AMD Ryzen 7 7700X3D vs Intel Core 5 213PE Comparison
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X3D
Core 5 213PE
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: AMD Ryzen 7 7700X3D vs Intel Core 5 213PE
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results for the AMD Ryzen 7 7700X3D, as it has no recorded benchmark scores, average benchmark score of 0, and no nearest rivals listed. In contrast, the Intel Core 5 213PE has a comprehensive set of 17 benchmark scores across Cinebench and Passmark tests, an average benchmark score of 35428, and a percentile ranking of 85 among all CPUs.
The Intel Core 5 213PE delivers strong multi-threaded performance in Cinebench tests. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22468 positions it well above typical desktop processors, while its Cinebench R20 multicore score of 9436 and Cinebench R15 multicore score of 2264 follow the expected scaling pattern. Single-core performance is equally solid: Cinebench R23 singlecore reaches 3172, Cinebench R20 singlecore hits 1332, and Cinebench R15 singlecore records 319.
Passmark results for the Intel Core 5 213PE show particular strengths in specific workloads. The data compression score of 298804 is the highest recorded metric in its suite, indicating excellent throughput for compression tasks. Integer math achieves 92089, floating point math reaches 68587, and extended instructions score 19565. The multithread score of 26434 confirms strong parallel processing capability, while single-thread performance registers 4060 in both Passmark single_thread and singlethread tests.
The AMD Ryzen 7 7700X3D lacks any recorded benchmark scores in the database, making direct numerical comparison impossible. Its percentile ranking of 50 places it at the median of all CPUs in the database, but without actual scores, the data cannot quantify how it performs relative to the Intel Core 5 213PE's 85th percentile standing. The wins counter shows 0 wins for the AMD and 0 wins for the Intel, reflecting the absence of head-to-head test data.
The Intel Core 5 213PE's nearest rivals provide context for its performance level. It sits 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core i7-13700T (avg score 35403), 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core i7-12700KF (avg score 35365), 0.3% ahead of the Intel Core i5-13600T (avg score 35305), and 0.4% ahead of the Intel Core i7-12700K (avg score 35287). These margins are narrow, indicating the Core 5 213PE performs within a tight cluster of established Intel processors.
Where Each One Wins
For the Intel Core 5 213PE, the recorded data shows wins across every benchmark category where measurements exist. Cinebench R15, R20, and R23 multicore and singlecore tests all return positive scores, as do all seven Passmark tests. The highest relative strength appears in data compression, where the 298804 score dwarfs other Passmark metrics. Integer math at 92089 and floating point math at 68587 suggest balanced arithmetic capability, while random string sorting at 32027 and data encryption at 15916 indicate moderate performance in those specific tasks. The physics score of 1624 and find prime numbers score of 114 are the lowest recorded metrics, suggesting these workloads are less optimized for this processor.
The AMD Ryzen 7 7700X3D has no benchmark data in the database, so no wins can be attributed to it from measurements. However, its specifications indicate theoretical advantages in certain areas. Its 96 MB shared L3 cache is substantially larger than the Intel's 24 MB shared L3, which typically benefits cache-sensitive workloads. Its 5 nm process node from TSMC, compared to Intel's 10 nm node, suggests higher transistor density and potentially better power efficiency. The AMD's 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth exceeds the Intel's 76.8 GB/s, which could aid memory-intensive applications. Its Radeon Graphics integrated GPU contrasts with Intel's UHD Graphics 730, and the AMD supports PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes versus Intel's 16 lanes.
The core and thread counts are identical: both processors feature 8 cores and 16 threads. The AMD's base clock of 4.00 GHz is higher than the Intel's 2.70 GHz, but the Intel's boost clock of 5.20 GHz surpasses the AMD's 4.50 GHz. The AMD's TDP of 120 W exceeds the Intel's 65 W, indicating higher power draw under load.
The Verdict
From the recorded data, the Intel Core 5 213PE is the only processor with measurable performance. Its average benchmark score of 35428 and 85th percentile ranking demonstrate solid performance within the database's CPU population. Its nearest rival margins, all within 0.4%, show it competes effectively with established Intel Core i7 and i5 processors. Users requiring verified benchmark results for tasks like Cinebench rendering, Passmark compression, or arithmetic workloads would select the Intel Core 5 213PE based on available measurements.
The AMD Ryzen 7 7700X3D presents a different case. With no benchmarks, no average score, and no rivals listed, the database provides no performance evidence for this processor. Its percentile ranking of 50 suggests median standing, but this cannot be corroborated with actual scores. Users prioritizing large cache capacity, higher base clock, newer process node, or wider PCIe connectivity might consider the AMD based on specifications alone, but no data confirms its real-world performance.
The launch MSRP for the AMD Ryzen 7 7700X3D is $329. The launch MSRP for the Intel Core 5 213PE is $221. Both processors have locked multipliers, meaning no overclocking via multiplier adjustment. Both support ECC memory, and both use dual-channel memory buses. The AMD supports DDR5 only, while the Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5.
FAQ
Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?
A: The Intel Core 5 213PE has a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen 7 7700X3D has a boost clock of 4.50 GHz.
Q: What is the L3 cache size difference?
A: The AMD Ryzen 7 7700X3D has 96 MB of shared L3 cache, while the Intel Core 5 213PE has 24 MB of shared L3 cache.
Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?
A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen 7 7700X3D and the Intel Core 5 213PE support ECC memory.
Q: What is the process node for each processor?
A: The AMD Ryzen 7 7700X3D uses a 5 nm process from TSMC, while the Intel Core 5 213PE uses a 10 nm process from Intel.
Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?
A: The Intel Core 5 213PE has an average benchmark score of 35428, while the AMD Ryzen 7 7700X3D has an average benchmark score of 0 due to no recorded benchmarks.
Q: What is the memory bandwidth for each processor?
A: The AMD Ryzen 7 7700X3D has a memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, while the Intel Core 5 213PE has a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s.
Architecture Differences
The AMD Ryzen 7 7700X3D belongs to the 7000 series with the codename Raphael and uses the Zen 4 microarchitecture on a 5 nm process node from TSMC. It contains 11,270 million transistors on a 71 mm² die. The Intel Core 5 213PE uses the codename Bartlett Lake with a Core 5 generation label, built on a 10 nm process node from Intel, with no transistor count or die size recorded.
Cache architecture differs significantly. The AMD allocates 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 96 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel allocates 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD's L3 cache is four times larger, while the Intel has larger per-core L1 and L2 caches.
Memory support diverges: the AMD supports DDR5 exclusively with dual-channel configuration and 83.2 GB/s bandwidth, while the Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5 with dual-channel configuration and 76.8 GB/s bandwidth. Both processors support ECC memory.
PCIe connectivity differs: the AMD provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). Integrated graphics also differ: the AMD uses Radeon Graphics, while the Intel uses UHD Graphics 730.
Socket compatibility separates the two platforms. The AMD uses AMD Socket AM5, while the Intel uses Intel Socket 1700. Both are desktop market segments with active production status. The AMD has a part number of 100-000002235, and the Intel has a part number of SA4QG. Both have locked multipliers, preventing overclocking through multiplier changes.
The AMD's base clock of 4.00 GHz is higher than the Intel's 2.70 GHz, but the Intel's boost clock of 5.20 GHz exceeds the AMD's 4.50 GHz. The AMD's TDP of 120 W is nearly double the Intel's 65 W. Release dates differ by roughly three months: the AMD released on 2026-05-30, while the Intel released on 2026-03-08.