AMD Ryzen 3 110 vs AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data contains no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between the AMD Ryzen 3 110 and the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164. The database shows zero wins for the Ryzen 3 110 and zero wins for the Ryzen AI Embedded P164 in direct matchup fields. However, the Ryzen AI Embedded P164 carries a full set of PassMark benchmark scores, while the Ryzen 3 110 has no recorded benchmark results in the database. This absence of direct measurements means the analysis relies on the P164's recorded performance profile and the architectural specifications of both processors.

The Ryzen AI Embedded P164 delivers strong absolute performance across several workloads. Its PassMark multithread score is 25,889, with a single-thread score of 4,029. The floating point math test records 55,799, integer math reaches 87,940, and extended instructions score 24,193. Data compression scores 327,891, data encryption reaches 16,055, and random string sorting hits 34,801. The physics test records 1,210, and the find prime numbers test scores 71. The average benchmark score for the P164 is 52,901, placing it at the 91st percentile of all CPUs in the database.

The P164's nearest rivals confirm its standing. The AMD Ryzen 5 9500F records an average score of 52,873, a delta of 0.1 percent relative to the P164. The Intel Xeon 634 scores 52,974, a negative delta of 0.1 percent. The AMD EPYC 7313P reaches 53,206, a negative delta of 0.6 percent. The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X scores 53,288, a negative delta of 0.7 percent. These figures place the P164 within a tight performance band, slightly below the EPYC and Ryzen 9 parts but effectively tied with the Ryzen 5 9500F and Xeon 634.

The Ryzen 3 110 has no recorded PassMark scores, no average benchmark score, and no nearest rivals in the database. Its percentile versus all CPUs stands at 50, which is the median. This percentile is not derived from measured performance but reflects the absence of benchmark data. The P164, by contrast, sits at the 91st percentile, indicating that its recorded scores exceed the vast majority of processors tracked in the database.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164?

A: The P164 has an average benchmark score of 52,901, placing it at the 91st percentile of all CPUs.

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen 3 110 have any recorded benchmark results?

A: No. The database shows no benchmark scores for the Ryzen 3 110, and its average benchmark score is 0.

Q: How does the Ryzen AI Embedded P164 compare to the AMD Ryzen 5 9500F?

A: The P164 scores 52,901 on average, while the Ryzen 5 9500F scores 52,873. The P164 leads by 0.1 percent.

Q: What is the highest single-thread score recorded for the P164?

A: The P164 records a PassMark single-thread score of 4,029, which appears twice in the database under slightly different test names.

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?

A: The Ryzen AI Embedded P164 boosts to 5.00 GHz, while the Ryzen 3 110 boosts to 4.30 GHz.

Q: What is the process node for each processor?

A: The Ryzen 3 110 uses a 6 nm process, while the Ryzen AI Embedded P164 uses a 4 nm process. Both are fabricated by TSMC.

Where Each One Wins

The Ryzen AI Embedded P164 wins in every category where recorded performance data exists. Its multithread score of 25,889 indicates strong parallel throughput, consistent with its 8 cores and 16 threads. The single-thread score of 4,029 confirms capable per-core performance, which aligns with its 5.00 GHz boost clock. The floating point math score of 55,799 and integer math score of 87,940 show strength in arithmetic workloads. Data compression at 327,891 is particularly dominant, suggesting efficient memory and cache handling. Data encryption at 16,055 and extended instructions at 24,193 round out a comprehensive performance profile.

The Ryzen 3 110 cannot claim any benchmark wins because the database contains no scores for it. Its only recorded advantage is architectural. The 3.00 GHz base clock is higher than the P164's 2.00 GHz base clock, which could imply better low-load responsiveness, but no measurements support this in the data. The Ryzen 3 110 uses 4 cores and 8 threads, a lower core count than the P164's 8 cores and 16 threads.

For workloads that benefit from many cores, such as multithreaded rendering or compilation, the P164's core and thread advantage is decisive. For single-threaded tasks, the P164's 5.00 GHz boost clock exceeds the Ryzen 3 110's 4.30 GHz boost, giving the P164 the edge on paper. The P164 also records higher memory bandwidth at 89.6 GB/s versus 76.8 GB/s, which supports data-heavy operations.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in several core specifications. The Ryzen 3 110 has 4 cores and 8 threads, while the Ryzen AI Embedded P164 has 8 cores and 16 threads. Base clocks differ: 3.00 GHz for the Ryzen 3 110 versus 2.00 GHz for the P164. Boost clocks also differ: 4.30 GHz versus 5.00 GHz. Both have a TDP of 28 watts, so power draw is identical on paper.

The socket is different. The Ryzen 3 110 uses AMD Socket FP7, while the P164 uses AMD Socket FP8. The Ryzen 3 110 has a die size of 210 mm², and the P164 has a die size of 233 mm². Cache configurations differ as well. The Ryzen 3 110 has 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3. The P164 has 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of L3.

