AMD Ryzen 5 40 vs Intel Core 5 213PE Comparison

The AMD Ryzen 5 40 and Intel Core 5 213PE occupy different corners of the processor market, and the benchmark data reflects that divide clearly. The Ryzen 5 40 is a 4-core, 8-thread mobile chip built for efficiency, while the Core 5 213PE is an 8-core, 16-thread desktop processor aimed at sustained workloads. Across 15 recorded head-to-head tests, the Intel part wins every single one, with margins ranging from 39% to 82.5%. The average benchmark score for the Intel chip is 35428, placing it in the 85th percentile of all CPUs, while the AMD chip averages 15882 and sits in the 70th percentile. These are not close competitors; the data describes two different performance classes.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PE has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 5 40 has 4 cores and 8 threads.

Q: What is the largest single benchmark margin between the two?

A: The biggest gap is in PassMark find prime numbers, where the Intel chip scores 114 versus the AMD chip's 20, a delta of -82.5% from the AMD perspective.

Q: How do the single-thread scores compare?

A: In Cinebench R23 single-core, the Intel Core 5 213PE scores 3172 against the Ryzen 5 40's 1150, a 63.7% advantage. In PassMark single-thread, Intel leads 4060 to 2477, a 39% margin.

Q: Are both processors currently in production?

A: Yes, both are listed as Active in the database.

Q: What memory types does each support?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 40 supports LPDDR5, while the Intel Core 5 213PE supports both DDR4 and DDR5.

Q: Which chip has higher memory bandwidth?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 40 lists 88.0 GB/s, while the Intel Core 5 213PE lists 76.8 GB/s, despite the Intel chip having more cores and a desktop socket.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different foundries and process nodes. The AMD Ryzen 5 40 uses TSMC's 6 nm process with a Zen 2 architecture, codenamed Mendocino. The Intel Core 5 213PE uses Intel's 10 nm process with the Bartlett Lake codename. The die size for AMD is 100 mm², while Intel's die size is not recorded in the database. These manufacturing differences set the stage for the power and performance profiles seen in the benchmarks.

Cache organization differs substantially. The AMD chip provides 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 4 MB of shared L3. The Intel chip provides 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3. The Intel part's L3 cache is six times larger, which helps explain its dominance in multi-threaded and cache-sensitive workloads. The AMD chip's total cache is small by comparison, reflecting its mobile-oriented design.

Memory support also diverges. AMD uses LPDDR5, which is typical for low-power mobile parts, while Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5 for desktop flexibility. The AMD chip has a higher memory bandwidth rating at 88.0 GB/s versus Intel's 76.8 GB/s, but the Intel chip supports ECC memory while AMD does not. PCIe connectivity favors Intel heavily: the Core 5 213PE provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), whereas the Ryzen 5 40 provides Gen 3 with 4 lanes (CPU only). Integrated graphics differ as well, with AMD using Radeon 610M and Intel using UHD Graphics 730.

Clock speeds tell part of the story. The AMD chip has a base clock of 2.80 GHz and a boost of 4.30 GHz. The Intel chip has a slightly lower base of 2.70 GHz but a much higher boost of 5.20 GHz. The TDP figures are stark: AMD is rated at 15 watts, Intel at 65 watts. That 50-watt difference reflects the Intel part's desktop orientation and explains why it can sustain higher clocks and larger caches.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 5 213PE wins every benchmark in the database, so the question shifts to what each chip is suited for. The AMD Ryzen 5 40 is built for mobile use, with a 15-watt TDP and LPDDR5 memory. Its strengths lie in efficiency and portability, not raw performance. The benchmark scores, while lower, represent what is achievable in a thin-and-light form factor. The Intel Core 5 213PE, with its 65-watt TDP, desktop socket, and 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, is designed for systems where power delivery and cooling are not constrained.

The data shows the AMD chip delivers 4 cores and 8 threads, which is sufficient for basic multitasking and light productivity. The Intel chip doubles that to 8 cores and 16 threads, making it the choice for parallel workloads like video encoding, compilation, or 3D rendering. The gap in Cinebench R23 multi-core is enormous: 22468 for Intel versus 4841 for AMD, a 78.5% deficit for the AMD part. That kind of margin means the AMD chip is not competitive in multi-threaded desktop tasks.

Single-thread performance also favors Intel, though by a smaller margin. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3172 versus 1150 shows Intel's higher boost clock of 5.20 GHz delivers tangible benefits. The PassMark single-thread scores of 4060 versus 2477 confirm this pattern. For users who need responsiveness in everyday applications, the Intel chip is clearly stronger, but the AMD chip's lower power draw may be more important for battery life in mobile devices.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every specification field. The AMD Ryzen 5 40 has 4 cores and 8 threads, while the Intel Core 5 213PE has 8 cores and 16 threads. The AMD base clock is 2.80 GHz, the Intel base clock is 2.70 GHz. The AMD boost clock is 4.30 GHz, the Intel boost clock is 5.20 GHz. TDP is 15 watts for AMD and 65 watts for Intel. The sockets are entirely different: AMD uses Socket FT6, Intel uses Socket 1700.

