AMD Ryzen 3 110 vs AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data contains no benchmark scores for either processor. The database lists no completed workloads, no average benchmark scores, and no head-to-head comparison results for the AMD Ryzen 3 110 versus the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i. Both parts have an average benchmark score of zero and a percentile ranking of 50th among all CPUs, which reflects the absence of measured performance data rather than any actual performance parity.

Without benchmark outcomes, the nearest rival comparisons are also empty. There are no delta percentages, no rival names, and no relative performance figures to analyze. The wins counter shows zero for both processors. This means a numerical head-to-head performance assessment is not possible from the current database records.

What the data does show is a structural contrast that will likely influence future benchmark results. The Ryzen AI Embedded P164i uses eight cores and sixteen threads, exactly double the four cores and eight threads of the Ryzen 3 110. The boost clock also differs substantially: the embedded part reaches 5.00 GHz, while the Ryzen 3 110 tops out at 4.30 GHz. The base clocks move in the opposite direction, with the Ryzen 3 110 starting at 3.00 GHz versus 2.00 GHz for the P164i. These specifications suggest the P164i should have a clear multi-threaded advantage in any workload that scales across cores, while the Ryzen 3 110 may hold an edge in lightly threaded tasks where its higher base clock matters.

The process technology also differs. The Ryzen 3 110 uses a 6 nm node, while the Ryzen AI Embedded P164i uses a 4 nm node. Both are fabricated by TSMC. The smaller node typically enables higher clock speeds and better power efficiency, which aligns with the P164i's 5.00 GHz boost clock. The die sizes are close: 210 mm² for the Ryzen 3 110 and 233 mm² for the P164i, despite the latter having twice as many cores. The cache hierarchies diverge significantly as well. The Ryzen 3 110 provides 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3. The P164i provides 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of L3. Total L3 is identical at 8 MB, but the per-core L1 and L2 allocations are larger on the P164i.

Memory bandwidth also favors the P164i. It supports both DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory with a dual-channel bus and a recorded bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Ryzen 3 110 supports DDR5 only, also dual-channel, with 76.8 GB/s. Both support ECC memory. The PCIe configurations differ: the Ryzen 3 110 offers Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only), while the P164i offers Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The integrated graphics differ as well, with the Ryzen 3 110 using a Radeon 660M and the P164i using a Radeon 880M.

The Verdict

The data does not support a performance verdict between these two processors because no benchmark results are recorded. Neither processor has any measured scores, and the empty head-to-head section means there is no empirical basis for declaring a winner.

The specification sheet does indicate which processor is designed for which type of workload. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i is positioned for compute-heavy, multi-threaded, and embedded AI scenarios. Its eight cores, sixteen threads, 5.00 GHz boost clock, larger per-core caches, higher memory bandwidth, and support for both DDR5 and LPDDR5X all point toward sustained parallel throughput. The name itself, with the "AI Embedded" designation, suggests a target market of edge inference and embedded processing.

The AMD Ryzen 3 110 is a four-core, eight-thread mobile part with a higher base clock of 3.00 GHz and a lower boost clock of 4.30 GHz. It uses the older Zen 3+ architecture on a 6 nm node, whereas the P164i uses Zen 5 / Zen 5c on a 4 nm node. The Ryzen 3 110 offers more PCIe lanes (20 versus 16) and a smaller die (210 mm² versus 233 mm²). It is the more conservative design in terms of core count and memory bandwidth.

For users who need maximum multi-threading and the latest architecture, the data points to the P164i. For users who need a simpler four-core part with a higher base clock and more PCIe lanes, the Ryzen 3 110 is the listed option. The absence of benchmark scores means neither can be recommended on measured performance, only on architectural intent.

Architecture Differences

The two processors belong to different architectural generations. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 is based on Zen 3+ under the codename Rembrandt-R, and its generation is listed as "Ryzen 3 (Zen 3+ (Rembrandt))". The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i uses the Zen 5 / Zen 5c architecture under the codename Gorgon Point, with the generation listed as "Ryzen AI Embedded (Zen 5 / Zen 5c)".

The process node differs by two generations of scaling: 6 nm for the Ryzen 3 110 versus 4 nm for the P164i. Both are manufactured by TSMC. The smaller node on the P164i allows for more transistors in a similar die area, which is consistent with its higher core count and larger per-core caches.

Core counts diverge sharply. The Ryzen 3 110 has four cores and eight threads. The P164i has eight cores and sixteen threads. This is the single largest architectural gap between the two. The P164i also has a higher boost clock by 0.70 GHz, reaching 5.00 GHz versus 4.30 GHz. The base clock is lower on the P164i by 1.00 GHz, which suggests a wider frequency range and possibly a more aggressive boost behavior under load.

Cache architecture differs in per-core allocation but not in total L3. The Ryzen 3 110 uses 64 KB of L1 per core and 512 KB of L2 per core. The P164i uses 80 KB of L1 per core and 1 MB of L2 per core. Both share 8 MB of L3. The larger per-core caches on the P164i align with the Zen 5 design philosophy of reducing memory latency for compute-heavy workloads.

Integrated graphics also differ. The Ryzen 3 110 includes a Radeon 660M, while the P164i includes a Radeon 880M. The higher-numbered Radeon part is generally associated with more execution units and better iGPU performance, though the database does not list specific GPU benchmark numbers.