Memory support differs. The Ryzen 3 110 supports DDR5 only, while the P164 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X. Both use dual-channel memory buses. Memory bandwidth is higher on the P164 at 89.6 GB/s versus 76.8 GB/s. Both support ECC memory. PCIe lanes differ: the Ryzen 3 110 has Gen 4 with 20 lanes, while the P164 has Gen 4 with 16 lanes.

Integrated graphics differ. The Ryzen 3 110 uses Radeon 660M, while the P164 uses Radeon 880M. Both are classified as mobile market segment and are active in production. Release dates differ: the Ryzen 3 110 released on September 30, 2025, and the P164 released on March 8, 2026. Neither processor has a recorded launch MSRP.

Architecture Differences

The architectural split is substantial. The Ryzen 3 110 uses Zen 3+ architecture under the Rembrandt-R codename, while the Ryzen AI Embedded P164 uses a generation labeled Zen 5 / Zen 5c under the Gorgon Point codename. The Ryzen 3 110's generation is listed as "Ryzen 3 (Zen 3+ (Rembrandt))", while the P164's generation is "Ryzen AI Embedded (Zen 5 / Zen 5c)". The P164's architecture field is null in the database, but its generation explicitly names Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores.

Process nodes differ significantly. The Ryzen 3 110 is fabricated on a 6 nm node, while the P164 is fabricated on a 4 nm node. Both are TSMC foundry parts. The P164's smaller node allows for a denser transistor layout, which supports its higher core count within a similar power envelope. The die size grows from 210 mm² to 233 mm², despite the node shrink, reflecting the additional cores.

Cache architecture differs in per-core allocations. The Ryzen 3 110 provides 64 KB of L1 per core and 512 KB of L2 per core. The P164 provides 80 KB of L1 per core and 1 MB of L2 per core. Both share 8 MB of L3, but the P164 distributes it across twice as many cores, so per-core L3 availability is lower on the P164. The larger L1 and L2 on the P164 compensate partially, and the Zen 5 core design typically handles cache misses more efficiently.

The P164 supports LPDDR5X in addition to DDR5, while the Ryzen 3 110 only supports DDR5. This memory flexibility is relevant for embedded and mobile designs where power-efficient memory is preferred. The P164 also records higher memory bandwidth, 89.6 GB/s versus 76.8 GB/s, which aligns with its higher core count and memory ceiling.

Integrated graphics differ by generation. The Radeon 660M in the Ryzen 3 110 is based on older RDNA architecture, while the Radeon 880M in the P164 is a newer design. No benchmark scores exist for either iGPU in the database, so the comparison is limited to naming and generation.

The Verdict

The database shows a clear performance hierarchy. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 has recorded benchmark scores that place it at the 91st percentile of all CPUs, with an average score of 52,901. Its nearest rivals, including the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X and AMD EPYC 7313P, are within 0.7 percent of its score, which indicates the P164 performs at a high desktop or server-class level despite its 28 watt TDP. The P164's 8 cores and 16 threads, combined with a 5.00 GHz boost clock, deliver strong multithread and single-thread results. Its memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s and support for LPDDR5X give it flexibility for embedded applications.

The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has no recorded benchmark scores. Its percentile of 50 is a placeholder, not a measured result. The processor's 4 cores and 8 threads, 4.30 GHz boost clock, and 76.8 GB/s memory bandwidth suggest it would perform below the P164 in most workloads, but the database cannot confirm this because no tests exist. The Ryzen 3 110 does have a higher base clock of 3.00 GHz versus 2.00 GHz, which may indicate better idle or light-load efficiency, but no measurements support this.

For users who need verified performance, the Ryzen AI Embedded P164 is the only choice with data. Its benchmark scores show it competes with the Ryzen 9 7900X and EPYC 7313P, both of which are high-end parts. The P164's 91st percentile ranking confirms it outperforms the vast majority of CPUs in the database. Its 4 nm process, Zen 5 / Zen 5c cores, and larger cache per core give it a modern architecture advantage over the Zen 3+ based Ryzen 3 110.

For workloads that require many threads, such as server virtualization, content creation, or scientific computing, the P164's 16 threads are a clear advantage over the Ryzen 3 110's 8 threads. For single-threaded tasks, the P164's 5.00 GHz boost exceeds the Ryzen 3 110's 4.30 GHz boost. The P164 also records higher memory bandwidth, which benefits memory-intensive applications. The Ryzen 3 110's only potential advantages are its higher base clock and smaller die size, but neither appears in any benchmark measurement.

The verdict from the recorded data is straightforward: the Ryzen AI Embedded P164 is the superior processor by every measured metric. The Ryzen 3 110 remains an unmeasured part, and its specifications do not suggest it would outperform the P164 in any tested workload. The P164's performance percentile, rival comparisons, and absolute scores all point to a capable, high-performing processor. The Ryzen 3 110, lacking any benchmark evidence, cannot be recommended based on the database records.