AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i vs Intel Core i5-14501TE Comparison

FAQ

Q: What are the core and thread counts of these two processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Core i5-14501TE has 6 cores and 12 threads. This gives the AMD part a 2-core and 4-thread advantage in raw parallelism.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core i5-14501TE reaches a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, slightly higher than the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i’s 5.00 GHz. The Intel part also has a higher base clock at 2.20 GHz versus 2.00 GHz.

Q: What process nodes are used by each chip?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i is manufactured on a 4 nm process by TSMC, while the Intel Core i5-14501TE uses a 10 nm process from Intel’s own foundry. The AMD chip’s smaller node indicates a denser transistor layout.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i and the Intel Core i5-14501TE support ECC memory. This makes both suitable for error-sensitive workloads.

Q: What are the integrated graphics solutions?

A: The AMD part includes Radeon 880M graphics, while the Intel part features UHD Graphics 770. The AMD solution is branded as a higher-tier Radeon product, whereas Intel’s is a UHD series.

Q: Which processor has a larger L3 cache?

A: The Intel Core i5-14501TE has 24 MB of shared L3 cache, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i has 8 MB of L3 cache. Intel’s L3 capacity is three times larger.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i is built on the Gorgon Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI Embedded generation, which uses a hybrid of Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. This architecture is fabricated by TSMC on a 4 nm process, with a die size of 233 mm². The chip employs an 8-core, 16-thread configuration, with each core carrying 80 KB of L1 cache and 1 MB of L2 cache. The L3 cache is 8 MB, which is shared across the chip. Memory support includes DDR5 and LPDDR5X over a dual-channel bus, delivering 89.6 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The integrated graphics are Radeon 880M, and the processor uses AMD Socket FP8. It has 16 PCIe Gen 4 lanes available from the CPU only.

The Intel Core i5-14501TE is a Raptor Lake-R part, part of the Core 14th Gen series and the Raptor Lake Refresh generation. It is manufactured on Intel’s 10 nm process, with a die size of 215 mm². This processor uses 6 cores and 12 threads, with each core also having 80 KB of L1 cache but a slightly larger 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core. The L3 cache is 24 MB and shared. Memory support covers both DDR4 and DDR5 over a dual-channel bus; the memory bandwidth figure is not recorded in the database. The integrated graphics are UHD Graphics 770, and it fits into Intel Socket 1700. PCIe support includes Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU only.

The architectural divergence is significant: AMD uses a smaller 4 nm node versus Intel’s 10 nm process, which typically allows for higher transistor density and better power efficiency per area. AMD’s cache hierarchy is smaller, especially L3, which might affect workloads that rely on large shared pools of cache. Intel’s L2 cache per core is larger, and its L3 is 24 MB versus AMD’s 8 MB. The AMD part supports only DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5, offering broader memory compatibility. PCIe generation differs as well: Intel provides Gen 5 lanes, while AMD provides Gen 4 lanes. Both support ECC memory, which is notable for embedded and workstation use cases.

The memory bandwidth figure of 89.6 GB/s for the AMD part is recorded, whereas the Intel part has no such figure in the database. This suggests the AMD chip may have a more defined memory throughput profile, though the actual comparison cannot be made without Intel’s number.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i appears positioned for scenarios that benefit from more cores and threads. With 8 cores and 16 threads, it offers a higher degree of parallel processing capability. Its smaller 4 nm process and support for LPDDR5X also indicate a design aimed at power-sensitive or mobile-embedded environments, given its 28 W TDP. The Radeon 880M integrated graphics are likely more capable for graphical tasks than Intel’s UHD Graphics 770, although no benchmark scores are provided to confirm this.

The Intel Core i5-14501TE, with its higher base and boost clocks, may excel in single-threaded or lightly threaded workloads where clock speed matters. Its larger L3 cache of 24 MB could benefit applications that repeatedly access a sizeable working set. The support for DDR4 memory gives it compatibility with older, more widely available memory modules. PCIe Gen 5 support offers higher bandwidth for storage or accelerators that can utilize it, which is a forward-looking feature for desktop embedded use.

