PE is the clear choice based on the recorded data. For users who need a lower power draw, mobile compatibility, and are willing to work with fewer cores, the AMD Ryzen 3 110 fits that profile. The database does not provide benchmark scores for the AMD chip, so any direct performance comparison beyond architectural specifications is not possible from the recorded data.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 5 213PE wins in multi-threaded workloads. Its 8 cores and 16 threads provide double the parallel execution capacity of the AMD Ryzen 3 110. The recorded Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22468 and PassMark multi-thread score of 26434 demonstrate strong scaling. The Intel chip also wins in single-thread boost performance, with a 5.20 GHz maximum versus the AMD's 4.30 GHz. The PassMark single-thread score of 4060 supports this advantage.

The Intel chip wins in cache capacity. With 24 MB of L3 versus 8 MB, and 2 MB of L2 per core versus 512 KB, the Intel part can hold more working data closer to the cores. This likely contributes to its PassMark data compression score of 298804, which is the highest single score recorded for the Intel part. The Intel chip also wins in memory flexibility, supporting both DDR4 and DDR5, while the AMD chip only supports DDR5.

The Intel chip wins in PCIe bandwidth per lane. Its PCIe Gen 5 connection with 16 lanes provides double the per-lane throughput of the AMD chip's PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes. For devices that use a few high-bandwidth lanes, such as modern GPUs or NVMe drives, the Intel implementation offers newer technology.

The AMD Ryzen 3 110 wins in power efficiency, at least by TDP rating. Its 28 watt TDP is less than half of the Intel chip's 65 watts. This makes the AMD part more appropriate for thin-and-light mobile systems where cooling and battery life are primary constraints. The AMD chip also wins in process node, using 6 nm technology from TSMC compared to Intel's 10 nm process. A smaller process node typically allows for lower operating voltages and reduced power consumption at the same clock speed, though the database does not list direct power measurements.

The AMD chip has more PCIe lanes at 20 versus 16, which could benefit systems with multiple expansion cards or storage devices. The AMD chip's Radeon 660M integrated graphics may offer different graphics capabilities than Intel's UHD Graphics 730, though the database does not include iGPU benchmarks.

For mobile users who prioritize battery life and portability, the AMD Ryzen 3 110 is the logical choice. For desktop users who need maximum processing throughput, higher boost clocks, and larger caches, the Intel Core 5 213PE is the better option. The Intel chip's 85th percentile ranking versus the AMD chip's 50th percentile confirms that, within the database's recorded CPU population, the Intel part is the higher-performing product overall.