The process node differs, with AMD at 6 nm and Intel at 10 nm. The foundries are TSMC for AMD and Intel for Intel. AMD's die size is 100 mm², Intel's is not recorded. Cache hierarchies differ as noted: L1 is 64 KB per core for AMD versus 80 KB per core for Intel; L2 is 512 KB per core versus 2 MB per core; L3 is 4 MB shared versus 24 MB shared. Memory support sees AMD using LPDDR5 and Intel using DDR4 and DDR5. Both are dual-channel, but bandwidth differs at 88.0 GB/s versus 76.8 GB/s. ECC memory is supported only on Intel. PCIe is Gen 3 with 4 lanes for AMD, Gen 5 with 16 lanes for Intel. Integrated graphics are Radeon 610M versus UHD Graphics 730. The release dates differ, with AMD at 2025-09-30 and Intel at 2026-03-08. The Intel chip has a launch MSRP of $221, while AMD has no recorded MSRP. Neither has an unlocked multiplier.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head table contains 15 tests, and the Intel Core 5 213PE wins all of them. The most lopsided result is PassMark find prime numbers, where Intel scores 114 against AMD's 20, a delta of -82.5%. This test is highly sensitive to integer throughput and cache efficiency, both of which favor the Intel chip's larger L3 and higher clocks.

Cinebench R23 multi-core shows a 78.5% gap, with Intel at 22468 and AMD at 4841. This is the largest multi-threaded margin in the dataset and reflects the 8-core versus 4-core difference. PassMark floating point math is nearly as stark: Intel scores 68587, AMD scores 15194, a 77.8% deficit. The physics test follows the same pattern, with Intel at 1624 and AMD at 432, a 73.4% gap.

PassMark integer math shows Intel at 92089 versus AMD at 31598, a 65.7% margin. Extended instructions see Intel at 19565 versus AMD at 6437, a 67.1% margin. Data encryption has Intel at 15916 versus AMD at 6646, a 58.2% gap. Data compression shows Intel at 298804 versus AMD at 141533, a 52.6% margin. Random string sorting has Intel at 32027 versus AMD at 15124, a 52.8% gap.

The single-thread tests show the smallest margins, but Intel still leads clearly. Cinebench R15 single-core has Intel at 319 versus AMD at 165.5, a 48.1% gap. Cinebench R23 single-core has Intel at 3172 versus AMD at 1150, a 63.7% margin. PassMark single-thread and singlethread both record the same scores: Intel at 4060, AMD at 2477, a 39% deficit. Even in the closest test, Intel holds a substantial lead, and in the majority of tests the margin exceeds 50%.

The Verdict

The data points to a simple conclusion: the Intel Core 5 213PE is in a different performance tier from the AMD Ryzen 5 40. The Intel chip wins all 15 recorded benchmarks, with an average score of 35428 versus 15882 for AMD. The percentile rankings confirm this, with Intel at 85th and AMD at 70th among all CPUs. The nearest rivals for Intel include the Core i7-13700T, Core i7-12700KF, Core i5-13600T, and Core i7-12700K, all within a 0.1% to 0.4% delta of its average score. The AMD chip's nearest rivals are the EPYC 75F3, Core Ultra 5 134U, EPYC 9354P, and EPYC 9334, with deltas between 0.1% and 0.4%. These rival lists show that the Intel chip competes with enthusiast-class desktop parts, while the AMD chip sits among efficient mobile and server options.

For a desktop system requiring maximum throughput in multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Core 5 213PE is the only choice based on the recorded scores. Its 8 cores, 16 threads, 24 MB L3 cache, and 5.20 GHz boost clock deliver consistent wins across every workload category. The AMD Ryzen 5 40, with its 4 cores, 8 threads, 4 MB L3, and 15-watt TDP, is suited for mobile devices where battery life and low heat output take priority over performance. The benchmark results should not be read as a failure for AMD; they simply reflect a different design goal. The Intel chip's 65-watt TDP and desktop socket require a power supply and cooling solution that a mobile device cannot provide. The AMD chip's LPDDR5 support and 88.0 GB/s bandwidth show it is optimized for efficiency, not raw compute. Users who need the lowest power draw and a compact form factor will find the Ryzen 5 40 adequate, but those who need the highest scores in the database will select the Core 5 213PE without hesitation.