In summary, the AMD part leans toward multi-threaded throughput and integrated graphics performance, while the Intel part leans toward higher clock speeds, larger cache capacity, and newer PCIe connectivity. The TDP difference, 28 W for AMD versus 45 W for Intel, suggests the AMD chip is designed for lower power envelopes, whereas Intel’s higher TDP may permit sustained performance in desktop-oriented embedded systems.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across several specification fields. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Core i5-14501TE has 6 cores and 12 threads. Base clocks are 2.00 GHz for AMD and 2.20 GHz for Intel. Boost clocks are 5.00 GHz for AMD and 5.10 GHz for Intel. The TDP is 28 W for AMD and 45 W for Intel. Sockets are AMD Socket FP8 versus Intel Socket 1700.

The process nodes differ: AMD uses 4 nm, Intel uses 10 nm. The foundries are TSMC for AMD and Intel for Intel. Die sizes are 233 mm² for AMD and 215 mm² for Intel. The codenames are Gorgon Point for AMD and Raptor Lake-R for Intel. The generations are Ryzen AI Embedded (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) for AMD and Core i5 (Raptor Lake Refresh) for Intel.

Cache configurations differ: both have 80 KB L1 per core, but AMD has 1 MB L2 per core while Intel has 1.25 MB L2 per core. AMD has 8 MB L3, Intel has 24 MB shared L3. Memory support: AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X; Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5. Memory bandwidth is 89.6 GB/s for AMD, not recorded for Intel. PCIe: AMD has Gen 4 with 16 lanes, Intel has Gen 5 with 16 lanes. Integrated graphics: Radeon 880M for AMD, UHD Graphics 770 for Intel.

Market segments differ: AMD is classified as Mobile, Intel as Desktop. Release dates are 2026-03-08 for AMD and 2024-06-30 for Intel. Both have a production status of Active and neither has an unlocked multiplier. The Intel part has a part number of Q49KSRNJN, while AMD’s is unknown. Both are recorded with a percentile vs all CPUs of 50 and an average benchmark score of 0.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database records no head-to-head benchmark results between the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i and the Intel Core i5-14501TE. Both processors have empty benchmark arrays, zero recorded wins each, and an average benchmark score of 0. The percentile vs all CPUs is identical at 50 for both, indicating they sit at the median of all CPUs in the database, but this figure is not derived from any comparative test between these two specific parts.

Without measured scores, the analysis must rely on specification differences. The AMD part’s advantage in core count and thread count suggests it would outperform the Intel chip in multi-threaded workloads, assuming similar IPC. The Intel part’s clock advantage, 0.10 GHz higher boost and 0.20 GHz higher base, could give it an edge in single-threaded tasks. The larger L3 cache on Intel, 24 MB versus 8 MB, might improve performance in cache-sensitive applications, but the AMD chip’s smaller node could provide better power efficiency per operation.

The absence of benchmark data means no exact percentage differences or score deltas can be cited. The recorded data shows no wins for either side, so no definitive performance verdict can be drawn from measured results. The only quantitative comparisons possible are the clock speeds, core counts, cache sizes, TDP, memory bandwidth, and process node, as listed above.

The Verdict

Based strictly on the recorded data, the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i offers more cores and threads, a smaller process node, lower TDP, and support for LPDDR5X memory. These characteristics point toward a processor designed for parallel workloads and power-constrained environments, likely in mobile or embedded applications. The Radeon 880M integrated graphics may provide stronger graphical performance relative to Intel’s UHD Graphics 770, though no benchmarks confirm this.

The Intel Core i5-14501TE offers higher base and boost clocks, a much larger L3 cache, PCIe Gen 5 support, and compatibility with DDR4 memory. These traits suit workloads that favor clock speed, cache capacity, and modern I/O bandwidth. The 45 W TDP suggests it can sustain higher power draw, which may be acceptable in desktop embedded systems with adequate cooling.

The decision between these two comes down to workload priorities. For multi-threaded processing with lower power consumption, the AMD part is the logical choice from the specification data. For single-threaded speed, larger cache, and newer PCIe connectivity, the Intel part stands out. Since no benchmark results exist, the verdict must be based on architectural and specification differences alone. The data indicates two distinct design philosophies: AMD targets efficiency and parallel throughput, Intel targets clock speed and cache capacity. Each processor serves a different segment, and the choice depends on which attributes matter more for the intended use case.