The memory controller differs in supported types. The Ryzen 3 110 supports DDR5 only. The P164i supports both DDR5 and LPDDR5X. Both use a dual-channel bus. The recorded bandwidth is 76.8 GB/s for the Ryzen 3 110 and 89.6 GB/s for the P164i. Both support ECC memory.

The PCIe implementation differs in lane count. The Ryzen 3 110 provides 20 lanes of Gen 4 (CPU only). The P164i provides 16 lanes of Gen 4 (CPU only). The Ryzen 3 110 therefore has more direct CPU-attached PCIe bandwidth for peripherals, which may matter for certain embedded or mobile configurations.

Socket compatibility differs. The Ryzen 3 110 uses AMD Socket FP7, while the P164i uses AMD Socket FP8. These are not interchangeable sockets, so motherboard compatibility is determined by the socket.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in the following recorded specification fields:

• Cores: 4 (Ryzen 3 110) versus 8 (P164i)
• Threads: 8 versus 16
• Base clock: 3.00 GHz versus 2.00 GHz
• Boost clock: 4.30 GHz versus 5.00 GHz
• Socket: FP7 versus FP8
• Architecture: Zen 3+ versus Zen 5 / Zen 5c
• Codename: Rembrandt-R versus Gorgon Point
• Generation: Ryzen 3 (Zen 3+) versus Ryzen AI Embedded (Zen 5 / Zen 5c)
• Process node: 6 nm versus 4 nm
• Die size: 210 mm² versus 233 mm²
• L1 cache: 64 KB per core versus 80 KB per core
• L2 cache: 512 KB per core versus 1 MB per core
• Memory support: DDR5 versus DDR5, LPDDR5X
• Memory bandwidth: 76.8 GB/s versus 89.6 GB/s
• PCIe: Gen 4, 20 lanes versus Gen 4, 16 lanes
• Integrated graphics: Radeon 660M versus Radeon 880M
• Release date: 2025-09-30 versus 2026-03-08
• Part number: 100-000000549 (FP7r2) versus unknown

The fields that are identical include manufacturer (both AMD), TDP (both 28 watts), memory bus (both dual-channel), ECC support (both true), PCIe generation (both Gen 4), market segment (both mobile), production status (both active), multiplier unlock (both false), and total L3 cache (both 8 MB shared).

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i has 8 cores and 16 threads. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has 4 cores and 8 threads.

Q: What is the boost clock difference?

A: The P164i boosts to 5.00 GHz, while the Ryzen 3 110 boosts to 4.30 GHz. The difference is 0.70 GHz in favor of the P164i.

Q: Which processor supports LPDDR5X memory?

A: Only the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i supports LPDDR5X, in addition to DDR5. The Ryzen 3 110 supports DDR5 only.

Q: Are the sockets the same?

A: No. The Ryzen 3 110 uses AMD Socket FP7, and the P164i uses AMD Socket FP8.

Q: Which processor has higher memory bandwidth?

A: The P164i has a recorded bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, compared to 76.8 GB/s for the Ryzen 3 110.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the Ryzen 3 110 and the P164i support ECC memory.

Q: Which processor has more PCIe lanes?

A: The Ryzen 3 110 has 20 Gen 4 lanes (CPU only), while the P164i has 16 Gen 4 lanes (CPU only).

Where Each One Wins

Based on the specification data, the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i holds the advantage in raw compute capacity. It has double the core count and thread count of the Ryzen 3 110, a higher boost clock by 0.70 GHz, larger per-core L1 and L2 caches, higher memory bandwidth by 12.8 GB/s, support for LPDDR5X memory, a smaller 4 nm process node, and a newer Zen 5 / Zen 5c architecture. These factors collectively favor workloads that are parallel, memory-intensive, or latency-sensitive at the cache level. The integrated Radeon 880M also suggests stronger graphical output than the Radeon 660M in the Ryzen 3 110, though no GPU benchmarks are recorded.

The AMD Ryzen 3 110 holds advantages in a few specific areas. Its base clock is 1.00 GHz higher than the P164i, which may help in single-threaded tasks that do not boost or that run at sustained low power. It provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes versus 16 on the P164i, offering more direct connectivity for storage or expansion devices. Its die size is smaller by 23 mm², which may indicate lower manufacturing complexity. It also has a later release date advantage in the opposite direction: the Ryzen 3 110 was released on 2025-09-30, while the P164i was released on 2026-03-08, making the P164i the newer product.

For embedded AI inference, parallel rendering, or multi-threaded server-like tasks, the data points to the P164i as the stronger candidate. For lightweight mobile workloads with a higher idle or base frequency, or for configurations that need more CPU-attached PCIe lanes, the Ryzen 3 110 is the better fit. The 28 watt TDP on both parts means power consumption is identical at the package level, so the choice comes down to core count, memory bandwidth, and platform compatibility.

The database records no benchmark wins for either processor, so the "wins" section here is based entirely on specification differences. The P164i wins on core count, threads, boost clock, cache size, memory bandwidth, memory type support, process node, and integrated graphics tier. The Ryzen 3 110 wins on base clock, PCIe lane count, and smaller die size. Neither processor has a measured performance advantage in any benchmark, so the final selection depends on whether the workload favors the P164i's parallel architecture or the Ryzen 3 110's higher base frequency and wider PCIe connectivity.